|Atorvastatin in stroke: a review of SPARCL and subgroup analysis.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 20407630 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|Statin therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease is associated with reduced incidence of stroke. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction of Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial showed daily treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin in patients with a recent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) reduced the incidence of fatal or nonfatal stroke by 16%. Several post hoc analyses of different subgroups followed the SPARCL study. They have not revealed any significant differences when patients were sorted by age, sex, presence of carotid disease or type of stroke, with the exception of intracranial hemorrhage as the entry event. Lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in addition to possible neuroprotective mechanisms due to atorvastatin treatment correlate with improved risk reduction. Although not predefined subgroups and subject to an insufficient power, these post hoc studies have generated new clinical questions. However, clinicians should avoid denying therapy based on such subgroup analysis. At this point, the best evidence powerfully demonstrates stroke and TIA patients should be prescribed high dose statin therapy for secondary stroke prevention.|
|Branko N Huisa; Andrew B Stemer; Justin A Zivin|
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Date: 2010-04-15|
|Title: Vascular health and risk management Volume: 6 ISSN: 1178-2048 ISO Abbreviation: Vasc Health Risk Manag Publication Date: 2010|
|Created Date: 2010-04-21 Completed Date: 2011-01-27 Revised Date: 2013-05-29|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101273479 Medline TA: Vasc Health Risk Manag Country: New Zealand|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 229-36 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, CA 92103, USA. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Carotid Artery Diseases / complications
Cholesterol, LDL / blood
Heptanoic Acids / therapeutic use*
Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
Intracranial Hemorrhages / chemically induced
Ischemic Attack, Transient / drug therapy, prevention & control*
Pyrroles / therapeutic use*
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stroke / drug therapy, prevention & control*
|3P50 NS044148-07S2/NS/NINDS NIH HHS|
|0/Cholesterol, LDL; 0/Heptanoic Acids; 0/Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; 0/Pyrroles; A0JWA85V8F/atorvastatin|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Vasc Health Risk Manag
Journal ID (publisher-id): Vascular Health and Risk Management
Publisher: Dove Medical Press
? 2010 Huisa et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Received Day: 27 Month: 3 Year: 2010
collection publication date: Year: 2010
Print publication date: Year: 2010
Electronic publication date: Day: 15 Month: 4 Year: 2010
Volume: 6First Page: 229 Last Page: 236
PubMed Id: 20407630
Publisher Id: vhrm-6-229
|Atorvastatin in stroke: a review of SPARCL and subgroup analysis|
|Branko N Huisa|
|Andrew B Stemer|
|Justin A Zivin|
|Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
|Correspondence: Correspondence: Branko N Huisa, Department of Neurosciences, 8665, UCSD Stroke Center, Hillcrest Medical Offices North, Third Floor, Suite #3, 200 W. Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92103, USA, Tel +1 (619) 481-9024, Fax +1 (619) 543-7771, Email
Statins, as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, belong to a well established class of drugs that can reduce cholesterol, ameliorate vascular atherosclerosis and improve cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.1?5 Previous clinical trials demonstrated that statins reduce the first or recurrent stroke risk among patients with known heart disease and subsequently have become cornerstones of therapy for secondary prevention of vascular disease along with antiplatelets and antihypertensives.6 Among the statins atorvastatin is a synthetic type of HMG-CoA analogue that exhibits a substantial efficacy for decreasing total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, triglycerides and modification of lipoprotein composition. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial was the only study to test whether high doses of atorvastatin would reduce the risk of secondary stroke in patients with a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) but without known heart disease.7 This paper will review the SPARCL trial, its sub group analyses, and related studies.
The beneficial effects of statins result, at least in part, from direct inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase.8 This inhibition reduces endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis and increases the expression of LDL receptors responsible for LDL-C uptake and clearance.8 These do not seem to be the only mechanisms of action, and several other so-called ?pleotropic? effects have been suggested.8 Those beneficial effects include modification of endothelial function, reduction of inflammatory responses, increase in plaque stability, and inhibition of platelets with decreased thrombus formation. However, the neuroprotective mechanisms of statins against stroke are not well understood. Stroke animal models suggested that augmentation of cerebral blood flow by increasing nitric oxygen (NO) production, decrease of glutamate excitotoxicity, neurogenesis and angiogenesis are responsible for some of its neuroprotective actions.9?14 So far, the clinical importance of these nonlipid lowering properties remains uncertain.
