|Attenuated reovirus displays oncolysis with reduced host toxicity.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 21179029 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND: Although the naturally occurring reovirus causes only mild symptoms in humans, it shows considerable potential as an oncolytic agent because of its innate ability to target cancer cells. In immunocompromised hosts, however, wild-type reovirus can target healthy tissues, including heart, liver, pancreas and neural structures.
METHODS: We characterized an attenuated form of reovirus (AV) derived from a persistently infected cell line through sequence analysis, as well as western blot and in vitro transcription and translation techniques. To examine its pathogenesis and oncolytic potential, AV reovirus was tested on healthy embryonic stem cells, various non-transformed and transformed cell lines, and in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice with tumour xenografts.
RESULTS: Sequence analysis of AV reovirus revealed a premature STOP codon in its sigma 1 attachment protein. Western blot and in vitro translation confirmed the presence of a truncated σ1. In comparison to wild-type reovirus, AV reovirus did not kill healthy stem cells or induce black tail formation in SCID mice. However, it did retain its ability to target cancer cells and reduce tumour size.
CONCLUSION: Despite containing a truncated attachment protein, AV reovirus still preferentially targets cancer cells, and compared with wild-type reovirus it shows reduced toxicity when administered to immunodeficient hosts, suggesting the potential use of AV reovirus in combination cancer therapy.
|M Kim; K A Garant; N I zur Nieden; T Alain; S D Loken; S J Urbanski; P A Forsyth; D E Rancourt; P W K Lee; R N Johnston|
Related Documents :
|2858349 - Avarol, a cytostatically active compound from the marine sponge dysidea avara.
6318439 - Methylations of adenosine residues (m6a) in pre-mrna are important for formation of lat...
8933739 - Rat peritubular cell secretory activity: modulation by vitamin a.
14996659 - Physiological responses of wild type and putrescine-overproducing transgenic cells of p...
16665389 - Polyamine biosynthesis and effect of dicyclohexylamine during the cell cycle of heliant...
2002699 - Regulation of the retinoblastoma anti-oncogene in aging human diploid fibroblasts.
3593779 - Studies on the mechanism of selective retention of porphyrins and metalloporphyrins by ...
12649319 - Neuregulin 1-erbb2 signaling is required for the establishment of radial glia and their...
14527929 - Dna synthesis and bcl-2 expression during development of mucous cell metaplasia in airw...
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2010-12-21|
|Title: British journal of cancer Volume: 104 ISSN: 1532-1827 ISO Abbreviation: Br. J. Cancer Publication Date: 2011 Jan|
|Created Date: 2011-01-19 Completed Date: 2011-02-22 Revised Date: 2013-07-03|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 0370635 Medline TA: Br J Cancer Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 290-9 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Medical Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Reoviridae / genetics, pathogenicity*
|//Canadian Institutes of Health Research|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Br J Cancer
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK
Received Day: 31 Month: 08 Year: 2010
Revision Received Day: 08 Month: 11 Year: 2010
Accepted Day: 16 Month: 11 Year: 2010
Print publication date: Day: 18 Month: 01 Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 21 Month: 12 Year: 2010
Volume: 104 Issue: 2
First Page: 290 Last Page: 299
Publisher Item Identifier: 6606053
PubMed Id: 21179029
|Attenuated reovirus displays oncolysis with reduced host toxicity Alternate Title:Attenuated oncolytic reovirus with reduced toxicity|
|K A Garant25|
|N I zur Nieden37|
|S D Loken49|
|S J Urbanski4|
|P A Forsyth1|
|D E Rancourt3|
|P W K Lee2|
|R N Johnston3*|
1Department of Medical Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
3Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
4Department of Pathology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
5These contributed equally to this work and should be recognized as co-first authors.
6Current address: Asan Medical Research Center, Ulsan University, Seoul, South Korea
7Current address: Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA
8Current address: Goodman Cancer Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
9Current address: Department of Pathology, Nanaimo Regional General Hospital, 1200 Dufferin Crescent, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada
Mammalian REO (respiratory enteric orphan) virus is a small, non-enveloped icosahedral virus that contains segments of double-stranded RNA as its genome. In humans, reovirus targets the upper respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts to generate a relatively benign and often asymptomatic infection (Tyler, 2001). Of interest is its ability to infect and kill many types of transformed cells (Hashiro et al, 1977; Duncan et al, 1978), making reovirus one example among a variety of replication competent oncolytic viruses that potentially serve as anti-cancer therapies. Such oncolytic viruses have, in principle, two main advantages over conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. First, they generally target cancer cells because of their reduced ability, whether innate or engineered, to replicate in normal cells. Second, in comparison with replication-incompetent vectors, they can propagate from initially infected cancer cells to surrounding or distant cancer cells, thereby achieving a large volume of distribution and potent anti-cancer effects. Despite the above, ongoing challenges in this field include, ensuring that (a) all cancer cells are efficiently targeted, including those that have metastasised to distant sites; (b) damage to normal tissues and proliferating cells is minimized and (c) natural host-immune responses do not prematurely block viral eradication of tumour cell populations.
