Document Detail


Analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  11912374     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: We evaluated the effectiveness of and patient preference for analgesia used during shock wave lithotripsy by comparing diclofenac alone with a combination of diclofenac and patient controlled analgesia, that is alfentanil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 64 patients were treated using a Lithotriptor S (Dornier Medical Systems, Marietta, Georgia) and randomized to receive diclofenac alone or combined with an alfentanil patient controlled analgesia pump. If treated twice, they crossed over to the alternative form of analgesia. A record was maintained of the site and size of the stone, maximum power achieved, number of shocks, amount of alfentanil used and need for additional analgesia. After treatment patients scored on a visual analog scale the maximum level of pain and satisfaction with analgesia. RESULTS: There was no difference in the mean size of the stone treated (8.6 and 7.5 mm.), energy level (71% and 71% or approximately 17 kV.) or number of shocks (3,000 and 2,900, respectively) in the groups. Only 2 patients in the diclofenac group required additional analgesia and there were no significant side effects from either treatment. The mean pain scores were not significantly different in the diclofenac and patient controlled analgesia groups (3.54 and 2.93, respectively, (p = 0.34), although those on patient controlled analgesia were more satisfied (7.72 versus 9.14, p = 0.04). Of the 38 patients who presented twice 58% preferred diclofenac alone. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there is no significant difference in the level of pain experienced with diclofenac alone or when combined with an alfentanil patient controlled analgesia pump during shock wave lithotripsy. However, patients are more satisfied with treatment when a patient controlled analgesia pump is available.
Authors:
John Parkin; Francis X Keeley FX; Anthony G Timoney
Related Documents :
10652894 - Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of nimesulide and diclofenac in patients with degene...
25073404 - Long-term use of ciclosporin on kidney transplant recipients surviving more than 10 years.
22655194 - Effect and safety of mycophenolate mofetil or sodium in systemic sclerosis-associated i...
6352034 - A six-month parallel group comparison of fenbufen and naproxen in the treatment of rheu...
24977044 - Effect of swimming on clinical functional parameters and serum biomarkers in healthy an...
9160944 - Massive, irreparable tears of the rotator cuff. results of operative debridement and su...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  167     ISSN:  0022-5347     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2002 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-03-25     Completed Date:  2002-05-30     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1613-5     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Alfentanil / administration & dosage*
Analgesia*
Analgesics, Opioid / administration & dosage*
Diclofenac / administration & dosage*
Drug Therapy, Combination
Humans
Lithotripsy / adverse effects*
Prospective Studies
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Analgesics, Opioid; 15307-86-5/Diclofenac; 71195-58-9/Alfentanil

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A single 24-hour urine collection is inadequate for the medical evaluation of nephrolithiasis.
Next Document:  Neoinfundibulotomy for the management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula.