| Association between Interleukin-6 Receptor Gene Variations and Atherosclerotic Lipid Profiles among Young Adolescents in Taiwan. | |
| | |
| Jump to Full Text | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21835044 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: To analyze the potential genetic associations between four polymorphisms of interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) gene and atherosclerotic lipid profiles among young adolescents in Taiwan. METHODS: Using data from the Taipei Children Heart Study-II - a cross-sectional survey in 2003. After multi-stage sampling, we selected 418 boys and 441 girls with an average age of 13.1 years. We genotyped the subjects for four IL-6R gene polymorphisms (rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, rs8192284 A/C, and rs2229238 C/T) using a TaqMan 5' nuclease assay. Lipid profiles, including total cholesterol (CHOL), triglycerides (TG), high density lipoprotein- cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) were measured using standard methods. We also calculated CHOL/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, and TG/HDL-C ratio as atherosclerotic indexes. RESULTS: IL-6R rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T variants showed strong associations with high TG (additive model, OR=1.58, 95%CI: 1.05-2.37; OR=1.55, 95%CI: 1.04-2.29, respectively), low HDL-C (additive model, OR=1.57, 95%CI: 1.03-2.39; OR=1.68, 95%CI: 1.12-2.52, respectively), and high CHOL/HDL-C (additive model, OR=1.68, 95%CI: 1.08-2.61, OR=1.82, 95%CI: 1.18-2.79, respectively) in girls. We inferred five common haplotypes using rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, and rs2229238 C/T (GAC, GAT, GGC, AAC, and AAT ). In girls, the AAT haplotype was associated with a significant risk of high TG, low HDL-C, high CHOL/HDL-C, and abnormal lipid levels (high TG or low HDL-C) when compared with the GAC haplotype (OR range=3.08-4.40, all p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The IL-6R rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T variants are associated with dyslipidemia in girls, but not in boys. The AAT haplotype of the IL-6R gene (rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, and rs2229238 C/T) may play an important role in the pathogenesis of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis in girls. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Nain-Feng Chu; Fu-Hung Lin; Hsien-Chuan Chin; Ye-Jen Hong |
Related Documents
:
|
3708564 - Suppression of choline-deficient diet-induced hepatocyte membrane lipid peroxidation in... 8104734 - Differential responses of two inbred rat strains to a choline-deficient diet during liv... 7962844 - Modulation of expression of fos and ha-ras oncogenes and ornithine decarboxylase activi... 21164504 - Differential contribution of dietary fat and monosaccharide to metabolic syndrome in th... 15962674 - Relationship between soluble leptin receptor, leptin, lipid profiles and anthropometric... 3676184 - The efficiency of energy utilization in growing cattle consuming fresh perennial ryegra... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2011-8-12 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Lipids in health and disease Volume: 10 ISSN: 1476-511X ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2011 Aug |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-8-12 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 101147696 Medline TA: Lipids Health Dis Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: 136 Citation Subset: - |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
| Full Text | |
|
Journal Information Journal ID (nlm-ta): Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Publisher: BioMed Central |
Article Information Download PDF ![]() Copyright ©2011 Chu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. open-access: Received Day: 22 Month: 6 Year: 2011 Accepted Day: 12 Month: 8 Year: 2011 collection publication date: Year: 2011 Electronic publication date: Day: 12 Month: 8 Year: 2011 Volume: 10First Page: 136 Last Page: 136 ID: 3180403 Publisher Id: 1476-511X-10-136 PubMed Id: 21835044 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-136 |
| Association between interleukin-6 receptor gene variations and atherosclerotic lipid profiles among young adolescents in Taiwan | |
| Nain-Feng Chu12 | Email: chuepi@ndmctsgh.edu.tw |
| Fu-Hung Lin2 | Email: noldling@ndmctsgh.edu.tw |
| Hsien-Chuan Chin2 | Email: ph4870193@yahoo.com.tw |
| Ye-Jen Hong3 | Email: metahung@yahoo.com |
|
1Department of Community Medicine, Shuang-Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, 235, Taiwan |
|
|
2School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, 114, Taiwan |
|
|
3Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, 114, Taiwan |
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine with important roles in both immunoregulation and non-immune events in a variety of cell types and tissues outside of the immune system [1]. IL-6 binds to the Interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), and together they activate the intracellular signaling cascade leading to the inflammatory response [2]. Also, IL-6 has been shown to inhibit lipoprotein lipase activity and stimulate lipolysis, which affects lipid profiles [3], which could contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic disease [4].
The IL-6R gene is located on human chromosome 1q21 [5], a region reported to be linked to dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes [6-8]. In particular, IL-6R rs8192284 A/C (Asp358Ala), in which the polymorphism is localized to a functional domain of the receptor protein [9], was found to correlate with plasma triglyceride levels [6,8].
However, to our knowledge, the relationship between genetic variation in the IL-6R gene and lipid profiles has been rarely investigated in the Asian population, especially among children or young adolescents. The purposes of this study were to examine possible associations between IL-6R polymorphisms (rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, rs8192284 A/C, and rs2229238 C/T) and atherosclerotic lipid profiles among young adolescents in Taiwan.
The Taipei Children Heart Study-II is an epidemiologic cross-sectional survey aimed at evaluating obesity and cardiovascular-related diseases risk factors among school children in Taipei during 2003. In order to obtain a representative distribution of demographic and lifestyle characteristics, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of junior high school students in Taipei. After a multistage sampling of 85 junior high schools, we randomly selected 1500 school children for this survey. The sampling method and results have been described elsewhere [10]. After considering the study power and excluding missing data, a total of 859 young adolescents (418 boys and 441 girls) with a mean age of 13.1 years (from 12 to 14) were included in the final analyses.
