Document Detail

Analysis of lead toxicity in human cells.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22839698     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Lead is a metal with many recognized adverse health side effects, and yet the molecular processes underlying lead toxicity are still poorly understood. Quantifying the injurious effects of lead is also difficult because of the diagnostic limitations that exist when analyzing human blood and urine specimens for lead toxicity.
RESULTS: We analyzed the deleterious impact of lead on human cells by measuring its effects on cytokine production and gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Lead activates the secretion of the chemokine IL-8 and impacts mitogen-dependent activation by increasing the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α and of the chemokines IL-8 and MIP1-α in the presence of phytohemagglutinin. The recorded changes in gene expression affected major cellular functions, including metallothionein expression, and the expression of cellular metabolic enzymes and protein kinase activity. The expression of 31 genes remained elevated after the removal of lead from the testing medium thereby allowing for the measurement of adverse health effects of lead poisoning. These included thirteen metallothionein transcripts, three endothelial receptor B transcripts and a number of transcripts which encode cellular metabolic enzymes. Cellular responses to lead correlated with blood lead levels and were significantly altered in individuals with higher lead content resultantly affecting the nervous system, the negative regulation of transcription and the induction of apoptosis. In addition, we identified changes in gene expression in individuals with elevated zinc protoporphyrin blood levels and found that genes regulating the transmission of nerve impulses were affected in these individuals. The affected pathways were G-protein mediated signaling, gap junction signaling, synaptic long-term potentiation, neuropathic pain signaling as well as CREB signaling in neurons. Cellular responses to lead were altered in subjects with high zinc protoporphyrin blood levels.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study defined specific changes in gene and protein expression in response to lead challenges and determined the injurious effects of exposures to lead on a cellular level. This information can be used for documenting the health effects of exposures to lead which will facilitate identifying and monitoring efficacious treatments for lead-related maladies.
Authors:
Bruce S Gillis; Zarema Arbieva; Igor M Gavin
Related Documents :
8206338 - Expression of pc2 and pc1/pc3 in human pheochromocytomas.
12591118 - Hypothalamic cocaine-amphetamine regulated transcript (cart) is regulated by glucocorti...
16061068 - Genomic structure of the proopiomelanocortin gene and expression during acute low-water...
12422058 - Effects of single and repeated restraint stresses on the expression of beta(1)-adrenoce...
1652768 - The c-mos gene product is required for cyclin b accumulation during meiosis of mouse eggs.
10603358 - Regulation of neurogenesis by interactions between hen1 and neuronal lmo proteins.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2012-07-27
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMC genomics     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1471-2164     ISO Abbreviation:  BMC Genomics     Publication Date:  2012  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-08-23     Completed Date:  2012-12-19     Revised Date:  2013-07-12    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100965258     Medline TA:  BMC Genomics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  344     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Cytokines / biosynthesis
Environmental Exposure
Female
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation / drug effects
Humans
Lead / blood,  toxicity*
Leukocytes, Mononuclear / drug effects*,  metabolism
Male
Middle Aged
Multigene Family / genetics
Protoporphyrins / blood
Young Adult
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Cytokines; 0/Protoporphyrins; 15442-64-5/zinc protoporphyrin; 7439-92-1/Lead
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): BMC Genomics
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): BMC Genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Publisher: BioMed Central
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright ©2012 Gillis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
open-access:
Received Day: 25 Month: 1 Year: 2012
Accepted Day: 27 Month: 7 Year: 2012
collection publication date: Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 27 Month: 7 Year: 2012
Volume: 13First Page: 344 Last Page: 344
ID: 3424832
Publisher Id: 1471-2164-13-344
PubMed Id: 22839698
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-344

Analysis of lead toxicity in human cells
Bruce S Gillis1 Email: bsgmd@hotmail.com
Zarema Arbieva2 Email: zarbieva@uic.edu
Igor M Gavin2 Email: igavin@uic.edu
1Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
2Research Resources Center, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Background

Lead (Pb) is a widely distributed industrial metal and it also is naturally present in the environment. It is an environmentally persistent element and a major global environmental hazard. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) currently consider lead poisoning the leading environmental health threat to children in the US. Lead-based paint is a primary source of lead exposure and the major source of lead toxicity in children. Lead exposure also remains one of the leading causes of workplace illness [1].

Lead contamination mainly occurs through absorption via the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. Approximately 30-40% of inhaled lead enters the bloodstream [2]. Once absorbed, 99 percent of lead is retained in the blood for approximately 30-35 days and over the following 4-6 weeks it is dispersed and accumulated in other tissues – liver, renal cortex, aorta, brain, lungs, spleen, teeth and bones [3]. The half-life of lead in brain tissue is about two years and in bones it persists for 20-30 years [4]. Liver tissue is the largest repository of lead (33%) followed by the kidney cortex and medulla [5]. Depending on the amount of exposure, lead can adversely affect the nervous system, kidneys, the immune system, reproductive and developmental systems and the cardiovascular system. Its toxic effects vary from subtle changes in neurocognitive function in low-level exposures to a potentially fatal encephalopathy in acute lead poisoning [1]. Infants and young children are especially sensitive to low levels of lead which may contribute to behavioral problems, learning deficits and lowered IQ.

The molecular mechanisms of lead toxicity are still not clearly defined. The effects of lead on calcium fluxes and calcium-regulated events have been suggested as major mechanisms of lead neurotoxicity [6-8]. Lead also stimulates calmodulin and cAMP phosphodiesterase and enhances calmodulin-mediated protein phosphorylation in synaptic vesicles ([4] and references therein), thereby interfering with calcium/calmodulin-mediated neurotransmitter release. Another potential mechanism of lead toxicity is the ability of lead to induce oxidative stress. The deleterious effects of lead exposures can involve both the generation of reactive oxygen or nitrogen species (ROS) and a direct depletion of the antioxidant reserves (reviewed in [9]). Lead decreases glutathione levels by directly binding to thiol groups and inhibiting glutathione reductase [10]. Lead also inhibits δ-aminolevulinic acid dehydrogenase (ALAD) resulting in increased levels of δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) which is known to stimulate ROS production [11]. Lead also can stimulate membrane lipid peroxidation by binding to phosphatidylcholine in the cellular membrane and inducing changes in membrane biophysical properties [12,13]. ROS production and the generation of other potentially genotoxic compounds are possible mechanisms of the carcinogenicity of lead [9].

The diagnosis of lead poisoning has traditionally relied on measuring blood lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels. It is commonly accepted that the blood level concentration is the single best indicator of recent lead exposure [14]. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control established a 10μg/dL lead concentration in blood as the concern limit for exposures in children [15]. The blood lead level rises within hours of exposure and remains elevated for several weeks thereafter [16]. Due to lead’s short half-life time in the blood, blood lead tests cannot be used to diagnose or rule out evidence of exposure that occurred more than six weeks before testing. Zinc protoporphyrin or free erythrocyte protoporphyrin accumulates in erythrocytes as a result of the inhibition of heme synthesis [17]. Protoporphyrin levels begin to rise when blood lead levels exceed 1.5 to 2 μM and remain elevated for several months after exposure [18]. The protoporphyrin test is not as sensitive as the direct measurement of lead levels as other inhibitors of heme biosynthesis or iron deficiency anemia also increase protoporphyrin levels [19]. The genetic deficiency of ferrochelatase, a heme biosynthetic enzyme may lead to inaccurate test results as well [20].

