Document Detail


Assessing the quality of the peer review process: Author and editorial board member perspectives.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23021414     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Because peer review is central to the publication of rigorous research, periodic assessment of the process's effectiveness is clearly warranted.
METHODS: Two online surveys, one for authors (n = 102) and the other for Editorial Board members (n = 20), were conducted to assess their perspectives on the quality and timeliness of peer review. The χ(2) or Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences between authors and Board member responses.
RESULTS: Authors of accepted manuscripts were significantly more likely to rate the review as the same or better than other peer reviews they had received when compared with authors of rejected manuscripts (93.3% vs 47.4%, respectively, P = .001). In general, perceptions of review quality among Board members and authors were similar, but Board members were significantly more likely to rate reviewers as fair and unbiased (91.4% and 70%, respectively, P = .04). Approximately one-fourth (23.5%) of authors reported that length of time between manuscript submission and receipt of decision was 0 to 4 weeks, 38.2% indicated 5 to 7 weeks, 18.6% took 8 to 10 weeks, and 19.6% of authors reported that the decision required more than 10 weeks.
CONCLUSION: This survey of authors and Board members provided important insights into perceptions of the peer review process and identified areas for improvement.
Authors:
Christina Bunner; Elaine L Larson
Related Documents :
15076924 - Incompleteness of reporting of laboratory-confirmed chlamydial infection by providers a...
24301874 - Magician accuses faith healers of hoax.
21449694 - Combination antifungal therapy for disseminated fusariosis in immunocompromised patient...
24785734 - Book reviews.
9029914 - Comparison of wound patterns in homicide and dyadic death.
11759874 - Histology of connective tissue graft. a case report.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  American journal of infection control     Volume:  40     ISSN:  1527-3296     ISO Abbreviation:  Am J Infect Control     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-01     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8004854     Medline TA:  Am J Infect Control     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  701-4     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Managing Editor, American Journal of Infection Control, New York, NY. Electronic address: cmb2216@columbia.edu.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Wide variation in adoption of screening and infection control interventions for multidrug-resistant ...
Next Document:  Sample size and power.