Document Detail

Antiestrogens inhibit xenoestrogen-induced brain aromatase activity but do not prevent xenoestrogen-induced feminization in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16581536     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
In fish, exposure to estrogen or estrogen-mimicking chemicals (xenoestrogens) during a critical period of development can irreversibly invert sex differentiation. In medaka, a male-to-female reversal upon exposure to a xenoestrogen is accompanied by an increase in brain aromatase expression and activity. However, whether this increase is the direct cause of sex reversal is unknown. In this study we further examined the role brain aromatase plays in genesis of developmental abnormalities in response to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Further, the effects of a mixture of apparent antagonistic environmentally relevant EDCs on development were examined to determine if their combined actions could lessen each other's impacts. To this end, hatchling medaka were subjected in a 2-week flow-through immersion exposure to an estrogen mimic [dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (o,p -DDT)] and to pharmaceutical [fadrozole (FAD)] and environmental aromatase inhibitors [tributyltin (TBT)] alone and in combination. Brain aromatase expression and enzyme activity were measured on exposure days 5, 9, and 14 by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and tritiated water release assay, respectively. We recorded sex reversals at sexual maturity by examining the phenotypic and genotypic sex of d-rR-strain medaka. Results indicate that FAD and TBT inhibit aromatase activity in o,p -DDT-treated fish but do not prevent feminization, indicating that increased brain aromatase activity is not critical to EDC-induced male-to-female sex inversion. The observation that estradiol biosynthesis inhibitors do not block the effect of the xenoestrogen suggests that in the environment, exposure to seemingly antagonistic EDCs does not necessarily lessen the harmful impacts of these compounds.
Adam J Kuhl; Marius Brouwer
Related Documents :
7436126 - Effect of layoff and rehire on respiratory variables of grain elevator workers.
16581536 - Antiestrogens inhibit xenoestrogen-induced brain aromatase activity but do not prevent ...
23472556 - The benefits of exercise for ckd patients.
22959566 - In-parallel attachment of a low-resistance compliant thoracic artificial lung under res...
11526066 - Effect of cloning rate on fitness-related traits in two marine hydroids.
9951756 - Influence of pulse oximetry and capnography on time to diagnosis of critical incidents ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Environmental health perspectives     Volume:  114     ISSN:  0091-6765     ISO Abbreviation:  Environ. Health Perspect.     Publication Date:  2006 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2006-04-03     Completed Date:  2006-08-28     Revised Date:  2013-06-07    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0330411     Medline TA:  Environ Health Perspect     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  500-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
University of Southern Mississippi, 703 East Beach Drive, Ocean Springs, MS 39564, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aromatase / biosynthesis*,  metabolism
Base Sequence
Brain / drug effects*,  enzymology
DNA Primers
Endocrine Disruptors / pharmacology*
Estrogens / pharmacology*
Feminization / chemically induced*
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Xenobiotics / pharmacology*
Reg. No./Substance:
0/DNA Primers; 0/Endocrine Disruptors; 0/Estrogens; 0/Xenobiotics; EC

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Environ Health Perspect
ISSN: 0091-6765
Publisher: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
Article Information
Download PDF
This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original DOI.
Received Day: 15 Month: 4 Year: 2005
Accepted Day: 27 Month: 10 Year: 2005
Print publication date: Month: 4 Year: 2006
Electronic publication date: Day: 27 Month: 10 Year: 2005
Volume: 114 Issue: 4
First Page: 500 Last Page: 506
ID: 1440771
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8211
Publisher Id: ehp0114-000500
PubMed Id: 16581536

Antiestrogens Inhibit Xenoestrogen-Induced Brain Aromatase Activity but Do Not Prevent Xenoestrogen-Induced Feminization in Japanese Medaka (Oryzias latipes)
Adam J. Kuhl12
Marius Brouwer1
1University of Southern Mississippi, Ocean Springs, Mississippi, USA
2CIIT Centers for Health Research, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
Correspondence: Address correspondence to M. Brouwer, University of Southern Mississippi, 703 East Beach Dr., Ocean Springs, MS 39564 USA. Telephone: (228) 872-4294. Fax: (228) 872-4204. E-mail:
The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Beginning early in sex determination and gonadogenesis in fish, communication between nonadjacent tissues is necessary. This communication is accomplished through the endocrine system, which controls sex differentiation through complex interactions between the central nervous system and gonads using pituitary-derived gonadotropins and sex steroids produced in the gonad and brain (Nagahama 1994). Production of these sex steroids is very strongly linked with the early steps of gonadal differentiation, and they can influence long-term sex determination choices (Devlin and Nagahama 2002). Further, it has been demonstrated that exposure to estrogen or estrogen-mimicking chemicals during a critical period of development can result in genotypic XY males developing into fully functional phenotypic females, whereas exposure of genotypic XX females to androgenic chemicals can result in development of phenotypic males (Cheek et al. 2001a, 2001b; Edmunds et al. 2000; Gronen et al. 1999; Hunter and Donaldson 1983; Yamamoto 1969).

Because of the critical role of estrogen in the very early stages of sex determination and sex differentiation, the estrogen-synthesizing enzyme is of likely importance. As in all vertebrates, in fish this function is performed by cytochrome P450 aromatase, which converts androgens to estrogens and is expressed in a number of tissues, including the brain, liver, and gonads. Recently, a second isoform of aromatase (cyp19b; Genbank accession no. AY319970; National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD) has been found in the brain of several teleost species (Callard and Tchoudakova 1997; Chiang et al. 2001; Kuhl et al. 2005). This isoform has much higher activity and mRNA levels in the brain than the ovary has of ovarian aromatase (Kishida and Callard 2001).

It has been hypothesized that altered expression of aromatase is important in environmentally influenced sex differentiation. Increases in brain aromatase expression occur in 0- to 14-day-posthatch (dph) medaka concomitantly with xenoestrogen-induced feminization (Kuhl et al. 2005), whereas ovarian aromatase mRNA transcripts at this life stage are not detectable. Conversely, inhibition of aromatase activity can result in masculinization of genotypic females (Piferrer et al. 1994). Whether altered aromatase activity is directly responsible for sex reversal is not known. In the present study we aimed to further examine the critical role aromatase plays in the genesis of developmental abnormalities in response to endocrine disruptors.

