Document Detail

Alternative parameterizations of relatedness in whole genome association analysis of pre-weaning traits of Nelore-Angus calves.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  25249774     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Gestation length, birth weight, and weaning weight of F2 Nelore-Angus calves (n = 737) with designed extensive full-sibling and half-sibling relatedness were evaluated for association with 34,957 SNP markers. In analyses of birth weight, random relatedness was modeled three ways: 1) none, 2) random animal, pedigree-based relationship matrix, or 3) random animal, genomic relationship matrix. Detected birth weight-SNP associations were 1,200, 735, and 31 for those parameterizations respectively; each additional model refinement removed associations that apparently were a result of the built-in stratification by relatedness. Subsequent analyses of gestation length and weaning weight modeled genomic relatedness; there were 40 and 26 trait-marker associations detected for those traits, respectively. Birth weight associations were on BTA14 except for a single marker on BTA5. Gestation length associations included 37 SNP on BTA21, 2 on BTA27 and one on BTA3. Weaning weight associations were on BTA14 except for a single marker on BTA10. Twenty-one SNP markers on BTA14 were detected in both birth and weaning weight analyses.
Authors:
David G Riley; Clare A Gill; Andy D Herring; Penny K Riggs; Jason E Sawyer; James O Sanders
Related Documents :
10447904 - Remifentanil infusion for major abdominal surgery in small infants.
18329814 - Response to neonatal anesthesia: effect of sex on anatomical and behavioral outcome.
3566884 - Lidocaine toxicity after maternal pudendal anesthesia in a term infant with fetal distr...
562094 - Caudal anesthesia in infants.
11204714 - Effect of oxygen inhalation at birth on the reduction of early postnatal mortality in p...
7142984 - The effect of early extended contact on father-newborn interaction.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Genetics and molecular biology     Volume:  37     ISSN:  1415-4757     ISO Abbreviation:  Genet. Mol. Biol.     Publication Date:  2014 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-09-24     Completed Date:  2014-09-24     Revised Date:  2014-09-26    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100883590     Medline TA:  Genet Mol Biol     Country:  Brazil    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  518-25     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Genet Mol Biol
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Genet. Mol. Biol
Journal ID (publisher-id): GMB
ISSN: 1415-4757
ISSN: 1678-4685
Publisher: Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © 2014, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética.
License:
Received Day: 07 Month: 3 Year: 2014
Accepted Day: 12 Month: 6 Year: 2014
epub-ppub publication date: Month: 9 Year: 2014
Print publication date: Month: 9 Year: 2014
Volume: 37 Issue: 3
First Page: 518 Last Page: 525
PubMed Id: 25249774
ID: 4171760
Publisher Id: gmb-37-518

Alternative parameterizations of relatedness in whole genome association analysis of pre-weaning traits of Nelore-Angus calves
David G. Riley
Clare A. Gill
Andy D. Herring
Penny K. Riggs
Jason E. Sawyer
James O. Sanders
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, [city: College Station], [state: TX], USA.
Correspondence: Send correspondence to David G. Riley. Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, 77843-2471 College Station, TX, USA. E-mail: david-riley@tamu.edu.

Introduction

Relatedness within animal data may be modeled in multiple ways ranging from incorporation of some aspect of family as a classification variable to more complex modeling of pedigree accomplished through inclusion of the numerator relationship matrix in mixed model equations (Henderson, 1963). The availability of dense single nucleotide polymorphism arrays for research permits the evaluation of genomic relatedness among animals with records based on their marker genotypes. Modeling of genomic relatedness, rather than average relatedness based on pedigree, was considered an important opportunity for genetic prediction (Liu et al., 2002; Visscher et al., 2006; Visscher, 2009), due to the improvement of regression equations through refinement of the covariances in the coefficient matrix that are due to relatedness among animals. Inclusion of genomic relatedness in prediction equations improved estimates of variances, and hence heritability (Thomas, 2005; Visscher et al., 2006; Wolc et al., 2013) and improved accuracies of predicted genetic merit (Hayes and Goddard, 2008). These appear to hinge upon the improved marker-trait associations detected with models using refined relationship models. Genomic relationship matrices incorporated in mixed model association analyses may be a better substitute for pedigree-based relationship in marker-QTL association studies (Yu et al., 2006; Zhang et al., 2006, 2007; Sham et al., 2009). There has not been comparison of association results using genomic relatedness and pedigree-based relatedness. The objectives of this study were to 1) describe the whole genome SNP-birth weight associations and the consequences of modeling relationship matrices derived either from pedigree or genomic information or modeling family structure as a fixed effect (per design of the experimental population), and 2) to describe weaning weight- and gestation length-SNP associations using records and genotypes of F2 Nelore-Angus calves.


