Document Detail


Axillary versus infraclavicular placement for endocardial heart rhythm devices in patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21094368     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Our objective was to evaluate the implant and mid-term outcomes of transvenous pacemaker or internal cardioverter-defibrillator placement by alternative axillary approaches compared to the infraclavicular approach in a pediatric and congenital heart disease population. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with new endocardial heart rhythm devices placed at 4 pediatric arrhythmia centers. A total of 317 patients were included, 63 had undergone a 2-incision axillary approach, 51 a retropectoral axillary approach, and 203 an infraclavicular approach. Congenital heart disease was present in 62% of the patients. The patients with the 2-incision axillary approach were younger and smaller. The patients with the retropectoral axillary approach were less likely to have undergone previous cardiac surgery and were more likely to have had an internal cardioverter-defibrillator placed. The duration of follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.9 years for the 2-incision axillary, 2.6 ± 2.6 years for retropectoral axillary, and 3.5 ± 1.4 years for the infraclavicular technique (p = 0.01). No differences were seen in implant characteristics, lead longevity, implant complications, lead fractures or dislodgements, inappropriate internal cardioverter-defibrillator discharges, or device infections among the 3 groups. In conclusion, our data support that the outcomes of axillary approaches are comparable to the infraclavicular approach for endocardial heart rhythm device placement and that axillary approaches should be considered a viable option in patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease.
Authors:
Christopher M Rausch; Benjamin H Hughes; Martin Runciman; Ian H Law; David J Bradley; Mathur Sujeev; Abdul Duke; Michael Schaffer; Kathryn K Collins
Related Documents :
19055798 - Algorithm of oma for large-scale orthology inference.
7513408 - Why do some patients have high defibrillation thresholds at defibrillator implantation?...
3386288 - Stratified application of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
20852288 - Midterm experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children and young a...
10397228 - Accuracy of methemoglobin measurements: comparison of six different commercial devices ...
22851758 - Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning after cardiac resynchronization ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study     Date:  2010-10-19
Journal Detail:
Title:  The American journal of cardiology     Volume:  106     ISSN:  1879-1913     ISO Abbreviation:  Am. J. Cardiol.     Publication Date:  2010 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-24     Completed Date:  2011-01-20     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0207277     Medline TA:  Am J Cardiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1646-51     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Copyright Information:
Published by Elsevier Inc.
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Hospital, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA. rausch.christopher@tchden.org
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Axilla
Clavicle
Defibrillators, Implantable*
Electric Countershock / methods*
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Defects, Congenital / physiopathology,  therapy*
Heart Rate / physiology*
Humans
Male
Prosthesis Implantation / methods*
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on left ventricular ejection fraction in patients w...
Next Document:  Relation of size of secondary ventricles to exercise performance in children after fontan operation.