Most research to date on the effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has focused on abnormalities induced by exposure to a single compound. However, in the environment, humans and wildlife are exposed to diverse mixtures of androgenic, estrogenic, antiandrogenic, and antiestrogenic compounds (Bush et al. 1990). Only recently has focus begun to shift to examining the impact of mixtures of EDCs on human and wildlife populations. Most of this research, however, has focused on the synergism between several weak estrogenic compounds (Bergeron et al. 1999; Payne et al. 2000). These studies demonstrate that there is an additive effect of several weakly estrogenic EDCs. To date, little work has been done on the impacts of mixtures of antagonistic EDCs. It is unknown if an androgenic or anti-estrogenic chemical can block the activity of an estrogenic one. Here we address this question by examining if xenoestrogen [dichloro-diphenyltrichloroethane (o,p?-DDT)]-induced feminization of developing medaka can be prevented by coexposure to a pharmaceutical [fadrozole (FAD)] and an environmental aromatase inhibitor (AI), tributyltin (TBT). We hypothesize that o,p?-DDT activates the estrogen receptor to induce transcription of brain aromatase. Increased brain aromatase activity results in increased estradiol levels feminizing the development of the fish. We further hypothesize that inhibiting aromatase activity will prevent a xenoestrogen-induced surge of estradiol production and prevent feminization.

o,p?-DDT is a known xenoestrogen that can negatively affect reproduction and development in fish, through immersion exposure (Cheek et al. 2001a, 2001b) and direct injection into oocytes (Edmunds et al. 2000). FAD has been used extensively in breast cancer research as a pharmaceutical inhibitor of aromatase and has been shown to be a reversible competitive inhibitor of aromatase in birds (Elbrecht and Smith 1992), mammals (Steele et al. 1987), and fish (Afonso et al. 1999, 2001). In Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), the suppression of aromatase with a FAD-treated diet resulted in a 100% male population Afonso 2001; Kwon et al. 2000). TBT has been used as an antifouling biocide in paint for boats, for wood treatment and preservation, and as a fungicide/bactericide in textile and industrial water systems (Gehring et al. 1991). At very low concentrations, TBT can disrupt the endocrine system, as evidenced by the induction of male sexual characteristics in female gastropods (Oberdorster and McClellan-Green 2002; Smith 1981). TBT has also been shown to be an EDC in fish, as well. A 30-day exposure to 100 ng/L TBT in zebrafish (Danio rerio) resulted in an almost completely male population (McAllister and Kime 2003). It is hypothesized that TBT acts as a competitive inhibitor of aromatase, which causes accumulation of testosterone and masculinization of the organism (McAllister and Kime 2003; Oberdorster and McClellan-Green 2002).

Our results from the present study demonstrate that an increase in aromatase activity is not needed for EDC-induced feminization and that antiestrogenic AIs are unable to prevent xenoestrogen-induced feminization.

Materials and Methods
Experimental animals.

Medaka (d-rR strain) used in this study were hatched from brood-stock cultured and maintained at the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, University of Southern Mississippi (Ocean Springs, MS). The d-rR strain contains a Y-chromosome?linked gene coding for a red body color phenotype, allowing for the simple determination of sex genotype: males have red phenotype, and females have white. Medaka also have secondary sex characteristics that are reflective of sexual phenotype. Females have shorter anal fins, and males have a notched dorsal fin. With the d-rR strain and secondary sex characteristics (fin morphology), sex reversals can be determined by simple observation of body color and fin development. Animal care and experimentation were conducted in accordance with University of Southern Mississippi guidelines for animal care and use, and animals were treated humanely with regard for alleviation of suffering. Broodstock cultures were maintained in 300-L fiberglass runs at a 27 ? 1?C. A 16-hr light/8-hr dark photoperiod was provided by timer-controlled overhead fluorescent lights. Broodstock cultures were fed a minimum of twice daily, one feeding of commercial flake (Ziegler Brothers, Santa Anna, CA) and one feeding of brine shrimp nauplii, ad libitum.

EDC exposure.

Medaka were exposed in two consecutive experiments. In the first experiment medaka were exposed to nominal concentrations of 0, 10, 50, and 100 ?g/L FAD and 0.7 ?g/L TBT. This was designed as a range-finding study to determine potential masculinizing concentrations of a pharmaceutical AI and determine the responsiveness of the system to an environmental AI. The second exposure consisted of nominal concentrations of 300 ?g/L FAD, 1.5 ?g/L TBT, 7.5 ?g/L DDT, 50 ?g/L FAD with 7.5 ?g/L DDT, 300 ?g/L FAD with 7.5 ?g/L DDT, and 1.5 ?g/L TBT with 7.5 ?g/L DDT. DDT concentrations were selected based on levels previously shown to induce male-to-female sex inversion (Kuhl et al. 2005).

Eggs were collected from 15-cm cylindrical filter sponges used as spawning substrates. Embryos were transferred to glass hatching jars containing about 4 L of hatching solution (1.00 g/L NaCl, 0.030 g/L KCl, 0.040 g/L CaCl2, 0.162 g/L MgSO4 in distilled water) with the salinity of the hatching solution brought to 5 g/L with NaCl to control fungus. Hatching jars were maintained under continuous fluorescent light in a water bath at 24 ? 1?C and vigorously aerated to suspend embryos.

At hatch, 75 d-rR fry were housed in three retention chambers (100-mm Petri dish bottoms with attached 475-?m nylon collar) with 25 fish in each chamber. For the first exposure, fry were exposed to four duplicated exposure treatments (control, three FAD concentrations, and one TBT concentration) for a total of 8 test aquaria. For the second exposure, fry were exposed to seven duplicated exposure treatments (control, carrier control, FAD, two FAD + DDT combinations, TBT, and TBT + DDT) for a total of 14 test aquaria. Test aquaria were 35 L with a water depth of 19 cm maintained by drain siphon. Test aquaria were housed within a central water bath kept at 27 ? 1?C and provided with a 16-hr light/8-hr dark photoperiod supplied by fluorescent bulbs.