Measurements of lead in tissues are useful in estimating exposure doses but they do not document injurious effects from the amount of lead that was absorbed by the body. Consequently, a methodology to track and quantify the injurious effects of exposures to lead is not only desirable, it is critical in order to identify appropriate preventive and therapeutic methodologies. And because the injurious effects of lead are often not recognized until the disease has advanced, identifying subclinical effects of exposures to lead is vital for early intervention. In an attempt to identify the biological effects of exposures to lead as well as develop and test the methodology for evaluating lead's injurious consequences at a cellular level, we performed global gene expression profiling in human cells challenged to lead. In our recent studies, we have previously utilized this methodology to comprehensively assess unique responses to environmental toxins in cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) [21,22]. In this study we identified the cellular processes and pathways which were affected by exposures to lead, as well as the nature of cellular defences against lead insults.


Results
Subjects characteristics

We recruited a group of 44 subjects who did not have any known occupational exposures to lead and none had ever been diagnosed with lead-related disorders. The serum lead levels in the group were in a range from 0.1 to 5.8 μg/dL, with an average of 2.13 μg/dL. ZPP levels in the blood of the subjects ranged from 15-101 μg/dL with an average of 42.7 μg/dL. Since normal levels for blood zinc protoporphyrin are defined as being in the range of 16-36 μg/dL [23], a significant portion of the test subjects had elevated ZPP test results.

Cytokine expression

To determine how lead affects PBMC functions, we analyzed the impact of lead acetate on the secretion of 15 common cytokines by PBMC. The majority of the cytokines were below the lower detection limit and only chemokines IL-8, MIP-1β, MCP-1, Eotaxin, MIP-1α and RANTES were detected in the PBMC culture supernatants (not shown). Challenging cells with lead acetate at concentrations 10μM and above resulted in a dose-dependent increase of IL-8 production (Figure 1A). We also examined the effects of lead acetate on the mitogen-activated expression of cytokines. PHA stimulated production of all 15 cytokines in the control cultures which resulted in a significant increase in cytokine levels [21,22]. Lead acetate further increased the PHA-stimulated production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α and chemokines IL-8, and MIP-1α (Figuref 1B). The highest increase of cytokine levels was at 50 μM lead acetate and some effect was also detected at 10 μM. These results demonstrated that lead increases mitogenic activation of PBMC, which is in agreement with the lead-dependent stimulation of lymphocyte and leukocyte proliferation and function observed in earlier studies [24-27].

Gene expression profiling in PBMC challenged to lead

The cytokine expression study identified the specific impact of lead on mononuclear cell functions. To better understand how exposures to lead affect cellular processes on a molecular level and in order to identify intracellular responses to lead, we performed a genome-wide expression profiling in the PBMC of seven healthy individuals challenged to 10 μM lead acetate, the lowest concentration which affected cytokine production. Culturing cells in the presence of lead acetate for one day significantly altered the expression of 271 transcripts, of which expression of 221 transcripts changed 1.5-fold or more, including 157 downregulated transcripts and 64 upregulated transcripts. We observed elevated expressions of a number of cellular metabolic enzymes and metal-binding proteins which are important components in cellular defense responses against heavy metal insults. For example, of sixteen transcripts which were elevated 3-fold or more in lead-treated cells, twelve corresponded to seven metallothionein (MT) genes and the MT pseudogene. MT is a family of cysteine-rich, low molecular weight proteins which bind heavy metals through the thiol group of their cysteine residues [28]. MT proteins are implicated in protecting against metal-induced toxicity as well as oxidative stress and their expression is induced by a number of stimuli, including exposures to metals, oxidative stress, glucocorticoids, hydric stress and others [29,30].

To determine what cellular functions were most affected by the exposure to lead, we applied the DAVID functional bioinformatics resources tool to identify annotation clusters enriched with differentially expressed genes. Two annotation clusters containing methallothionein genes were identified, methallothioneins and cadmium/copper ion binding (Table 1). Metallothioneins and protein kinases were also among the functional groups of genes that were affected by exposure to lead (Table 2).

Residual effect of exposures to lead

Exposures to lead of human PBMC adversely affected their functions as evidenced by the changes in gene expression. However, these changes may reverse when lead is no longer available in the medium. To investigate the residual, adverse effects of lead poisoning on the cells, we removed lead acetate from the cell cultures and determined the persistent changes in the gene expression. After an initial incubation with lead acetate for one day, the cells were washed three times and cultured in fresh RPMI medium without lead acetate for one additional day, for a total of two days. Gene expression in these cells from the entire group of 44 individuals was compared with control cells from the same group which were cultured under the identical conditions in the absence of lead acetate. We identified 604 transcripts whose expressions were different in these two groups of cells. 146 transcripts corresponded to 104 genes whose expression increased 1.5-fold or more in lead-challenged cells, and 58 transcripts corresponded to 39 genes whose expressions decreased 1.5-fold or more in exposed cells. The observed changes were consistent with cells recovering from the lead insult and the restoration of their functions. However, it is likely that the changes in the expression of many genes resulted from removing lead from the medium. In order to identify genes whose expressions changed in response to the lead challenge and remained altered after removing lead from the cultures, we compared the lead-dependent changes in one-day cultures and in two-day cultures. We identified 42 transcripts, corresponding to 31 genes whose expressions changed similarly in both groups. Expressions of 38 transcripts corresponding to 22 genes were at least 2 times higher than in the control cells. The list of these genes is shown in Table 3. Eighteen transcripts remained elevated three-fold or more in lead-exposed cells after removing lead from the culture. We observed elevated levels of all 12 MT transcripts, the pirin transcript (an iron-binding nuclear protein), three endothelial receptor type B transcripts, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, the KIT ligand and the tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase transcripts. Other transcripts included four transcripts encoding dihydrodiol dehydrogenase, six transcripts encoding aspartate beta-hydroxylase, four transcripts encoding solute carrier proteins, two transcripts encoding prostaglandin reductase, transcripts encoding arrestin, and malic enzyme. These genes represented a panel of putative cellular biomarkers which were induced by lead and whose expressions remained activated after lead was removed from the medium. Since the changes in expression of these genes were not transient, they could be utilized for evaluating exposures to lead.