Reovirus Type 3 Dearing (T3D) is a naturally occurring oncolytic virus that preferentially targets Ras-transformed cells both in vitro and in vivo (Coffey et al, 1998; Strong et al, 1998; Norman et al, 2004). Constitutively activated Ras contributes to reovirus oncolysis by increasing the efficiency of (1) reovirus disassembly during entry, (2) infectious virion production and (3) apoptosis and virion release (Marcato et al, 2007). As Ras gene mutations are observed in over 30% of all human cancers (Duursma and Agami, 2003), these findings have led to the current use of reovirus in phase I, II and III clinical trials (Oncolytics Biotech Inc., 2010). However, in immunocompromised hosts, such as newborn and severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) animals; wild-type reovirus shows significant pathogenicity, especially to neural and cardiac muscle tissues (Sabin, 1959; Weiner et al, 1977; Baty and Sherry, 1993; Loken et al, 2004). Occasionally, this pathogenesis is observed in immunocompetent hosts, but mainly at high viral loads (Hirasawa et al, 2003; Terheggen et al, 2003). Clinical trials have reported no severe toxicity when utilising wild-type reovirus in combination with radiation or chemotherapy (Thirukkumaran and Morris, 2009). Even so, a less virulent reovirus that displays reduced pathogenicity to healthy tissues and cells while retaining potent oncolytic activity could still be beneficial by providing a potentially higher number of treatments or dosage.
One way of generating less virulent reovirus is through the establishment of persistently infected cells. Persistent reovirus infection is occasionally induced in various cell types in vitro (Dermody, 1998). Although the underlying basis of reovirus persistent infection is not well understood, it has been speculated that interactions between the virus and host cell can be fundamentally altered such that a modified cytopathic virus–host relationship is established (Wetzel et al, 1997). Importantly, such infections can give rise to distinct reovirus variants (Ahmed and Fields, 1982; Wilson et al, 1996; Wetzel et al, 1997); however, the potential utility of these variants for reovirus oncolysis has yet to be examined. In this report, we describe a mutant reovirus with a modified S1 gene that has been isolated from persistently infected cells. The modified reovirus contains a truncated σ1-cell-attachment protein and displays significantly reduced pathogenic potential to healthy cells while maintaining its oncolytic activity. This attenuated virus (AV) may provide a desirable option in future oncolytic cancer therapy.
HT1080 human fibrosarcoma, L929 murine fibrosarcoma, Raji human Burkitt's lymphoma, CA46 human Burkitt's lymphoma and HEK 293 cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and were maintained according to the ATCC protocols. To establish persistently infected cell lines, HT1080, Raji and CA46 cells were infected with wild-type (WT) reovirus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20. The surviving cells were maintained for 3–10 weeks until they reached confluency and subsequently reinfected 2–3 times for up to 3–7 weeks to ensure the selection of virus-resistant cells (Ahmed and Fields, 1982). From the surviving cells of HT1080, several subclones were obtained by serial dilution. Clone HTR1 (HT1080 virally resistant clone 1) was used for this study. HTR1 cells were persistently infected and maintained for more than 48 months (Kim et al, 2007). From surviving Raji and CA46 cells, persistently infected Raji PI (Alain et al, 2006), and CA46 PI were stably established and maintained for more than 6 months.
Murine R1 and D3 embryonic stem cell lines were also purchased from the ATCC. The cells were maintained in high glucose DMEM, 15% FCS (selected batches), 50 U ml−1 penicillin and 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin, 1% nonessential amino acids and 0.1 m β-mercaptoethanol as described (zur Nieden et al, 2001). Pluripotency was sustained by adding 1000 U ml−1 leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) to the culture. The cultures were passaged at 80% confluency approximately every second day. All medium components were purchased from Invitrogen (Burlington, ON, Canada). Murine MES1 embryonic stem cells were isolated from 3.5-day postcoitum embryos of the 129 IM/SvJ substrain at the blastocyst stage. MES1 were routinely grown as described for R1 and D3 ESCs.
The wild-type reovirus T3D strain used in this study was propagated in L929 cells and purified by cesium chloride ultracentrifugation as described previously (Smith et al, 1969). Attenuated reovirus derived from the HTR1 culture was purified by the same method used in wild-type reovirus preparation, except AV reovirus was propagated in HT1080 and L929 cells. For AV reovirus collection from HT1080- and HTR1-infected supernatants (used only in Figure 2B), high-speed ultracentrifugation at 35 000 r.p.m. was used to pellet the virus.
For wild-type reovirus titration, HEK 293 cells were plated in 6-well plates at 2 × 105 cells per well. After 2 h of adsorption at 37°C, the inoculum was removed. Cell monolayers were then covered with 1% agar and fresh medium. Plaques were counted 5–7 days after infection. For AV reovirus titration, the same procedure was followed except after 5–7 days of infection, the agar was removed and cell monolayers were fixed/permeabilzed with cytofix/cytoperm (BD Biosciences, Mississauga, ON, Canada) for immunostaining with reovirus antiserum and secondary FITC antibody. Attenuated reovirus plaques were identified by immunofluorescence detection. Furthermore, WT and AV reovirus titrations were also performed on monolayers of L929 cells, which after an initial infection for 1 h at 37°C, were subsequently covered with a 1 : 1 ratio of 1% agar and 2X MEM containing 10% horse serum. Plaques were counted 5–7 days after infection using a neutral red counterstain. In either case, titers yielded PFU:particle ratios of approximately 1 : 200 for both WT and AV reovirus, respectively.
Cells were infected with reovirus (MOI of 20 or 40) in serum-free media and after 1 h the virus-containing media was replaced with the appropriate cell-culture media.
