Document Detail

Anorectal physiology in relation to clinical subgroups of patients with severe constipation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15335368     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate anorectal physiology in relation to clinically defined subgroups of patients with idiopathic constipation and to analyse relationships between anorectal physiology and rectal evacuation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients with idiopathic constipation were clinically categorized as slow transit (n=19), outlet obstruction (n=52) and a group with mixed symptoms (n=29). They were examined by recording anal pressures and also rectal volumes in response to stepwise increases in rectal pressure (5-60 cm H2O). The manovolumetric results were compared with 28 sex and aged matched controls. Rectal evacuation was measured by computer-based image analysis of rectal emptying rate in defaecography. RESULTS: The rectal pressure thresholds for filling, urge and pain did not differ between the groups but there were proportionally more patients in the slow transit and mixed group with thresholds for filling exceeding 25 cm H2O (P=0.04). In total, 18% of patients had impaired sensitivity which was associated with long duration of symptoms (P < 0.05). Patients with grossly impaired rectal sensitivity (filling threshold > 40 cm H2O) had impaired rectal evacuation (P < 0.05). The rectal compliance was increased in the slow transit and mixed group (P < 0.01-0.05) in the pressure interval 5-15 cm H2O. Anal resting and squeeze pressures did not differ between the groups although 7/19 in the slow transit group had values around the lower limit of controls. Slow wave frequency was lower in all patient groups (P < 0.001 vs. controls). Rectal evacuation was not related to sphincter function or to rectal compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical categorization of constipated patients defines groups where altered anorectal physiology is not uncommon. Constipation with symptoms of infrequent defaecation may be associated with impaired rectal sensitivity and increased rectal compliance whereas outlet obstruction symptoms are not clearly related to changes in anorectal physiology.
U Karlbom; E Lundin; W Graf; L Påhlman
Related Documents :
21206878 - Ictal rpp - a supplement to cuff method in detecting ect-induced cerebral seizure.
1130358 - Effect of increased intraabdominal pressure on lower esophageal sphincter pressure.
8981148 - Study of the intramural oviduct response to tubal and uterine distension: identificatio...
1599058 - Upper oesophageal sphincter pressure and the intravenous induction of anaesthesia.
22461048 - How effective are continuous flow left ventricular assist devices in lowering high pulm...
11282388 - Alpha2 adrenergic receptors and the central control of breathing in the cane toad, bufo...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland     Volume:  6     ISSN:  1462-8910     ISO Abbreviation:  Colorectal Dis     Publication Date:  2004 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-08-31     Completed Date:  2005-01-04     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100883611     Medline TA:  Colorectal Dis     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  343-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Aged, 80 and over
Anal Canal / physiology*
Case-Control Studies
Chi-Square Distribution
Constipation / diagnosis*
Defecation / physiology
Defecography / methods
Gastrointestinal Transit / physiology*
Manometry / methods
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Rectum / physiology
Reference Values
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Statistics, Nonparametric

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: clinical and functional results.
Next Document:  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications and results after 100 cases.