Exposure was conducted in a setup similar to that described by Walker et al. (1985) and Manning et al. (1999). Briefly, a water partitioner delivered 2 L of test solution each cycle to splitter/mixing boxes that dispensed 1 L to each duplicate aquarium. The exposure system cycled between three and five cycles per hour during the exposure period. Test concentrations were prepared each cycle by injection of appropriate stock to the splitter boxes of each treatment using Hamilton PSD2 liquid injectors (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV). Stocks were created by dissolving the compound in the appropriate solvent. DDT and TBT were dissolved in triethylene glycol, and FAD was dissolved in well water.

Water quality (pH, temperature, and dissolved oxygen) was measured twice each week, and water samples were removed four times (day 0, 5, 8, and 14) for analytical analysis of the test chemicals. Survival was monitored and recorded daily, and all dead fry were removed. Six fish per aquaria (12/treatment) were sampled, weighed, and archived for molecular analysis on days 5, 9, and 14. Six sampled fish per treatment were preserved in 200 ?L RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX) for mRNA analysis, and six were preserved in 200 ?L phosphate buffer (100 mM KCl, 10 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM dithiothreitol, pH 7.4) for enzyme activity analysis. Upon exposure completion, fry were transferred to 18.5-L grow-out aquaria until sexual maturity so secondary sex characteristics could be observed. After sex determination, fish were terminally anesthetized with MS-222 and discarded.

Real-time quantitative RT-PCR.

Ovarian (cyp19a) and brain aromatase (cyp19b) expression was measured using real-time quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Due to lack of detection of ovarian aromatase with real-time PCR, further examination of cyp19a was performed using multiple primer pair with visualization of expression using both real-time methods and 2% agarose gel/ethidium bromide. Total RNA was extracted from whole fry using a Trizol procedure and purified with a phenol: chloroform extraction followed by an ethanol precipitation. Total RNA concentration was measured using a Beckman (Fullerton, CA) DU640 spectrophotometer and treated with DNase H (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to remove genomic DNA contamination. cDNA was synthesized from 1 ?g total RNA using Superscript II reverse transcriptase from Invitrogen and random decamers. Real-time PCR was accomplished using Taqman chemistry (Heid et al. 1996).

Forward and reverse primers for cyp19a and cyp19b amplification and dual dye-labeled FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein; excitation, 490 nm; emission, 520 nm)?Black Hole Quencher (BHQ) were designed from the ovarian and brain aromatase sequence (Genebank accession nos. D82968 and AY319970) using Beacon Designer 3.01 (PREMIER Biosoftware, Palo Alto, CA) (oligo 1?7) (Table 1). 18S primers designed from published medaka 18S sequence and Cy5 (excitation, 596 nm; emission, 615 nm)?Iowa Black RQ dual-labeled Taqman probes (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) were used as internal normalization standard (oligo 8, 9, 10) (Table 1). Integrated DNA Technologies supplied probes, and we used a Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) IQ-Cycler real-time PCR system to amplify and measure fluorescence of aromatase and 18S. For the reactions in the first exposure, conditions consisted of 100 nM probe, 900 nM primer for aromatase, and 100 nM probe and 50 nM primers for 18S for all sampling days. Primer concentrations were tested to ensure equal amplification efficiency between aromatase and 18S.

Due to differences in the ratio of 18S and aromatase concentrations in fish collected at each sample period in the second exposure, we used different concentrations of probe and primers to obtain equal amplification efficiencies. Day 5 conditions consisted of 100 nM probe, 1,200 nM primer for aromatase, and 100 nM probe and 35 nM primers for 18S. Day 9 conditions were 100 nM probe, 1,200 nM primer for aromatase, and 100 nM probe and 40 nM primers for 18S. On day 14, no primer concentrations could be determined that would express both aromatase and 18S for all samples in multiplex with equal amplification efficiency. Therefore, day 14 samples were measured in separate single-plex reactions using Bio-Rad IQ Real-Time SYBRMix with SYBRGreen. Multiplex reactions used Bio-Rad IQ Real-Time Supermix according to manufacturer?s instructions. Cycle parameters were 50?C for 120 sec, 95?C for 120 sec, 50 cycles of 95?C for 15 sec, and 61?C for 30 sec. Relative expression was calculated with the comparative Ct (? ?Ct) method, which involves comparing the thresh-old cycle (Ct) values of the treated samples with the nontreated controls (calibrator). The Ct values of both the calibrator and the treated samples are then normalized to the endogenous housekeeping gene 18S. Gene expression for each sampling time is expressed as fold increase over same-day control.

Aromatase activity.

Aromatase activity was measured by a tritiated water release assay based on the work of Thompson and Siiteri (1974) as adapted to medaka by Melo and Ramsdell (2001) and Contractor et al. (2004). Whole medaka fry sampled during exposure were homogenized in phosphate buffer (1 M KCl, 0.01 M K2HPO4, and 0.001 M EDTA, pH 7.4). Protein concentration of homogenate was determined using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Homogenate containing about 20 mg of protein was incubated with 5 nM androst-4-ene-3,17-dione [1?-3H(N)] (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) in a 200 ?L solution of 1 mM NADPH, 10 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 1 U/mL glucose-6-dehydrogenase, 10 mM potassium phosphate (dibasic), 1,000 mM potassium chloride, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol at 37?C for 3 hr. After incubation, reactions were terminated by immersion in ice-cold water and adding 100 ?L 30% trichloroacetic acid, and centrifuged at 1,700g for 10 min to remove precipitated protein. Unconverted substrate was removed by vortexing vigorously for 60 sec with 1 mL chloroform followed by centrifugation at 1,700g for 25 min at 4?C. Addition of a 5% charcoal/0.5% dextran slurry followed by a 40 sec vortex and 30 min centrifugation (10,000g) was used to remove any residual androst-4-ene-3,17-dione. Radioactivity of tritiated water was measured in a Beckman LS6500 liquid scintillation counter and background subtracted using samples without homogenate. Sensitivity of detection was set at two standard deviations above the mean blank activity to be considered detectable.

Analytical chemistry.

Magnolia Scientific Services Inc. (Hattiesburg, MS) measured o,p?-DDT and TBT. o,p?-DDT was measured according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) method 608 (U.S. EPA 1988), and TBT was measured according to U.S. EPA method 282.3 (U.S. EPA 1989).

