Document Detail

Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet drugs for cervical artery dissection: case for anticoagulants.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23238975     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
There are no reliable data from randomised trials to decide whether anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents are better to prevent further thromboembolic events after cervical arterial dissection. Most neurologists favour anticoagulants based on the underlying pathology and the likely course of acute post-dissection thromboembolism.
John W Norris
Related Documents :
12813385 - Spontaneous recanalization of functionally occluded bilateral internal thoracic artery ...
2964905 - Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of a surgically obstructed left internal mammary ...
11258405 - Use of 99tcm-mibi scintigraphy in the evaluation of perfusion improvement after myocard...
1525815 - The usefulness of a tracking catheter in complex coronary angioplasty.
12424945 - Magnetic resonance imaging of mediastinal vessels.
12499615 - Review of coronary artery disease in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-12-13
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1435-1463     ISO Abbreviation:  J Neural Transm     Publication Date:  2012 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-12-14     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9702341     Medline TA:  J Neural Transm     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Clinical Neurosciences, St Georges Medical School, London, UK,
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Steroids in bacterial meningitis: yes.
Next Document:  Propargylamine-derived multitarget-directed ligands: fighting Alzheimer's disease with monoamine oxi...