Materials and Methods
Cattle

Calves (n = 737) were produced by embryo transfer at the Texas AgriLife Research Center near McGregor, Texas, USA. These calves were part of 14 Nelore-Angus full-sibling F2 families produced by five F1 Nelore-Angus sires (all F1 parents were Nelore-sired) and 10 F1 Nelore-Angus cows. The five sires were represented by 1, 2, 3, 4, and 4 families, respectively. The average number of calves in each family was 33.8 and ranged from 2 to 69. Calves were spring- and fall-born from the fall of 2003 through spring of 2007. Recipient cows consisted of 229 crossbred Bos indicus-Bos taurus cows; most had one calf, but a few had as many as four project calves. Four of those five F1 bulls were mated by natural service to 1/2 Bos indicus 1/2 Bos taurus cows to produce 4 half-sibling families. Most of the dams of calves in those half-sibling families were F1 or F2 Brahman-Hereford; some were Brahman-Angus and Nelore-Angus. All of those calves (n = 264) were spring-born (February to late April) from 2003 through 2007. Calves were identified and weighed as soon as practical after birth, usually within one day. Calves were weaned at an average of 213.8 ± 17.9 d of age. All procedures involving animals were approved by the Texas A&M University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee with multiple animal use protocols from 2002 through the present.

Genotypes

Isolation of DNA was conducted from blood samples as previously described (Riley et al., 2013). Genotypes for all project animals were obtained from the Infinium BovineSNP50v1 assay (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). There were on average 29,692 informative markers per F2 family (1 informative marker per 101 kb). Loci were excluded from association analyses if 1) genotypes were missing in 10% or more individuals because phasing programs and other software generally perform poorly with higher levels of missing genotypes, 2) minor allele frequency was less than or equal to 0.05 because very low minor allele frequencies could be SNP that were segregating in founders but not transmitted to the F1 and F2 individuals in the context of this experimental design (family structure), or 3) deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p ≤ 0.05, exact tests according to Wigginton et al., 2005). The assay used is known to have approximately a 0.5% error rate (Hong et al., 2012); 684 Mendelian errors were detected in 181 of the 776 individuals (from 1 to 69 SNP in individuals).

Association analyses included 34,957 markers.

Statistical analyses

Models were built using the MIXED procedures of SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). Investigated fixed effects included the main and interaction effects of year, season of birth, family, dam age (distinct categories for 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-to 10-yr-olds, and older than 10 yr), and calf gender. Regression of weaning weight on calf age in days was investigated. Association analyses were conducted using the Q-K procedures (Yu et al., 2006) of JMP Genomics (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC) with fixed effects identified from the preliminary analyses and regression of trait on genotypic values, which were coded as 0 for the homozygote of the allele with the highest frequency and 2 assigned to the other homozygote. Heterozygotes were assigned values of 1. The false discovery rate was constrained to 0.05 using methodology of Benjamini and Hochberg (1995).