All of the participating young adolescents completed a structured questionnaire detailing their age, gender, puberty development and lifestyle characteristics including cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption. Research technicians measured body weight to an accuracy of 0.1 kg using a standard beam balance scale with subjects barefoot and wearing light indoor clothing. Body height was recorded to the nearest 0.5 cm using a ruler attached to the scale. Waist circumference (WC) was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at the level of the midpoint between the inferior margin of the last rib and the iliac crest. Hip circumference was measured at its widest point to the nearest 0.1 cm. Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis was applied to measure body fat percentage to an accuracy of 0.1 percent. The body mass index for each individual was calculated through body weight (kg) divided by the square of their height (m). The Ethical Committee of the Scientific Institute approved this study and informed consent was obtained from the parents and the young adolescents.
We measured serum total cholesterol (CHOL) using the esterase oxidase method [11], triglyceride (TG) using an enzymatic procedure [12], low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) using a multilayer analytical slide method [13], and high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) by an enzymatic method with magnesium precipitation using a Synchron CX5 analyzer (Beckman Instrument, Palo Alto, CA) [14]. We also calculated CHOL/HDL-C ratio, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, and TG/HDL-C ratio as atherosclerotic indexes. Abnormal lipid profile criteria and atherosclerotic index ratio were determined by age- and gender-specific 90th percentile (10th percentile for HDL-C) cut-off points.
The genotypes of IL-6R rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, rs8192284 A/C, and rs2229238 C/T were determined by TaqMan® assay [15]. Assay on demand TaqMan® assays were used for genotyping the SNPs. TaqMan® probes and Universal PCR Master Mix were obtained from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA). After amplification, allele specific fluorescence was measured on ABI PRISM® 7900 HT Sequence Detector Systems (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
The distributions of body height, weight, BMI, waist circumference, CHOL, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, CHOL/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and TG/HDL-C with gender specification were described by sample means and standard deviations (SD). The studied children were categorized into subgroups based on their IL-6R genotypes with gender specification.
The differences in lipid profiles across IL-6R genotypes were analyzed by the general linear model (GLM). To determine if IL-6R SNPs are predictors of lipid profiles, a multivariate regression model was applied to assess the association between IL-6R SNPs and these profiles after adjusting for age, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking and puberty development.
The SNPs were assessed to see if they were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the ALLELE procedure in SAS/GENETICS release 8.2. We used Haploview software to construct haplotype blocks constituted by "strong LD" markers [16]. The haplotype association analyses were performed by using the HAPLOTYPE procedure in SAS/GENETICS release 8.2. A two-tailed p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
All statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical package SAS (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA).
The genotype and allele frequencies of IL-6R gene polymorphisms are shown in Table 1. The frequencies of IL-6R rs4845617 G/A genotypes GG, GA and AA were 29.4, 47.6, and 23.0% for boys and 29.5, 47.8, and 22.7% for girls, respectively. The frequencies of IL-6R rs4845623 A/G genotypes AA, AG and GG were 69.4, 27.7, and 2.9% for boys and 71.2, 26.1, and 2.7% for girls, respectively. The frequencies of IL-6R rs8192284 A/C genotypes AA, AC and CC were 38.5, 48.3, and 13.2% for boys and 33.5, 49.0, and 17.5% for girls, respectively. The frequencies of IL-6R rs2229238 C/T polymorphisms CC, CT and TT were 40.4, 45.9 and 13.7% for boys and 35.4, 45.8 and 18.8% for girls, respectively. There was no significant difference in genotype distribution between boys and girls at these four polymorphisms, and all of them were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. IL-6R rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T each exhibited (marginal) statistically significant differences in allele frequency with gender (rs8192284 C allele, boys vs. girls = 37.3% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.05; rs2229238 T allele, boys vs. girls = 36.6% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.03, respectively).
Table 2 shows the relationship between IL-6R genotypes and lipid profiles of young adolescents with gender specification. Those are wild-type carriers of IL-6R SNPs had higher TG levels when compared with boys carrying the minor genotype (for all IL-6R SNPs p = 0.07, marginal significance, with the exception of rs4845623 A/G). In contrast, girls that are minor allele carriers for rs4845623 A/G had higher HDL-C, and girls that are minor allele carriers for rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 had higher CHOL/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C than those with wild-type genotypes (all p < 0.05).
The logistic regression analyses of IL-6R genotypes on the risk of abnormal lipid profiles and atherosclerotic indexes in young adolescents after adjusting for age, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and puberty status are shown in Table 3. We found significant association of rs4845617 G/A, rs8192284 A/C, and rs2229238 C/T variants with high TG in girls (additive model, OR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.06-2.37; OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 1.05-2.37; OR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.04-2.29, respectively). In addition, the minor alleles of IL-6R rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T were associated with low HDL-C (additive model, OR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.03-2.39; OR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.12-2.52, respectively) and high CHOL/HDL-C (additive model, OR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.08-2.61; OR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.18-2.79, respectively). The minor allele carriers of rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T had a greater risk of high TG (OR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.10-4.44; OR = 2.14, 95%CI: 1.09-4.20, respectively), low HDL-C (OR = 1.98, 95%CI: 0.99-4.00; OR = 2.16, 95%CI: 1.07-4.35, respectively), and high CHOL/HDL-C (OR = 3.17, 95%CI: 1.37-7.30; OR = 3.47, 95%CI: 1.51-8.00, respectively) than wild-type girls in recessive model analyses. However, lipid status in boys was not significantly associated with IL-6R polymorphisms.
Table 4 shows the haplotype frequencies of the IL-6R gene and their association with abnormal lipid profiles and atherosclerotic indexes. We inferred the haplotypes from the polymorphisms within the linkage disequilibrium block (including IL-6R rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, rs8192284 A/C, and rs2229238 C/T). Because rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T were almost in linkage disequilibrium (r2>0.9), only rs2229238 C/T was kept in the haplotype inference, together with the other two SNPs (rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G) in this linkage disequilibrium block (Figure 1.). Five common haplotypes (frequency >5%) were identified (H1: GAC, H2: GAT, H3: GGC, H4: AAC, H5: AAT) with the three SNPs (rs4845617 G/A - rs4845623 A/G - rs2229238 C/T). Haplotype H5 had a significant risk of high TG, low HDL-C, high CHOL/HDL-C, and abnormal lipid levels (high TG or low HDL-C) when compared with the haplotype H1 in girls (OR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.07-8.87; OR = 3.30, 95%CI: 1.11-9.85; OR = 4.40, 95%CI: 1.35-14.32; and OR = 3.22, 95%CI: 1.34-7.76, respectively). However, there was still no significant association of abnormal lipid profiles with IL-6R haplotypes in boys.