Viral dsRNAs, derived from WT reovirus and Raji, CA46 and HTR1 persistent reovirus infected cells were TRIzol extracted, converted to cDNA by reverse transcription, and PCR amplified. The PCR reactions were hot-started (held at 94°C for 30 s), followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 59°C and 1 min 30 s at 72°C. A final extension for 10 min at 72°C was performed and the reaction product was cooled to 4°C. The primers used to amplify the S1 gene segment were 5′-CATGAATTCATGGATCC TCGCCTACGTTAAGAAG-3′ (Forward) and 5′-CAGAAGCTTCTGATCCTCACGTGAA ACTACGC-3′ (Reverse), and the primers used to amplify the S4 gene segment were 5′-CAAGAATTCTTGTCGCAATGGAGGTGTG-3′ (Forward) and 5′-TCTAAGCTTAGATG GGGGTGTTTAGCCAAG-3′ (Reverse). Sequencing results were obtained from the University of Calgary Core DNA services. The sequence that was established, including the premature stop codon in the S1 gene (Table 1), has remained stable for 3 years of culture since the AV virus was first isolated from HTR1 cells.
Cell lysates were prepared by sonication in a buffer containing 10 m Tris (pH 7.4), 2 m EDTA, 1% NP-40, 50 m mercaptoethanol, 100 μg ml−1 leupeptin and 2 μg ml−1 aprotinin. The lysates were then cleared by centrifugation at 16 000 g for 15 min, normalised for protein amount, mixed with SDS sample buffer, boiled for 5 min and stored at −70°C. After separation by SDS–PAGE, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose or PVDF membranes and detected by immunoblot hybridisation. The primary antibodies (Abs) used were: anti-reovirus polyclonal Ab (Strong et al, 1998) and anti-σ1 N-terminus monoclonal Ab (Duncan and Lee, 1994). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse Ab or horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit Ab were used as secondary Abs (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA).
For metabolic labelling, [35S]-methionine was added to the culture medium for 12 h. Cells were harvested and lysed in PBS buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 1 m EDTA. Lysates were cleared of debris by centrifugation and supernatants were stored at −70°C until use. Polyclonal rabbit anti-reovirus serotype 3 serum was used for immunoprecipitation of [35S]-methionine-labelled reovirus proteins from cell lysates as described previously (Lee et al, 1981). Immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to SDS–PAGE, followed by autoradiography.
For flow cytometry analysis, cells were trypsinized and fixed using cytofix/cytoperm solution (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA). The fixed and permeabilized cells were incubated with primary reovirus antiserum and secondary FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Cedarlane, Burlington, ON, Canada), then analysed by flow cytometry.
Trizol was used to extract dsRNA from purified AV reovirus. The resulting RNA underwent cDNA synthesis using the S1 gene-specific primer (5′-GATGAAATGCCCCAGTGCCGC-3′) and the conditions for SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). The cDNA was used as template for PCR amplification of AV reovirus S1. Using primers 5′-AGGAATTCGCTATTGGTCGGA-3′ (Forward) and 5′-GCTAGCTAGAGCGGCCGCGATGAAAT-3′ (Reverse), AccuPrime Pfx DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), and an annealing temperature of 55C, the S1 open reading frame was amplified with EcoR1 and Not1 restriction enzyme overhangs. The S1 PCR product was PCR purified (Invitrogen) and double-digested at 37°C for 2 h along with vector, pcDNA3 (Invitrogen), using restriction enzymes EcoR1 and Not1 (NEB, Pickering, ON, Canada). Digested products were gel purified (Invitrogen) and then ligated (Invitrogen) at room temperature for 1 h. The AV reovirus S1 plasmid was transformed into Top10 Escherichia coli-competent cells and screened by ampicillin resistance. Individual bacterial colonies were inoculated into ampicillin LB broth, midi-prepped (Invitrogen) and analysed for incorporation of the S1 insert.
Using the AV reovirus S1 plasmid as template, the AV S1 open reading frame was amplified by Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) at an annealing temperature of 55°C using the primers 5′-GGTACCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGCTATTGCCACC-3′ (Forward) and 5′-GATGAAATGCCCCAGTGCCGC-3′ (Reverse), which were optimised for T7 transcription. The S1 PCR product was gel purified (Invitrogen) and eluted using 10 m Tris pH 8.0. In vitro transcription was performed using a 50 μl reaction containing 5 μg of AV reovirus S1 template by the RiboMAX large-scale RNA production systems for T7 polymerase (Promega, Nepean, ON, Canada). The transcription reaction was treated with DNase (Promega) for 10 min at 37°C to remove any residual DNA template, RNA purified (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada), and then analysed by RNase-free agarose gel electrophoresis. The AV reovirus S1 RNA transcript was translated using a 25 μl reaction from the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). The samples were analysed by 12% SDS–PAGE and subsequent autoradiography.
Severe combined immunodeficiency mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA, USA) received a single subcutaneous implantation of 5 × 106 cells of murine ESCs (R1 or MES1). At 12 days after implantation, palpable teratomas were observed. The R1 teratomas were then injected with reoviruses (WT reo (wild-type reovirus), 1 × 107 PFU/tumour; n=5, AV reo (AV reovirus), 1 × 107 PFU/tumour: n=5, D reo (Dead, UV-inactivated reovirus): n=5) and teratoma growth was followed 21–70 days post-infection. For the MES1 teratoma experiment, 12–15 days after implantation, teratomas were intratumourally injected with reoviruses or PBS (WT Reo (wild-type reovirus, 107 PFU per mouse); n=3, AV Reo (AV reovirus, 107 PFU per mouse): n=3, PBS: n=3) and teratoma growth was followed 31–46 days post-infection.