The designed relatedness in this project was evaluated by conducting association analyses with two random structures. The genetic covariance among animals in this project was modeled by constructing 1) the relationship matrix based on pedigree, and 2) the genomic relationship matrix based upon genotypes from the Bovine SNP50 using procedures of JMP Genomics. The pedigree-based relationship matrix was constructed with coancestry coefficients for pairs of animals according to methodology described by Falconer and Mackay (1996). There were 2,419 individuals in the pedigree. Elements of the genomic relationship were calculated as an approximation of identity-by-descent by adjusting the probability of identity-by-descent between two individuals with the average probability of identity-by-state between random individuals (Yu et al., 2006):


1n∑k=1nIBDijk

IBDijk=(Xik-2p)×(Xjk-2p)2pq
where n indexes genotypes, i and j index individuals with genotypes; IBDijk is identity-by-descent estimate of the probability that individuals i and j share an allele at marker genotype k that came from the same ancestor at a locus. This probability is estimated without considering pedigree information; Xik = 0, 1, 2, corresponding to genotypes at marker k in animal i; Within a genotype, p (q) is the frequency within each genotype of the nucleotide (A, C, G, or T) lower (higher) in the alphabet.

A third analysis was conducted using a completely fixed effects model with no relatedness modeled. For each of those 3 scenarios, additional analyses differed by the inclusion of family as a fixed effect (18 levels: 14 full-sibling and four half-sibling families). These six analyses were conducted on birth weight (n = 737; mean 35.0 kg; SD 5.73 kg). Subsequently, those results were used to select the model for analysis of gestation length (n = 473; mean 281 days; SD 5.39 days) and weaning weight (n = 699; mean 229.7 kg, SD 30.5 kg). All outliers (those outside the mean ± 4 SD) were excluded from analyses. Quantile-quantile plots were constructed of ranked test statistics (un-adjusted probability values of F ratios for regression of phenotype on coded genotypes) at each SNP (The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, 2007), and the degree of inflation of the median probability value (λ) was calculated (Devlin and Roeder, 1999) as assessment of the appropriate removal of the effects of population substructure (Voorman et al., 2011). Values of this parameter λ that are closer to 1 are favorable, and those much larger than 1 may indicate the presence of stratification that could result in spurious association of phenotype with genotype.

Locations of the genomic feature closest to each SNP locus associated in final models for each trait were determined using R statistical software and the package Map2NCBI (Hanna and Riley, 2014). Map coordinates reported are from the bovine UMD_3.1 build (Zimin et al., 2009).


Results and Discussion

Preliminary analyses indicated that a combination of year and season of birth was an efficient parameterization of these effects (p < 0.001). Cow age was retained in final models for all traits (p < 0.01), and calf gender explained significant birth weight variation. Family was considered important for all traits in these preliminary analyses (p < 0.001).

The first notable effect of refinement of the relatedness modeled was reduction of the number of detected associations (Table 1). Relative to a model that included no relatedness, the number of detected associations was reduced by over one third in analysis that modeled random animal effects with the inclusion of a pedigree-based relationship matrix. The numbers of detections when employing a genomic relationship matrix were drastically reduced. This implies that the failure to model animal as random resulted in that variation inappropriately contained in the marker regression. Smaller values of λ̂ indicated that additional refinement by employing marker relatedness as opposed to the average relatedness (with exception of parent-offspring, as that relatedness is exact) based on pedigree best accounted for that variation in the analyses (Figures S1, S2, and S3). The variation in pedigree relationships within a population may be much larger than variation within the genomic relationships among pairs with the same pedigree relationship (Hill, 2013).

The inclusion of the designed family fixed effect had pronounced influence on the association results. In the fixed effects model (no inclusion of relationship matrix in equations corresponding to random effects), the effect of family appeared to substitute for random structure and capture variation to the extent that this model resulted in approximately the same numbers of detections (Table 1, Figure 1) as the mixed model with pedigree-based relatedness included. The inclusion of family as a fixed effect resulted in additional associations detected in pedigree-based analyses and genomic-based analyses (Figures 2 and 3) and a slightly larger value for λ̂ in the pedigree-based analysis. This is likely because family structure is confounded with information provided in the relationship matrix. Also, there must exist non-0 covariances between levels of this effect and the relatedness modeled in these mixed models. These were modeled as 0 in these analyses, and that may also have contributed to the more liberal detections of SNP-birth weight associations.

