Document Detail


Architectural Analysis of Human Abdominal Wall Muscles: Implications for Mechanical Function.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20890265     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY DESIGN.: Cadaveric analysis of human abdominal muscle architecture. OBJECTIVE.: To quantify the architectural properties of rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and transverse abdominis (TrA), and model mechanical function in light of these new data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Knowledge of muscle architecture provides the structural basis for predicting muscle function. Abdominal muscles greatly affect spine loading, stability, injury prevention, and rehabilitation; however, their architectural properties are unknown. METHODS.: Abdominal muscles from 11 elderly human cadavers were removed intact, separated into regions, and microdissected for quantification of physiologic cross-sectional area, fascicle length, and sarcomere length. From these data, sarcomere operating length ranges were calculated. RESULTS.: IO had the largest physiologic cross-sectional area and RA the smallest, and would thus generate the largest and smallest isometric forces, respectively. RA had the longest fascicle length, followed by EO, and would thus be capable of generating force over the widest range of lengths. Measured sarcomere lengths, in the postmortem neutral spine posture, were significantly longer in RA and EO (3.29 ± 0.07 and 3.18 ± 0.11 μm) compared to IO and TrA (2.61 ± 0.06 and 2.58 ± 0.05 μm) (P < 0.0001). Biomechanical modeling predicted that RA, EO and TrA act at optimal force-generating length in the midrange of lumbar spine flexion, where IO can generate approximately 90% of its maximum force. CONCLUSION.: These data provide clinically relevant insights into the ability of the abdominal wall muscles to generate force and change length throughout the lumbar spine range of motion. This will impact the understanding of potential postures in which the force-generating and spine stabilizing ability of these muscles become compromised, which can guide exercise/rehabilitation development and prescription. Future work should explore the mechanical interactions among these muscles and their relationship to spine health and function.
Authors:
Stephen H M Brown; Samuel R Ward; Mark S Cook; Richard L Lieber
Related Documents :
20447635 - What gives bolt the edge-a.v. hill knew it already!
23165775 - Effect of temperature and ph on postmortem color development of porcine m. longissimus ...
7713075 - Theoretical and experimental behaviour of the muscle viscosity coefficient during maxim...
15713285 - A 3d model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii.
10398045 - Regional differences in the sympathetic innervation of the guinea pig large intestine b...
22488625 - A mouse model of massive rotator cuff tears.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2010-9-30
Journal Detail:
Title:  Spine     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1528-1159     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2010 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-4     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7610646     Medline TA:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
From the Departments of *Orthopaedic Surgery, †Radiology, and ‡Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA; §VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA; and ¶Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Dynamic Changes in Dural Sac and Spinal Cord Cross-Sectional Area in Patients With Cervical Spondylo...
Next Document:  The relationship between deformity correction and clinical outcomes after thoracoscopic scoliosis su...