Document Detail

Alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19936195     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Since its original description in 1994, alcohol septal ablation (ASA) has emerged as a minimally invasive modality for treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy compared to surgical myomectomy. This catheter-based intervention relies on the injection of absolute alcohol into the septal perforator to induce a controlled infarction of the hypertrophied septum and consequently abolish the dynamic outflow obstruction. This gradient reduction has been correlated with a significant clinical improvement in the patient's symptomatology and with left ventricular remodeling. The procedure has been refined throughout the years, especially with the introduction of myocardial contrast echocardiography for localization of the area at risk of infarction and the reduction in the amount of alcohol used. Major complications of ASA are uncommon in large referral centers but conduction system disturbances has been the most commonly reported complications of ASA with 10% of patients necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation for complete heart block. ASA has not been compared to the gold standard surgical myomectomy in a randomized prospective study. We review the clinical aspects of this procedure and provide some historical background.
Authors:
Hicham El Masry; Jeffrey A Breall
Related Documents :
12665045 - Do variable age-related secondary factors affect ventricular geometry in hypertrophic c...
19715885 - Recovery of ventricular function with a left ventricular axial pump in a patient with e...
448785 - Idiopathic cardiomyopathy in botswana.
9440705 - Myocardial presynaptic and postsynaptic autonomic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyo...
12383565 - The effect of blockade of the cd11/cd18 integrin receptor on infarct size in patients w...
14683745 - Clinical outcomes of stents versus balloon angioplasty in non-acute coronary artery dis...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Current cardiology reviews     Volume:  4     ISSN:  1875-6557     ISO Abbreviation:  Curr Cardiol Rev     Publication Date:  2008 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-11-25     Completed Date:  2011-07-14     Revised Date:  2013-05-29    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101261935     Medline TA:  Curr Cardiol Rev     Country:  United Arab Emirates    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  193-7     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Curr Cardiol Rev
Journal ID (publisher-id): CCR
ISSN: 1573-403X
ISSN: 1875-6557
Publisher: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Article Information
Download PDF
?2008 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
open-access:
Received Day: 24 Month: 3 Year: 2008
Revision Received Day: 09 Month: 4 Year: 2008
Accepted Day: 09 Month: 4 Year: 2008
Print publication date: Month: 8 Year: 2008
Volume: 4 Issue: 3
First Page: 193 Last Page: 197
ID: 2780820
PubMed Id: 19936195
Publisher Id: CCR-4-193
DOI: 10.2174/157340308785160561

Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Hicham El Masry
Jeffrey A Breall*
Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine
*Address correspondence to this author at the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, and Interventional Cardiology, 1800 N Capitol Avenue E-490, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; Tel: 317-962-0561; Fax: 317-9620566; Email: jbreall@iupui.edu

INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cadiomyopathy inherited as an autosomal dominant trait and characterized by asymmetrical septal hypertrophy unexplained by any other cardiac disease. Microscopically, this disease process is notable for a distinct abnormal disorderly array of myofiber orientation. The disease has a wide spectrum of clinical presentation varying from totally asymptomatic individuals with normal life expectancy to severely symptomatic patients with increased mortality due to sudden death or congestive heart failure. The overall prognosis of HCM patients is favorable with an annual mortality of about 1% and adverse events are mostly related to sudden cardiac death, obstructive symtoms or progressive heart failure. Left ventricular outflow obstruction is present in 25-30% of patients with HCM and constitutes the pathophysiological basis for many aspects of the disease. It is also an important prognostic factor of the disease. In fact, it has been clearly shown that a gradient of 30 mmHg or more is associated with an increased risk of disease progression, congestive heart failure, stroke and death. While the treatment of obstructive HCM has largely relied on pharmacologic management of the disease with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers, a small but important subgroup of patients are refractory to medical therapy. Surgical myectomy and percutaneous alcohol septal ablation have proven efficacy in the symptomatic management of this drug-refractory population. Alcohol septal ablation was developed as a less invasive approach to reduce left ventricular outflow obstruction by inducing a partially controlled infarct of the basal septum with resultant scar formation and left ventricular remodeling.