SPARCL was a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled international trial conducted at 205 centers, in which 4731 patients with a history of stroke or TIA were randomized. Patients received either atorvastatin 80 mg per day (n = 2365) or placebo (n = 2366) and were followed for an average of 4.9 years.7 Stroke, or a TIA, was diagnosed by a neurologist within 30 days and randomization occurred within 1 to 6 months after the event. LDL-C concentration required being between 100 and 190 mg/dL, and any lipid-altering treatments had to be discontinued 30 days before the first screening visit. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke were included only if they were believed to be at risk for ischemic stroke or coronary artery disease; patients with atrial fibrillation, cardiac sources of embolism and subarachnoid hemorrhage were excluded. The primary outcome was any nonfatal or fatal stroke after randomization. The analysis plan was prespecified and performed on an intention to treat basis with the inclusion of all patients who underwent randomization.
Demographics, mean LDL-C, stroke type, concomitant therapy, stroke risk factors and history of prior statin therapy were evenly distributed between placebo and treatment groups. The primary study endpoint, fatal or nonfatal stroke, was significantly less frequent in the atorvastatin group (11.2%) versus placebo (13.1%) and represented a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 16% (P = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.71?0.99) (Figure 1). Interestingly, this effect was driven predominately by reduced adjusted relative risk of fatal stroke which was decreased by 43% (P = 0.03), whereas atorvastatin had no significant effect on nonfatal stroke reduction (P = 0.11).7
Every secondary endpoint showed significant improvement with atorvastatin treatment: reduced relative risks of stroke and TIA (23%; P < 0.001), TIA alone (26%; P = 0.004), major coronary events (35%; P = 0.003), nonfatal myocardial infarction (49%; P = 0.001), major cardiovascular events (20%; P = 0.002), acute coronary events (35%; P = 0.001), any coronary events (42%; P < 0.001), revascularization procedures (45%; P < 0.001), and any cardiovascular event (26%; P < 0.001).7 Total mortality (9.1% vs 8.9%), and cancer related mortality (2.4% vs 2.2%) did not significantly differ between groups.
After randomization, more patients in the placebo group withdrew consent (P = 0.07) or permanently stopped the study medication (P = 0.07). Approximately half as many atorvastatin (compared to placebo) recipients received open-label statin therapy (11.4% vs 25.4%), and, in both study groups, atorvastatin was the most widely used nonstudy open-label statin.7 The use of open label statins reduced the frequency of strokes in the placebo group; therefore the overall effect size appeared to be smaller than it actually was.
In contrast to the reduction of ischemic stroke and TIA, there was a significant increase in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke in the atorvastatin group (2.3% vs 1.4%). Regarding adverse effects, a benign but significant elevation of aspartate aminotransferase occurred in the treatment group but was not associated with liver failure or rhabdomyolisis. No other differences in adverse events and laboratory values were noted.
With a number needed to treat (NNT) of 143 patients to prevent one recurrent ischemic stroke per year, aspirin is considered a first line medical therapy for secondary stroke prevention.15 In comparison, the NNT with atorvastatin to prevent one stroke is 46 patients over 5 years and is likely much lower due to poor adherence in the treatment group. While the benefit of atorvastatin may not be apparent to every individual, it has an enormous impact when applied to an entire population. Furthermore, the reduction of cardiac and peripheral arterial disease in this group is important. In summary, SPARCL demonstrated that high dose atorvastatin decreased the risk of secondary stroke, major coronary events and revascularization procedures among patients with a recent stroke or TIA.7
Multiple publications consisting of subgroup analyses originated from SPARCL. Although not predefined in the original study and inadequately powered, these post hoc studies suggest answers to important clinical questions, generate new hypothesis and strengthen (or weaken) previous theories of statin use in stroke patients. However, any subgroup analysis should be interpreted cautiously until further confirmatory studies are performed.