In this study, the minor allele of IL-6R rs8192284 A/C and IL-6R rs2229238 C/T variants were associated with a higher risk of abnormal lipid profiles in girls. The girls with the AAT haplotype of the IL-6R gene (rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, and rs2229238 C/T) had significant risk of high TG, low HDL-C, high CHOL/HDL-C, and abnormal lipid levels (high TG or low HDL-C). However, there was almost no statistical association between IL-6R variants and lipid profiles in boys.
IL-6 binds to its receptor (IL-6R), and together they activate the intracellular signaling cascade leading to the inflammatory response [17]. Previous studies have reported that IL-6 is associated with lipid metabolism [3,18]. It is involved in production of TG, decreases lipoprotein lipase activity and monomeric lipoprotein lipase in plasma, which contributes to increased macrophage uptake of lipids. In atheromatous plaques and fatty streaks, smooth muscle cells and macrophage foam cells express IL-6, may be an important role for this cytokine in the progression of atherosclerosis [4]. Some studies have indicated that elevated TG may correlate with IL-6R gene polymorphisms [6,8]. Our data reveals that there is a borderline association of the major allele (the A allele) of IL-6R rs8192284 A/C and increased TG levels in boys, which is similar to other findings [6,8]. In contrast, the minor alleles of the IL-6R SNPs were related to high dyslipidemia risk in girls. The relationship between IL-6R rs8192284 A/C variants and high TG risk was inconsistent with previous findings [6,8]. In Spain, a study of middle-aged Caucasians indicated that carriers of the A allele of the IL-6R rs8192284 A/C polymorphism had higher plasma TG levels than those with the CC genotype [6]. In the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study-Cardiovascular Disease (GBCS-CVD) sub-cohort study, the A allele of IL-6R rs8192284 A/C also was associated with increased TG levels among aged Chinese [8].
The possible reasons for inconsistent results in girls are as follows. First, there is strong evidence that IL-6 levels increase with age [19], and some studies have evaluated alterations in the frequency of IL-6 SNPs with age [20,21]. Moreover, IL-6 and insulin action have had conflicting results in different tissues (organs), such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and liver [22]. IL-6 and lipid metabolism might potentially contribute to different adipose or skeletal muscle distribution in children and adults. Our study was focused on children, so the subjects were younger than in the Spanish and GBCS-CVD studies (mean ages 43.3 and 59.4 years, respectively). We suggest that differences in the frequencies of genotypes or alleles may, in part, be responsible for the discrepancies in the results of these studies, but that age differences between the populations should also be taken into consideration. Secondly, previous studies have shown that there are gender differences in IL-6 production [23], therefore IL-6 or IL-6R polymorphisms modifying IL-6 levels might potentially contribute to sex disparity. In IL-6 polymorphisms, females with the CC genotype of IL-6 -174 G/C have an earlier onset of type 1 diabetes when compared with IL-6 -174G allele females and all males [24]. Of studies focused on IL-6R polymorphisms, some have analyzed females (in relation to IL-6 levels, CRP levels, bone mineral density, obesity, hyperandrogenism, preterm birth, type 2 diabetes, and melanoma) [25-32], and another concentrated on males (studying the relationship between IL-6R polymorphisms and obesity) [33]. Most analyses of IL-6R SNPs have not investigated (or at least have not reported) gender differences. We found that there was no gender difference in IL-6R rs8192284 A/C genotype frequency distribution, but that there was a borderline significant disparity in allele frequency distribution, which is similar to recent studies [33,34]. In addition, previous studies have found that estrogen modulation and the inherently greater amount of adipose tissue in females relative to males may be responsible for the observed differences in IL-6 production [35]. Our data show that a relationship between IL-6R SNPs and lipid status is almost only observed in girls, for both genotype and haplotype analyses. The IL-6R genotype or allele distribution of different genders may be responsible for these results. The gender-specific role of IL-6R SNPs in the pathology of dyslipidemia should be further investigated.
Haplotypes are more likely than single polymorphisms to identify disease associations because they reflect complete gene structure. IL-6R rs8192284 A/C is a well-known functional polymorphism in exon 9 of the IL-6R gene which results in an amino acid substitution (Asp358Ala) [36]. After calculations using Haploview software, we determined that rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T were almost in LD (LD = 0.97, r2 = 0.91). The LD was similar to that calculated for rs2228145 G/T (corresponding to Asp358Ala substitution) and rs2229238 C/T in a Pima Indian study (LD = 0.98, r2 = 0.78) [37]. Using Haploview, we picked rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, and rs2229238 C/T for haplotype analysis. We found that carriers of the AAT haplotype had a significantly greater risk of dyslipidemia than carriers of the major allele haplotype (GAC). The results indicate that haplotype analysis can indicate a higher dyslipidemia risk than single polymorphism analysis. The haplotype effects within the IL-6R SNPs might explain the discrepancies between our results and previous studies, which examined SNPs separately. Further studies might explore how IL-6R haplotype influences lipid profiles.
Several limitations of our study should be noted. First, we did not control the potential confounders of food intake and physical activity. These factors correlate with plasma lipids and IL-6 levels [38], so that may affect IL-6R gene expression and disturb the regulation of IL-6 and lipid metabolism. In an adult population, a similar study of IL-6R SNPs and lipid profiles may yield biased or confounded results if subjects are on a special diet, exercise, or are being treated for lipid-related disorders, which may also alter lipid levels. However, children of these age groups are rarely on special diets, exercise, or treatment regimens for dyslipidemia. Secondly, the measurement errors in assessing the biological variables of lipid profiles are likely to be minimal. Any error is likely to be random and only attenuate our results. Thirdly, the sample size limits the statistical power of this study. We may not confirm absolutely which SNP is the real functional variant, nor rule out the possibility of minor variants within our SNPs. Moreover, we did not detect serum levels of IL-6 to investigate the relationship between the IL-6R SNPs and the serum level of IL-6. We could not observe a direct association between the IL-6 levels and lipid profiles for IL-6R variants. In the future, may be worth investigating possible associations between IL-6R SNPs and serum levels of IL-6 or sIL-6R in children.