The majority of SNP loci detected as associated with birth weight in the analyses with a genomic relationship matrix included (28 of 31) were detected in each of the other analyses with different relationship parameterizations (Figure 4) except for the fixed effect model that did not include family effects. The analysis that modeled no relatedness (nor family as a fixed effect) identified a large number of loci (n = 650) that were not detected otherwise.

Zhang et al. (2006) reported high correspondence between relationship matrices constructed using pedigree and molecular information, but reported that the distribution of p values (H0: no association) from a mixed model with relationship matrix based on markers was closer to the expected distribution than those p values produced from mixed models with pedigree-based relationship matrix included or from a fixed effect model. Incorporating marker-based relationships may increase the power of association tests (Yu et al., 2006). The most recent efforts reported that the use of both pedigree and genomic relationship may be the most appropriate for prediction of breeding values (Aguilar et al., 2010; Goddard et al., 2011; Haile-Mariam et al., 2013). The appropriate modeling of relatedness was incorporation of the genomic relationship matrix without including family as a fixed effect.

Birth weight

There were 14, 8, and 9 SNP loci detected as associated with birth weight at the p < 0.001, < 0.01, and < 0.05 levels respectively (Table S1); corresponding numbers in Bos taurus studies were 35, 91, and 339 (Snelling et al., 2010), and 105, 527, and 2,095 (Lu et al., 2013). The majority of detected loci (30 of 31) were from BTA14:16.3 to 28.4 Mb. The proportion of phenotypic variance accounted for by each SNP (singly, that is, not in a multiple regression model) ranged from 0.023 to 0.067. A single locus was detected at BTA5:49.5. Most recently, Lu et al. (2013) reported multiple SNP-birth weight associations on both of these chromosomes. Kneeland et al. (2004) reported QTL for birth weight on BTA6, 19, and 21. Seven associated markers were within the bp limits of the XK, Kell blood group subunit-related family, member 4 (XKR4), and another was upstream > 25 kb of this gene (Table S1). A significant association of a SNP within this gene with birth weight was also detected in Nelore cattle (Utsunomiya et al., 2013); this was one of five total associations detected in that study, as those researchers applied Bonferroni corrections to p-values for the 434,020 loci evaluated. Detected marker-subcutaneous rump fat associations were reported for markers in and around XKR4 in Brahman and Brahman-influenced cattle (Bolormaa et al., 2011; Porto Neto et al., 2012), and this was considered a candidate gene based on marker-trait associations for average daily gain, average daily feed intake, and residual feed intake in Bos taurus cattle (Lindholm-Perry et al., 2012). Chromosome 14 has been consistently identified in association studies as important for growth traits of cattle (e.g., Snelling et al., 2010; Bolormaa et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2013); summaries of detections and genes in that region across time were detailed by Wibowo et al. (2008) and Hawken et al. (2012). Although pleiomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1) on BTA14 was considered a candidate gene for influencing hip height in cattle (Karim et al., 2011), it was not the closest gene to any SNP with detected association in the present study. The closest gene to the marker with strongest association was proenkephalin (PENK) on BTA14. This gene was identified as one of 13 found within 500 kb of the SNP most significantly associated with birth weight in Nelore cattle (Utsunomiya et al., 2013). Increasing expression of PENK in the bovine endometrium concurrent with the progression of pregnancy may indicate that this gene promotes or contributes to conceptus elongation (Forde et al., 2013).

Peters et al. (2012) reported six SNP associated with birth weight in Brangus cattle in the similar region of BTA5. Although it was not the closest feature to the detected locus on BTA5 in the present study, signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) is in the same region; it has been characterized with respect to SNP associations with various cattle traits (Rincón et al., 2009). Hawken et al. (2012) detected associations of SNP with body weight in a broad region of BTA5 and provided a good summary of earlier work with detections on that chromosome.