Epidemiological and observational studies have shown a relationship between low cholesterol levels and hemorrhagic stroke but that difference was not found in trials with statins given for coronary artery disease.16?19 In SPARCL, the overall incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was low (1.8%).7 While mortality from hemorrhagic stroke was similar (17 in the atorvastatin vs 18 patients in the placebo group) there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (2.3% in the atorvastatin vs 1.4% in the placebo group; P = 0.01).7 Post hoc analyses based on stroke type revealed that atorvastatin reduced the relative risk of fatal and not fatal of ischemic stroke by 21% (P = 0.01); this effect was partially attenuated by an increased risk of hemorrhage (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% CI 1.09?2.59) resulting in the overall reduction of 16% in the risk of fatal and nonfatal stroke.20 Interestingly, the risk of hemorrhagic stroke was not related to of LDL-C levels in statin-treated subjects. Using Cox multivariable regression analysis male sex, hypertension, advancing age and a hemorrhagic or small vessel stroke upon study entry were independent risk factors associated with hemorrhagic stroke.20 Treatment did not disproportionally increase the hemorrhage risk in these patients; conversely, those with hemorrhagic stroke at entry did not benefit from treatment (HR 2.82, 95% CI 0.89?9.01).20 The SPARCL findings contradict several cardiac interventional studies using statins where increased intracranial hemorrhage was not found.1?4 In the Heart Protection Study, patients enrolled with prior history of stroke were found to have a nonsignificant increase in hemorrhagic stroke if treated with simvastatin 40 mg per day compared with the placebo group.5 Because most SPARCL patients had stroke as entry event (60.9%), it is possible that patients with prior cerebro-vascular accident are prone to ICH after statin therapy. Based on the SPARCL data, it seems that patients with hemorrhagic stroke as an entry event may not benefit from statin therapy. Most importantly though, as the authors conclude, the theoretical risk of ICH with high dose statins should be balanced with the compelling benefit of treatment that reduces the overall risk of stroke and other cardiovascular events.
LDL-C reduction was used as a marker for adherence to the allocated treatment and patients were subsequently classified into levels of LDL-C reduction. Based on 55,045 blinded measures, patients with ?50% reduction had a 31% decrease in the combined risk of fatal and nonfatal stroke.21 This was approximately twice the 16% observed in the prespecified intention to treat analysis (Figure 2).7 Additionally, increased ICH were not observed in the group with the greatest reduction of LDL-C.21 Only lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels at baseline predicted the risk of both, recurrent stroke and mayor cardiovascular events; however, high baseline levels of triglycerides and LDL/HDL ratio were associated to the occurrence of mayor cardiovascular events.22 In the treatment group, higher HDL-C levels were maintained at low levels of LDL-C and a there was cumulative protective effect for major cardiovascular events and stroke when having all together, lower LDC-L, higher HDL-C and optimal blood pressure control.23 Although the intention to treat analysis is often the best way to determine treatment efficacy, this post hoc analysis using LDL-C levels as a surrogate of high dose atorvastatin, attempts to answer the initial SPARCL hypothesis disregarding noncompliance observed during trial. The findings are consistent with two previous metaanalysis revealing an association between reduced stroke risk and reduction of LDL-C.6,24 However, because the relationship between stroke and cholesterol levels is not as clearly defined as for coronary artery disease, the dose-related stroke risk reduction found in this analysis could be attributed to pleotropic effects and vascular protection rather than simple LDL-C reduction.