The notable findings of our study were that the IL-6R rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, and 2229238 C/T polymorphic markers were chosen to construct the haplotype, which differed from that used in previous studies, and that they showed a significant association with lipid status. This is also the first study to investigate the relationship between IL-6R SNPs and lipid profiles in young adolescents. Many biological processes and different tissues contribute to circulating IL-6 levels. If the IL-6R gene polymorphisms relate to IL-6 and lipid metabolism, they could be used as stable biological markers to detect lipid-related disorders and be very helpful for the prevention of these diseases.
In summary, IL-6R rs8192284 A/C and rs2229238 C/T variants associated with dyslipidemia were presented among young adolescents, especially in girls, in Taiwan. The AAT haplotype of IL-6R gene SNPs rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, and rs2229238 C/T may play an important role in the pathogenesis of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis in girls. Further mechanistic studies are warranted to explore how IL-6R SNPs exert their effect on lipid metabolism. This information may suggest ways of tailoring strategies for the prevention of dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis according to the genetic make-up of each individual patient.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
NFC carried out the design, coordination and conduction of the study, participated in the data collection and analysis, participated in drafted the manuscript. FHL performed the data collection, statistical analyses, and participated in drafted the manuscript. HCC participated in the data collection, SNP analysis and statistical analysis. YJH carried out the design and coordination of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
References
| Ishihara K,Hirano T,IL-6 in autoimmune disease and chronic inflammatory proliferative diseaseCytokine Growth Factor RevYear: 2002134-535736810.1016/S1359-6101(02)00027-812220549 | |
| Boulanger MJ,Chow DC,Brevnova EE,et al. Hexameric structure and assembly of the interleukin-6/IL-6 alpha-receptor/gp130 complexScienceYear: 200330056282101210410.1126/science.108390112829785 | |
| van Hall G,Steensberg A,Sacchetti M,et al. Interleukin-6 stimulates lipolysis and fat oxidation in humansJ Clin Endocrinol MetabYear: 20038873005301010.1210/jc.2002-02168712843134 | |
| Yudkin JS,Kumari M,Humphries SE,et al. Inflammation, obesity, stress and coronary heart disease: is interleukin-6 the link?AtherosclerosisYear: 2000148220921410.1016/S0021-9150(99)00463-310657556 | |
| Kluck PM,Wiegant J,Jansen RP,et al. The human interleukin-6 receptor alpha chain gene is localized on chromosome 1 band q21Hum GenetYear: 19939055425448428753 | |
| Esteve E,Villuendas G,Mallolas J,et al. Polymorphisms in the interleukin-6 receptor gene are associated with body mass index and with characteristics of the metabolic syndromeClin Endocrinol (Oxf)Year: 2006651889110.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02553.x | |
| Hamid YH,Urhammer SA,Jensen DP,et al. Variation in the interleukin-6 receptor gene associates with type 2 diabetes in Danish whitesDiabetesYear: 200453123342334510.2337/diabetes.53.12.334215561970 | |
| Jiang CQ,Lam TH,Liu B,et al. Interleukin-6 receptor gene polymorphism modulates interleukin-6 levels and the metabolic syndrome: GBCS-CVDObesity (Silver Spring)Year: 201018101969197410.1038/oby.2010.31 | |
| Mullberg J,Oberthur W,Lottspeich F,et al. The soluble human IL-6 receptor. Mutational characterization of the proteolytic cleavage siteJ ImmunolYear: 199415210495849688176214 | |
| Chu NF,Rimm EB,Wang DJ,et al. Relationship between anthropometric variables and lipid levels among school children: The Taipei Children Heart StudyInt J Obes Relat Metab DisordYear: 1998221667210.1038/sj.ijo.08005469481602 | |
| Richmond W,Preparation and properties of a cholesterol oxidase from Nocardia sp. and its application to the enzymatic assay of total cholesterol in serumClin ChemYear: 19731912135013564757363 | |
| Stavropoulos WS,Crouch RD,New colorimetric procedure for the determination of serum triglyceridesClini ChemYear: 197420857 | |
| Spayd RW,Bruschi B,Burdick BA,et al. Multilayer film elements for clinical analysis: applications to representative chemical determinationsClin ChemYear: 197824813431350567106 | |
| Warnick GR,Benderson J,Albers JJ,Dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation procedure for quantitation of high-density-lipoprotein cholesterolClin ChemYear: 1982286137913887074948 | |
| Holland PM,Abramson RD,Watson R,et al. Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5'----3' exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymeraseProc Natl Acad Sci USAYear: 199188167276728010.1073/pnas.88.16.72761871133 | |
| Gabriel SB,Schaffner SF,Nguyen H,et al. The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genomeScienceYear: 200229655762225222910.1126/science.106942412029063 | |
| Heinrich PC,Behrmann I,Haan S,et al. Principles of interleukin (IL)-6-type cytokine signalling and its regulationBiochem JYear: 2003374Pt 112012773095 | |
