Document Detail

Attitudes to reporting medication error among differing healthcare professionals.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20532494     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
AIMS: Medication error reporting is an important measure to prevent medication error incidents in a healthcare system and can serve as an important tool for improving patient safety. This study aimed to investigate attitudes of healthcare professionals (doctors, nurses, and pharmacists) in reporting medication errors.
METHODS: Fifty-six healthcare professionals working at a 900-bed tertiary referral hospital were surveyed. A questionnaire using two different clinical scenarios (involving oral and intravenous administration of a drug) and four questions with an ascending order of worsening patient outcome was used. A Likert scale ranging from 1 (unlikely) to 5 (likely) was used to describe the likelihood of reporting a medication error.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 57% (43% for doctors, 68% for nurses, and 64% for pharmacists). Results showed that doctors were unlikely to report less-serious medication errors (median value of 2 on the Likert scale). Nurses and pharmacists (median value of 5) were likely to report less-serious as well as serious medication errors despite their fears of receiving disciplinary action. All healthcare professionals were more likely to report an error as the clinical scenarios had a progressively worsening outcome for the patient.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that among healthcare professionals, there are differing attitudes to reporting medication errors. Differing approaches are therefore required to encourage medication error reporting among different healthcare professionals. Future study is required to further investigate these findings and improve reporting rates.
Ajit Sarvadikar; Gordon Prescott; David Williams
Related Documents :
14699654 - Self-reported therapeutic errors to a poison control center.
16648274 - Are patients morally responsible for their errors?
10113924 - More about recruitment--pick me!
20841674 - Method for testing a cpoe system in the medication process in a cardiology ward.
20805424 - Preprinted standardized orders promote venous thromboembolism prophylaxis compared with...
19682764 - Pharmaceutical reforms: implications through comparisons of korea and japan.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2010-06-08
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of clinical pharmacology     Volume:  66     ISSN:  1432-1041     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.     Publication Date:  2010 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-07-16     Completed Date:  2011-01-20     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1256165     Medline TA:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol     Country:  Germany    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  843-53     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Data Collection
Delivery of Health Care*
Interviews as Topic
Likelihood Functions
Medication Errors / nursing,  prevention & control,  statistics & numerical data*
Nurses / psychology,  statistics & numerical data
Pharmacists / psychology,  statistics & numerical data
Physicians / psychology,  statistics & numerical data

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Off-label antibiotic use in children in three European countries.
Next Document:  Initial experience with the Penumbra Stroke System for recanalization of large vessel occlusions in ...