Stroke is more frequent in individuals 65 years or older.25,26 Several studies have shown the benefits of statin treatment in elderly patients, particularly those with established vascular disease or risk factors for it.5,27?30 Unfortunately, elderly patients are less likely to be prescribed statins, and have worse compliance compared to younger patients.31 An analysis of the entire SPARCL cohort, using an intention to treat protocol, compared primary and secondary endpoints between patients over 65 and under 65 years old.32 Patients over 65 were more likely to have hypertension, a history of carotid stenosis at baseline, and less likely to be current smokers compared with younger patients.32 For the primary endpoint there was a 10% RRR (HR 0.90, 0.73?1.11, P = 0.33) in the elderly group compared to a 26% RRR in the younger group (HR 0.74, 0.57?0.96, P = 0.02).32 This corresponded to an absolute risk reduction of 1.5% in the elderly group and 2.6% in the younger group (Figure 2).32 A test of heterogeneity for a treatment?age interaction, however, was not significant (P = 0.52).32 There were no treatment interactions associated with age for the SPARCL primary endpoint or any of the SPARCL secondary endpoints.32 Atorvastatin was well tolerated in both groups, though serious adverse events were more common in the elderly with either active treatment or placebo.32 Significant elevation in liver enzymes and myopathy were uncommon with atorvastatin and equally reported in both the cohorts.32 Although the risk reduction with high dose statins was not significant for older patients, no interactions were found between age and treatment effect. The authors note the study was not powered for detecting risk reduction in older patients. Ultimately, all we can conclude is the findings suggest a possible benefit in stroke prevention in the elderly group.
Regarding gender, a secondary analysis of the effects of statin therapy in primary and secondary endpoints in men and women was also attempted.33 Although stroke risk factor profiles from the SPARCL baseline data differed for men and women, a secondary analysis did not find any differences in statin treatment effects or adverse reactions.33
Differences in outcomes between various stroke subtypes were also examined. Baseline stroke subtype assignment was based on local investigator judgment and not standardized or adjudicated. Neuroimaging data was not available for the final analysis but it was used by local investigators for the elucidation of stroke subtype. Among 4731 participants, 4728 had information regarding entry event subtype with 15.8% classified as having large vessel disease, 29.8% small vessel disease, 21.5% ischemic stroke of unknown cause, 30.9% TIA, and 2% hemorrhagic stroke.34 Primary and secondary endpoints were obtained and no differences were found across baseline stroke subtypes with the exception of hemorrhagic stroke (Figure 2).34 This post hoc analysis was exploratory as it oversimplified stroke subtypes and lacked power for subgroup analyses. It contained an estimated a power of 51% to detect the risk reduction of 16% observed for the primary SPARCL end point between all entry event stroke subtypes. The power to detect a risk reduction of 16% was 20% for the small vessel disease group but only 6% for the hemorrhagic stroke group. Hence, a difference among ischemic stroke subtypes may exist but could not be proven by this subgroup analysis.
Carotid artery evaluation was not required by the SPARCL protocol, but 4278 (90.4%) of the SPARCL subjects underwent carotid imaging by the local investigators at the time of patient randomization.35 3724 subjects did not have carotid stenosis while 1007 subjects had carotid stenosis, including 453 subjects categorized as unknown carotid status.35 Within the carotid stenosis group, a primary end point occurred in 55 patients randomized to atorvastatin and in 83 randomized to placebo.35 Patients with carotid stenosis randomized to atorvastatin reduced their risk of stroke by 33% (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47?0.94; P = 0.02) (Figure 2) and risk of TIA or stroke by 34% (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50?0.89; P = 0.005).35 Furthermore, all cardiovascular end points were reduced in patients with carotid stenosis treated with atorvastatin: major coronary events by 43% (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32?1.00; P = 0.05), any cardiovascular event by 42% (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46?0.73; P < 0.0001), any revascularization procedure by 51% (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33?0.73; P = 0.0004), and carotid revascularizations by 56% (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24?0.79; P = 0.006).35 With the exception of carotid revascularization there was not heterogeneity regarding primary and secondary endpoints. However, the carotid stenosis group treated with atorvastatin had a higher absolute risk reduction and benefited more when all cardiovascular events were taken into consideration.35
The authors estimated a NNT of 20 patients treated for 5 years to prevent one stroke using high dose atorvastatin in patients with carotid disease. Considering all cardiovascular events, the annual risk reduction exceeded 2.5% per year estimating a NNT of 8 patients over 5 years. This is comparable to performing carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients but without the risks of surgery or additional benefits of reduced cardiovascular events.36,37 This subanalysis suggested that patients with carotid disease receive the most benefit for secondary stroke prevention. This implies that statins powerfully modulate atherosclerotic disease and could, in theory, similarly benefit patients with aortic arch or intracranial stenosis.