Each SCID mouse received single subcutaneous implantations of 5 × 106 cells of HT1080 or HCT116 cells suspended in PBS. At 11 days after implantation, 4–6 mice with tumours were injected intratumourally with WT, AV or D (Dead, UV-inactivated) reovirus at 107 PFU/tumour and tumour growth was followed up to 34 days post implantation. WT reovirus was reinjected after 23 days post implantation and AV reovirus was reinjected after 23 and 27 days.
All the mice were treated according to the protocols approved by the University of Calgary Animal Care Committee. Tumour growth was measured externally using calipers and the volume was determined by the equation V=(L × W2) × 0.5, where L is the largest dimension and W is the largest dimension perpendicular to L. Tumours and hearts were taken from the mice at 34–35 days post implantation and fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution at room temperature, then paraffin embedded. Teratomas were taken from the mice at 21–70 days post-infection, excised and fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution at room temperature. The specimens were processed by the University of Calgary Histopathology Laboratory Research Service for routine histological analysis (H&E staining).
For reovirus antigen detection (reovirus structural proteins), deparaffinized tumour sections were retrieved in a solution containing 50 m Tris (pH 7.5), 120 m NaCl, 0.2% Tween 20 and 0.1% Triton X-100. After blocking the sections with a solution containing 50 m Tris (pH 7.5), 120 m NaCl, 0.2% Tween 20, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2% normal goat serum for 1 h, the sections were immunostained with a solution containing 0.1% reovirus antiserum, 50 m Tris (pH 7.5), 120 m NaCl, 0.2% Tween 20, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2% normal goat serum for 2 h. As a secondary antibody, biotinylated goat anti-mouse antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) was used at 1 : 100 in a solution containing 50 m Tris (pH 7.5), 120 m NaCl, 0.2% Tween 20, 0.1% Triton X-100 and 2% normal goat serum for 2 h at room temperature. Detection was monitored by a diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride-based immunohistochemistry protocol according to the manufacturer (Vector Laboratories). Dehydration was carried out in a series of graded ethanol solutions, followed by clarification in xylene. Slides were mounted with Vectamount (Vector Laboratories) and stored at 25°C.
Our group recently reported that persistent reovirus infections could be established in oncogenic N-Ras human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells and p53 mutated lymphoma cells, yielding persistently infected (PI) HTR1 (Kim et al, 2007) and Raji PI (Alain et al, 2006) cells, respectively. In this study, we have also included a newly established persistent reovirus infection from the Burkitt's lymphoma cell line CA46 (p53 mutated). As shown in Figure 1, infected parental cells exhibited abundant reovirus protein synthesis, whereas PI derivatives showed viral proteins (λ, μ and σ classes) even without the addition of wild-type reovirus. Furthermore, the viral protein expression profile in the PI cells was similar to that of the newly infected parental cells.
Virus preparations from each of the infected cell lines were analysed for genetic modifications. As alterations of the S1 and S4 genes have a role in persistently infected L cells (Ahmed and Fields, 1982; Wetzel et al, 1997), gene segments from HTR1, Raji PI and CA46 PI-derived reoviruses were sequenced. As shown in Table 1, multiple mutations of S1 and S4 genes were detected. Surprisingly, the S1 gene of the HTR1-derived virus contained a stop codon mutation at amino acid 251 in the S1 gene product (cell attachment protein σ1). σ1 is responsible for binding host cell receptors, including primary receptor sialic acid and various secondary receptor proteins (Lee et al, 1981; Chappell et al, 1997; Barton et al, 2001).
Immunoblotting of the HTR1-derived reovirus and WT reovirus using a polyclonal anti-reovirus antibody and a polyclonal anti-σ1 antibody (raised against the N-terminus) revealed the presence of a 25 kD protein in the reovirus variant; a protein product approximately half the size of its full-length, 455 amino-acid form (Figure 2A). HT1080 cells infected with the HTR1 reovirus variant were also found to express the truncated σ1 protein (Figure 2B). Furthermore, in vitro transcription and translation of the cloned S1 gene from the HTR1-derived virus also generated a truncated 25 kD σ1 protein (Figure 2C). Collectively, these results confirm that the PI HTR1-derived reovirus variant produces a truncated σ1 protein representing the N-terminal half of the full-length σ1 protein and from which the C-terminal portion (which is active in cell adhesion; Weiner et al, 1977; Wilson et al, 1996; Wetzel et al, 1997) is absent. The virus variant was accordingly referred to as AV reovirus.