| Pedersen BK,Febbraio M,Muscle-derived interleukin-6--a possible link between skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, liver, and brainBrain Behav ImmunYear: 200519537137610.1016/j.bbi.2005.04.00815935612 | |
| Ferrucci L,Corsi A,Lauretani F,et al. The origins of age-related proinflammatory stateBloodYear: 200510562294229910.1182/blood-2004-07-259915572589 | |
| Bonafe M,Olivieri F,Cavallone L,et al. A gender--dependent genetic predisposition to produce high levels of IL-6 is detrimental for longevityEur J ImmunolYear: 20013182357236110.1002/1521-4141(200108)31:8<2357::AID-IMMU2357>3.0.CO;2-X11500818 | |
| Christiansen L,Bathum L,Andersen-Ranberg K,et al. Modest implication of interleukin-6 promoter polymorphisms in longevityMech Ageing DevYear: 2004125539139510.1016/j.mad.2004.03.00415130757 | |
| Glund S,Krook A,Role of interleukin-6 signalling in glucose and lipid metabolismActa Physiol (Oxf)Year: 200819213748 | |
| O'Connor MF,Motivala SJ,Valladares EM,et al. Sex differences in monocyte expression of IL-6: role of autonomic mechanismsAm J Physiol Regul Integr Comp PhysiolYear: 20072931R14515110.1152/ajpregu.00752.200617428894 | |
| Kristiansen OP,Nolsoe RL,Larsen L,et al. Association of a functional 17beta-estradiol sensitive IL6-174G/C promoter polymorphism with early-onset type 1 diabetes in femalesHum Mol GenetYear: 200312101101111010.1093/hmg/ddg13212719374 | |
| Bustamante M,Nogues X,Mellibovsky L,et al. Polymorphisms in the interleukin-6 receptor gene are associated with bone mineral density and body mass index in Spanish postmenopausal womenEur J EndocrinolYear: 2007157567768410.1530/EJE-07-038917984249 | |
| Qi L,Rifai N,Hu FB,Interleukin-6 receptor gene variations, plasma interleukin-6 levels, and type 2 diabetes in U.S WomenDiabetesYear: 200756123075308110.2337/db07-050517898129 | |
| Qi L,Rifai N,Hu FB,Interleukin-6 receptor gene, plasma C-reactive protein, and diabetes risk in womenDiabetesYear: 200958127527810.2337/db08-096818852330 | |
| Escobar-Morreale HF,Calvo RM,Villuendas G,et al. Association of polymorphisms in the interleukin 6 receptor complex with obesity and hyperandrogenismObes ResYear: 200311898799610.1038/oby.2003.13612917504 | |
| Menon R,Velez DR,Simhan H,et al. Multilocus interactions at maternal tumor necrosis factor-alpha, tumor necrosis factor receptors, interleukin-6 and interleukin-6 receptor genes predict spontaneous preterm labor in European-American womenAm J Obstet GynecolYear: 200619461616162410.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.05916731080 | |
| Velez DR,Fortunato SJ,Williams SM,et al. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and receptor (IL6-R) gene haplotypes associate with amniotic fluid protein concentrations in preterm birthHum Mol GenetYear: 200817111619163010.1093/hmg/ddn04918276608 | |
| Velez DR,Menon R,Thorsen P,et al. Ethnic differences in interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL6 receptor genes in spontaneous preterm birth and effects on amniotic fluid protein levelsAnn Hum GenetYear: 200771Pt 558660017346257 | |
| Gu F,Qureshi AA,Niu T,et al. Interleukin and interleukin receptor gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to melanomaMelanoma ResYear: 200818533033510.1097/CMR.0b013e32830658b218781131 | |
| Song Y,Miyaki K,Araki J,et al. The interaction between the interleukin 6 receptor gene genotype and dietary energy intake on abdominal obesity in Japanese menMetabolismYear: 200756792593010.1016/j.metabol.2007.02.00617570254 | |
| Dema B,Martinez A,Fernandez-Arquero M,et al. The IL6-174G/C polymorphism is associated with celiac disease susceptibility in girlsHum ImmunolYear: 200970319119410.1016/j.humimm.2009.01.01019280716 | |
| Alpizar E,Spicer LJ,Effects of interleukin-6 on proliferation and follicle-stimulating hormone-induced estradiol production by bovine granulosa cells in vitro: dependence on size of follicleBiol ReprodYear: 1994501384310.1095/biolreprod50.1.388312448 | |
| Kristiansen OP,Mandrup-Poulsen T,Interleukin-6 and diabetes: the good, the bad, or the indifferent?DiabetesYear: 200554Suppl 2S11412416306329 | |
| Wolford JK,Colligan PB,Gruber JD,et al. Variants in the interleukin 6 receptor gene are associated with obesity in Pima IndiansMol Genet MetabYear: 200380333834310.1016/j.ymgme.2003.07.00314680981 | |
| You T,Berman DM,Ryan AS,et al. Effects of hypocaloric diet and exercise training on inflammation and adipocyte lipolysis in obese postmenopausal womenJ Clin Endocrinol MetabYear: 20048941739174610.1210/jc.2003-03131015070939 |
Figures
|
[Figure ID: F1] |
Figure 1
Haploview linkage disequilibrium (D') display the haplotype structures of IL-6R genes. Darker shading of cells indicates stronger LD between single nucleotide polymorphisms. |
Tables
The genotypes and alleles frequencies of IL-6R gene polymorphisms among young adolescents in Taiwan
| Boys (n = 418) | Girls (n = 441) | χ2 test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||
| n | % | n | % | p value | |
| rs4845617 G/A | |||||
| Genotype | |||||
| GG | 123 | 29.4 | 130 | 29.5 | 0.99 |
| GA | 199 | 47.6 | 211 | 47.8 | |
| AA | 96 | 23.0 | 100 | 22.7 | |
| Allele | |||||
| G | 445 | 53.2 | 471 | 53.4 | 0.94 |
| A | 391 | 46.8 | 411 | 46.6 | |
| rs4845623 A/G | |||||