There is ample laboratory data suggesting pleotropic effects of statins might not only affect the risk of stroke but also secondary stroke outcome.8 In the SPARCL trial a total of 265 patients randomized to atorvastatin and 311 patients randomized to placebo suffered a stroke.7 An exploratory analysis of the trial assessed whether treatment favorably changed the distribution of stroke severities using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NISSS) and Bathel Index (BI) at enrollment and 90 days post stroke.38 Among all subjects having an ischemic stroke during the trial, there was a trend toward less severe outcomes in those taking atorvastatin based on the mRS in (P = 0.647) (Figure 3). This was true despite poor adherence to randomized treatments. No other differences were significant. The authors found a significant reduction of all stroke events and all ischemic events (P < 0.001) using Mantel-Haenszel test after creating a composite of fatal stroke, severe (mRS 5?4), moderate (mRS 3-2), mild (mRS 1-0), TIA and no events.38 However, this analysis combined stroke prevention and stroke ?attenuation? properties making it inadequate for definitively determining a favorable outcome after a secondary stroke. Possible reduction in secondary stroke severity using statins has been suggested by observational studies but has yet to be proven.39?42 Interestingly, there is experimental animal43,44 and human epidemiological data45,46 revealing that prior use of statins protects the brain and improves outcomes after intracranial hemorrhage. The latter was not replicated by the SPACRL trial.
During the 4.9 years of follow-up in SPARCL, patients with recent stroke or TIA had a 5.1% incidence of a major coronary event (death from cardiac causes [1.6%], nonfatal myocardial infarction [3.5%]), major cardiovascular event (17.2%), any coronary event (8.6%) and need for revascularization (coronary, carotid or peripheral; 6.9%).7 High dose atorvastatin reduced major coronary events by 35% (HR 0.65,CI 95% 0.49?0.87), any coronary event by 42% (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46?0.73]) and the need for revascularization by 45% (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.43?0.72).7 The high incidence of coronary vascular events in patients with ischemic stroke, as well as the profound reduction of coronary events with statin treatment, has caused stroke and TIA to be considered a coronary risk equivalent.47 SPARCL confirmed the high risk for non-stroke vascular events and their substantial reduction with atorvastatin. Recent reviews of clinical trials illustrate this relationship and suggest the idea of adding cardiovascular endpoint events in preventive stroke clinical trials.48,49 Future studies should assess the use of cardiac screening test within ischemic stroke patients.
The SPARCL trial has shown that high dose atorvastatin is an effective medication for secondary prevention of stroke cardiovascular events in patients with no known history of cardiac disease.7 Although treating patients with a history of ICH should be considered with caution, we feel it is inappropriate to deny an effective therapy to stroke patients based on subgroup analysis. Further studies might help to identify best responders and stratify risk groups.
Dr Justin A Zivin is a paid consultant to Pfizer and steering committee member of the SPARCL trial. Dr Huisa and Dr Stemer have no disclosures.
The review was supported by the educational grant : NIH grant 3P50 NSO44148-07S2.