Cellular responses to lead in subjects with elevated blood lead levels

A number of studies have demonstrated that lead exposures resulting in blood lead levels below 10 μg/dL may cause cognitive dysfunction, neurobehavioral disorders, neurological damage, hypertension and renal impairment [31-33]. To determine if cellular responses to lead are altered in individuals with elevated blood lead levels which are still below the safety concern threshold level, we divided the subjects into three groups based on their lead test results and compared gene expressions between these groups. The control “low lead” group consisted of eight individuals whose blood lead levels were equal to or below 1μg/dL, with a 0.7 μg/dL mean value. The “moderate lead” group had nine individuals with blood lead levels ranging from 2 μg/dL to 3 μg/dL, with a 2.6 μg/dL mean value and the “high lead” group contained seven subjects with lead test results above 4 μg/dL. The lead levels in this group ranged from 4.4 μg/dL to 5.8 μg/dL and the mean value was 5.2 μg/dL. Initially, we compared gene expressions in the control cultures to determine the basal differences in the gene expression pattern between the groups. Gene expressions in the “moderate lead” and “high lead” group were similar to the “low lead” group. There was no statistically significant difference in the gene expression patterns between the “moderate lead” and the “low lead” groups and only one transcript was identified which was upregulated in the “high lead” group. However, when the cells were challenged to lead acetate, marked changes in gene expressions were observed between these groups depending on the blood lead levels. Expressions of 17 transcripts in the “moderate lead” group and expressions of 1440 transcripts in the “high lead group” were altered compared to the “low lead” group. Eight transcripts in the “moderate lead” set of 17 differentials were also present among 1440 transcripts identified in the “high lead” group. Annotation clustering revealed that the most affected cellular processes were negative regulation of transcription and the induction of apoptosis (Table 4). Functional analysis of the gene expression data showed that nervous system development and function were the most affected categories in the "high lead" group (Table 5). These results show that the responses of the cells were significantly altered in individuals with higher blood lead levels affecting primarily the nervous system and supported the view that the blood lead levels lower than the CDC-recommended concern level have deleterious effects on cellular functions.

Gene expression profiling in subjects with elevated ZPP test results

One of the inclusion parameters for selecting a cohort of 44 subjects was the normal blood lead test result. Unlike blood lead levels which decrease to normal in several weeks after exposure, blood ZPP levels remain elevated for several months [18]. Zinc protoporphyrin levels in the blood samples of 28 subjects were above the normal range. It is possible that some individuals may have been unknowingly exposed to lead in the past and their blood lead levels returned to normal at the time the test was taken. To explore this possibility, we determined whether cellular responses to lead were altered in the subjects with higher ZPP levels. We placed the subjects in two groups according to their ZPP test result. The “high ZPP” group contained fifteen subjects whose ZPP levels were above normal. In this group, the ZPP test results ranged from 43 μg/dL to 101 μg/dL and the mean value was 55 μg/dL. Fifteen subjects in the “normal ZPP” group had ZPP levels in the normal range, from 20 μg/dL to 35 μg/dL, with the mean value of 28 μg/dL. The mean blood lead levels in both groups were 3 μg/dL and 1.1 μg/dL, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. Initially, we determined the difference in gene expressions in control cells. We identified 567 transcripts whose abundance was different in these two groups. For most transcripts, the ratios of the signals were below 1.5 and the levels of only 140 transcripts changed 1.5-fold or more. Among the genes that were downregulated in the “high ZPP” group were angiopoietin genes as well as genes encoding cyclin 1 and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2. The expressions of these genes were also inhibited in human cell lines challenged to ZPP [34]. DAVID annotation clustering analysis revealed that the most affected cellular process in the “high ZPP” group was the positive regulation of synaptic transmission (Table 6). Pathway analysis also identified a number of groups related to the nervous system. Among the groups with top ten scores were neuropathic pain signaling, CREB signaling in neurons, neuroprotection in Alzheimer's disease, Gβγ signaling, gap junction signaling, and synaptic long term potentiation (Figure 2). Other groups were related to the immune system.

To determine if the cells from the subjects with elevated ZPP levels responded differently to the lead challenges, we compared gene expressions in the “high ZPP” group and the “normal ZPP” group in the cell samples challenged to lead. A total of 1230 transcripts were identified whose signals were different in the two study groups by a statistically significant value. Of those, only 275 transcripts had a ratio of mean signal values higher than 1.5. 146 transcripts in this group were also identified in control cultures at the 10% confidence level. Expressions of the majority of genes therefore varied between these two groups regardless of a lead challenge. A remaining 129 transcripts were found only in the cells challenged to lead and signified the difference in the responses to lead between the “high ZPP” group and the “normal ZPP” group (Additional file 1: Table S1). These results demonstrated that cellular responses to lead were altered in subjects with elevated blood ZPP levels.


Discussion

For many chronic diseases, the specific role of environmental exposures in causing diseased phenotypes is not well understood. It is vital to determine when injurious exposures have occurred long before there is the appearance of overt clinical signs and symptoms in humans. Because these injurious effects most certainly develop in a discrete cellular manner, we applied gene expression and protein profiling to find and categorize these cellular effects. Cytokine profiling, in particular, is very important for understanding how environmental exposures affect the expression of these soluble mediators which are produced in tissues undergoing defence, growth, differentiation and repair processes [35]. Even low-level exposures to lead impair cell-mediated immunity by upsetting the balance between Th1- and Th2- like T lymphocytes which alters cytokine expression [36-38]. The changes in proinflammatory cytokines also play a role in the neurotoxicity of lead [39-41]. We demonstrated that lead exposures resulted in a dose-dependent increase of IL-8 production by PBMC as well as enhanced the production of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α and the chemokines IL-8 and MIP-1α in response to mitogens. The increase in the TNF-α level was in agreement with previous studies [42] and was consistent with epidemiological data on lead-exposed workers [43]. Our observation that lead increases mitogenic activation of PBMC was in agreement with the activation of lymphocyte and leukocyte proliferation and function by lead which has been observed in earlier studies [24-27]. One mechanism by which lead may activate PBMC is by inducing PKC-dependent cell signaling cascades [4]. Our findings demonstrated that exposure to lead strongly affects cell signaling pathways, particularly ATP binding and kinase activity.

In an attempt to find changes in gene expression following exposures to lead, we identified genes whose expressions were induced by lead and remained activated even after the lead was removed from the media. The most pronounced effect was the activation of the expression of metallothionein (MT) genes. MT gene expression has been identified and utilized as a biomarker of heavy metal exposures in a variety of biological systems [44-51] including in human cell lines [52] as well as in exposures to cadmium in humans [53]. Our findings imply that expressions of metallothionein genes in human tissues also may be applied to assessing exposures to lead. Another gene whose expression was activated by lead was the endothelin receptor B (EDNRB). Although the mechanism of EDNRB regulation by lead is unknown, an increase of its expression may contribute to the hypertension observed in low-level lead exposures [54].

A number of metabolic enzymes were also upregulated by lead exposures, including the genes encoding aldehyde dehydrogenase, tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase, malic enzyme, aspartate beta-hydroxylase, prostaglandin reductase 1 and two members of the aldo-keto reductase family 1, C1 and C2. All of these enzymes with the exception of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase and aspartate beta-hydroxylase are NAD(P) + dependent. Tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase catalyzes the degradation of tryptophan into N-formyl-kynurenine. Tryptophan depletion and the accumulation of its metabolites induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of T lymphocytes, thereby suppressing T-cell activation [55,56]. They also promote the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into regulatory T cells. An increase in the expression of this enzyme as a result of exposure to lead may explain the depletion of CD4+ T cells observed in exposed individuals [57-60]. An increased production of tryptophan metabolites was also implicated in neurodegenerative disorders [61]. For example, an increase of tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase expression was found in astrocytes of schizophrenic patients [62]. Lead-dependent activation of the gene encoding this enzyme may contribute to the neurocognitive symptoms which are observed in lead-exposed individuals. Another possible mechanism by which exposures to lead can impair neurocognitive function is the dysregulation of neurosteroids. The Aldo-keto reductase family 1 enzymes, AKR1C1 and AKRC2 are implicated in steroid metabolism. AKRC1 inactivates progesterone by forming 20α-hydroxyprogesterone [63,64]. Progesterone and its neuroactive metabolites have modulatory effects on brain function and influence social, cognitive, emotional and physical processes [65,66]. Increased expression of AKR1C as a result of exposures to lead may change the levels of progesterone and its neuroactive metabolites, such as 3α,5α-THP, thereby contributing to neurocognitive disorders. Upregulation of the xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes AKR1C1 and AKRC2 caused by lead was also observed in primary normal human bronchial epithelial cells [67].

