Document Detail


Automatic remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead and generator performance: the Lumos-T Safely RedUceS RouTine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) trial.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20716717     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Monitoring performance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) generators and leads is important. Methods available are with in-person evaluations or by automatic remote home monitoring (HM). These were prospectively evaluated and compared in the TRUST trial. The HM technology tested performed daily self-checks and databasing with rapid event notifications for out-of-range (including asymptomatic) conditions.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n=1339) were randomly assigned after ICD implant 2:1 to HM or to conventional groups. Both groups underwent scheduled checks every 3 months and were followed for 15 months. In HM, in-person office visits were scheduled at 3 and 15 months. At 6, 9, and 12 months, HM only was used with subsequent office visits if necessary. Between these time points, ICDs triggered event notifications for system integrity problems. Patients randomly assigned to conventional follow-up were evaluated with office visits only. HM and conventional patients were similar (age, 63.3±12.8 versus 64.0±12.1 years; 72.0% versus 73.1% male; New York Heart Association II class, 55.9% versus 60.4%; left ventricular ejection fraction, 29.0±10.7% versus 28.5±9.8%; coronary artery disease, 64.8% versus 71.7%; primary prevention, 72.2% versus 73.8%; DDD devices, 57.8% versus 56.6%). Four patients crossed over from conventional to HM because of advisories. Scheduled checks were more successfully accomplished in HM (92.7% versus 89.2% in conventional, P<0.001). Sixty-two device-related events (53 in HM versus 9 in conventional) were observed in 46 patients (40 [4.4%] in HM versus 6 [1.39%] in conventional, P=0.004). Forty-seven percent were asymptomatic. HM detected generator and lead problems earlier (HM versus conventional: median, 1 versus 5 days; P=0.05). A total of 20 device problems (eg, lead fracture, elective replacement indicators) requiring surgical revision (0.012 per patient-year) were found, 15 in HM and 5 in the conventional groups. Other events were managed nonsurgically (eg, reprogramming, initiation of antiarrhythmics).
CONCLUSIONS: ICD lead and generator malfunction was infrequent and often asymptomatic. Only a minority of detected events required surgical intervention. Automatic HM enhanced discovery, permitted prompt detection, and facilitated management decisions. Longitudinal parameter trending, with component function evaluated daily by remote monitoring, may enable long-term performance assessment.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00336284.
Authors:
Niraj Varma; Justin Michalski; Andrew E Epstein; Robert Schweikert
Related Documents :
12079967 - Play safe: band the late presenting complete atrioventricular canal.
11559687 - Transcatheter closure of persistent ductus arteriosus in infants using the amplatzer du...
12658187 - Comparison of extracardiac fontan techniques: pedicled pericardial tunnel versus condui...
18373767 - Outcome of young patients with abandoned, nonfunctional endocardial leads.
3826257 - Secondary intraocular lens implantation vs epikeratophakia for the treatment of aphakia.
17115237 - Comparative evaluation of the effects of nd:yag and er:yag laser in dentin hypersensiti...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2010-08-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology     Volume:  3     ISSN:  1941-3084     ISO Abbreviation:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-20     Completed Date:  2010-11-04     Revised Date:  2012-02-03    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101474365     Medline TA:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  428-36     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. varman@ccf.org
Data Bank Information
Bank Name/Acc. No.:
ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00336284
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Arrhythmias, Cardiac / physiopathology*,  therapy
Automation*
Defibrillators, Implantable*
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Telemetry / instrumentation*
Time Factors

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Prediction of 1-year mortality with different measures of ST-segment recovery in all-comers after pr...
Next Document:  Cigarette smoking and adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: a pooled analys...