In addition to causing various pathogenic manifestations in immunodeficient hosts, WT reovirus is also known to rapidly target normal ESCs and adversely affect the formation of rat and mouse blastocysts; thus inhibiting embryonic development (Heggie and Gaddis, 1979; Priscott, 1983). To determine if the attenuated virus was capable of inducing cytopathogenicity in ESCs, two murine ESC lines (R1 and D3) were infected with either AV or WT reovirus. In comparison with the WT virus, immunoblot and flow cytometry analyses revealed minimal infectivity of ESCs by AV reovirus and reduced viral protein synthesis by 48 h post-infection (Figure 3A). In addition, AV reovirus infected R1 and D3 ESCs showed no detectable signs of viral cytopathogenicity, whereas WT reovirus induced extensive cytopathic effects and the destruction of embryoid bodies (Figure 3B). To compare AV and WT reovirus pathogenesis in vivo, a murine teratoma model was adopted, in which pluripotent ESCs were able to develop into mature benign teratomas with a high level of differentiation upon xenograft implantation in vivo (Sasaki et al, 2005). Thus, SCID mice were xenografted with murine R1 or MES1 ESCs and teratomas were allowed to develop into palpable tumours. At 12 days post implantation, AV or WT reoviruses were delivered intratumourally and benign teratoma growth was monitored (Figure 3C). Photographs of representative R1 teratomas were taken 9 days after reovirus administration (21 days after implantation) (Figure 3D). Consistent with the in vitro observations, AV reovirus did not suppress benign teratoma growth or differentiation, whereas WT reovirus prevented further teratoma growth and induced neuroglia necroses (histological data not shown), supporting previous findings that WT reovirus targets the nervous system in suckling mice (Flamand et al, 1991; Oberhaus et al, 1997). Therefore, unlike WT reovirus, AV reovirus exhibits a reduced cytopathogenicity towards various non-cancerous and differentiated cell types.
As the S1 gene of reovirus has a critical role in binding host cells and in virus-induced apoptosis (Lee et al, 1981; Duncan et al, 1991; Tyler et al, 1995; Connolly et al, 2001), we speculated that the oncolytic activity of AV reovirus would be somewhat reduced. To determine if AV reovirus mimicked the wild-type form by preferentially targeting Ras-transformed cells, N-Ras-transformed HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells and K-Ras-transformed HCT116 colon carcinoma cells were challenged with the virus. Attenuated reovirus retained its ability to kill parental HT1080 cells efficiently in vitro, however its pathogenesis on L929 and HCT116 cells was somewhat reduced (Figure 4B). Cytopathic effects on L929 cells by AV reovirus were observed by 72 hpi (data not shown). Attenuated reovirus protein synthesis remained comparable or slightly decreased compared with the WT virus, suggesting that the cytolytic activity of AV reovirus had been partially attenuated (Figure 4B). Furthermore, our group recently showed that cancer cells dysfunctional in p53, ATM or Rb, are susceptible to both WT and AV reovirus (Kim et al, 2010). Thus, although the cytocidal potency of AV reovirus in vitro is somewhat reduced, it retains its ability to infect and replicate in a variety of tumour cell types.
Even though WT reovirus infection is often asymptomatic or causes only mild disease in immunocompetent hosts, it can induce various pathologic manifestations, such as myocarditis, vasculitis, black tail syndrome and neuronal damage in newborn and immunodeficient animals (Sabin, 1959; Weiner et al, 1977; Baty and Sherry, 1993; Terheggen et al, 2003; DeBiasi et al, 2004; Loken et al, 2004). Genetic reassortment studies of reovirus genes have implicated S1 in having a significant role in determining reovirus pathogenesis (Weiner et al, 1977, 1980; Haller et al, 1995). As the replication competent AV reovirus is mutated in the S1 gene, produces a truncated σ1 protein, and exhibits reduced cytolytic potential in vitro, its capacity for oncolysis and pathogenesis in vivo was also assessed.
We first compared the AV reovirus producing cell line, HTR1, with two other reovirus persistently infected cells lines (Raji PI and CA46 PI) for their respective pathogenicities in reovirus-susceptible SCID mice (George et al, 1990; Loken et al, 2004). Previously, we showed that persistently infected cells lose tumourigenicity in vivo (Alain et al, 2006; Kim et al, 2007), and as expected, none of the three persistently infected cell lines were able to produce tumours in SCID mice. Nevertheless, mice injected with Raji PI or CA46 PI cells rapidly developed black tail syndrome (Figure 5A) and displayed severe morbidity by 3–4 weeks post-inoculation. In contrast, HTR1 inoculated mice showed no visible morbidity after 1 month and only began to develop black tail syndrome after 3–7 months.
To assess the oncolytic potential of AV reovirus in vivo, human Ras-oncogenic HCT116 colon carcinoma cells or HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells were implanted in SCID mice and subsequently treated with reovirus. During the first 23 days of virus treatment, it was found that both WT and AV reovirus effectively suppressed tumour growth, whereas inactivated virus (D reo) showed no suppression of tumour growth (Figure 5B). At this point, it was clear that tumour suppression by AV or WT reovirus was comparable, however, it did not address the issue of host cytotoxicity and as a result, longer-term studies were required. As current clinical trials utilise multiple reovirus administrations, AV reovirus was reinjected two more times at day 23 and 27 into the established SCID mice tumours. Wild-type reovirus was also reinjected at day 23, but not at day 27 because of increased host cytotoxicity. This is consistent with previous studies that have already shown that a single injection of the WT virus is enough to cause black tail syndrome in SCID mice (Loken et al, 2004). Ultimately, mice treated with WT reovirus were all killed at 25–40 days post-viral inoculation because of severe morbidity (weight loss and black tail development), whereas mice treated with AV reovirus only developed these pathologies after several months post-treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that both WT and AV reovirus replicated well at tumour sites (Figure 5C).