Among the enzymes that were upregulated in the cells challenged to lead were prostaglandin reductase 1, which inactivates leukotriene B4; 15-ketoprostaglandins which are important mediators of inflammation [68,69]; aspartate beta-hydroxylase, which plays an important role in calcium homeostasis [70]; malic enzyme, a cytosolic, NADP-dependent enzyme which generates NADPH for fatty acid biosynthesis [71]; and a cytosolic isoform of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1, an enzyme in the major oxidative pathway of alcohol metabolism [72]. Other activated genes included transcriptional cofactor pirin, an iron-binding nuclear protein involved in apoptosis [73]; two members of the amino acid/polyamine transport system, SLC12A8A [74] and SLC7A11 [75]; KIT ligand, the ligand of the tyrosine-kinase receptor encoded by the KIT locus, implicated in pigmentation [76] and cancer [77]; α-arrestin 4 [78]; transmembrane protein TMEM158; FAM70A and putative protein ENSG00000204134. Our findings that expressions of these genes were not transient and remained elevated even after the lead was removed from the system, demonstrate that they could be utilized as biomarkers in tests for assessing exposures to lead.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control set a threshold for a significant exposure to lead at blood lead levels of 10 μg/dL or above which have an increased risk for both subclinical and overt effects from this substance [15]. In particular, individuals with a blood lead level of 10 μg/dL or above are at high risk for peripheral neuropathies and/or chronic nephropathies, with the latter often triggering consequential hypertension. The analysis of the gene expressions demonstrated that cellular responses to lead were significantly altered in individuals with blood lead levels around 5 μg/dL, suggesting that doses lower than 10 μg/dL impair cellular functions. The most affected system was the nervous system and the most affected groups were the negative regulation of transcription and the positive regulation of apoptosis. The changes in gene expressions correlated well with the blood lead levels and were in agreement with previous studies in children [79].

Although the blood lead test provides accurate information on lead absorption in persons with brief acute exposures, it cannot be used for assessing past or chronic exposures. It is well known that exposures to lead are also associated with elevated blood ZPP levels which remain elevated for several months after the exposure. The analysis of blood chemistries in 44 subjects demonstrated that elevated blood ZPP levels correlated with higher blood ZPP content. Expressions of genes encoding proteins involved in the transmission of nerve impulses were significantly affected in the “high ZPP” group. Among the affected pathways were G-protein mediated signaling, gap junction signaling, synaptic long-term potentiation, neuropathic pain signaling as well as CREB signaling in neurons (Figure 2). Therefore, the nervous system was highly affected in these individuals confirming clinical observations [31-33].

Blood ZPP levels are increased in individuals who are deficient in mineral iron or metabolism [19,80], therefore ZPP measurements only provide indirect evidence of an exposure to lead. Nevertheless, the cellular responses to lead were changed in the subjects with the elevated blood ZPP levels which were signified by the altered gene expression profiles.


Conclusions

The present study defined discrete and unique responses to lead in cultured PBMC. Our findings define the injurious effects from lead exposures at the cellular level. The methodology of detecting the health effects of environmental exposures based upon individual cellular response patterns offers a starting point for assessing injurious consequences of such exposures and to developing appropriate health treatment protocols. This approach makes it possible to obtain human toxicity data which can be used to identify the potentially injurious effects of exposures to any occupational and environmental compound for which human toxicity data are not yet available. Human medical toxicology is based upon the appreciation that after target cells of a toxin are impacted, there are two primary phases of reaction. One is composed of the acute side effects, which are then followed by the chronic and residual impact of the toxin. We have been able to document both the “acute” and “residual” effects of lead on human cells based upon changes in gene expression patterns. We believe that gene expression profiling can be utilized whenever there is a desire to confirm lead poisoning and it therefore merits being an adjunct to blood lead testing in lead-exposed individuals, particularly in those in which an adverse impact needs to be ascertained.


Methods
Human subjects

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board Services, Aurora, Ontario, Canada. We recruited 44 healthy volunteers from the Los Angeles, CA area. Volunteers were of both genders ranging in age between 18 and 54 and equally distributed among Caucasians, Hispanics, African Americans and Asians. The subjects signed the consent forms, completed the health questionnaire forms and underwent physical examinations. Those who had no history of known personal or occupational exposures to lead and no background of lead-related symptoms or disorders underwent blood tests to determine their plasma lead and ZPP levels. The subjects whose plasma lead levels were in the normal range below 10 μg/dL were asked to provide 50 ml of blood for experimentation.

Isolation and culture of PBMC

The blood was collected in (K3) EDTA collection tubes by venipuncture after obtaining appropriate informed consent. PBMC were isolated by Ficol gradient centrifugation as described earlier [21,22] and were suspended at 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The cells were cultured for 18 hours in three replicate plates in the presence of lead acetate at five concentrations: 0.08 μM, 0.4 μM, 2 μM, 10 μM and 50 μM either with or without 10μg/ml phytohemagglutinin (PHA-P, Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis, MO). Control cells were cultured in three replicate wells in the medium which did not contain lead. Lead concentrations were far below the toxicity levels observed in PBMC at concentrations above 500 μM [81].

Cytokine assay

Cell culture supernatants were collected and concentrations of 15 common cytokines GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, MIP-1β, MCP-1, Eotaxin, MIP-1α and RANTES were measured by using multiplex immunoassays based on Luminex xMAP™ bead array technology as described earlier [21,22]. PBMC isolated from three donors were used for the cytokine analyses. Mean concentration values of cytokines in cultures challenged to lead acetate were normalized to those in control cultures. The normalized values at 10 μM and 50 μM lead acetate were compared to those at 0.08 μM and 0.4 μM lead acetate by pooled t-tests. The variances in the groups were confirmed by the F-test. All F-test p-values were above 0.1, except for IL-8 at 50 μM lead acetate. T-test with the Satterthwaite approximation to the degrees of freedom was used for this challenge. All t-tests assumed two-tailed distribution and the confidence level was set at 5%.

RNA isolation and gene array analysis

Total RNA was purified from PBMC samples by using Trizol reagent and RNeasy RNA purification kits (Qiagen Sciences, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Whole genome expression profiling was performed by using Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip® arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) interrogating over 47,000 transcripts from approximately 40,000 annotated human genes. All labeling reactions and hybridizations were carried out according to the Affymetrix GeneChip® eukaryotic target labeling protocol. Bound probes were detected by laser excitation of the fluorescent markers and the resultant emission spectra were obtained by using the Gene Array Scanner 3000 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Data acquisition was performed using GCOS (Affymetrix GeneChip Operating Software Package). Data normalization, background correction and all subsequent statistical tests for significant differential expressions were performed by using a Partek statistical software package (Partek., Inc, St. Louis, MO). Data was normalized via a quintiles normalization and summarized using the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) method [82]. The ANOVA test was used to calculate the significance of the differential expression between treated and untreated samples. Raw p-values were corrected for FDR (false discovery rate) using the Benjamini and Hochberg procedure [83] and a cut-off level equal or less than 0.05 was applied. Cluster analysis was performed by using the DAVID functional annotation tool [84]. Additional functional analysis was performed by using an Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (Ingenuity Systems, Redwood City, CA). Gene array data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database, accession number GSE37567 [85].