Gestation length

Almost all (37 of 40) of the markers associated with gestation length were on BTA21 (Figure 5; Table S2), as well as one marker on BTA3 and two on BTA27. The estimate of the degree of inflation of the median probability value (λ̂) was 0.98 and the quantile-quantile plot of χ2 statistics and p-values is in the supplementary information (Figure S4). These did not overlap with most markers previously detected as associated with gestation length (Maltecca et al., 2009; 2011) in dairy cattle, although Maltecca et al. (2011) identified 6 SNP on BTA3. Some SNP in imprinted domain regions on BTA13 were associated with calving difficulty and gestation length of dairy cows (Sikora et al., 2011). A similar region was identified on BTA21 (beginning at BTA21:68.1 Mb; Magee et al., 2010) including delta-like 1 homolog DLK1 and deiodinase, iodothyronine, type III (DIO3); this region was associated with various traits in dairy cattle, including gestation length (Magee et al., 2011). The closest two associated markers in the present study were approximately 30 Mb upstream of this region. Eighteen associated markers were within the bp boundaries of eight genes and four pseudogenes (Table S2).

Weaning weight

All but one of the 26 detected SNP-weaning weight associations (Figure 6; Table S3) were on BTA14. The quantile-quantile plot of χ2 statistics and p-values is in the supplementary information (Figure S4); λ̂ was 0.99. Most of those (n = 21) were also detected as associated with birth weight; this result supported the conclusions of Snelling et al. (2010), that is, genomic regions responsible for variation in both traits were largely the same and that using genomic information to select for growth in one phase while limiting or minimizing growth in another phase would be difficult. A single locus at BTA10:26.6 Mb was detected as associated with weaning weight. Lu et al. (2013) detected associations with weaning weight on these chromosomes (plus others) in similar regions. Snelling et al. (2010) detected associations of the direct component of weaning weight with SNP on BTA10 and BTA14, but primarily on BTA6; they detected maternal components of weaning weight associated with SNP on the chromosomes detected in the present study. It should be noted that these mentioned represent a small subset of the overall detections from Snelling et al. (2010) that spanned essentially all chromosomes. Peters et al. (2012) reported a window of SNP associated with 205-d weight in Brangus heifers on BTA10. Fifteen of the SNP with detected association with weaning weight were located within physical boundaries of eight genes and one pseudogene (Table S3).


Conclusions and Implications

In mixed model association analyses, marker-based relationship appeared to best capture trait variance corresponding to relatedness. In the absence of either a relationship matrix based on marker genotypes or pedigree, the fixed effect of family appeared to assume that role, but to a lesser extent. Detected associations increased when more primitive parameterizations of relatedness (or no relatedness) were employed, apparently because of stratification. Inclusion of family as a fixed effect in addition to either relationship matrix also resulted in increased associations detected, either due to duplicative modeling of relatedness or due to inappropriate assumption of non-zero covariance between fixed effect levels and random effect levels. Detected associations with birth weight and weaning weight were primarily on BTA14 and consistent with other reports. The strongest association for birth weight was for a marker within PENK, which has been identified as expressed in placenta. Detected associations with gestation length were primarily on BTA21.


Supplementary Material

The following online material is available for this article:

Table S1 - Single nucleotide polymorphism markers associated with birth weight.

Table S2 - Single nucleotide polymorphism markers associated with gestation length.

Table S3 - Single nucleotide polymorphism markers associated with weaning weight.

Figure S1 - Quantile-quantile plots and 95% confidence bands of observed χ2 values against expected probability values of birth weight-marker association F statistics from models with no relationship matrix included, and the fixed effect family included (upper) or not included (lower).

Figure S2- Quantile-quantile plots for models based on average pedigree relatedness.

Figure S3- Quantile-quantile plots for models with genomic relationship matrix.

Figure S4- Quantile-quantile plots of gestation length-marker association and weaning weight- marker association F statistics.

This material is available as part of the online article from http://www.scielo.br/gmb.

Data Access: Data will be shared with collaborators upon request.


Notes

Associate Editor: Dario Grattapaglia

This project was supported by National Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2008-35205-18767 from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Appreciation is noted for B. D. Johnson, D. A. Gann, and all personnel at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center at McGregor.


