Document Detail


Assessing the probability of carbon and greenhouse gas benefit from the management of peat soils.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20427076     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This study proposes a method for assessing the probability that land management interventions will lead to an improvement in the carbon sink represented by peat soils. The method is able to: combine studies of different carbon uptake and release pathways in order to assess changes on the overall carbon or greenhouse gas budget; calculate the probability of the management or restoration leading to an improvement in the budget; calculate the uncertainty in that probability estimate; estimate the equivalent number of complete budgets available from the combination of the literature; test the difference in the outcome of different land management interventions; and provide a method for updating the predicted probabilities as new studies become available. Using this methodology, this study considered the impact of: afforestation, managed burning, drainage, drain-blocking, grazing removal; and revegetation, on the carbon budget of peat soils in the UK. The study showed that afforestation, drain-blocking, revegetation, grazing removal and cessation of managed burning would bring a carbon benefit, whereas deforestation, managed burning and drainage would bring a disbenefit. The predicted probabilities of a benefit are often equivocal as each management type or restoration often leads to increase in uptake in one pathway while increasing losses in another.
Authors:
F Worrall; M J Bell; A Bhogal
Related Documents :
17181796 - Patch mosaic burning for biodiversity conservation: a critique of the pyrodiversity par...
2720456 - Burns management and junior staff--what do they know?
2685846 - Management of the acutely burned hand for the nonspecialized clinician.
20022706 - Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines for adaptation in burn injury.
19682966 - The ethics of improving african traditional medical practice: scientific or african tra...
17013286 - Factors influencing vigilance and performance of anesthetists.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2010-04-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Science of the total environment     Volume:  408     ISSN:  1879-1026     ISO Abbreviation:  Sci. Total Environ.     Publication Date:  2010 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-05     Completed Date:  2010-06-17     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0330500     Medline TA:  Sci Total Environ     Country:  Netherlands    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  2657-66     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, Science Laboratories, University of Durham, South Road, Durham, UK. fred.worrall@durham.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Air Pollution / prevention & control*
Carbon / analysis*
Conservation of Natural Resources / methods*
Environmental Remediation / methods
Greenhouse Effect
Probability
Risk Assessment
Soil / analysis*
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Soil; 7440-44-0/Carbon

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The paleoclimate of the Eastern Mediterranean during the transition from early to mid Pleistocene (9...
Next Document:  A comparison of the isotopic composition of lead in rainwater, surface vegetation and tree bark at t...