Document Detail


Analysis of LV lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy using different imaging modalities.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20466342     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate whether left ventricular (LV) lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be determined by myocardial deformation imaging during LV pacing and to compare imaging techniques for analysis of LV lead position. BACKGROUND: LV lead position has a significant impact on effectiveness of CRT, but clinically applicable methods to determine LV lead position are less defined. METHODS: In 56 patients (53 +/- 5 years, 34 men) undergoing CRT, fluoroscopy and 2 myocardial deformation imaging-based approaches were applied to determine the LV lead position. Myocardial deformation imaging-based techniques were used to determine 1) the segment with maximal temporal difference of peak circumferential strain before and while on biventricular CRT; and 2) the segment with earliest peak systolic circumferential strain during pure LV pacing. Twelve-month echocardiography was performed to determine LV remodeling and improvement in function. Optimal LV lead position was defined as concordance or immediate neighboring of the determined LV lead position to the segment with latest systolic strain prior to CRT. RESULTS: LV lead position determined during LV pacing correlated to the position determined by fluoroscopy (kappa = 0.761). Patients with optimal LV lead position had greater improvement in LV ejection fraction and decrease in end-diastolic volume than those with nonoptimal LV lead position (12 +/- 4% vs. 7 +/- 3%, p < 0.001, and 28 +/- 13 ml vs. 14 +/- 8 ml, p < 0.001, respectively). Determination of the LV lead position based on myocardial deformation imaging during LV pacing showed greater discriminatory power for improvement of ejection fraction (difference optimal vs. nonoptimal lead position group: 4.64 +/- 1.01 ml; p < 0.001) than deformation imaging with biventricular pacing (3.03 +/- 1.08 ml; p = 0.007) and fluoroscopy (2.22 +/- 1.12 ml; p = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial deformation imaging during LV pacing allows determination of the LV lead position in CRT. Improvement in LV function and remodeling as indicators of optimal LV lead position can be best predicted by LV lead position analysis during LV pacing. (Left Ventricular Lead Position in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; NCT00748735).
Authors:
Michael Becker; Ertunc Altiok; Christina Ocklenburg; Renate Krings; Dan Adams; Michael Lysansky; Barbara Vogel; Patrick Schauerte; Christian Knackstedt; Rainer Hoffmann
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  JACC. Cardiovascular imaging     Volume:  3     ISSN:  1876-7591     ISO Abbreviation:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging     Publication Date:  2010 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-14     Completed Date:  2010-08-30     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101467978     Medline TA:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  472-81     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, University RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Data Bank Information
Bank Name/Acc. No.:
ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00748735
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Cardiac Pacing, Artificial*
Defibrillators, Implantable*
Echocardiography, Doppler
Electric Countershock / instrumentation*
Equipment Design
Female
Fluoroscopy
Heart Failure / diagnosis,  physiopathology,  therapy*
Heart Ventricles / physiopathology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Contraction
Pacemaker, Artificial*
Recovery of Function
Stroke Volume
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
Ventricular Remodeling

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Comparative mechanical activation mapping of RV pacing to LBBB by 2D and 3D speckle tracking and ass...
Next Document:  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld ...