Document Detail


Are double-blind food challenges necessary before starting an elimination diet?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  1959769     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Food allergy is normally treated by eliminating the offending food. Such a measure, however, may cause nutritional and sociopsychological problems, so an allergy must be diagnosed with the utmost certainty. To date the most reliable diagnostic test is the double-blind food challenge (DBFC). The rationale for using this test is the marked difference in positive results with open and double-blind food challenges. Only about 30% of open challenges that appear positive are confirmed on blind challenge. There is ample evidence, too, that a negative DBFC may in fact indicate tolerance to that food. From the literature it appears that almost all patients who reintroduced a certain food into their diet after a DBFC had given negative findings did not present any adverse reaction to it. In our caselist of 21 patients with probable reactions to foods but negative DBFC, 19 (90.5%) tolerated the "incriminated" food well when it was reintroduced into their diet even in unlimited amounts. Only two (9.5%) again presented symptoms when they started taking large amounts of the problem food. Therefore, one precaution recommended before reintroducing a food item into a patient's diet after a negative DBFC is to check how it is tolerated at high doses. A review of the literature confirms the unquestioned utility of the DBFC. Nevertheless, in some situations this test is not indicated. The main one, of course, is in patients with life-threatening symptoms such as anaphylactic shock or glottis edema, in whom any provocation test is contraindicated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Authors:
E A Pastorello; V Pravettoni; L Stocchi; A Bigi; M L Schilke; C Zanussi
Related Documents :
16455349 - 9. food allergy.
1811649 - New perspectives on the screening of food allergy.
73429 - Proper use of skin tests with food extracts in diagnosis of hypersensitivity to food in...
9196849 - Adverse reactions to food constituents: allergy, intolerance, and autoimmunity.
3355689 - Nasal response to food ingestion challenge.
3565859 - Anaphylaxis to cabbage: detection of allergens.
11924849 - Food web implications of delta13c and delta15n variability over 370 km of the regulated...
22886039 - Isotopic niche mirrors trophic niche in a vertebrate island invader.
19323089 - Intestinal bacterial and parasitic infections among food handlers in a tertiary care ho...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Allergy proceedings : the official journal of regional and state allergy societies     Volume:  12     ISSN:  1046-9354     ISO Abbreviation:  Allergy Proc     Publication Date:    1991 Sep-Oct
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1992-01-08     Completed Date:  1992-01-08     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8902396     Medline TA:  Allergy Proc     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  319-25     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Milan, School of Medicine, Italy.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Diet*
Double-Blind Method
Food Hypersensitivity / diagnosis*,  psychology,  therapy
Humans
Methods

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Local and systemic immune responses to food antigens in neonates and infants.
Next Document:  Oral sodium cromoglycate in the management of atopic dermatitis in children.