References
Aguilar I,Misztal I,Johnson DL,Legarra A,Tsuruta S,Lawlor TJ. Year: 2010A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final scoreJ Dairy Sci9374375220105546
Benjamini Y,Hochberg Y. Year: 1995Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testingJ Royal Stat Soc B57289300
Bolormaa S,Porto Neto LR,Zhang YD,Bunch RJ,Harrison BE,Goddard ME,Barendse W. Year: 2011A genome-wide association study of meat and carcass traits in Australian cattleJ Anim Sci892297230921421834
Devlin B,Roeder K. Year: 1999Genomic control for association studiesBiometrics55997100411315092
Falconer DS,Mackay TFC. Year: 1996Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th editionPearson Educ. Ltd.Essex480
Forde N,Mehta JP,McGettigan PA,Mamo S,Bazer FW,Spencer TE,Lonergan P. Year: 2013Alterations in expression of endometrial genes coding for proteins secreted into the uterine lumen during conceptus elongation in cattleBMC Genomics14e321
Goddard ME,Hayes BJ,Meuwissen THE. Year: 2011Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selectionJ Anim Breed Genet12840942122059574
Haile-Mariam M,Nieuwhof GJ,Beard KT,Konstatinov KV,Hayes BJ. Year: 2013Comparison of heritabilities of dairy traits in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle from genomic and pedigree data and implications for genomic evaluationsJ Anim Breed Genet130203123317062
Hanna LLH,Riley DG. Year: 2014Mapping genomic markers to closest feature using the R package Map2NCBILivest Sci1625965
Hawken RJ,Zhang YD,Fortes MRS,Collis E,Barris WC,Corbet NJ,Williams PJ,Fordyce G,Holroyd RG,Walkley JRW,et al. Year: 2012Genome-wide association studies of female reproduction in tropically adapted cattleJ Anim Sci901398141022100599
Hayes BJ,Goddard ME. Year: 2008Prediction of breeding values using marker-derived relationship matricesJ Anim Sci862089209118407982
Henderson CR. Year: 1963Selection index and expected genetic advanceStatistical Genetics and Plant Breeding Nat Acad Sci National Research Council, Publ. No. 982,. Washington, DC141163
Hill WG. Year: 2013On estimation of genetic variance within families using genome-wide identity-by-descent sharingGenet Sel Evol453224007429
Hong H,Xu L,Liu J,Jones WD,Su Z,Ning B,Perkins R,Ge W,Miclaus K,Zhang L,et al. Year: 2012Technical reproducibility of genotyping SNP arrays used in genome-wide association studiesPLoS One7e4448322970228
Karim L,Takeda H,Lin L,Druet T,Arias JAC,Baurain D,Cambisano N,Davis SR,Farnir F,Grisart B,et al. Year: 2011Variants modulating the expression of a chomrosome domain encompassing PLAG1 influence bovine statureNat Genet4340541321516082
Kneeland J,Li C,Basarab J,Snelling WM,Benkel B,Murdoch B,Hansen C,Moore SS. Year: 2004Identification and fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for growth traits on bovine chromosomes 2, 6, 14, 19, 21, and 23 within one commercial line of Bos taurusJ Anim Sci823405341415537758
Lindholm-Perry AK,Kuehn LA,Smith TPL,Ferrell CL,Jenkins TG,Freetly HC,Snelling WM. Year: 2012A region on BTA14 that includes the positional candidate genes LYPLA1, XKR4 and TMEM68 is associated with feed intake and growth phenotypes in cattleAnim Genet4321621922404358
Liu Y,Jansen GB,Lin CY. Year: 2002The covariance between relatives conditional on genetic markersGen Sel Evol34657678
Lu D,Miller S,Sargolzaei M,Kelly M,Vander Voot G,Caldwell T,Plastow G,Moore S. Year: 2013Genome-wide association analyses for growth and feed efficiency traits in beef cattleJ Anim Sci913612363323851991
Magee DA,Berry DP,Berkowicz EW,Sikora KM,Howard DJ,Mullen MP,Evans RD,Spillane C,MacHugh DE. Year: 2011Single nucleotide polymorphisms within the bovine DKLIDIO3 imprinted domain are associated with economically important production traits in cattleJ Hered1029410120817761
Magee DA,Sikora KM,Berkowicz EW,Berry DP,Howard DJ,Mullen MP,Evans RD,Spillane C,MacHugh DE. Year: 2010DNA sequence polymorphisms in a panel of eight candidate bovine imprinted genes and their association with performance traits in Irish Holstein-Friesian cattleBMC Genet11e93
Maltecca C,Weigel KA,Khatib H,Cowan M,Bagnato A. Year: 2009Whole-genome scan for quantitative trait loci associated with birth weight, gestation length and passive immune transfer in a Holstein x Jersey crossbred populationAnim Genet40273419016677
