Document Detail

Assessment of guidelines for good practice in psychosocial care of mothers after stillbirth: a cohort study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12126820     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Most maternity units have good practice protocols, advising that after stillbirth parents should be encouraged to see and hold their dead infant. Our aim was to assess whether adherence to these protocols is associated with measurably beneficial effects on the psychological health of mother and next-born child. This study forms part of a wider case-control study of the psychological effects of stillbirth. METHODS: We identified 65 women in the pregnancy after stillbirth, and enrolled matched controls for 60 of them. Outcome measures included depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic-stress disorder (PTSD) in pregnancy and 1 year after the next birth, and disorganised attachment behaviour in the next-born infant. Comparison variables included seeing and holding the stillborn infant, having a funeral, and keeping mementoes. FINDINGS: Behaviours that promote contact with the stillborn infant were associated with worse outcome. Women who had held their stillborn infant were more depressed than those who only saw the infant, while those who did not see the infant were least likely to be depressed (13 of 33, 39%, vs three of 14, 21%, vs one of 17, 6%; p=0.03). Women who had seen their stillborn infant had greater anxiety (p=0.02) and higher symptoms of PTSD than those who had not (p=0.02), and their next-born infants were more likely to show disorganised attachment behaviour (18 of 43, 42%, vs one of 12, 8%, p=0 x 04). Having a funeral and keeping mementoes were not associated with further adverse outcomes, but small numbers limited interpretation. INTERPRETATION: Our findings do not support good-practice guidelines, which state that failure to see and hold the dead child could have adverse effects on parents' mourning.
P Hughes; P Turton; E Hopper; C D H Evans
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Lancet     Volume:  360     ISSN:  0140-6736     ISO Abbreviation:  Lancet     Publication Date:  2002 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-07-19     Completed Date:  2002-07-30     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985213R     Medline TA:  Lancet     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  114-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Department of Psychiatry, St George's Hospital Medical School, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Case-Control Studies
Cohort Studies
Fetal Death*
Practice Guidelines as Topic*
Psychosocial Deprivation
Comment In:
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1601; author reply 1601-2   [PMID:  12443621 ]
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1601; author reply 1601-2   [PMID:  12443620 ]
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1600-1; author reply 1601-2   [PMID:  12443618 ]
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1600; author reply 1601-2   [PMID:  12443617 ]
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1600; author reply 1601-2   [PMID:  12443616 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Aspirin and coumadin after acute coronary syndromes (the ASPECT-2 study): a randomised controlled tr...
Next Document:  Prognosis of HIV-1-infected patients starting highly active antiretroviral therapy: a collaborative ...