We determined FAD concentration using reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) with photo diode array detection. Water samples (~ 5 mL) were collected twice weekly in glass vials and injected directly as 1.0 mL aliquots onto a 4.6 mm ? 25 cm Beckman Ultrasphere C18 reverse-phase column connected to a Beckman Gold HPLC system. Samples were chromatographed using a gradient program with a mobile phase starting at 60% methanol/40% 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) for 4 min and increased to 80% methanol/20% buffer over 2 min, where it was held for 9 min. Mobile phase was then returned to 60% methanol/20% phosphate buffer to prepare the column for the next sample. FAD in column eluate was detected using a Beckman System Gold 168 photodiode array detector set at 229 nm. A five-point standard curve was developed with FAD dissolved in well water for sample quantification. Samples were measured in duplicate in conjunction with standards. Limit of detection was approximately 5 ?g/L.

Statistical analysis.

We compared treatments and controls for percent survival with the chi-square test after transformation of percentages by the arcsine square root procedure. Deviations from a 1:1 sex ratio were analyzed by the replicated goodness-of-fit test (G-test) followed by the unplanned test of the homogeneity of replicates. In treatments were no males remained after exposure, we added 0.05 to values for all males and females for all treatments so that the natural logarithm could be calculated. Throughout all experiments, each fish was treated as a replicate for both aromatase activity and cyp19b expression (n = 6) because space for individual experimental units was limited. We compared cyp19b expression and aromatase activity among treatments by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). A Kolmogorov-Smirnov one-sample test was used to test for normality, and Levine?s test was used to test for homogeneity of variance. If data failed either test, the we used the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA to examine differences. If significant difference among groups was observed, a Dunn?s multiple comparisons test on each day separately was used to determine where significance occurred. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses and graphing were completed using Sigmastat 3.1 (Systat Software, Inc., Point Richmond, CA) and SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL).

Juvenile medaka exposure.

In the first exposure, juvenile medaka were exposed in a flow-through system to FAD and TBT for 2 weeks beginning at hatch. Measured concentrations of the test chemicals were approximately 90?141% of nominal concentrations. Survival ranged from 51 to 63%, and according to the goodness-of-fit chi-square test, no significant difference in survival between controls and exposed groups existed (Table 2). Developmental exposure to FAD and TBT did not significantly alter adult sex ratios at concentrations chosen. In d-rR medaka, white males and red females indicate a phenotypic sex inversion. At this exposure, there were no sex inversions as evidenced by the lack of any white males or red females (Table 3).

In the second exposure, medaka were exposed to FAD, TBT, and o,p?-DDT for 2 weeks beginning at hatch. Measured doses ranged between 81 and 101% of nominal concentrations. Survival ranged from 39 to 50%, and there was no significant difference in survival between controls and exposed groups (Table 4). According to a goodness-of-fit G-test, developmental exposure to FAD and TBT did not alter sex distributions or induce sex inversion. However, o,p?-DDT significantly altered sex distributions in all o,p?-DDT exposures regardless of inhibitor cotreatment (Table 5).

Aromatase expression.

Gene expression was measured in individual whole fry on days 5, 9, and 14 for each treatment and quantitated using the ? ?Ct method. 18S was used as the internal normalization standard, and expression data for each time point are expressed as fold change relative to the mean of the same-day controls. Ovarian aromatase was not detected in any sample through measurement with real-time PCR or traditional PCR. Further multiple primer sets were tested in multiple conditions (data not shown). Therefore, all following data represent brain aromatase expression.

In the first exposure, day 9 samples were lost because of defective extraction reagent. A Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA demonstrated that brain aromatase expression levels showed a significant decrease in the TBT treatment versus control treatment at sampling day 5 (Figure 1). However, this significance was lost by sampling day 14 (data not shown).

In the second exposure, the day 14 sampling period demonstrated a significant difference in cyp19b expression between treatments according to a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA. Pairwise multiple comparisons between treatments revealed that this difference is between FAD- and TBT-only treatments and DDT only (Dunn?s method, p < 0.05). Fish exposed to FAD- and TBT-only treatments also had lower expression levels than those exposed to the AI and o,p?-DDT cotreatments; however, these differences are not significant (Figure 2). Day 5 and day 9 sampling periods show similar trends but are not significant (results not shown).

Aromatase activity.

Aromatase activity was measured using a tritiated water release assay. In the first exposure, assay sensitivity was 1.49, 1.20, and 0.86 fmol/hr/mg protein for sampling days 5, 9, and 14, respectively. The highest concentration of FAD and TBT treatment levels consistently resulted in aromatase activity levels below level of sensitivity for this assay and can be considered non-detectable (Figure 3).

In the first experiment, changes in activity followed the same pattern as changes in gene expression on all sampling days, with decreasing activity at increasing concentrations of FAD and in the TBT treatment. Although day 5 and day 9 showed no significant difference between any treatments (results not shown), day 14 showed a significant decrease in activity between the controls and the highest concentrations of FAD and TBT (Figure 3).

For the second exposure, the limit of detection (LOD) was 2.30, 1.37, and 0.26 fmol/hr/mg protein for days 5, 9, and 14, respectively. Only the control treatment had measurable levels of aromatase activity on day 5, and all day 9 samples were < LOD. On day 14, only the o,p?-DDT/high FAD and o,p?-DDT/TBT cotreatments had enzyme activity levels below assay sensitivity (Figure 4).

Aromatase activity demonstrated a pattern different from aromatase expression. Unlike cyp19b expression data, which showed an increase in aromatase expression in all o,p?-DDT treatments regardless of presence of inhibitors, aromatase activity showed an increase only in the o,p?-DDT control treatment (Figure 4). A Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated a significant difference in aromatase activity between treatments on day 14. Pairwise multiple comparison procedure revealed that the o,p?-DDT?only treatment is significantly different from all other treatments. The cotreatments of o,p?-DDT and AIs had reduced or nondetectable aromatase activity with no corresponding decrease in aromatase gene expression. However, this decrease in activity was not significant. This trend was not observed on sampling day 5 or day 9 (results not shown).