INDICATIONS FOR SEPTAL REDUCTION

Septal reduction therapies are largely reserved for the subgroup of patients with obstructive HCM who continue to experience significant symptomatology despite maximized medical therapy: limited functional capacity secondary to exertional dyspnea and chest pain classified as NYHA III-IV or CCS III-IV. In addition, the ACC/ESC recommends that two additional selection criteria be employed in selecting patients for this procedure 1) septal hypertrophy of 18mm or more and 2) resting or provocable gradient of 50 mmHg or more [1]. However, with the increased experience and relative safety of ASA, these criteria have been relaxed and the procedure is now used to treat an increasing number of patients with obstructive symptoms. In fact, in a recent systematic review of almost 3000 patients undergoing ASA by Alam et al., the mean NYHA class was 2.9 (?0.01), and only 51-53% percent were on beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker therapy [2].

The preprocedural evaluation of candidates for ASA should include a rigorous clinical and echocardiographic investigation of comorbidities and other cardiac anomalies. A careful review of the patients? medical therapy should be undertaken to assess the potential for symptomatic improvement by optimization of this regimen. Moreover, an evaluation for concomitant abnormalities which warrant definitive surgical therapy is necessary. These abnormalities include discrete subaortic stenosis, severe coronary artery disease and structural abnormalities of the mitral valve. In particular mitral valvular apparatus abnormalities are common in these patients (7-10%) and include: abnormal insertion of the papillary muscle into the anterior mitral valve leaflet and abnormal fibrous attachment or fusion of the papillary muscles to the septum or LV free wall both of which result in midcavitary fixed obstruction [3, 4]. Careful echocardiographic evaluation of the mitral regurgitant jet timing and direction is usually helpful in excluding these pathologies.


PROCEDURE DETAILS

Percutaneous alcohol septal ablation was introduced in 1994 as a less invasive alternative to surgical myomectomy and was originally targeted to a population of symptomatic patients who were thought to be poor surgical candidates. The procedure has undergone significant technical refinements most notable of which is the introduction of myocardial contrast echocardiographic localization of the target area.

After obtaining arterial access, the procedure is usually initiated with a reevaluation of the patient?s hemodynamics and re-measurement of the intracavitary gradient. This is performed through simultaneous pressure measurement in the left ventricle with an end-hole catheter and the aorta. Physiologic provocation of the gradient is then assessed with the Valsalva maneuver and checking for the Brockenbrough sign by inducing a ventricular extrasystole. Venous access, usually through the femoral vein, is also obtained and a temporary transvenous pacemaker is inserted into the RV apex. Coronary angiography is then performed to exclude severe coronary disease and to locate the first septal perforator. Usually this vessel arises from the proximal LAD, however it might have a separate takeoff from the left main, or branch from the left circumflex, ramus intermedius, or the right coronary. Uncommonly, a distinct first septal perforator cannot be located which obviates the procedure?s feasibility. The septal perforator is then engaged with an over-the-wire balloon, the lumen of which serves to inject contrast and alcohol. The balloon is then inflated and a selective angiogram is performed to exclude its encroachment onto the LAD. Angiographic contrast may also be injected through the balloon lumen to ensure no spill of the contrast back into the LAD. During inflation, a continuous monitoring of the gradient might reveal a significant reduction indicating a favorable target vessel and usually portends a good response to ASA [4].

Due to anatomical variation of the septal perforator, the area supplied by this vessel might include a variable amount of myocardial tissue that might not only involve the hypertrophied basal septum but also the right ventricular septum and even the LV apex [5]. In that respect, evaluation of the area at risk by myocardial contrast echocardiography is considered a key aspect for the localization of the ablation which ideally should only be localized to the proximal septum at the point of contact with the anterior mitral leaflet. Echocardiographic contrast is injected thru the balloon and intraprocedural two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiogram is performed to visualize the perfusion area prior to alcohol injection [6, 7]. Patients with a large area at risk or who have a significant involvement of the right ventricle have a higher complications rate including complete atrioventricular block [7, 8]. In cases where the septal perforator supplies large territories, lower doses of alcohol may be used. Also, if the vessel bifurcates, the branch supplying the basal septum should be used.

After localizing the target vessel, the transvenous pacemaker is checked for capture and intravenous analgesia is administered. Then a slow injection of absolute alcohol is performed through the target vessel and a gradient reassessment is performed to demonstrate an initial partial response defined. After deflation of the balloon, a final angiogram is performed to ensure the patency of the LAD (this usually shows an occluded septal perforator at the site of injection).