Abbreviations

PBMC, Peripheral blood mononuclear cells; ZPP, Zinc protoporphyrin; MT, Metallothionein; PHA, Phytohemagglutinin.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Authors' contributions

BSG conceived of the study, designed it, recruited the patients and drafted the manuscript; IMG participated in the design of the study and its coordination, carried out the immunoassays, analyzed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. ZA carried out the gene expression studies, and helped drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


Supplementary Material Additional file 1

Changes in cellular responses to lead in individuals with high blood ZPP levels.


Click here for additional data file (1471-2164-13-344-S1.xlsx)


Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Aaron Bruno, Kristine Baraoidan, Juan Chen and WeiHua Wang for technical support during the course of this study.


References
Needleman H,Lead poisoningAnnu Rev MedYear: 20045520922210.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.10365314746518
Philip AT,Gerson B,Lead poisoning–Part I. Incidence, etiology, and toxicokineticsClin Lab MedYear: 19941424234447924196
Patrick L,Lead toxicity, a review of the literature. Part 1: Exposure, evaluation, and treatmentAltern Med RevYear: 200611122216597190
Verstraeten SV,Aimo L,Oteiza PI,Aluminium and lead: molecular mechanisms of brain toxicityArch ToxicolYear: 2008821178980210.1007/s00204-008-0345-318668223
Mudipalli A,Lead hepatotoxicity & potential health effectsIndian J Med ResYear: 2007126651852718219078
Bressler J,Kim KA,Chakraborti T,Goldstein G,Molecular mechanisms of lead neurotoxicityNeurochem ResYear: 199924459560010.1023/A:102259611589710227691
Marchetti C,Molecular targets of lead in brain neurotoxicityNeurotox ResYear: 20035322123610.1007/BF0303314212835126
Toscano CD,Guilarte TR,Lead neurotoxicity: from exposure to molecular effectsBrain Res Brain Res RevYear: 200549352955416269318
Patrick L,Lead toxicity part II: the role of free radical damage and the use of antioxidants in the pathology and treatment of lead toxicityAltern Med RevYear: 200611211412716813461
Gurer H,Ercal N,Can antioxidants be beneficial in the treatment of lead poisoning?Free Radic Biol MedYear: 2000291092794510.1016/S0891-5849(00)00413-511084283
Bechara EJ,Oxidative stress in acute intermittent porphyria and lead poisoning may be triggered by 5-aminolevulinic acidBraz J Med Biol ResYear: 19962978418519070373
Adonaylo VN,Oteiza PI,Pb2+ promotes lipid oxidation and alterations in membrane physical propertiesToxicologyYear: 19991321193210.1016/S0300-483X(98)00134-610199578
Adonaylo VN,Oteiza PI,Lead intoxication: antioxidant defenses and oxidative damage in rat brainToxicologyYear: 19991352–3778510463764
Roots LM,Tests available for assessing recent exposure to inorganic lead compounds and their use for screening purposesSci Total EnvironYear: 1979111596810.1016/0048-9697(79)90033-084406
Blood lead levels in young children--United States and selected states, 1996-1999MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly RepYear: 200049501133113711190117
Rabinowitz MB,Wetherill GW,Kopple JD,Kinetic analysis of lead metabolism in healthy humansJ Clin InvestYear: 197658226027010.1172/JCI108467783195
Labbe RF,Vreman HJ,Stevenson DK,Zinc protoporphyrin: A metabolite with a missionClin ChemYear: 199945122060207210585337
Staudinger KC,Roth VS,Occupational lead poisoningAm Fam PhysicianYear: 1998574719726 731-712. 9490995
Martin CJ,Werntz CL,Ducatman AM,The interpretation of zinc protoporphyrin changes in lead intoxication: a case report and review of the literatureOccup Med (Lond)Year: 200454858759110.1093/occmed/kqh12315576877
Kansky A,Fluorescence microscopy test in porphyrias, photodermatoses and lead exposed personsArch Dermatol ForschYear: 197525243113151164041
Gillis B,Gavin IM,Arbieva Z,King ST,Jayaraman S,Prabhakar BS,Identification of human cell responses to benzene and benzene metabolitesGenomicsYear: 200790332433310.1016/j.ygeno.2007.05.00317572062
Gavin IM,Gillis B,Arbieva Z,Prabhakar BS,Identification of human cell responses to hexavalent chromiumEnviron Mol MutagenYear: 200748865065710.1002/em.2033117685462
Kratz A,Ferraro M,Sluss PM,Lewandrowski KB,Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Laboratory reference valuesN Engl J MedYear: 2004351151548156310.1056/NEJMcpc04901615470219
Lawrence DA,Heavy metal modulation of lymphocyte activities--II. Lead, an in vitro mediator of B-cell activationInt J ImmunopharmacolYear: 19813215316110.1016/0192-0561(81)90006-06266971
Razani-Boroujerdi S,Edwards B,Sopori ML,Lead stimulates lymphocyte proliferation through enhanced T cell-B cell interactionJ Pharmacol Exp TherYear: 199928827147199918580
Warner GL,Lawrence DA,Stimulation of murine lymphocyte responses by cationsCell ImmunolYear: 1986101242543910.1016/0008-8749(86)90155-33489539
De Guise S,Bernier J,Lapierre P,Dufresne MM,Dubreuil P,Fournier M,Immune function of bovine leukocytes after in vitro exposure to selected heavy metalsAm J Vet ResYear: 200061333934410.2460/ajvr.2000.61.33910714530
Coyle P,Philcox JC,Carey LC,Rofe AM,Metallothionein: The multipurpose proteinCellular and Molecular Life SciencesYear: 200259462764710.1007/s00018-002-8454-212022471
Haq F,Mahoney M,Koropatnick J,Signaling events for metallothionein inductionMutat ResYear: 20035331–221122614643422
Klaassen CD,Liu J,Role of metallothionein in cadmium-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicityDrug Metabolism ReviewsYear: 1997291–2791029187512
Lanphear BP,Dietrich K,Auinger P,Cox C,Cognitive deficits associated with blood lead concentrations <10 microg/dL in US children and adolescentsPublic Health RepYear: 2000115652152910.1093/phr/115.6.52111354334
Canfield RL,Henderson CR,Cory-Slechta DA,Cox C,Jusko TA,Lanphear BP,Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10 microg per deciliterN Engl J MedYear: 2003348161517152610.1056/NEJMoa02284812700371
Cory-Slechta DA,Relationships between Pb-induced changes in neurotransmitter system function and behavioral toxicityNeurotoxicologyYear: 19971836736889339816
La P,Fernando AP,Wang Z,Salahudeen A,Yang G,Lin Q,Wright CJ,Dennery PA,Zinc protoporphyrin regulates cyclin D1 expression independent of heme oxygenase inhibitionJ Biol ChemYear: 200928452363023631110.1074/jbc.M109.03164119850937
Hopkins SJ,The pathophysiological role of cytokinesLeg Med (Tokyo)Year: 20035Suppl 1S45S5712935551
Heo Y,Parsons PJ,Lawrence DA,Lead differentially modifies cytokine production in vitro and in vivoToxicol Appl PharmacolYear: 1996138114915710.1006/taap.1996.01088658504
Iavicoli I,Marinaccio A,Castellino N,Carelli G,Altered cytokine production in mice exposed to lead acetateInt J Immunopathol PharmacolYear: 2004172 Suppl9710215345199
Iavicoli I,Carelli G,Stanek EJ,Castellino N,Calabrese EJ,Below background levels of blood lead impact cytokine levels in male and female miceToxicol Appl PharmacolYear: 20062101–2949916289177
Lahat N,Shapiro S,Froom P,Kristal-Boneh E,Inspector M,Miller A,Inorganic lead enhances cytokine-induced elevation of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-9 expression in glial cellsJ NeuroimmunolYear: 20021321–212312812417442
Struzynska L,Dabrowska-Bouta B,Koza K,Sulkowski G,Inflammation-like glial response in lead-exposed immature rat brainToxicol SciYear: 200795115616217047031
White LD,Cory-Slechta DA,Gilbert ME,Tiffany-Castiglioni E,Zawia NH,Virgolini M,Rossi-George A,Lasley SM,Qian YC,Basha MR,New and evolving concepts in the neurotoxicology of leadToxicol Appl PharmacolYear: 2007225112710.1016/j.taap.2007.08.00117904601
Guo TL,Mudzinski SP,Lawrence DA,The heavy metal lead modulates the expression of both TNF-alpha and TNF-alpha receptors in lipopolysaccharide-activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cellsJ Leukoc BiolYear: 19965969329398691080
Di Lorenzo L,Vacca A,Corfiati M,Lovreglio P,Soleo L,Evaluation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor serum levels in lead-exposed smoker workersInt J Immunopathol PharmacolYear: 200720223924717624258
Bebianno MJ,Cravo A,Miguel C,Morais S,Metallothionein concentrations in a population of Patella aspera: variation with sizeSci Total EnvironYear: 20033011–315116112493193
Carvalho CD,de Araujo HSS,Fernandes MN,Hepatic metallothionein in a teleost (Prochilodus scrofa) exposed to copper at pH 4.5 and pH 8.0Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B-Biochemistry & Molecular BiologyYear: 2004137222523410.1016/j.cbpc.2003.11.004