Maltecca C,Gray KA,Weigel KA,Cassady JP,Ashwell M. Year: 2011A genome-wide association study of direct gestation length in US Holstein and Italian Brown populationsAnim Genet4258559122034999
Peters SO,Kizilkaya K,Garrick DJ,Fernando RL,Reecy JM,Weaber RL,Silver GA,Thomas MG. Year: 2012Bayesian genome-wide association analysis of growth and yearling ultrasound measures of carcass traits in Brangus heifersJ Anim Sci903398340923038745
Porto Neto LR,Bunch RJ,Harrison BE,Barendse W. Year: 2012Variation in the XKR4 gene was significantly associated with subcutaneous rump fat thickness in indicine and composite cattleAnim Genet4378578922497494
Riley DG,Welsh TH Jr,Gill CA,Hulsman LL,Herring AD,Riggs PK,Sawyer JE,Sanders JO. Year: 2013Whole genome association of SNP with newborn calf cannon bone lengthLivest Sci155186196
Rincón G,Farber EA,Farber CR,Nkrumah JD,Medrano JF. Year: 2009Polymorphisms in the STAT6 gene and their association with carcass traits in feedlot cattleAnim Genet4087888219519791
Sham PC,Cherny SS,Purcell S. Year: 2009Application of genome-wide SNP data for uncovering pairwise relationships and quantitative lociGenetica13623724319127410
Sikora KM,Magee DA,Berkowicz EW,Berry DP,Howard DJ,Mullen MP,Evans RD,MacHugh DE,Spillane C. Year: 2011DNA sequence polymorphisms within the bovine guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gs subunit alpha (Gsα)-encoding (GNAS) genomic imprinting domain are associated with performance traitsBMC Genet12e4
Snelling WM,Allan MF,Keele JW,Kuehn LA,McDaneld T,Smith TPL,Sonstegard TS,Thallman RM,Bennett GL. Year: 2010Genome-wide association study of growth in cross-bred beef cattleJ Anim Sci8883784819966163
The Wellcome Trust Case Control ConsortiumYear: 2007Genome-wide association of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controlsNature44766167817554300
Thomas SC. Year: 2005The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations. (Special issue. Population genetics, quantitative genetics and animal improvement. Papers in honour of William [Bill] Hill)Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci36014571467
Utsunomiya YT,do Carmo AS,Carvalheiro R,Neves HHR,Matos MC,Zavarez LB,Pérez O’Brien AM,Sölkner J,McEwan JC,et al. Year: 2013Genome-wide association study for birth weight in Nellore cattle points to previously described orthologous genes affecting human and bovine heightBMC Genet14e52
Visscher PM. Year: 2009Whole genome approaches to quantitative geneticsGenetica13635135818668208
Visscher PM,Medland SE,Ferreira MA,Morley KI,Zhu G,Cornes BK,Montgomery GW,Martin NG. Year: 2006Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblingsPLoS Genet2e4116565746
Voorman A,Lumley T,McKnight B,Rice K. Year: 2011Behavior of QQ-plots and genomic control in studies of gene-environment interactionPLoS One6e1941621589913
Wigginton JE,Cutler DJ,Abecasis GR. Year: 2005A note on exact tests of Hardy-Weinberg equilibriumAm J Hum Genet7688789315789306
Wibowo TA,Gaskins CT,Newberry RC,Thorgaard GH,Michal JJ,Jiang Z. Year: 2008Genome assembly anchored QTL map of bovine chromosome 14Int J Biol Sci440641419043607
Wolc A,Arango J,Settar P,Fulton JE,O’Sullivan NP,Preisinger R,Fernando R,Garrick DJ,Dekkers JCM. Year: 2013Analysis of egg production in layer chickens using a random regression model with genomic relationshipsPoultry Sci921486149123687143
Yu J,Pressoir G,Briggs WH,Bi IV,Yamasaki M,Doebley JF,McMullen MD,Gault BS,Nielsen DM,Holland JB,et al. Year: 2006A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatednessNat Genet3820320816380716
Zhang Z,Mateescu RG,Lust G,Phavaphutanon J,Tsai K,Murphy K,Todhunter RJ,Buckler ES. Year: 2006Association mapping accounting for background QTLs: Relationship based on pedigree vs. molecular markersProc 8th World Congr Genet Appl Livest Prod 20-08 Belo Horizonte, CD-ROM Communication . No. 20-08..
Zhang Z,Todhunter RJ,Buckler ES,Van Vleck LD. Year: 2007Use of marker-based relationships with multiple-trait derivative-free restricted maximal likelihoodJ Anim Sci8588188517085728
Zimin AV,Delcher AL,Florea L,Kelley DR,Schatz MC,Puiu D,Hanrahan F,Pertea G,Van Tassell CP,Sonstegard TS,et al. Year: 2009A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow, Bos taurusGenome Biol10R4219393038