As WT reovirus is known to cause myocarditis (Baty and Sherry, 1993; Terheggen et al, 2003), heart tissue was examined by hematoxylin and eosin staining, and analysed by immunohistochemistry. Mice treated with WT reovirus showed distinct signs of viral myocarditis, as severe cardiac muscle damage and massive lymphocytic infiltration were observed (Figure 5C). On the other hand, mice treated with AV reovirus showed no symptoms of heart damage by 25 days post-viral treatment. Immunohistochemical analysis of heart tissue revealed an abundance of viral proteins in mice treated with WT reovirus, whereas no viral proteins were detected in the heart tissues of mice treated with AV reovirus (Figure 5C). Taken together, WT reovirus not only infected tumour sites and prevented tumour growth, but also systemically infected host heart tissues. In contrast, AV reovirus retained efficient oncolytic activity and caused less damage to healthy tissue in the SCID mouse model.
As a naturally oncolytic virus, reovirus preferentially infects and kills cancer cells with active Ras signalling or defective tumour suppressors, making the virus a promising anti-cancer agent (Coffey et al, 1998; Kim et al, 2010). In light of this finding, reovirus has been tested in a wide range of cancers both in vitro and in vivo, and is currently undergoing phase I, II and III clinical trials (Strong et al, 1998; Duursma and Agami, 2003; Norman et al, 2004). Although only mild toxicity has been reported in patients (Thirukkumaran and Morris, 2009), animal models have indicated that reovirus pathogenesis is not entirely restricted to cancer cells, as the virus is capable of inducing haemorrhage, fibrosis, hepatitis, pancreatitis, necrotising encephalitis and myocarditis in mice (Sabin, 1959; Baty and Sherry, 1993; Richardson et al, 1994; Mann et al, 2002; Loken et al, 2004). Furthermore, as these viruses are delivered to tumour-bearing hosts by intravenous injection, normal tissues, including stem cells and their developmental potential, may be subject to viral challenge (Heggie and Gaddis, 1979; Priscott, 1983). It may therefore be useful to identify and generate a modified reovirus that exhibits enhanced safety while maintaining its oncolytic potential, thereby providing a potentially higher dose or treatment number.
During our study of reovirus resistance in Ras-transformed human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells (Kim et al, 2007), we serendipitously isolated an S1 attenuated reovirus variant from persistently infected HTR1 cells (Figure 1). As is the case with reovirus mutants derived from persistent infections, the AV reovirus arising from the HTR1 culture displayed significant genetic alterations. Genomic sequence analysis revealed several mutations in the S1 gene segment, with the most significant resulting in a nonsense mutation at nucleotide 763 and a truncated σ1 protein (Table 1 and Figure 2). It is noteworthy that the sequence that was established for the AV reovirus, including the premature stop codon in the S1 gene, has remained stable for over 3 years of culture, suggesting a highly stable coadaptation between virus and host cell in the HTR1 culture (Kim et al, 2007).
Genetic reassortment studies have shown that the S1 gene segment of reovirus T3D is the major determinant in reovirus-induced pathogenesis (Weiner et al, 1977, 1980; Dichter and Weiner, 1984; Haller et al, 1995), with the σ1 protein having a critical role in reovirus-mediated apoptosis (Tyler et al, 1995; Connolly et al, 2001). Despite the S1 modification, AV reovirus retained robust viral replication in various cancer cell types, including those with an activated Ras signalling pathway (Figure 4). Although the AV virus displayed a significantly reduced, but not abolished, apoptotic potential in vitro (Figure 4), it was able to reduce tumour size in vivo to levels comparable with that of the WT virus (Figure 5). In terms of its pathogenesis in normal cells, AV reovirus consistently caused less damage to normal cells than its WT counterpart. The virus only minimally infected ESCs in vitro and did not adversely affect ECS development in vivo (Figure 3). Furthermore, even with multiple injections in SCID mice, AV reovirus did not induce black tail syndrome or myocarditis (Figure 5). Taken as a whole, AV reovirus pathogenesis is limited to cancer cells and this oncolytic specificity is even greater than the WT virus when taking into account the reduced damage by AV virus to normal cells.
Unlike the AV reovirus from HTR1, reoviruses from Raji PI and CA46 PI, both possess full-length σ1 and caused severe viral pathogenesis comparable with that of WT reovirus (Loken et al, 2004). This was consistent with the notion that the reduced viral pathogenesis seen with AV reovirus was strongly associated with the S1 gene attenuation acquired during persistent reovirus infection of the HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells, but not necessarily arising during the persistent infection of other cell types. As AV reovirus also contained several mutations in the S4 gene (S4 mutations are also present in CA46 PI- and Raji PI-derived viruses), which encodes one of the major outer capsid proteins, we cannot rule out the possibility that these mutations (and those that may be present in other gene segments) also have a role in virus attenuation. However, in view of the well-documented role of the S1 gene in reovirus pathogenesis, we favour the idea that the nonsense mutation in S1 likely has a major, if not the sole, role in AV virus attenuation.
With its significantly reduced viral pathogenic potential and retained ability to display strong oncolytic activity in vivo, AV reovirus may deserve consideration as an alternative therapeutic agent for various types of tumours in immunosuppressed patients. These findings may also serve as a starting point for optimising reovirus' potential as a cancer therapeutic through the use of the newly developed reverse genetics system for dsRNA viruses (Kobayashi et al, 2007).
