Document Detail

Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet drugs for cervical artery dissection: case for anticoagulants.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23238975     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
There are no reliable data from randomised trials to decide whether anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents are better to prevent further thromboembolic events after cervical arterial dissection. Most neurologists favour anticoagulants based on the underlying pathology and the likely course of acute post-dissection thromboembolism.
John W Norris
Related Documents :
14609605 - Robotic mammary takedown and off-pump bypass surgery for single-vessel disease of the l...
8201705 - Prevention of paraplegia during thoracic aortic cross-clamping: importance of patent in...
2229155 - Acute dissection of the internal mammary artery: a fatal complication of coronary arter...
1082315 - Comparative hemodynamic properties of vein and mammary artery in coronary bypass operat...
23536645 - Salvage of distal non-target coil embolization with stent placement and intravenous ept...
15841915 - Mechanical properties of selfexpandable stents.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-12-13
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1435-1463     ISO Abbreviation:  J Neural Transm     Publication Date:  2012 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-12-14     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9702341     Medline TA:  J Neural Transm     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Clinical Neurosciences, St Georges Medical School, London, UK,
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Steroids in bacterial meningitis: yes.
Next Document:  Propargylamine-derived multitarget-directed ligands: fighting Alzheimer's disease with monoamine oxi...