Domouhtsidou GP,Dailianis S,Kaloyianni M,Dimitriadis VK,Lysosomal membrane stability and metallothionein content in Mytilus galloprovincialis (L.), as biomarkers - Combination with trace metal concentrationsMar Pollut BullYear: 2004485–657258614980473
Geret F,Jouan A,Turpin V,Bebianno MJ,Cosson RP,Influence of metal exposure on metallothionein synthesis and lipid peroxidation in two bivalve mollusks: the oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and the mussel (Mytilus edulis)Aquatic Living ResourcesYear: 2002151616610.1016/S0990-7440(01)01147-0
Lecoeur S,Videmann B,Berny P,Evaluation of metallothionein as a biomarker of single and combined Cd/Cu exposure in Dreissena polymorphaEnviron ResYear: 200494218419110.1016/S0013-9351(03)00069-014757381
Lukkari T,Taavitsainen M,Soimasuo M,Oikari A,Haimi J,Biomarker responses of the earthworm Aporrectodea tuberculata to copper and zinc exposure: differences between populations with and without earlier metal exposureEnviron PollutYear: 2004129337738610.1016/j.envpol.2003.12.00815016459
Perceval O,Pinel-Alloul B,Methot G,Couillard Y,Giguere A,Campbell PGC,Hare L,Cadmium accumulation and metallothionein synthesis in freshwater bivalves (Pyganodon grandis): relative influence of the metal exposure gradient versus limnological variabilityEnviron PollutYear: 2002118151710.1016/S0269-7491(01)00282-211996382
Regoli F,Pellegrini D,Winston GW,Gorbi S,Giuliani S,Virno-Lamberti C,Bomdadre S,Application of biomarkers for assessing the biological impact of dredged materials in the Mediterranean: the relationship between antioxidant responses and susceptibility to oxidative stress in the red mullet (Mullus barbatus)Mar Pollut BullYear: 200244991292210.1016/S0025-326X(02)00120-012405216
Shea J,Moran T,Dehn PF,A bioassay for metals utilizing a human cell lineToxicol VitrYear: 20082241025103110.1016/j.tiv.2008.02.014
Lu J,Jin TY,Nordberg G,Nordberg M,Metallothionein gene expression in peripheral lymphocytes from cadmium-exposed workersCell Stress & ChaperonesYear: 2001629710410.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0097:MGEIPL>2.0.CO;211599580
Vaziri ND,Sica DA,Lead-induced hypertension: role of oxidative stressCurr Hypertens RepYear: 20046431432010.1007/s11906-004-0027-315257867
Lob S,Konigsrainer A,Rammensee HG,Opelz G,Terness P,Inhibitors of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase for cancer therapy: can we see the wood for the trees?Nat Rev CancerYear: 20099644545210.1038/nrc263919461669
Katz JB,Muller AJ,Prendergast GC,Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in T-cell tolerance and tumoral immune escapeImmunol RevYear: 200822220622110.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00610.x18364004
Mishra KP,Lead exposure and its impact on immune system: a reviewToxicol In VitroYear: 200923696997210.1016/j.tiv.2009.06.01419540334
Fischbein A,Tsang P,Luo JC,Roboz JP,Jiang JD,Bekesi JG,Phenotypic aberrations of CD3+ and CD4+ cells and functional impairments of lymphocytes at low-level occupational exposure to leadClin Immunol ImmunopatholYear: 199366216316810.1006/clin.1993.10208095868
Undeger U,Basaran N,Canpinar H,Kansu E,Immune alterations in lead-exposed workersToxicologyYear: 19961092–31671728658547
Li S,Zhengyan Z,Rong L,Hanyun C,Decrease of CD4+ T-lymphocytes in children exposed to environmental leadBiol Trace Elem ResYear: 20051051–3192516034150
Muller N,Myint AM,Schwarz MJ,The impact of neuroimmune dysregulation on neuroprotection and neurotoxicity in psychiatric disorders–relation to drug treatmentDialogues Clin NeurosciYear: 200911331933219877499
Miller CL,Llenos IC,Dulay JR,Barillo MM,Yolken RH,Weis S,Expression of the kynurenine pathway enzyme tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase is increased in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophreniaNeurobiol DisYear: 200415361862910.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.01515056470
Jin Y,Duan L,Lee SH,Kloosterboer HJ,Blair IA,Penning TM,Human cytosolic hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases of the aldo-ketoreductase superfamily catalyze reduction of conjugated steroids: implications for phase I and phase II steroid hormone metabolismJ Biol ChemYear: 200928415100131002210.1074/jbc.M80946520019218247
Penning TM,Byrns MC,Steroid hormone transforming aldo-keto reductases and cancerAnn N Y Acad SciYear: 20091155334210.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03700.x19250190
Zheng P,Neuroactive steroid regulation of neurotransmitter release in the CNS: action, mechanism and possible significanceProg NeurobiolYear: 200989213415210.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.07.00119595736
Frye CA,Neurosteroids' effects and mechanisms for social, cognitive, emotional, and physical functionsPsychoneuroendocrinologyYear: 200934Suppl 1S143S16119656632
Glahn F,Schmidt-Heck W,Zellmer S,Guthke R,Wiese J,Golka K,Hergenroder R,Degen GH,Lehmann T,Hermes M,et al. Cadmium, cobalt and lead cause stress response, cell cycle deregulation and increased steroid as well as xenobiotic metabolism in primary normal human bronchial epithelial cells which is coordinated by at least nine transcription factorsArch ToxicolYear: 200882851352410.1007/s00204-008-0331-918654764
Tai HH,Ensor CM,Tong M,Zhou H,Yan F,Prostaglandin catabolizing enzymesProstaglandins Other Lipid MediatYear: 200268-6948349312432938
Murphy RC,Gijon MA,Biosynthesis and metabolism of leukotrienesBiochem JYear: 2007405337939510.1042/BJ2007028917623009
Hong CS,Kwon SJ,Kim do H,Multiple functions of junctin and junctate, two distinct isoforms of aspartyl beta-hydroxylaseBiochem Biophys Res CommunYear: 200736211410.1016/j.bbrc.2007.07.16617706594
Hsieh JY,Chen SH,Hung HC,Functional roles of the tetramer organization of malic enzymeJ Biol ChemYear: 200928427180961810510.1074/jbc.M109.00508219416979
Vasiliou V,Pappa A,Polymorphisms of human aldehyde dehydrogenasesConsequences for drug metabolism and disease. PharmacologyYear: 2000613192198
Gelbman BD,Heguy A,O'Connor TP,Zabner J,Crystal RG,Upregulation of pirin expression by chronic cigarette smoking is associated with bronchial epithelial cell apoptosisRespir ResYear: 200781010.1186/1465-9921-8-1017288615
Daigle ND,Carpentier GA,Frenette-Cotton R,Simard MG,Lefoll MH,Noel M,Caron L,Noel J,Isenring P,Molecular characterization of a human cation-Cl- cotransporter (SLC12A8A, CCC9A) that promotes polyamine and amino acid transportJ Cell PhysiolYear: 2009220368068910.1002/jcp.2181419472210
Kanai Y,Endou H,Heterodimeric amino acid transporters: molecular biology and pathological and pharmacological relevanceCurr Drug MetabYear: 20012433935410.2174/138920001333832411766986
Sturm RA,Molecular genetics of human pigmentation diversityHum Mol GenetYear: 200918R1R9R1710.1093/hmg/ddp00319297406
Rapley EA,Nathanson KL,Predisposition alleles for testicular germ cell tumourCurr Opin Genet DevYear: 2010201610.1016/j.gde.2010.01.00120116234
Patwari P,Chutkow WA,Cummings K,Verstraeten VL,Lammerding J,Schreiter ER,Lee RT,Thioredoxin-independent regulation of metabolism by the alpha-arrestin proteinsJ Biol ChemYear: 200928437249962500310.1074/jbc.M109.01809319605364
Tian Y,Green PG,Stamova B,Hertz-Picciotto I,Pessah IN,Hansen R,Yang X,Gregg JP,Ashwood P,Jickling G,Van de Water J,Sharp FR,Correlations of gene expression with blood lead levels in children with autism compared to typically developing controlsNeurotox ResYear: 201119111310.1007/s12640-009-9126-x19921347
Labbe RF,Clinical utility of zinc protoporphyrinClin ChemYear: 19923811216721681424105
de la Fuente H,Portales-Perez D,Baranda L,Diaz-Barriga F,Saavedra-Alanis V,Layseca E,Gonzalez-Amaro R,Effect of arsenic, cadmium and lead on the induction of apoptosis of normal human mononuclear cellsClin Exp ImmunolYear: 20021291697710.1046/j.1365-2249.2002.01885.x12100024
Irizarry RA,Hobbs B,Collin F,Beazer-Barclay YD,Antonellis KJ,Scherf U,Speed TP,Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level dataBiostatisticsYear: 20034224926410.1093/biostatistics/4.2.24912925520
Benjamini Y,Hochberg Y,Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series BYear: 199557289300
DAVID functional annotation tool http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov.
Gene Expression Omnibus http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/.