Most laboratory research to date on EDCs has focused on the effects of a single compound on an organism. However, in the environment, organisms are exposed to complex mixtures of potentially synergistic and antagonistic compounds, and it is unknown how these chemicals interact in vivo and whether such interactions diminish or exacerbate their individual effects on the health of the organism. To begin addressing these questions, our objectives in the present study were 2-fold: to examine the role of brain aromatase in o,p?-DDT?induced sex reversal in medaka and to determine if an environmentally relevant mixture of both estrogenic (o,p?-DDT) and apparent antiestrogenic (TBT) chemicals, which have opposing effects on aromatase activity, can block each other?s effects on reproductive development. Extensive experiments showed that ovarian aromatase transcripts could not be detected in medaka fry (0?14 dph) by real-time or traditional RT-PCR. Further, ovarian aromatase could not be detected upon stimulation of the estrogen response system after exposure to estradiol and o,p?-DDT. It appears, therefore, that the brain isoform of aromatase accounts for most, if not all, estradiol production during this life stage of the medaka and that the aromatase activity measured in this study represents the brain form of this enzyme.

To accomplish our stated objectives, we exposed juvenile medaka to an environmental estrogen in the presence and absence of two AIs and examined the effects on aromatase expression and activity and sex reversal. After a 2-week exposure, all fish developed female secondary sex characteristics regardless of the presence of AIs and independent of levels of brain aromatase activity, indicating that an increase in brain aromatase activity, as observed with o,p?-DDT exposure only, is not required for a male-to-female sex reversal resulting from exposure to an environmental estrogen. The results of the study presented here also show that the effects (feminization) of an environmental estrogen (o,p?-DDT) are not negated by the antagonistic effects of an environmental antiestrogen (TBT) at the exposure conditions and developmental stage examined. Whether the results of this specific case are of general validity for mixtures with predicted antagonistic effects deserves further study.

Additionally, results from this study demonstrate that immersion exposure to AIs alone did not result in any female-to-male inversions, even though aromatase activity was inhibited. These results contrast with several published studies in which inhibition of aromatase by both pharmaceutical (FAD) and environmental (TBT) AI exposure (McAllister and Kime 2003; Uchida et al. 2004) can result in masculinization of several fish species, including Japanese flounder, zebrafish, and salmon (Kitano et al. 2000; Kwon et al. 2000; Piferrer et al. 1993; Uchida et al. 2004). Masculinization occurs concomitantly with a decrease in aromatase expression, suggesting that manipulation of the aromatase system during development can alter gonadal differentiation (Fenske and Segner 2004).

These studies on the role of aromatase in sex reversal during development support the theory that androgens and estrogens are the natural sex inducers in fish and play pivotal roles in sex differentiation (Devlin and Nagahama 2002). Other evidence such as sexually dimorphic expression of aromatase in developing zebrafish (Trant et al. 2001) and the ability of exogenous steroid treatment to influence sex differentiation (Yamamoto 1958) suggest the importance of sex steroid production in the very early steps in gonad differentiation. Also, in medaka, inhibition of aromatase can result in the prevention of ovarian cavity formation, suggesting the importance of endogenous estrogen in gonadal development (Suzuki et al. 2004).

However, other evidence exists that suggests sex steroids may not play such an important role. For example, in medaka, germ cell differentiation appears to occur before somatic steroid-producing cells are observed (Satoh 1974). Further, in a study by Kawahara and Yamashita (2000), medaka eggs incubated with an AI resulted in no abnormal sex ratios. From these observations, the authors concluded that female sex determination in medaka is not estrogen dependent. They also suggested that estrogen-independent activation of the estrogen receptor may be a primary pathway in female gonadal development. They emphasized that the observations of female-to-male sex inversion after treatment with AI in other vertebrates and fish suggests a role of aromatase only during the sex determination period and not the importance of estrogen and aromatase as the natural sex inducer in gonadal differentiation.

In the present study, exposure to AIs significantly reduced aromatase activity between days 9 and 14 yet did not induce a sex inversion. This could be because male sex differentiation is irreversibly determined before day 9. However, it is more likely that our treatment period terminated too early, because male germ cell proliferation does not occur until 14 dph (Satoh 1974). Sensitivity of sex differentiation to endocrine disruptors has been shown to be dependent on duration and dose of exposure and on developmental stage. Insufficient exposure length or dosage concentrations can result in lack of response (Cheek et al. 2001b). The lack of response to aromatase inhibition reported by Kawahara and Yamashita (2000) may therefore be due to the developmental period of exposure. In most cases, the most sensitive period is just before or at the same time as histologic differentiation of the primitive gonad (Hunter and Donaldson 1983). In medaka, differentiation occurs at hatch, with the proliferation of ovarian cells beginning shortly after hatch (about 6?10 dph) (Satoh 1974). Medaka have been shown to be sensitive to feminization by estradiol during this proliferation period (Cheek et al. 2001a; Nimrod and Benson 1998). Unlike female germ cells, male germ cells cease to divide immediately after hatching, and proliferation is delayed until about the 9?10 mm larval stage (about 14?20 dph) (Satoh 1974). This is also the stage of development in which male gonial cells first appear in the female gonad upon androgen treatment (Kobayashi and Hishida 1985). Thus, lack of masculinization in response to aromatase inhibition observed in this study might be due to termination of exposure before male germ cell proliferation begins.

In the present study, the inhibition of aromatase did not induce a female-to-male inversion, i nor did it prevent a male-to-female inversion induced by o,p?-DDT. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between an increase in aromatase expression and activity upon exposure to environmental estrogens and sex differentiation in fish (Chiang et al. 2001; Fenske and Senger 2004;Kitano et al. 2000; Scholz and Gutzeit 2000; Tanaka et al. 1995). Previous work in this laboratory (Kuhl et al. 2005) also demonstrated the importance of the aromatase system in fish gonadal development by observing a significant 5-fold increases in aromatase expression and activity at o,p?-DDT concentrations that induce a male-to-female sex inversion.

Results from the present study, however, demonstrate that sex inversion can be induced without a corresponding increase in aromatase activity. Treatment with o,p?-DDT alone induces both aromatase activity and brain aromatase expression, while resulting in a complete male-to-female sex inversion. However, inhibition of aromatase activity in o,p?-DDT/AI?cotreated fish also results in a complete male-to-female sex inversion. In these fish, there is an increase in brain aromatase expression while activity is reduced to nondetectable levels. Altered aromatase activity levels are therefore not a requirement for sex inversion in fish.