| Genotype | |||||
| AA | 290 | 69.4 | 314 | 71.2 | 0.84 |
| AG | 116 | 27.7 | 115 | 26.1 | |
| GG | 12 | 2.9 | 12 | 2.7 | |
| Allele | |||||
| A | 696 | 83.2 | 743 | 84.2 | 0.58 |
| G | 140 | 16.8 | 139 | 15.8 | |
| rs8192284 A/C | |||||
| Genotype | |||||
| AA | 161 | 38.5 | 148 | 33.5 | 0.13 |
| AC | 202 | 48.3 | 216 | 49.0 | |
| CC | 55 | 13.2 | 77 | 17.5 | |
| Allele | |||||
| A | 524 | 62.7 | 512 | 58.0 | 0.05 |
| C | 312 | 37.3 | 370 | 42.0 | |
| rs2229238 C/T | |||||
| Genotype | |||||
| CC | 169 | 40.4 | 156 | 35.4 | 0.08 |
| CT | 192 | 45.9 | 202 | 45.8 | |
| TT | 57 | 13.7 | 83 | 18.8 | |
| Allele | |||||
| C | 530 | 63.4 | 514 | 58.3 | 0.03 |
| T | 306 | 36.6 | 368 | 41.7 | |
The lipid profiles among young adolescents with different IL-6R genotypes
| Wild-type | Heterozygotes | Minor-type | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||
| mean ± s.d. | mean ± s.d. | mean ± s.d. | pa | ||
| Boys (n = 418) | |||||
| rs4845617 G/A | GG (n = 123) | GA (n = 199) | AA (n = 96) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 158.7 ± 25.9 | 161.4 ± 28.4 | 156.7 ± 25.4 | 0.71 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 70.1 ± 29.9 | 70.2 ± 34.4 | 63.5 ± 31.3 | 0.07 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 49.0 ± 11.0 | 50.7 ± 11.7 | 48.8 ± 12.0 | 0.95 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 80.5 ± 18.2 | 81.7 ± 19.6 | 80.6 ± 19.7 | 0.84 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.38 ± 0.84 | 3.32 ± 0.85 | 3.39 ± 1.01 | 0.85 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.73 ± 0.57 | 1.70 ± 0.95 | 1.77 ± 0.69 | 0.89 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.57 ± 0.94 | 1.52 ± 1.02 | 1.47 ± 1.08 | 0.18 | |
| rs4845623 A/G | AA (n = 290) | AG (n = 116) | GG (n = 12) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 160.0 ± 27.2 | 158.8 ± 26.8 | 155.3 ± 26.0 | 0.51 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 68.0 ± 32.0 | 71.1 ± 33.8 | 59.3 ± 30.1 | 0.87 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 49.7 ± 11.6 | 49.3 ± 11.4 | 56.7 ± 11.3 | 0.44 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 81.8 ± 19.2 | 80.4 ± 19.4 | 72.0 ± 16.5 | 0.12 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.36 ± 0.86 | 3.38 ± 0.96 | 2.80 ± 0.48 | 0.24 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.74 ± 0.59 | 1.73 ± 0.65 | 1.31 ± 0.36 | 0.09 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.51 ± 0.98 | 1.61 ± 1.11 | 1.05 ± 0.46 | 0.84 | |
| rs8192284 A/C | AA (n = 161) | AC (n = 202) | CC (n = 55) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 158.8 ± 28.6 | 159.6 ± 26.0 | 161.3 ± 25.9 | 0.64 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 69.9 ± 33.5 | 70.3 ± 33.8 | 58.7 ± 21.2 | 0.07 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 48.9 ± 10.6 | 50.2 ± 12.5 | 50.6 ± 10.7 | 0.22 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 80.4 ± 20.2 | 80.9 ± 18.7 | 83.9 ± 18.2 | 0.37 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.38 ± 0.89 | 3.35 ± 0.93 | 3.28 ± 0.71 | 0.46 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.73 ± 0.60 | 1.73 ± 0.64 | 1.72 ± 0.51 | 0.93 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.57 ± 1.05 | 1.56 ± 1.05 | 1.24 ± 0.62 | 0.06 | |
| rs2229238 C/T | CC (n = 169) | CT (n = 192) | TT (n = 57) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 158.3 ± 28.9 | 160.0 ± 25.7 | 161.2 ± 25.6 | 0.51 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 70.2 ± 33.3 | 70.0 ± 34.1 | 59.5 ± 21.5 | 0.07 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 49.3 ± 10.9 | 50.1 ± 12.3 | 50.1 ± 11.0 | 0.49 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 79.7 ± 20.7 | 81.5 ± 18.1 | 84.0 ± 18.4 | 0.17 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.35 ± 0.90 | 3.36 ± 0.91 | 3.33 ± 0.78 | 0.96 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.71 ± 0.61 | 1.74 ± 0.62 | 1.75 ± 0.57 | 0.47 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.57 ± 1.04 | 1.56 ± 1.06 | 1.27 ± 0.63 | 0.09 | |
|
|
|||||
| Girls (n = 441) | |||||
| rs4845617 G/A | GG (n = 130) | GA (n = 211) | AA (n = 100) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 167.1 ± 26.0 | 168.7 ± 28.5 | 169.8 ± 28.2 | 0.47 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 66.8 ± 27.0 | 69.6 ± 31.0 | 74.0 ± 32.1 | 0.11 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 51.7 ± 11.2 | 52.5 ± 12.2 | 49.9 ± 10.3 | 0.31 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 85.3 ± 18.3 | 86.7 ± 21.0 | 87.4 ± 20.6 | 0.44 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.33 ± 0.70 | 3.36 ± 0.89 | 3.52 ± 0.80 | 0.16 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.72 ± 0.50 | 1.74 ± 0.60 | 1.82 ± 0.55 | 0.26 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.37 ± 0.72 | 1.47 ± 1.01 | 1.59 ± 0.96 | 0.09 | |
| rs4845623 A/G | AA (n = 314) | AG (n = 115) | GG (n = 12) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 167.3 ± 27.9 | 170.5 ± 27.3 | 178.4 ± 23.7 | 0.17 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 71.1 ± 31.7 | 67.5 ± 26.8 | 58.4 ± 15.3 | 0.24 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 50.7 ± 11.0 | 54.2 ± 12.8 | 51.7 ± 10.0 | 0.04 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 86.0 ± 20.7 | 86.8 ± 18.9 | 93.1 ± 14.2 | 0.44 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.43 ± 0.85 | 3.27 ± 0.73 | 3.54 ± 0.63 | 0.37 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.78 ± 0.58 | 1.68 ± 0.51 | 1.87 ± 0.46 | 0.52 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.53 ± 1.01 | 1.34 ± 0.66 | 1.17 ± 0.40 | 0.07 | |