|1..||Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)LancetYear: 1994344138313897968073|
|2..||The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study GroupPrevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levelsN Engl J MedYear: 1998339134913579841303|
|3..||Plehn JF,Davis BR,Sacks FM,et al. Reduction of stroke incidence after myocardial infarction with pravastatin: the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) studyCirculationYear: 1999992162239892586|
|4..||Sever PS,Dahlof B,Poulter NR,et al. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial ? Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trialLancetYear: 20033611149115812686036|
|5..||Heart Protection Collaborative Study GroupMRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomized placebo-controlled trialLancetYear: 200236072212114036|
|6..||Amarenco P,Labreuche J,Lavall?e P,Touboul PJ. Statins in stroke prevention and carotid atherosclerosis: systematic review and metaanalysisStrokeYear: 2004352902290915514180|
|7..||The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) InvestigatorsHigh-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attackN Engl J MedYear: 200635554955916899775|
|8..||Liao JK. Effects of statins on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibition beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterolAm J CardiolYear: 200596Suppl24F33F|
|9..||Zhang L,Zhang ZG,Liu XS,Hozeska-Solgot A,Chopp M. The PI3K/Akt pathway mediates the neuroprotective effect of atorvastatin in extending thrombolytic therapy after embolic stroke in the ratArterioscler Thromb Vasc BioYear: 2007272470247517717296|
|10..||Chen JL,Zhang ZG,Li Y,et al. Statins induce angiogenesis, neurogenesis, and synaptogenesis after strokeAnn NeurolYear: 20035374375112783420|
|11..||Kawashima S,Yamashita T,Miwa Y,et al. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor has protective effects against stroke events in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive ratsStrokeYear: 20033415716312511768|
|12..||Lu D,Qu C,Goussev A,et al. Statins increase neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus, reduce delayed neuronal death in the hippocampal CA3 region, and improve spatial learning in rat after traumatic brain injuryJ NeurotraumaYear: 2007241132114617610353|
|13..||Bosel J,Gandor F,Harms C,et al. Neuroprotective effects of atorvastatin against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity in primary cortical neuronesJ NeurochemYear: 2005921386139815748157|
|14..||Laufs U,Gertz K,Huang P,et al. Atorvastatin upregulates type III nitric oxide synthase in thrombocytes, decreases platelet activation, and protects from cerebral ischemia in normocholesterolemic miceStrokeYear: 2000312442244911022078|
|15..||Sandercock P,Gubitz G,Foley P,Counsell C. Antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic strokeCochrane Database Syst RevYear: 20032CD00002912804384|
|16..||Iso H,Jacobs DRJ,Wentworth D,Neaton JD,Cohen JD. Serum cholesterol levels and six-year mortality from stroke in 350,977 men screened for the multiple risk factor intervention trialN Engl J MedYear: 19893209049102619783|
|17..||Yano K,Reed DM,MacLean CJ. Serum cholesterol and hemorrhagic stroke in the Honolulu heart programStrokeYear: 198920146014652815179|
|18..||Ebrahim S,Sung J,Song YM,Ferrer RL,Lawlor DA,Davey Smith G. Serum cholesterol, haemorrhagic stroke, ischaemic stroke, and myocardial infarction: Korean national health system prospective cohort studyBMJYear: 2006333222816757495|
|19..||Leppala JM,Virtamo J,Fogelholm R,Albanes D,Heinonen OP. Different risk factors for different stroke subtypes: association of blood pressure, cholesterol, and antioxidantsStrokeYear: 1999302535254010582974|
|20..||Goldstein LB,Amarenco P,Szarek M,et al. on behalf of the SPARCL InvestigatorsHemorrhagic stroke in the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels studyNeurology702364237018077795|
|21..||Amarenco P,Goldstein LB,Szarek M,et al. SPARCL InvestigatorsEffects of intense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) TrialStrokeYear: 2007383198320417962589|
|22..||Amarenco P,Goldstein LB,Callahan A 3rd,et al. SPARCL InvestigatorsBaseline blood pressure, low- and high-density lipoproteins, and triglycerides and the risk of vascular events in the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trialAtherosclerosisYear: 200920451552018962621|
|23..||Amarenco P,Goldstein LB,Messig M,et al. SPARCL InvestigatorsRelative and cumulative effects of lipid and blood pressure control in the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trialStrokeYear: 2009402486249219461031|
|24..||Baigent C,Keech A,Kearney PM,et al. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists? (CTT) CollaboratorsEfficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statinsLancetYear: 20053661267127816214597|
|25..||Rothwell PM,Coull AJ,Silver LE,et al. Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study)LancetYear: 20053661773178316298214|