The apparent lack of aromatase involvement suggests that alternative, non-aromatase-dependent pathways exist through which o,p?-DDT may bring about sex reversal. For example, exogenous estrogen treatment can also result in reduction of expression of several steroidogenic enzymes, including P450c17, 3?HSD, and P45011? in the differentiating testis (Govoroun et al. 2001). This would decrease the synthesis of 11-oxygenated androgen and may be an important step in exogenous estrogen feminization. Further, xenobiotics can induce steroid-metabolizing enzymes, including steroid sulfotransferases, steroid glucuronidation enzymes, and steroid hydroxylases (You 2004). Because the ratio of androgens to estrogens may be more important in differentiating gonads than their absolute values (Bogart 1987), xenobiotic alterations of androgen levels may also play a role in the cotreatments conducted in this study. Steroidogenic enzyme levels and androgen to estrogen ratios during cotreatments must be measured to examine the possibility of this mechanism. Finally, non-genomic actions mediated through membrane-bound hormone receptors also can influence steroid production. Loomis and Thomas (2000) demonstrated that estrogens, and likely xenoestrogens including o,p?-DDT, can cause a decrease in gonadotropin-stimulated androgen production through a nongenomic mechanism in the Atlantic croaker (Micropogonias undulatus). This may further interfere with steroid production and the ratios between androgens and estrogens.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the xenoestrogen o,p?-DDT increases brain aromatase activity accompanied by complete male-to-female sex inversion. Coexposure to o,p?-DDT and AIs does suppress aromatase activity but does not prevent sex reversal. Thus, increased aromatase activity is not necessary for sex inversion, and alternatively, aromatase-independent pathways for sex reversal resulting from xenobiotic treatment must exist. This study shows that exposure to AIs during days 0?14 fails to induce female-to-male sex inversion. This suggests that testis differentiation in d-rR medaka does not occur until after 14 dph. The observation that exposure to a mixture of estrogenic and antiestrogenic compounds does not block estrogen-induced sex reversal suggests that, in the environment, exposure to antagonistic EDCs may not necessarily lessen the harmful impacts of these compounds.


We thank S. Manning for his indispensable assistance with medaka culture and exposure.

This work was supported by a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Sea Grant (award NA16RG2258/CEH).