| rs8192284 A/C | AA (n = 148) | AC (n = 216) | CC (n = 77) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 166.8 ± 26.9 | 168.6 ± 27.6 | 171.4 ± 29.3 | 0.21 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 66.6 ± 24.8 | 70.5 ± 30.3 | 73.9 ± 38.0 | 0.24 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 52.8 ± 11.7 | 51.6 ± 11.8 | 49.8 ± 10.2 | 0.09 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 84.7 ± 18.7 | 86.7 ± 20.9 | 89.2 ± 20.3 | 0.11 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.26 ± 0.66 | 3.42 ± 0.90 | 3.56 ± 0.84 | 0.01 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.67 ± 0.48 | 1.77 ± 0.61 | 1.86 ± 0.54 | 0.02 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.34 ± 0.61 | 1.51 ± 0.99 | 1.62 ± 1.18 | 0.10 | |
| rs2229238 C/T | CC (n = 156) | CT (n = 202) | TT (n = 83) | ||
| CHOL (mg/dl) | 166.7 ± 27.2 | 168.6 ± 27.0 | 171.5 ± 30.2 | 0.17 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 66.3 ± 24.6 | 70.9 ± 30.9 | 73.6 ± 36.9 | 0.16 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 52.9 ± 11.9 | 51.5 ± 11.7 | 49.8 ± 10.4 | 0.07 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 84.5 ± 18.9 | 86.7 ± 20.8 | 89.2 ± 20.5 | 0.08 | |
| CHOL/HDL-C | 3.25 ± 0.66 | 3.43 ± 0.90 | 3.56 ± 0.84 | 0.008 | |
| LDL-C/HDL-C | 1.66 ± 0.48 | 1.78 ± 0.61 | 1.86 ± 0.54 | 0.01 | |
| TG/HDL-C | 1.33 ± 0.61 | 1.52 ± 1.01 | 1.61 ± 1.15 | 0.06 | |
Abbreviation: CHOL, Cholesterol; TG, Triglycerides; HDL-C, High density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol.
a Using GLM test after adjusting for age, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and puberty status.
Logistic regression analyses of different IL-6R genotypes on lipid status among young adolescents a
| Model type | rs4845617 G/A | rs4845623 A/G | rs8192284 A/C | rs2229238 C/T | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
| OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | OR | 95%CI | ||
| Boys | |||||||||
| High CHOL | additive | 0.91 | 0.55-1.50 | 1.10 | 0.58-2.06 | 0.90 | 0.53-1.52 | 0.81 | 0.48-1.36 |
| dominant | 0.74 | 0.29-1.86 | 0.77 | 0.09-6.39 | 1.36 | 0.53-3.50 | 1.32 | 0.51-3.38 | |
| recessive | 1.01 | 0.46-2.19 | 1.18 | 0.56-2.47 | 0.70 | 0.35-1.42 | 0.58 | 0.29-1.17 | |
| High TG | additive | 0.92 | 0.61-1.40 | 1.45 | 0.85-2.46 | 0.85 | 0.54-1.34 | 0.81 | 0.51-1.27 |
| dominant | 0.95 | 0.46-1.97 | 1.56 | 0.32-7.50 | 0.39 | 0.12-1.32 | 0.38 | 0.11-1.26 | |
| recessive | 0.86 | 0.45-1.63 | 1.55 | 0.83-2.91 | 1.04 | 0.56-1.94 | 0.95 | 0.52-1.75 | |
| High HDL-C | additive | 1.02 | 0.70-1.49 | 0.98 | 0.58-1.64 | 0.78 | 0.51-1.18 | 0.84 | 0.56-1.27 |
| dominant | 1.35 | 0.72-2.52 | 0.51 | 0.06-4.04 | 0.68 | 0.28-1.68 | 0.79 | 0.34-1.85 | |
| recessive | 0.81 | 0.45-1.45 | 1.04 | 0.58-1.89 | 0.74 | 0.43-1.28 | 0.81 | 0.46-1.40 | |
| High LDL-C | additive | 0.78 | 0.49-1.26 | 0.81 | 0.42-1.57 | 0.83 | 0.50-1.39 | 0.81 | 0.49-1.34 |
| dominant | 0.94 | 0.41-2.15 | - | - | 1.22 | 0.48-3.09 | 1.18 | 0.46-2.97 | |
| recessive | 0.60 | 0.30-1.21 | 0.90 | 0.43-1.90 | 0.65 | 0.33-1.27 | 0.62 | 0.32-1.22 | |
| High CHOL/HDL-C | additive | 1.24 | 0.79-1.93 | 0.74 | 0.38-1.43 | 0.70 | 0.43-1.16 | 0.78 | 0.48-1.27 |
| dominant | 1.39 | 0.67-2.89 | - | - | 0.30 | 0.07-1.26 | 0.45 | 0.13-1.51 | |
| recessive | 1.28 | 0.61-2.66 | 0.81 | 0.39-1.67 | 0.79 | 0.41-1.51 | 0.86 | 0.45-1.64 | |
| Girls | |||||||||
| High CHOL | additive | 1.23 | 0.79-1.93 | 0.96 | 0.51-1.79 | 1.13 | 0.71-1.80 | 1.20 | 0.77-1.88 |
| dominant | 1.15 | 0.55-2.43 | 1.78 | 0.36-8.79 | 1.51 | 0.70-3.27 | 1.60 | 0.76-3.38 | |
| recessive | 1.55 | 0.71-3.36 | 0.85 | 0.41-1.78 | 0.97 | 0.49-1.92 | 1.07 | 0.54-2.12 | |
| High TG | additive | 1.59 | 1.06-2.37 | 0.57 | 0.30-1.09 | 1.58 | 1.05-2.37 | 1.55 | 1.04-2.29 |
| dominant | 1.77 | 0.95-3.28 | - | - | 1.53 | 0.77-3.02 | 1.54 | 0.79-2.99 | |
| recessive | 2.00 | 0.97-4.11 | 0.59 | 0.29-1.19 | 2.21 | 1.10-4.44 | 2.14 | 1.09-4.20 | |
| High HDL-C | additive | 1.24 | 0.83-1.86 | 0.76 | 0.41-1.41 | 1.57 | 1.03-2.39 | 1.68 | 1.12-2.52 |
| dominant | 1.24 | 0.64-2.41 | 0.73 | 0.09-5.94 | 1.67 | 0.84-3.32 | 1.90 | 0.98-3.67 | |
| recessive | 1.46 | 0.74-2.92 | 0.74 | 0.37-1.46 | 1.98 | 0.99-4.00 | 2.16 | 1.07-4.35 | |
| High LDL-C | additive | 1.08 | 0.70-1.65 | 1.01 | 0.56-1.82 | 1.10 | 0.71-1.71 | 1.22 | 0.80-1.86 |
| dominant | 0.87 | 0.41-1.84 | 0.75 | 0.09-6.08 | 0.77 | 0.33-1.82 | 0.99 | 0.45-2.16 | |
| recessive | 1.38 | 0.68-2.83 | 1.05 | 0.53-2.05 | 1.48 | 0.74-2.96 | 1.63 | 0.81-3.25 | |
| High CHOL/HDL-C | additive | 1.27 | 0.83-1.94 | 0.70 | 0.37-1.36 | 1.68 | 1.08-2.61 | 1.82 | 1.18-2.79 |
| dominant | 1.38 | 0.69-2.75 | 1.75 | 0.36-8.56 | 1.35 | 0.64-2.86 | 1.61 | 0.79-3.27 | |
| recessive | 1.38 | 0.68-2.82 | 0.57 | 0.27-1.22 | 3.17 | 1.37-7.30 | 3.47 | 1.51-8.00 | |
Abbreviation: CHOL, Cholesterol; TG, Triglycerides; HDL-C, High density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol.
