Document Detail

BET 2: Which intraosseous device is best in the prehospital setting?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21788243     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
A short cut review was carried out to establish which intraosseous device is best for use in the prehospital environment. A total of 2100 papers were found using the reported search, of which 2 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated. The clinical bottom line is that traditional manual intraosseous infusion devices have better success rates and faster insertion times compared with semi-automatic intraosseous infusion devices in the prehospital setting.
Related Documents :
21788243 - Bet 2: which intraosseous device is best in the prehospital setting?
10217153 - Use of a bilayer stacking gel to improve resolution of lipopolysaccharides and lipoolig...
21063183 - Presenteeism: critical issues.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Emergency medicine journal : EMJ     Volume:  28     ISSN:  1472-0213     ISO Abbreviation:  Emerg Med J     Publication Date:  2011 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-07-26     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100963089     Medline TA:  Emerg Med J     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  717-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  BET 1: Can inflammatory markers distinguish streptococcal from viral tonsillitis?
Next Document:  BET 3: Evidence exists to guide thromboembolic prophylaxis in ambulatory patients with temporary low...