The dose as well as the rate of alcohol injection during ASA have been the subject of continuous reevaluation and vary between institutions. Original studies used 3-4ml injections however in a recent randomized controlled trial of thirty four patients undergoing ASA, a lower dose (less than 2 ml) of alcohol injected resulted in similar reductions in the outflow gradient and symptomatic improvement at six-month follow up [9]. The amount of alcohol injected has been correlated with the area of necrosis (peak CKMB) and has been shown to be an independent predictor of ASA complications and post-procedural mortality [10]. Moreover a slower rate of alcohol injection has been correlated with a decreased incidence of complete heart block in recent series [4, 11, 12].


STRUCTURAL REMODELING AND HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ASA

Although ASA is followed by an immediate decrease of the outflow gradient, most of the acute diminution likely represents stunning and is pathophysiologically different from the more delayed phenomenon which is a result of akinesis and thining of the basal septum. The immediate abolition of the outflow gradient may be followed by a recurrence of the gradient 1 to 3 days after ASA. Then, a permanent and more substantial reduction in the gradient (mean LVOT gradient from 65 to 31 mmHg [2]) progressively develops within 3 to 12 months after the procedure and is a direct result of scar formation, thinning, and left ventricular remodeling [13-15]. ASA has been also associated with a significant decrease and even abolition of mitral regurgitation on long term follow-up [16].Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and strain rate imaging have been used to evaluate the effect of remodeling on the LV systolic function. These studies showed a significant decrease in myocardial mass and LV wall thickness both in the infarcted and non infarcted areas at early and midterm follow up after ASA [17-19]. Moreover, a small decrease in the ejection fraction is noted in these follow up studies with a paradoxical increase in global systolic indices (shortening index and Tei index) [17, 20]. Diastolic function has been extensively studied in patients with HCM and follow up studies of post-ASA patients have shown a significant and sustained improvement in echocardiographic diastolic parameters [20, 21]. In a recent study by Jassal et al., all patients had a pseudonormal or an impaired relaxation pattern at baseline along with left atrial dilation. They showed significant improvement in E-wave deceleration time, isovolumic relaxation time, early diastolic mitral lateral annular velocity (E'), mitral inflow propagation velocity, ratio of transmitral early LV filling velocity (E) to early diastolic Doppler tissue imaging of the mitral annulus (E/E'), and E/Vp were observed on long term follow up one and two years following successful ASA [22].


CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS AFTER ASA

ASA has been associated with a favorable clinical response in short and intermediate-term follow-up studies. In a recent systematic review of 42 studies involving 2959 patients, Alam et al. demonstrated a significant improvement in heart failure symptoms with mean NYHA class from 2.9 to 1.2 as well as angina with mean CCS class from 1.9 to 0.4 at 1 year follow-up [2]. Peak oxygen consumption increased from 17.8 to 23.6 ml/kg per minute and mean exercise capacity on a treadmill from 325.3 to 437.5 seconds [2].

Complications of ASA, although rare in high volume centers, occur in the early post-procedural period and include LAD dissection, coronary artery spasm, cardiac tamponade, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary embolism and stroke. Most commonly, however, ASA causes a transient or permanent disruption of the conduction system: first degree AV block develops in 53% of patients while RBBB block in 46% and complete heart block (CHB) requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation in 10.5% of patients. Interestingly, CHB may be a transient phenomenon in 10 to 46% of patients with recovery within the first 24 hours [23, 24], while few patients might develop CHB up to nine days after ASA [11, 25]. This may have an important impact on post-procedural care. Specifically the length of hospital stay that varies according to institutional protocol from at least 24-48 hours up to five days of CCU monitoring [4, 24, 26]. Several studies evaluated determinants of complete heart block after ASA in an effort to identify a high risk group that would benefit from a PPM implantation prior to the procedure. While age >55, female gender, bolus injection of alcohol, injection of more than one septal perforator, volume of alcohol injection and lack of use myocardial contrast echocardiographic localization are all potential factors, only the presence of LBBB on baseline ECG has been persistently identified as a strong predictor of CHB [11, 23, 27, 28]. Faber et al. proposed a scoring system based on electrocardiographic markers of abnormal AV conduction (PQ interval, QRS duration and baseline heart rate), the severity of the LVOT gradient, reversibility of CHB, and timing of the SGOT peak. Based on this scoring system, three risk groups could be identified: low risk patients can be discharged after short term monitoring (48 hours), a high risk group where an elective PPM implantation should be considered, and an intermediate group for whom prolonged monitoring and expectant management are warranted [24]. Based on the present knowledge, it is still unclear if prophylactic PPM implantation is indicated for patients with LBBB at baseline and larger scale prospective evaluation is needed to answer this question.