Afonso LOB,Iwama GK,Smith J,Donaldson EM. 1999;Effects of the aromatase inhibitor fadrozole on plasma sex steroid secretion and ovulation rate in female coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, close to final maturationGen Comp Endocrinol 113:221–229. [pmid: 10082624]
Afonso LOB,Wassermann GJ,De Oliveira RT. 2001;Sex reversal in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitorJ Exp Zool 290:177–181. [pmid: 11471147]
Bergeron JM,Willingham E,Osborn CT III,Rhen T,Crews D. 1999;Developmental synergism of steroidal estrogens in sex determinationEnviron Health Perspect 107:93–97. [pmid: 9924002]
Bogart MH. 1987;Sex determination: a hypothesis based on steroid ratiosJ Theor Biol 128:349–357. [pmid: 3444342]
Bush B,Streeter RW,Sloan RJ. 1990;Polychlorobiphenyl (PCB) congeners in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) from marine and estuarine waters of New York State determined by capillary gas chromatographyArch Environ Contam Toxicol 19:49–61. [pmid: 2109967]
Callard GV,Tchoudakova A. 1997;Evolutionary and functional significance of two CYP19 genes differentially expressed in brain and ovary of goldfishJ Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 61:387–392. [pmid: 9365215]
Cheek A,Brouwer TH,Carroll S,Manning S,Brouwer M,McLachlan JA. 2001a;Developmental exposure to anthracene and estradiol alters reproductinve success in medaka (Oryzias latipes)Environ Sci 8:31–45.
Cheek A,Brouwer TH,Carroll S,Manning S,McLachlan JA,Brouwer M. 2001b;Experimental evaluation of vitellogenin as a predictive biomarker for reproductive disruptionEnviron Health Perspect 109:681–690.
Chiang EFL,Yan Y-L,Guiguen Y,Postlethwait J,Chung B. 2001;Two cyp19 (P450 Aromatase) genes on duplicated zebrafish chromosomes are expressed in ovary or brainMol Biol Evol 18:542–550. [pmid: 11264405]
Contractor RG,Foran CM,Li S,Willett KL. 2004;Evidence of gender and tissue-specific promoter methylation and the potential for ethinylestradiol-induced changes in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) estrogen receptor and aromatase genesJ Toxicol Environ Health A 67:1–22. [pmid: 14668108]
Devlin RH,Nagahama Y. 2002;Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influencesAquaculture 208:191–364.
Edmunds JSG,McCarthy RA,Ramsdell JS. 2000;Permanent and functional male-to-female sex reversal in d-rR strain medaka (Oryzias latipes) following egg microinjection of o,p?-DDTEnviron Health Perspect 108:219–224. [pmid: 10706527]
Elbrecht A,Smith RG. 1992;Aromatase enzyme activity and sex determination in chickensScience 255:467–470. [pmid: 1734525]
Fenske M,Segner H. 2004;Aromatase modulation alters gonadal differentiation in developing zebrafish (Danio rerio)Aquat Toxicol 67:105–126. [pmid: 15003697]
Gehring, . Nolan, RJ. Watanabe, PG. Schumann, AM. . 1991. Solvents, fumigants, and related compounds. In: Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology (Hayes WJ, Laws ER, eds). New York:Academic Press, 189?199.
Govoroun M,McMeel OM,D?Cotta H,Ricordel MJ,Smith T,Fostier A,et al. 2001;Steroid enzyme gene expressions during natural and androgen-induced gonadal differentiation in the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykissJ Exp Zool 290:558–566. [pmid: 11748604]
Gronen S,Denslow N,Manning S,Barnes S,Barnes D,Brouwer M. 1999;Serum vitellogenin levels and reproductive impairment of male Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) exposed to 4-tert-octylphenolEnviron Health Perspect 107:385–390. [pmid: 10210694]
Heid CA,Stevens J,Livak KJ,Williams PM. 1996;Real time quantitative PCRGenome Res 6:986–994. [pmid: 8908518]
Hunter, GA. Donaldson, EM. . 1983. Hormonal sex control and its application to fish culture. In: Fish Physiology (Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Donaldson EM, eds). Orlando, FL:Academic Press, 223?303.
Kawahara T,Yamashita I. 2000;Estrogen-independent ovary formation in the medaka fish, Oryzias latipesZool Sci 17:65–68.
Kishida M,Callard GV. 2001;Distinct cytochrome P450 aromatase isoforms in zebrafish (Danio rerio) brain and ovary are differntially programmed and estrogen regulated during early developmentEndocrinology 142:740–750. [pmid: 11159846]
Kitano T,Takamune K,Nagahama Y,Abe S-I. 2000;Aromatase inhibitor and 17alphamethyltestosterone cause sex-reversal from genetical females to phenotypic males and suppression of P450 aromatase gene expression in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus)Mol Reprod Dev 56:1–5. [pmid: 10737961]
Kobayashi H,Hishida T. 1985;Morphological observation on reversal processes of sex-differentiation in the genetic female gonad of the medaka, Oryzias latipes, by androgenMedaka 3:25–37.
Kuhl AJ,Manning S,Brouwer M. 2005;Brain aromatase in Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes): molecular characterization and role in xenoestrogen induced sex reversalJ Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 96:67–77. [pmid: 15876529]
Kwon JY,Haghpanah V,Kogson-Hurtado LM,McAndrew BJ,Penman DJ. 2000;Masculinization of genetic female Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by dietary administration of an aromatase inhibitor during sexual differentiationJ Exp Zool 287:46–53. [pmid: 10861549]
Loomis AK,Thomas P. 2000;Effects of estrogens and xenoestrogens on androgen production by Atlantic croaker testes in vitro: evidence for a nongenomic action mediated by an estrogen membrane receptorBiol Reprod 62:995–1004. [pmid: 10727269]
Manning CS,Schesny AL,Hawkins WE,Barnes DH,Barnes CS. 1999;Exposure methodologies and systems for long-term chemical carcinogenicity studies with small fish speciesToxicol Method 9:201–217.
McAllister BG,Kime DE. 2003;Early life exposure to environmental levels of the aromatase inhibitor tributyltin causes masculinisation and irreversible sperm damage in zebrafish (Danio rerio)Aquat Toxicol 65:309–316. [pmid: 13678849]
Melo AC,Ramsdell JS. 2001;Sexual dimorphism of brain aromatase activity in medaka: induction of a female phenotype by estradiolEnviron Health Perspect 109:257–264. [pmid: 11333187]
Nagahama Y. 1994;Endocrine regulation of gametogenesis in fishInt J Dev Biol 38:217–229. [pmid: 7981031]
Nimrod AC,Benson WH. 1998;Reproduction and development of Japanese medaka following an early life stage exposure to xenoestrogensAquat Toxicol 44:141–156.
Oberdorster E,McClellan-Green P. 2002;Mechanisms of imposex induction in the mud snail, Ilyanassa obsoleta: TBT as a neurotoxin and aromatase inhibitorMar Environ Res 54:715–718. [pmid: 12408641]
Payne J,Rajapakse N,Wilkins M,Kortenkamp A. 2000;Prediction and assessment of the effects of mixtures of four xenoestrogensEnviron Health Perspect 108:983–987. [pmid: 11049820]
Piferrer F,Baker IJ,Donaldson EM. 1993;Effects of natural, synthetic, aromatizable, and nonaromatizable androgens in inducing male sex differentiation in genotypic female chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)Gen Comp Endocrinol 91:59–65. [pmid: 8405891]
Piferrer F,Zanuy S,Carrillo M,Solar II,Devlin RH,Donaldson EM. 1994;Brief treatment with an aromatase inhibitor during sex differentiation causes chromosomally female salmon to develop as normal, functional malesJ Exp Zool 270:255–262.
Satoh N. 1974;An ultrastructural study of sex differentiation in the teleost Oryzias latipesJ Embryol Exp Morphol 32:195–215. [pmid: 4452829]
Scholz S,Gutzeit HO. 2000;17-alpha-Ethinylestradiol affects reproduction, sexual differentiation and aromatase gene expression of the medaka (Oryzias latipes)Aquat Toxicol 50:363–373. [pmid: 10967398]
Smith BS. 1981;Male characteristics on female mud snails caused by antifouling bottom paintsJ Appl Toxicol 1:22–25. [pmid: 7185870]
Steele RE,Mellor LB,Sawyer WK,Wasvary JM,Browne LJ. 1987;In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrating potent and selective estrogen inhibition with the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor CGS 16949ASteroids 50:147–161. [pmid: 2973160]
Suzuki A,Tanaka M,Shibata N,Nagahama Y. 2004;Expression of aromatase mRNA and effects of aromatase inhibitor during ovarian development in the medaka, Oryzias latipesJ Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol 301:266–273.
Tanaka M,Fukada S,Matsuyama M,Nagahama Y. 1995;Structure and promoter analysis of the cytochrome P-450 aromatase gene of the teleost fish, medaka (Oryzias latipes)J Biochem 117:719–725. [pmid: 7592531]
Thompson EA,Siiteri PK. 1974;Utilization of oxygen and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate by human placental microsomes during aromatization of androstenedioneJ Biol Chem 249:5364–5372. [pmid: 4153532]
Trant JM,Gavasso S,Ackers J,Chung BC,Place AR. 2001;Developmental expression of cytochrome P450 aromatase genes (CYP19a and CYP19b) in zebrafish fry (Danio rerio)J Exp Zool 290:475–483. [pmid: 11555854]
Uchida D,Yamashita M,Kitano T,Iguchi T. 2004;An aromatase inhibitor or high water temperature induce oocyte apoptosis and depletion of P450 aromatase activity in the gonads of genetic female zebrafish during sex-reversalComp Biochem Physiol A 137:11–20.
U.S. EPA 1989. Method 282.3: The Determination of Tributyltin Chloride in Marine and Fresh Waters by Liquid-Solid Extraction (LSE) and Gas Chromatography with Electron-Capture Detection (GC/ECD). Version 1.0. Cincinnati, OH:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: [accessed 2004].
U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency 1988. Method 608?Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs. Available: [accessed 2003].
Walker WW,Manning CS,Overstreet RM,Hawkins WE. 1985;Development of aquarium fish models for environmental carcinogenesis: an intermittent-flow exposure system for volatile, hydrophobic chemicalsJ Appl Toxicol 5:255–260. [pmid: 4045098]
Yamamoto T. 1958;Artificial induction of functional sex-reversal in genotypic females of the medaka (Oryzias latipes)J Exp Zool 137:227–263. [pmid: 13575738]
Yamamoto, T. . 1969. Sex differentiation. In: Fish Physiology (Hoar W, Randall D, eds). New York:Acedemic Press, 117?175.
You L. 2004;Steroid hormone biotransformation and xenobiotic induction of hepatic steroid metabolizing enzymesChem Biol Interact 147:233–246. [pmid: 15135080]


[Figure ID: f1-ehp0114-000500]
Figure 1 

Effects of FAD and TBT on brain aromatase expression on day 5 shown as fold change relative to same-day control as measured by real-time PCR (mean ? SE).