Figures

[Figure ID: F1]
Figure 1 

Cytokine production by PBMC challenged to lead acetate. Concentrations of cytokines in PBMC cultures challenged to either lead acetate alone at indicated concentrations (A) or to lead acetate in combination with 1μg/ml PHA (B) were normalized to those in control cultures. Statistically significant changes are marked with asterisks.



[Figure ID: F2]
Figure 2 

Physiological processes affected by lead challenge in subjects with high blood ZPP content. The categories were sorted by their scores (blue bars). Yellow graph corresponds to the ratio of the number of affected genes to the total number of genes in this category.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T1] Table 1 

Annotation clusters of genes affected by lead


Annotation Cluster 1 Enrichment Score: 9.7      
Category
Term
Count
P-value
FDR
UP_SEQ_FEATURE
metal ion-binding site: Divalent metal cation; cluster B
7
2.02E-10
3.01E-07
UP_SEQ_FEATURE
metal ion-binding site: Divalent metal cation; cluster A
7
2.02E-10
3.01E-07
PIR_SUPERFAMILY
PIRSF002564:metallothionein
7
2.15E-10
2.26E-07
INTERPRO
IPR018064: Metallothionein, vertebrate, metal binding site
7
2.23E-10
3.05E-07
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS
metal-thiolate cluster
7
3.86E-10
4.98E-07
INTERPRO
IPR000006: Metallothionein, vertebrate
7
4.43E-10
6.06E-07
INTERPRO
IPR003019: Metallothionein superfamily, eukaryotic
7
4.43E-10
6.06E-07
Annotation Cluster 2
Enrichment Score: 5.8
 
 
 
Category
Term
Count
P-value
FDR
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS
cadmium
6
2.79E-09
3.59E-06
GOTERM_MF_FAT
GO:0046870 ~ cadmium ion binding
6
2.94E-08
4.01E-05
SP_PIR_KEYWORDS
copper
6
1.47E-04
0.19
GOTERM_MF_FAT GO:0005507 ~ copper ion binding 6 7.95E-04 1.08

[TableWrap ID: T2] Table 2 

Functional families of genes affected by lead


Group1. IPR000006: Metallothionein, vertebrate Enrichment Score: 6.0
217546_at
metallothionein 1M
213629_x_at, 210524_x_at, 217165_x_at
metallothionein 1F
206461_x_at
metallothionein 1H
212185_x_at
metallothionein 2A
204745_x_at
metallothionein 1G
208581_x_at, 204326_x_at
metallothionein 1X
216336_x_at, 212859_x_at
metallothionein 1L (gene/pseudogene); metallothionein 1E; metallothionein 1 pseudogene 3; metallothionein 1J (pseudogene)
Group 2. GO:0004672 protein kinase activity
Enrichment Score: 1.2
211993_at
WNK lysine deficient protein kinase 1; hypothetical LOC100132369
244846_at
mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase kinase 4
214464_at
CDC42 binding protein kinase alpha (DMPK-like)
241403_at
CDC-like kinase 4
213328_at NIMA (never in mitosis gene a)-related kinase 1