Ventricular arrhythmias have been reported and include ventricular fibrillation (2.2%) [2] and less commonly sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) [29-32]. Typically, they develop in the early post-procedural period and are self-limited but few patients present with VT up to 3 weeks after ASA. The mechanism of these arrhythmias is controversial and has been suggested to be secondary to reentry around the MI-induced scar; however the arrhythmogenic potential of the myofibrillar disarray characteristic of HCM can?t be excluded. All patients reported in the literature with sustained VT after ASA underwent ICD implantation hence adding a therapeutic challenge to the management of these patients.

Early mortality occurring within the first 30 days after ASA has been reported to be 1.5% (0-5%) and results usually from hemodynamic collapse due to ventricular failure or tamponade, ventricular fibrillation or LAD dissection [2]. Unfortunately, few reports address the long term safety and outcomes of ASA especially late all-cause mortality. Kuhn et al. reported on a single center experience with ASA where 644 patients were followed for up to 10 years. In their report, they described a significant decrease in the incidence of complications correlating with decreasing alcohol dosage (from a mean of 2.9 ml to 0.8 ml). In fact, in-hospital mortality decreased from 1.8% to 0.6% and was mostly ascribed to non-cardiac causes of death [10]. It is clear however that an improved expertise might be an integral part in the refinement of the procedure with subsequent decrease of the complication rate. After hospital discharge, limited data indicates an annual mortality rate of 3.2% which is comparable to the natural history of high-risk HOCM patients.


COMPARISON OF ASA AND SEPTAL MYECTOMY

Since its introduction by Sigwart in 1994, ASA has been performed in thousands of patients with good short term results. Acute anatomical changes after ASA and myomectomy have been evaluated by cardiac MRI; ASA results in a larger area of tissue necrosis (16?7 grams compared to 6?4 grams) often involving a transmural infarct with varying location and depth at the junction of the anterior and inferior segments of the basal septum [33]. Some patients have had extension of the infarction into the right ventricular side of the septum with associated residual gradient on follow-up and less favorable symptomatic relief [34]. Myomectomy results in a more localized resection of the LV aspect of the basal septum as compared to the deeper scar of ASA offering a potential explanation of the association of ASA with RBBB and of the myomectomy with LBBB. Aside of these morphological differences, myomectomy is associated with a lower risk of complete AV block necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation (5% vs. 17%) [35] and an immediate clinical benefit although at the cost of a higher risk of strokes and a longer recovery period postoperatively [36].

Few reports compared the clinical outcomes of ASA to surgical myomectomy and no comparison of long term outcomes has been performed. In a recent meta-analysis of three retrospective studies including 171 patients [37-40], both interventions had comparable effect on interventricular septal thickness reduction, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension increase and NYHA class improvement [35]. However, there was a small but significant difference in the relief of the LVOT gradient: from 76.0 to 15.7 mmHg in ASA group compared to a decrease from 74.7 to 9.4 mmHg in the myomectomy group (p<0.05) [35]. It is difficult to predict any role of this difference in affecting the clinical outcomes after ASA and this question needs to be evaluated prospectively with longer follow-up period. Moreover, all reports comparing ASA and myomectomy usually involved an older cohort with more comorbidities for patients receiving the percutaneous therapy and it remains unclear if these factors may interact with the treatment effect.


CONCULSIONS

ASA has developed as a safe and attractive modality to treat patients with HCM whose symptoms are refractory to optimal medical therapy with negative inotropic agents. The procedure has been refined over the past decade since its development with steadily improving outcomes and reduced complications especially PPM implantation. However, concerns over the higher risk of complete AV block and development of a potentially arrhythmogenic scar after ASA have been raised [41]. The gold standard for HCM has been classically considered the surgical approach that has been time-tested over the past forty years, although many interventional cardiologists consider ASA as a first line intervention due to its ease of performance and less invasive nature. Either procedure is best performed by an experienced operator. The feasibility of comparing both modalities in a randomized controlled trial has been questionned due to the low frequency of the disease and the low event rates after these interventions [42]. Alternatively, a multicenter prospective evaluation of non-randomized patients with long term follow-up would be reasonable to resolve this controversy. Meanwhile, ASA is a reasonable therapeutic option especially in older patients with significant comorbidities (especially lung disease) and a favorable coronary anatomy in the absence of mitral valve disease.


