Document Detail

All is not lost, when lead goes in the wrong direction.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17684577     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Left sided superior vena cava (SVC) is an uncommon anomaly noted in the general population. It adds complexity to the procedure, when attempting to place pacing or defibrillator devices into the heart. Here we report a case where the leads were placed through the left sided SVC into the right sided chambers giving an interesting X-ray appearance.
Authors:
Uma N Srivatsa; Padraig O'Neill
Related Documents :
20304357 - Severe hypotension after interscalene block for outpatient shoulder surgery: a case rep...
125157 - Electrophysiologic and pathologic correlations in two cases of chronic second degree at...
11080957 - Cardiac metastatic liposarcoma.
8516447 - Digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases: analysis...
1923987 - Jacquet erosive diaper dermatitis in a young girl with urinary incontinence.
14964987 - An outbreak of scombroid fish poisoning in a kindergarten.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2007-08-01
Journal Detail:
Title:  Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal     Volume:  7     ISSN:  0972-6292     ISO Abbreviation:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J     Publication Date:  2007  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-08-08     Completed Date:  2007-08-10     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101157207     Medline TA:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J     Country:  India    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  184-6     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA. uma.srivatsa@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J
Journal ID (publisher-id): Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J
ISSN: 0972-6292
Publisher: Indian Heart Rhythm Society
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright: © 2007 Srivatsa et al.
open-access: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
collection publication date: Season: Jul–Sep Year: 2007
Electronic publication date: Day: 1 Month: 8 Year: 2007
Volume: 7 Issue: 3
First Page: 184 Last Page: 186
ID: 1939871
Publisher Id: ipej070184-00
PubMed Id: 17684577

All is not lost, when lead goes in the wrong direction
Uma N Srivatsa, MD
Padraig O'Neill, MD
UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA
Correspondence: Address for correspondence: Uma N Srivatsa MD, Asst Prof Medicine/Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA. E-mail: uma.srivatsa@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu

Seventy two year old female with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block, was referred for cardiac resynchronization therapy. She previously had single chamber defibrillator and had developed worsening heart failure over the years. Under fluoroscopy, her defibrillator lead was noted to be entering the heart from the left side. With contrast injection from left antecubital vein, she was found to have persistent left superior vena cava ( SVC) and absent innominate vein. Dye flow was extremely rapid from left SVC through coronary sinus (CS), that it was difficult to visualize the branches of coronary sinus. When contrast was administered in the coronary sinus, after occluding SVC and CS os, no significant branches were noted to be present. Therefore LV lead could not be placed by endocardial approach. However atrial lead was placed through the CS into the right atrium, giving this unusual but interesting appearance of the chest X-Ray. (Figure 1,Figure 2). She subsequently received epicardial lead to the left ventricle by mini thoracotomy.

The incidence of Left SVC is about 0.3% of the general population as evident from autopsy studies, and about 0.47% of patients receiving pacemaker and defibrillator devices [1]. In a case series among the158 patients receiving biventricular pacing devices, 4 were found to have left sided SVC, but the patients had tributaries enabling endocardial placement of the CS lead [2]. Since, left sided placement of the defibrillator can has lower defibrillation energy requirement, it presents a technical challenge, sometimes making it necessary to place the lead from the right side, then tunnel it to the left side where the defibrillator can is placed [3].


References
Mauro, Biffi;Boriani, Giuseppe;Frabetti, Lorenzo,et al. Left Superior Vena Cava Persistence in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker or Cardioverter-Defibrillator ImplantationChest 2001;120:139–144. [pmid: 11451829]
Gasparini M,Mantica M,Galimberti P,et al. Biventricular pacing via a persistent left superior vena cava: report of four casesPACE 2003;26:192–196. [pmid: 12687811]
Epstein AE,Kay GN,Plumb VJ,et al. Elevated defibrillation threshold when right-sided venous access is used for nonthoracotomy implantable defibrillator lead implantation: the Endotak investigatorsJ Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995;6:979–986. [pmid: 8589875]

Article Categories:
  • Case Report

Keywords: Left SVC, defibrillator.

Previous Document:  The need for studies to evaluate the reproducibility of the T-wave alternans (TWA), and the rational...
Next Document:  Right bundle branch block pattern during right ventricular permanent pacing: Is it safe or not?