Document Detail


Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17803618     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Birth certificate last menstrual period (LMP) date is widely used to estimate gestational age in the US. While data quality concerns have been raised, no large population-based study has isolated data quality issues by comparing birth record LMP (Birth LMP) with reliable LMP dates from another source. We assessed LMP data quality in 2002 California singleton livebirth records (n = 515 381) and in a subset of records with linked prenatally collected LMP from California's statewide Prenatal Expanded Alpha-fetoprotein Screening Program (XAFP) (n = 105 936). Missing or incomplete LMP data affected 13% of birth records; 17% of those had complete LMP within XAFP records. Data quality indicators supported XAFP LMP as more accurate than Birth LMP, with a lower prevalence of digit preference, post-term delivery, out-of-range gestational age estimates and implausible birthweight-for-gestational age. The bimodal birthweight distribution evident at 20-31 weeks' gestation based on Birth LMP was nearly absent with XAFP LMP-based gestational age. Approximately 32% of the second birthweight mode was explained by apparent clerical errors in Birth LMP month. Digit preference errors, particularly day 1, were associated with gestational age overestimation. Preterm delivery rates were higher according to Birth (7.6%) vs. XAFP LMP (7.2%). One-fifth of observed preterm and over half of observed post-term births using Birth LMP were not true cases; 15% of true preterm cases were missed. African American or Hispanic, less educated, and publicly or uninsured women were most likely to be misclassified and have large LMP date discrepancies attributable to clerical or digit preference error. The implementation of a revised birth certificate is an opportunity for targeted training and data entry checks that could substantially improve LMP accuracy on birth records.
Authors:
Michelle Pearl; Megan L Wier; Martin Kharrazi
Related Documents :
111758 - Deaths from rhesus haemolytic disease in england and wales in 1977: accuracy of records...
1556978 - The perinatal autopsy: its conduct and reporting in australia.
1508448 - Death certification in auckland.
9038758 - The coroner's necropsy in sudden death: an under-used source of epidemiological informa...
9359968 - Adoption by captive parturient rhesus macaques: biological vs. adopted infants and the ...
10768588 - Factors differentiating dropouts from completers in a longitudinal, multicenter clinica...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology     Volume:  21 Suppl 2     ISSN:  0269-5022     ISO Abbreviation:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol     Publication Date:  2007 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-09-06     Completed Date:  2007-11-19     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8709766     Medline TA:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  50-61     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Sequoia Foundation, La Jolla, CA, USA. michelle.pearl@cdph.ca.gov
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Birth Certificates*
California / epidemiology
Female
Fertilization
Gestational Age*
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Medical Records / statistics & numerical data
Menstrual Cycle*
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome / epidemiology*
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
CQ004942-LOS//PHS HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Effects of different data-editing methods on trends in race-specific preterm delivery rates, United ...
Next Document:  A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California ...