*Significant difference (p < 0.05).

[Figure ID: f2-ehp0114-000500]
Figure 2 

Effects of FAD, TBT, and o,p?-DDT, as well as FAD/DDT and TBT/DDT coexposure, on brain aromatase expression on day 14 shown as fold change (? SE) relative to same-day control as measured by real-time PCR. Bars with different letters are significantly different from each other based on Dunn?s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).

[Figure ID: f3-ehp0114-000500]
Figure 3 

Effects of FAD and TBT exposure on aromatase enzyme activity (mean? SE, fmol/hr/mg protein) on day 14. Values for 141.3 FAD and 0.631 TBT were < LOD.

*Significant difference (p < 0.05).

[Figure ID: f4-ehp0114-000500]
Figure 4 

Effects of FAD, TBT, o,p?-DDT, FAD/DDT, and TBT/DDT on aromatase enzyme activity (mean ? SE, fmol/hr/mg protein) on day 14. Bars with different letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).

[TableWrap ID: t1-ehp0114-000500] Table 1 

Oligonucleotide sequence for real-time PCR primers and probes.

Oligo Sequence Location Function
1 AGAAGAAAACCATCCCTGGAC 208?229 cyp19a forward 1
2 CCATTTCCTTCCTCTTTCGCT 847?868 cyp19a reverse 1
3 ACTGTAGGACTCCCATCCG 120?139 cyp19a forward 2
4 TCTTCTCACTGTGACTCCAGA 193?214 cyp19a reverse 2
5 CTGCACCCTGAACAGCATCAG 94?115 cyp19b forward
6 AGTAGAGGGCTATCACAAAATCTC 171?192 cyp19b reverse
8 GTTATTCCCATGACCCGCCG 1,445?1,465 18S forward
9 TTCCCGTGTTGAGTCAAATTAAGC 1,344?1,363 18S reverse
10 Cy5-ACTCCTGGTGGTGCCCTTCCGT-BHQ 1,400?1,425 18S probe

[TableWrap ID: t2-ehp0114-000500] Table 2 

Nominal and actual FAD and TBT exposure concentrations, growout survival, and water quality parameters.

Nominal (?g/L) Actual (?g/L ? SE) Percent nominal Percent survival growout Temperature (?C ? SE) pH ? SE DO (mg/L ? SE)
0 ? 57 26.7 ? 0.1 8.8 ? 0.03 6.3 ? 0.05
10 FAD 11.29 ? 2.27 113 58 26.7 ? 0.1 8.8 ? 0.02 6.5 ? 0.05
50 FAD 60.25 ? 0.5 121 63 26.7 ? 0.1 8.7 ? 0.04 6.2 ? 0.05
100 FAD 141.3 ? 5.81 141 52 26.8 ? 0.1 8.7 ? 0.02 6.3 ? 0.04
0.7 TBT 0.63 ? 0.007 90 51 26.7 ? 0.1 8.7 ? 0.04 6.3 ? 0.05

tfn1-ehp0114-000500DO, dissolved oxygen.

[TableWrap ID: t3-ehp0114-000500] Table 3 

Sex and color at sexual maturity after FAD and TBT treatments.

Treatment Red genotypic male White phenotypic male White genotypic female Red phenotypic female
Control 32 0 35 0
11.3 FAD 35 0 34 0
60.3 FAD 36 0 38 0
141 FAD 27 0 34 0
0.63 TBT 28 0 32 0

[TableWrap ID: t4-ehp0114-000500] Table 4 

. Nominal and actual FAD, TBT, and DDT exposure concentrations with growout survival.

Treatment Nominal (?g/L) Actual TBT (?g/L ? SE) Actual FAD (?g/L ? SE) Actual o,p?-DDT (?g/L ? SE) Percent survival growout
TEG control 0 ? ? ? 40
FAD 300 ? 243 ? 6.7 ? 40
TBT 1.5 1.52 ? 0.03 ? ? 44
DDT 7.5 ? ? 7.48 ? 0.04 38
DDT + low FAD 7.5 + 50 ? 49.75 ? 11.6 7.42 ? 0.05 40
DDT + high FAD 7.5 + 300 ? 270 ? 7.6 7.49 ? 0.04 50
DDT + TBT 7.5 + 1.5 1.40 ? 0.03 ? 7.53 ? 0.08 39

tfn2-ehp0114-000500Abbreviations: ?, not applicable; TEG, triethylene glycol.

[TableWrap ID: t5-ehp0114-000500] Table 5 

Sex and color at sexual maturity in o,p?-DDT/FAD and o,p?-DDT/TBT cotreatments.

Treatment Red genotypic male White phenotypic male White genotypic female Red phenotypic female
TEG control 24 0 23 0
FAD 18 0 28 0
TBT 26 0 24 0
DDT 0 0 21 22
DDT + low FAD 0 0 26 20
DDT + high FAD 0 0 33 25
DDT + TBT 0 0 25 19

tfn3-ehp0114-000500TEG, triethylene glycol.

Article Categories:
  • Research

Keywords: brain aromatase, fadrozole, medaka, o,p?-DDT, sex differentiation, sex reversal, tributyltin.

Previous Document:  Occupational toluene exposure induces cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA expression in peripheral lymphocytes.
Next Document:  Lead increases lipopolysaccharide-induced liver-injury through tumor necrosis factor-alpha overexpre...