This work was completed as part of a PhD thesis by MK. This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (to RNJ and PWKL), the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (to RNJ), the National Cancer Institute of Canada (to PF), the Terry Fox Foundation (PWKL) and the Alberta Cancer Board (to RNJ and DER). NzN and KG were funded by the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, respectively. TA was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research and by the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. We also would like to acknowledge Eileen Rattner, who derived the MES1 ESC line, and Laurie Robertson, who operated the Flow Cytometry Core Facility at the University of Calgary.
|Ahmed R,Fields BN. Year: 1982Role of the S4 gene in the establishment of persistent reovirus infection in L cellsCell286056127074685|
|Alain T,Kim M,Johnston RN,Urbanski S,Kossakowska AE,Forsyth PA,Lee PW. Year: 2006The oncolytic effect in vivo of reovirus on tumour cells that have survived reovirus cell killing in vitroBr J Cancer951020102717047650|
|Barton ES,Forrest JC,Connolly JL,Chappell JD,Liu Y,Schnell FJ,Nusrat A,Parkos CA,Dermody TS. Year: 2001Junction adhesion molecule is a receptor for reovirusCell10444145111239401|
|Baty CJ,Sherry B. Year: 1993Cytopathogenic effect in cardiac myocytes but not in cardiac fibroblasts is correlated with reovirus-induced acute myocarditisJ Virol67629562988396683|
|Chappell JD,Gunn VL,Wetzel JD,Baer GS,Dermody TS. Year: 1997Mutations in type 3 reovirus that determine binding to sialic acid are contained in the fibrous tail domain of viral attachment protein sigma1J Virol71183418419032313|
|Coffey MC,Strong JE,Forsyth PA,Lee PW. Year: 1998Reovirus therapy of tumors with activated Ras pathwayScience282133213349812900|
|Connolly JL,Barton ES,Dermody TS. Year: 2001Reovirus binding to cell surface sialic acid potentiates virus-induced apoptosisJ Virol754029403911287552|
|DeBiasi RL,Robinson BA,Sherry B,Bouchard R,Brown RD,Rizeq M,Long C,Tyler KL. Year: 2004Caspase inhibition protects against reovirus-induced myocardial injury in vitro and in vivoJ Virol78110401105015452224|
|Dermody TS. Year: 1998Molecular mechanisms of persistent infection by reovirusCurr Top Microbiol Immunol233122|
|Dichter MA,Weiner HL. Year: 1984Infection of neuronal cell cultures with reovirus mimics in vitro patterns of neurotropismAnn Neurol166036106095732|
|Duncan MR,Stanish SM,Cox DC. Year: 1978Differential sensitivity of normal and transformed human cells to reovirus infectionJ Virol28444449214572|
|Duncan R,Horne D,Strong JE,Leone G,Pon RT,Yeung MC,Lee PW. Year: 1991Conformational and functional analysis of the C-terminal globular head of the reovirus cell attachment proteinVirology1828108192024499|
|Duncan R,Lee PW. Year: 1994Localization of two protease-sensitive regions separating distinct domains in the reovirus cell-attachment protein sigma 1Virology2031491528030270|
|Duursma AM,Agami R. Year: 2003Ras interference as cancer therapySemin Cancer Biol1326727314563121|
|Flamand A,Gagner JP,Morrison LA,Fields BN. Year: 1991Penetration of the nervous systems of suckling mice by mammalian reovirusesJ Virol651231311845880|
|George A,Kost SI,Witzleben CL,Cebra JJ,Rubin DH. Year: 1990Reovirus-induced liver disease in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice. A model for the study of viral infection, pathogenesis, and clearanceJ Exp Med1719299342155280|
|Haller BL,Barkon ML,Vogler GP,Virgin HW. Year: 1995Genetic mapping of reovirus virulence and organ tropism in severe combined immunodeficient mice: organ-specific virulence genesJ Virol693573647983730|
|Hashiro G,Loh PC,Yau JT. Year: 1977The preferential cytotoxicity of reovirus for certain transformed cell linesArch Virol54307315562142|
|Heggie AD,Gaddis L. Year: 1979Effects of viral exposure of the two-cell mouse embryo on cleavage and blastocyst formation in vitroPediatr Res13937941225719|
|Hirasawa K,Nishikawa SG,Norman KL,Coffey MC,Thompson BG,Yoon CS,Waisman DM,Lee PW. Year: 2003Systemic reovirus therapy of metastatic cancer in immune-competent miceCancer Res6334835312543787|
|Kim M,Egan C,Alain T,Urbanski SJ,Lee PW,Forsyth PA,Johnston RN. Year: 2007Acquired resistance to reoviral oncolysis in Ras-transformed fibrosarcoma cellsOncogene264124413417213803|
|Kim M,Williamson CT,Prudhomme J,Bebb DG,Riabowol K,Lee PW,Lees-Miller SP,Mori Y,Rahman MM,McFadden G,Johnston RN. Year: 2010The viral tropism of two distinct oncolytic viruses, reovirus and myxoma virus, is modulated by cellular tumor suppressor gene statusOncogene293990399620473328|