|26..||Jemal A,Ward E,Hao Y,Thun M. Trends in the leading causes of death in the United States, 1970?2002JAMAYear: 20052941255125916160134|
|27..||Sever PA,Dahlof B,Poulter NR,et al. Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trialLancetYear: 20033611149115812686036|
|28..||Shepherd J,Blauw GJ,Murphy MB,et al. Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomized controlled trialLancetYear: 20023601623163012457784|
|29..||Lewis SJ,Moye LA,Sacks FM,et al. Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in older patients with myocardial infarction and cholesterol levels in the average rangeAnn Intern MedYear: 19981296816899841599|
|30..||Ko DT,Mamdani M,Alter DA. Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradoxJAMAYear: 20042911864187015100205|
|31..||Benner JS,Glynn RJ,Mogun H,Neumann PJ,Weinstein MC,Avorn J. Long-term persistence in use of statin therapy in elderly patientsJAMAYear: 200228845546112132975|
|32..||Chaturvedi S,Zivin JA,Breazna A,et al. for the SPARCL investigatorsEffect of atorvastatin in elderly patients with a recent stroke or transient ischemic attackNeurologyYear: 20097268869418768917|
|33..||Goldstein LB,Amarenco P,LaMonte M,et al. Relative effects of statin therapy on stroke and cardiovascular events in men and women: Secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) StudyStrokeYear: 2008392444244818617654|
|34..||Amarenco P,Benavente O,Goldstein LB,et al. Results of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial by stroke subtypesStrokeYear: 2009401405140919228842|
|35..||Sillesen H,Amarenco P,Hennerici MG,et al. Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels InvestigatorsAtorvastatin reduces the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: a secondary analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trialStrokeYear: 2008393297330218845807|
|36..||Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis StudyEndarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosisJAMAYear: 1995273142114287723155|
|37..||Halliday A,Mansfield A,Marro J,et al. MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative GroupPrevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trialLancetYear: 20043631491150215135594|
|38..||Goldstein LB,Amarenco P,Zivin J,et al. Statin treatment and stroke outcome in the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) TrialStrokeYear: 2009403526353119745172|
|39..||Moonis M,Kane K,Schwiderski U,Sandage BW,Fisher M. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors improve acute ischemic stroke outcomeStrokeYear: 2005361298130015879346|
|40..||Elkind MS,Flint AC,Sciacca RR,Sacco RL. Lipid-lowering agent use at ischemic stroke onset is associated with decreased mortalityNeurologyYear: 20056525325816043795|
|41..||Aslanyan S,Weir CJ,McInnes GT,Reid JL,Walters MR,Lees KR. Statin administration prior to ischaemic stroke onset and survival: exploratory evidence from matched treatment-control studyEur J NeurolYear: 20051249349815958087|
|42..||Reeves MJ,Gargano JW,Luo Z,Mullard AJ,Jacobs BS,Majid A. Effect of pretreatment with statins on ischemic stroke outcomesStrokeYear: 2008391779178518369173|
|43..||Karki K,Knight RA,Han Y,et al. Simvastatin and atorvastatin improve neurological outcome after experimental intracerebral hemorrhageStrokeYear: 2009403384338919644071|
|44..||Lapchak PA,Han MK. The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor simvastatin reduces thrombolytic-induced intracerebral hemorrhage in embolized rabbitsBrain ResYear: 200915130314415019781532|
|45..||FitzMaurice E,Wendell L,Snider R,et al. Effect of statins on intracerebral hemorrhage outcome and recurrenceStrokeYear: 2008392151215418436876|
|46..||Leker RR,Khoury ST,Rafaeli G,Shwartz R,Eichel R,Tanne D,NASIS InvestigatorsPrior use of statins improves outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: prospective data from the National Acute Stroke Israeli Surveys (NASIS)StrokeYear: 2009402581258419407227|
|47..||Amarenco P,Goldstein LB,Sillesen H,et al. Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels InvestigatorsCoronary heart disease risk in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack and no known coronary heart disease: findings from the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trialStrokeYear: 20104142643020110538|
|48..||Fitchett DH,Goodman SG,Langer A. Ischemic stroke: A cardiovascular risk equivalent? Lessons learned from the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trialCan J CardiolYear: 20082470570818787721|
|49..||Amarenco P,Steg PG. Stroke is a coronary heart disease risk equivalent: implications for future clinical trials in secondary stroke preventionEur Heart JYear: 2008291605160718523057|
Keywords: statins, intracranial hemorrhage, neuroprotection, outcome, prevention, carotid stenosis, transient ischemic attack.
Previous Document: Blood flow interplays with elastin: collagen and MMP: TIMP ratios to maintain healthy vascular struc...
Next Document: Managing anemia in patients with chronic heart failure: what do we know?