Document Detail


Association between a medical school admission process using the multiple mini-interview and national licensing examination scores.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23212501     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
CONTEXT: There has been difficulty designing medical school admissions processes that provide valid measurement of candidates' nonacademic qualities.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether students deemed acceptable through a revised admissions protocol using a 12-station multiple mini-interview (MMI) outperform others on the 2 parts of the Canadian national licensing examinations (Medical Council of Canada Qualifying Examination [MCCQE]). The MMI process requires candidates to rotate through brief sequential interviews with structured tasks and independent assessment within each interview.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cohort study comparing potential medical students who were interviewed at McMaster University using an MMI in 2004 or 2005 and accepted (whether or not they matriculated at McMaster) with those who were interviewed and rejected but gained entry elsewhere. The computer-based MCCQE part I (aimed at assessing medical knowledge and clinical decision making) can be taken on graduation from medical school; MCCQE part II (involving simulated patient interactions testing various aspects of practice) is based on the objective structured clinical examination and typically completed 16 months into postgraduate training. Interviews were granted to 1071 candidates, and those who gained entry could feasibly complete both parts of their licensure examination between May 2007 and March 2011. Scores could be matched on the examinations for 751 (part I) and 623 (part II) interviewees.
INTERVENTION: Admissions decisions were made by combining z score transformations of scores assigned to autobiographical essays, grade point average, and MMI performance. Academic and nonacademic measures contributed equally to the final ranking.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on MCCQE part I (standardized cut-score, 390 [SD, 100]) and part II (standardized mean, 500 [SD, 100]).
RESULTS: Candidates accepted by the admissions process had higher scores than those who were rejected for part I (mean total score, 531 [95% CI, 524-537] vs 515 [95% CI, 507-522]; P = .003) and for part II (mean total score, 563 [95% CI, 556-570] vs 544 [95% CI, 534-554]; P = .007). Among the accepted group, those who matriculated at McMaster did not outperform those who matriculated elsewhere for part I (mean total score, 524 [95% CI, 515-533] vs 546 [95% CI, 535-557]; P = .004) and for part II (mean total score, 557 [95% CI, 548-566] vs 582 [95% CI, 569-594]; P = .003).
CONCLUSION: Compared with students who were rejected by an admission process that used MMI assessment, students who were accepted scored higher on Canadian national licensing examinations.
Authors:
Kevin W Eva; Harold I Reiter; Jack Rosenfeld; Kien Trinh; Timothy J Wood; Geoffrey R Norman
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  JAMA     Volume:  308     ISSN:  1538-3598     ISO Abbreviation:  JAMA     Publication Date:  2012 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-12-05     Completed Date:  2012-12-07     Revised Date:  2014-09-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7501160     Medline TA:  JAMA     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2233-40     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cohort Studies
Education, Medical, Undergraduate / standards*
Educational Measurement*
Humans
Interviews as Topic*
Licensure
Ontario
School Admission Criteria*
Schools, Medical*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
JAMA. 2013 Mar 20;309(11):1108-9   [PMID:  23512047 ]
JAMA. 2012 Dec 5;308(21):2250-1   [PMID:  23212504 ]
JAMA. 2013 Mar 20;309(11):1109   [PMID:  23512048 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Effect of exposure to good vs poor medical trainee performance on attending physician ratings of sub...
Next Document:  General medicine vs subspecialty career plans among internal medicine residents.