[TableWrap ID: T3] Table 3 

Persistent changes in gene expression induced by lead


Gene Symbol Gene Title Probe Set ID Entrez Gene ID Fold Increase P-value
MT1M
metallothionein 1M
217546_at
4499
18
1.03E-22
MT1G
metallothionein 1G
204745_x_at
4495
17.7
1.64E-27
MT1H
metallothionein 1H
206461_x_at
4496
14.2
6.96E-28
MT1X
metallothionein 1X
208581_x_at
4501
13.9
1.90E-26
 
 
204326_x_at
4501
13
1.66E-25
MT1E
metallothionein 1E
212859_x_at
4493
10.9
4.23E-26
MT2A
metallothionein 2A
212185_x_at
4502
10.6
2.93E-27
MT1P2
metallothionein 1 pseudogene 2
211456_x_at
645745
9.55
2.96E-27
MT1F
metallothionein 1F
217165_x_at
4494
8.86
1.29E-24
 
 
213629_x_at
4494
6.6
2.47E-21
 
 
210524_x_at
4494
4.62
2.72E-19
MT1E///MT1H///MT1M///MT1P2
metallothionein 1E///metallothionein 1H///metallothionein 1M///metallothionein 1 pseudogene 2
216336_x_at
4493///4496///4499///645745
7.44
4.60E-23
EDNRB
endothelin receptor type B
204273_at
1910
11
1.11E-17
 
 
206701_x_at
1910
6.6
8.42E-13
 
 
204271_s_at
1910
5.99
3.32E-13
ALDH1A1
aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A1
212224_at
216
4.37
6.93E-06
KITLG
KIT ligand
226534_at
4254
3.19
2.02E-09
TDO2
tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase
205943_at
6999
3.14
0.004728
TMEM158
transmembrane protein 158
213338_at
25907
2.96
6.16E-15
FAM70A
family with sequence similarity 70, member A
219895_at
55026
2.87
0.000112
PTGR1
prostaglandin reductase 1
231897_at
22949
2.86
3.65E-08
 
 
228824_s_at
22949
2.74
4.81E-07
ARRDC4
arrestin domain containing 4
225283_at
91947
2.8
7.31E-11
AKR1C1
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C1 (dihydrodiol dehydrogenase 1; 20-alpha)
204151_x_at
1645
2.68
0.000934
 
 
216594_x_at
1645
2.28
3.79E-05
AKR1C2
aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C2 (dihydrodiol dehydrogenase 2; bile acid)
211653_x_at
1646
2.47
4.10E-05
 
 
209699_x_at
1646
2.28
5.27E-05
ME1
malic enzyme 1, NADP(+)-dependent, cytosolic
204058_at
4199
2.53
9.73E-07
 
 
204059_s_at
4199
2.3
9.20E-08
SLC7A11
solute carrier family 7, (cationic amino acid transporter, y + system) member 11
207528_s_at
23657
2.58
3.45E-07
 
 
209921_at
23657
2.42
7.46E-06
 
 
217678_at
23657
2.37
4.72E-05
ASPH
aspartate beta-hydroxylase
210896_s_at
444
2.41
1.80E-11
 
 
209135_at
444
2.5
3.04E-10
 
 
224996_at
444
2.08
9.56E-08
 
 
225008_at
444
1.87
4.93E-08
 
 
205808_at
444
1.58
7.60E-05
 
 
242037_at
444
1.57
1.32E-06
ENSG00000204134
---
238727_at
---
2.23
0.000495
SLC12A8
solute carrier family 12 (potassium/chloride transporters), member 8
219874_at
84561
2.17
1.85E-08
PIR pirin (iron-binding nuclear protein) 207469_s_at 8544 2.01 0.000561

[TableWrap ID: T4] Table 4 

Annotation clusters affected by lead in individuals with high blood lead levels


Annotation Cluster 1 Enrichment Score: 4.6      
Category
Term
Count
P-value
FDR
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0010941 ~ regulation of cell death
84
2.05E-05
0.04
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0042981 ~ regulation of apoptosis
83
2.21E-05
0.04
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0043067 ~ regulation of programmed cell death
83
3.15E-05
0.06
Annotation Cluster 2
Enrichment Score: 4.4
 
 
 
Category
Term
Count
P-value
FDR
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0010629 ~ negative regulation of gene expression
59
1.24E-05
0.02
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0016481 ~ negative regulation of transcription
55
1.33E-05
0.02
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0010558 ~ negative regulation of macromolecule biosynthetic process
62
1.97E-05
0.04
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0031327 ~ negative regulation of cellular biosynthetic process
63
2.22E-05
0.04
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0009890 ~ negative regulation of biosynthetic process
64
2.23E-05
0.04
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0045934 ~ negative regulation of nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process
57
7.26E-05
0.13
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0051172 ~ negative regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process
57
1.05E-04
0.19
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0010605 ~ negative regulation of macromolecule metabolic process
71
6.31E-04
1.14
Annotation Cluster 3
Enrichment Score: 4.0
 
 
 
Category
Term
Count
P-value
FDR
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0043068 ~ positive regulation of programmed cell death
50
9.01E-05
0.16
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0010942 ~ positive regulation of cell death
50
1.00E-04
0.18
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0043065 ~ positive regulation of apoptosis
49
1.47E-04
0.27
Annotation Cluster 4
Enrichment Score: 3.8
 
 
 
Category
Term
Count
P-value
FDR
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0016481 ~ negative regulation of transcription
55
1.33E-05
0.02
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0045892 ~ negative regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent
41
4.50E-04
0.81
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0051253 ~ negative regulation of RNA metabolic process 41 6.25E-04 1.13

[TableWrap ID: T5] Table 5 

Physiological processes affected by lead in individuals with high blood lead levels


Category Count P-Value
Nervous system development and function
8
8.32E-04 - 4.62E-02
Proliferation of Schwann cells
3
8.32E-04
Growth of axons
3
2.50E-02
Axonal transport
2
4.62E-02
Tissue development
18
3.62E-03 - 4.62E-02
Tumor Morphology
9
6.34E-03 - 4.62E-02
Hematological system development and function
22
9.70E-03 - 4.81E-02
Hematopoiesis 13 9.70E-03 - 3.61E-02

[TableWrap ID: T6] Table 6 

Annotation clusters of genes affected in individuals with higher ZPP levels


Annotation Cluster 1 Enrichment Score: 2.8        
Category
Term
Count
P-Value
Fold Enrichment
FDR
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0050806 ~ positive regulation of synaptic transmission
6
0.0013
7.3
2.1
GOTERM_BP_FAT
GO:0051971 ~ positive regulation of transmission of nerve impulse
6
0.0018
6.7
3.1
GOTERM_BP_FAT GO:0031646 ~ positive regulation of neurological system process 6 0.0023 6.3 3.9


Article Categories:
  • Research Article

Keywords: Lead, Heavy metals, Cytokines, Gene expression, Peripheral blood mononuclear cells, Zinc protoporphyrin.

Previous Document:  Intervertebral disk width in dogs with and without clinical signs of disk associated cervical spondy...
Next Document:  Correlative Analyses of NO Generation Rates and NOS Levels in Individual Cells Using Modular Cell Re...