|Kobayashi T,Antar AAR,Boehme KW,Danthi P,Eby EA,Guglielmi KM,Holm GH,Johnson EM,Maginnis MS,Naik S,Skelton WB,Wetzel JD,Wilson GJ,Chappell JD,Dermody TS. Year: 2007A plasmid-based reverse genetics system for animal double-stranded RNA virusesCell Host & Microbe1147157|
|Lee PW,Hayes EC,Joklik WK. Year: 1981Protein sigma 1 is the reovirus cell attachment proteinVirology1081561637269235|
|Loken SD,Norman K,Hirasawa K,Nodwell M,Lester WM,Demetrick DJ. Year: 2004Morbidity in immunosuppressed (SCID/NOD) mice treated with reovirus (dearing 3) as an anti-cancer biotherapeuticCancer Biol Ther373473815197356|
|Mann MA,Tyler KL,Knipe DM,Fields BN. Year: 2002Type 3 reovirus neuroinvasion after intramuscular inoculation: viral genetic determinants of lethality and spinal cord infectionVirology30321322112490384|
|Marcato P,Shmulevitz M,Pan D,Stoltz D,Lee PW. Year: 2007Ras transformation mediates reovirus oncolysis by enhancing virus uncoating, particle infectivity, and apoptosis-dependent releaseMol Ther151522153017457318|
|Norman KL,Hirasawa K,Yang AD,Shields MA,Lee PW. Year: 2004Reovirus oncolysis: the Ras/RalGEF/p38 pathway dictates host cell permissiveness to reovirus infectionProc Natl Acad Sci USA1011109911104|
|Oberhaus SM,Smith RL,Clayton GH,Dermody TS,Tyler KL. Year: 1997Reovirus infection and tissue injury in the mouse central nervous system are associated with apoptosisJ Virol71210021069032342|
|Oncolytics Biotech IncYear: 2010Reovirus Clinical Trials . http://www.oncolyticsbiotech.com/clinical.html|
|Priscott PK. Year: 1983The growth of reovirus 3 in cultured rat embryos and implications for human reproductive failureBr J Exp Pathol644674736315042|
|Richardson SC,Bishop RF,Smith AL. Year: 1994Reovirus serotype 3 infection in infants with extrahepatic biliary atresia or neonatal hepatitisJ Gastroenterol Hepatol92642688054525|
|Sabin AB. Year: 1959Reoviruses. A new group of respiratory and enteric viruses formerly classified as ECHO type 10 is describedScience1301387138914440555|
|Sasaki E,Hanazawa K,Kurita R,Akatsuka A,Yoshizaki T,Ishii H,Tanioka Y,Ohnishi Y,Suemizu H,Sugawara A,Tamaoki N,Izawa K,Nakazaki Y,Hamada H,Suemori H,Asano S,Nakatsuji N,Okano H,Tani K. Year: 2005Establishment of novel embryonic stem cell lines derived from the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)Stem Cells231304131316109758|
|Smith RE,Zweerink HJ,Joklik WK. Year: 1969Polypeptide components of virions, top component and cores of reovirus type 3Virology397918104311639|
|Strong JE,Coffey MC,Tang D,Sabinin P,Lee PW. Year: 1998The molecular basis of viral oncolysis: usurpation of the Ras signaling pathway by reovirusEMBO J17335133629628872|
|Terheggen F,Benedikz E,Frissen PH,Brinkman K. Year: 2003Myocarditis associated with reovirus infectionEur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis2219719812649721|
|Thirukkumaran C,Morris DG. Year: 2009Oncolytic viral therapy using reovirusMethods Mol Biol54260763419565924|
|Tyler KL. Year: 2001Mammalian ReovirusesFields Virology4th edn, Knipe DM, Howley PM (eds). pp17291745Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia|
|Tyler KL,Squier MK,Rodgers SE,Schneider BE,Oberhaus SM,Grdina TA,Cohen JJ,Dermody TS. Year: 1995Differences in the capacity of reovirus strains to induce apoptosis are determined by the viral attachment protein sigma 1J Virol69697269797474116|
|Weiner HL,Drayna D,Averill DR Jr,Fields BN. Year: 1977Molecular basis of reovirus virulence: role of the S1 geneProc Natl Acad Sci USA7457445748|
|Weiner HL,Powers ML,Fields BN. Year: 1980Absolute linkage of virulence and central nervous system cell tropism of reoviruses to viral hemagglutininJ Infect Dis1416096166989930|
|Wetzel JD,Wilson GJ,Baer GS,Dunnigan LR,Wright JP,Tang DS,Dermody TS. Year: 1997Reovirus variants selected during persistent infections of L cells contain mutations in the viral S1 and S4 genes and are altered in viral disassemblyJ Virol71136213698995660|
|Wilson GJ,Wetzel JD,Puryear W,Bassel-Duby R,Dermody TS. Year: 1996Persistent reovirus infections of L cells select mutations in viral attachment protein sigma1 that alter oligomer stabilityJ Virol70659866068794294|
|zur Nieden NI,Ruf LJ,Kempka G,Hildebrand H,Ahr HJ. Year: 2001Molecular markers in embryonic stem cellsToxicol In Vitro1545546111566578|
Keywords: mammalian reovirus, attenuated, persistent infection, oncolysis, reduced toxicity, sigma1.
Previous Document: Replication study of SNP associations for colorectal cancer in Hong Kong Chinese.
Next Document: CXCL9 induces chemotaxis, chemorepulsion and endothelial barrier disruption through CXCR3-mediated a...