Document Detail


Audit of dermatological content of U.K. undergraduate curricula.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19292717     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Recommendations for the dermatology content (learning outcomes) of the core undergraduate curriculum were sent to all U.K. medical schools in June 2006. OBJECTIVE: To carry out an audit of the content of the core curriculum in each U.K. medical school against the recommendations for a core undergraduate dermatology curriculum (the criteria) published by the British Association of Dermatologists, to identify areas of good practice and to gather evidence for developing the learning and teaching of dermatology. METHODS: A questionnaire was circulated to the dermatology teaching leads of all U.K. medical schools (29) and one Irish medical school. Questions which the teaching leads were unable to answer were sent to the relevant deans and responses incorporated into the results. All curricula should include the essential learning outcomes that focus on clinical skills; as this was an audit to benchmark current practice, we did not set standards for the other recommendations for a core curriculum. RESULTS: Replies were received from teaching leads in 29 of the 30 medical schools and from 16 of the deans. Essential clinical skills such as taking a dermatological history and examining the skin were included in the curricula of most, but not all, medical schools. Areas of good practice include teaching on tumours, acne and psoriasis, but we found some surprising omissions including the diagnosis of meningococcaemia. Our data suggest that some students have little exposure to dermatology, but dermatology teaching takes place in secondary care in all medical schools. Knowledge-based assessments are used by 27 medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: Curricula should be strengthened so that the recommended learning outcomes feature in the core curricula of all medical schools. Teaching leads in all specialties, including those in the community, should communicate so that learning and teaching are integrated horizontally and vertically. The results should provide a baseline for future audits.
Authors:
E Davies; S Burge
Related Documents :
20573257 - Attitudes of us medical trainees towards neurology education: "neurophobia" - a global ...
7754267 - Life as an academic medical statistician and how to survive it.
3898947 - One hundred forty-five years of surgery at the medical college of virginia.
7815967 - On the genesis of somatization disorder: the role of the medical profession.
1561497 - Renal calculi: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and medical therapy.
14575487 - Ruthenium-catalyzed cyclocarbonylation of allenyl alcohols and amines: selective synthe...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2009-03-09
Journal Detail:
Title:  The British journal of dermatology     Volume:  160     ISSN:  1365-2133     ISO Abbreviation:  Br. J. Dermatol.     Publication Date:  2009 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-05-07     Completed Date:  2009-07-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0004041     Medline TA:  Br J Dermatol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  999-1005     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Dermatology Department, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK. emilydavies@doctors.org.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Curriculum / standards*
Dermatology / education*
Education, Medical, Undergraduate / standards*
Female
Great Britain
Humans
Ireland
Male
Medical Audit
Questionnaires
Schools, Medical

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Mitochondrial DNA diversity and origins of South and Central American goats.
Next Document:  PORCN gene mutations and the protean nature of focal dermal hypoplasia.