additive model: major-homozygotes v.s. heterozygotes v.s. minor-homozygotes, reference group: major-homozygotes.
dominant model: major-homozygotes/heterozygotes v.s. minor-homozygotes, reference group: major-homozygotes/heterozygotes.
recessive model: major-homozygotes v.s. heterozygotes/minor-homozygotes; reference group: major-homozygotes.
a All abnormal variables defined as age- and gender-specific 90th percentile cut-off point of study variables and OR was adjusted for age, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking, and puberty status.
Haplotype frequencies of IL-6R gene and associated with lipid status among young adolescents a
| Haplotypeb | Abnormal | Normal | OR | 95%CI | p | Global p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||
| HF | HF | ||||||
| Boys | |||||||
| High TG | H1 | 0.35 | 0.33 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.75 |
| H2 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.49 | 0.08-2.84 | 0.43 | ||
| H3 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 1.27 | 0.27-5.91 | 0.76 | ||
| H4 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.15-2.98 | 0.61 | ||
| H5 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.61 | 0.20-1.90 | 0.39 | ||
| Low HDL-C | H1 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.29 |
| H2 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.31 | 0.06-1.60 | 0.16 | ||
| H3 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.04-1.18 | 0.08 | ||
| H4 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.47 | 0.13-1.78 | 0.27 | ||
| H5 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.18-1.38 | 0.18 | ||
| Abnormal lipidc | H1 | 0.36 | 0.32 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.84 |
| H2 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.64 | 0.17-2.41 | 0.51 | ||
| H3 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.55 | 0.14-2.10 | 0.38 | ||
| H4 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.68 | 0.21-2.18 | 0.51 | ||
| H5 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.64 | 0.26-1.57 | 0.33 | ||
| High CHOL/HDL-C | H1 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.19 |
| H2 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.03-2.29 | 0.23 | ||
| H3 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.02-1.45 | 0.10 | ||
| H4 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 1.26 | 0.32-5.02 | 0.74 | ||
| H5 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.63 | 0.19-2.05 | 0.44 | ||
| Girls | |||||||
| High TG | H1 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.04 |
| H2 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 2.75 | 0.62-12.26 | 0.19 | ||
| H3 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.47 | 0.06-3.64 | 0.47 | ||
| H4 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 3.22 | 0.68-15.36 | 0.14 | ||
| H5 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 3.08 | 1.07-8.87 | 0.04 | ||
| Low HDL-C | H1 | 0.22 | 0.30 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.13 |
| H2 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 3.56 | 0.81-15.53 | 0.09 | ||
| H3 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 1.35 | 0.23-8.04 | 0.74 | ||
| H4 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 1.45 | 0.24-8.81 | 0.69 | ||
| H5 | 0.37 | 0.28 | 3.30 | 1.11-9.85 | 0.03 | ||
| Abnormal lipid | H1 | 0.22 | 0.31 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.03 |
| H2 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 2.93 | 0.85-10.03 | 0.09 | ||
| H3 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.91 | 0.20-4.07 | 0.90 | ||
| H4 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 2.57 | 0.67-9.85 | 0.17 | ||
| H5 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 3.22 | 1.34-7.76 | 0.009 | ||
| High CHOL/HDL-C | H1 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 1.00 | - | - | 0.08 |
| H2 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 4.66 | 0.97-22.38 | 0.05 | ||
| H3 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 2.05 | 0.32-13.28 | 0.45 | ||
| H4 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 1.97 | 0.29-13.46 | 0.49 | ||
| H5 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 4.40 | 1.35-14.32 | 0.01 |
Abbreviation: CHOL, Cholesterol; TG, Triglycerides; HDL-C, High density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; HF, Haplotype frequency
a All abnormal variables defined as age- and gender-specific 90th percentile cut-off point of study variables
b Five common haplotype frequencies of IL-6R rs4845617 G/A, rs4845623 A/G, and rs2229238 C/T (H1: GAC, H2: GAT, H3: GGC, H5: AAC, H6: AAT) at least 5% and H1 as reference group.
c Abnormal lipid includes high TG or low HDL-C
Article Categories:
Keywords: Interleukin-6 receptor gene, Polymorphism, Lipid profiles, Atherosclerotic indexes. |
|
Previous Document: Successful radiopeptide targeting of metastatic anaplastic meningioma: Case report.
Next Document: Does sleep aggravate tension-type headache?: An investigation using computerized ecological momentar...