Figures

[Figure ID: f01]
Figure 1 

Number of detected SNP loci associated with birth weight by chromosome from analyses without modeled relatedness with and without the fixed effect of family (“Un” represents SNP that were not assigned to any chromosome).



[Figure ID: f02]
Figure 2 

Number of detected SNP loci associated with birth weight by chromosome from analyses with modeled pedigree relatedness with and without the fixed effect of family (“Un” represents SNP that were not assigned to any chromosome).



[Figure ID: f03]
Figure 3 

Number of detected SNP loci associated with birth weight by chromosome from analyses with the genomic relationship matrix included with and without the fixed effect of family (“Un” represents SNP that were not assigned to any chromosome).



[Figure ID: f04]
Figure 4 

Overlapping detected SNP-trait associations from fixed effect model with family included, pedigree-based relatedness, or genomic relatedness, each of those mixed model analyses distinctly with and without the fixed effect of family included.



[Figure ID: f05]
Figure 5 

Gestation length-SNP marker associations by significance (−log[FDR] = 1.3 at the horizontal line) and chromosome.



[Figure ID: f06]
Figure 6 

Weaning weight-SNP marker associations by significance (−log[FDR] = 1.3 at the horizontal line) and chromosome.



Tables
[TableWrap ID: t01] Table 1 

Detected SNP-birth weight associations and estimates of the degree of test statistic inflation (λ̂) in analyses that included different relationship matrices and the inclusion/exclusion of family structure as a fixed effect.


Modeled relatedness Family
Overlap
Not included Included
No relationship matrix included
Detected associations 1,200 790 488
λ̂ 1.48 1.28
Pedigree-based relatedness
Detected associations 735 805 661
λ̂ 1.24 1.26
Genomic relatedness
Detected associations 31 37 28
λ̂ 0.99 0.99


Article Categories:
  • Animal Genetics
    • Research Article

Keywords: birth weight, gestation length, weaning weight, Nelore, whole genome association.

Previous Document:  Molecular cloning and mRNA expression of the peptidoglycan recognition protein gene HcPGRP1 and its ...
Next Document:  Cytogenetics of the Brazilian Bolitoglossa paraensis (Unterstein, 1930) salamanders (Caudata, Pletho...