REFERENCES
1. Maron BJ,McKenna WJ,Danielson GK,et al. American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice GuidelinesJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 20034291687171314607462
2. Alam M,Dokainish H,Lakkis N. Alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a systematic review of published studiesJ Interv CardiolYear: 200619431932716881978
3. Maron BJ,Dearani JA,Ommen SR,et al. The case for surgery in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 200444102044205315542290
4. Holmes DR,Jr Valeti US,Nishimura RA. Alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: indications and techniqueCatheter Cardiovasc IntervYear: 200566337538916216025
5. Singh M,Edwards WD,Holmes DR,Jr Tajil AJ,Nishimura RA. Anatomy of the first septal perforating artery: a study with implications for ablation therapy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathyMayo Clin ProcYear: 200176879980211499819
6. Faber L,Ziemssen P,Seggewiss H. Targeting percutaneous transluminal septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy by intraprocedural echocardiographic monitoringJ Am Soc EchocardiogrYear: 200013121074107911119274
7. Monakier D,Woo A,Puri T,et al. Usefulness of myocardial contrast echocardiographic quantification of risk area for predicting postprocedural complications in patients undergoing septal ethanol ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathyAm J CardiolYear: 200494121515152215589007
8. Faber L,Seggewiss H,Welge D,et al. Echo-guided percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: 7 years of experienceEur J EchocardiogrYear: 20045534735515341870
9. Veselka J,Prochazkova S,Duchonova R,et al. Alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: Lower alcohol dose reduces size of infarction and has comparable hemodynamic and clinical outcomeCatheter Cardiovasc IntervYear: 200463223123515390343
10. Chang SM,Nagueh SF,Spencer WH 3rd,Lakkis NM. Complete heart block: determinants and clinical impact in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy undergoing nonsurgical septal reduction therapyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 200342229630012875767
11. Kuhn H,Lawrenz T,Lieder F,et al. Survival after transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (TASH): a 10 year experienceClin Res CardiolYear: 20089742344318071624
12. Bhagwandeen R,Woo A,Ross J,et al. Septal ethanol ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: early and intermediate results of a Canadian referral centreCan J CardiolYear: 200319891291712876612
13. Veselka J,Duchonova R,Prochazkova S,et al. The biphasic course of changes of left ventricular outflow gradient after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyKardiol PolYear: 200460213313615116158
14. Yoerger DM,Picard MH,Palacios IF,Vlahakes GJ,Lowry PA,Fifer MA. Time course of pressure gradient response after first alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathyAm J CardiolYear: 200697101511151416679095
15. Angelini P. The "1st septal unit" in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: a newly recognized anatomo-functional entity, identified during recent alcohol septal ablation experienceTex Heart Inst JYear: 200734333634617948085
16. Henein MY,O'Sullivan CA,Ramzy IS,Sigwart U,Gibson DG. Electromechanical left ventricular behavior after nonsurgical septal reduction in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 19993441117112210520800
17. van Dockum WG,Kuijer JP,Gotte MJ,et al. Septal ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy improves systolic myocardial function in the lateral (free) wall: a follow-up study using CMR tissue tagging and 3D strain analysisEur Heart JYear: 200627232833283917098761
18. van Dockum WG,Beek AM,ten Cate FJ,et al. Early onset and progression of left ventricular remodeling after alcohol septal ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyCirculationYear: 2005111192503250815867172
19. Mazur W,Nagueh SF,Lakkis NM,et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyCirculationYear: 2001103111492149611257074
20. Veselka J,Prochazkova S,Bolomova-Homolova I,Duchonova R,Tesar D. Effects of alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy on Doppler Tei index: a midterm follow-upEchocardiographyYear: 200522210510915693775
21. Nagueh SF,Lakkis NM,Middleton KJ,et al. Changes in left ventricular diastolic function 6 months after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyCirculationYear: 19999933443479918519
22. Jassal DS,Neilan TG,Fifer MA,et al. Sustained improvement in left ventricular diastolic function after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyEur Heart JYear: 200627151805181016774986
23. El-Jack SS,Nasif M,Blake JW,Dixon SR,Grines CL,O'Neill WW. Predictors of complete heart block after alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the timing of pacemaker implantationJ Interv CardiolYear: 2007201737617300408
24. Faber L,Welge D,Fassbender D,Schmidt HK,Horstkotte D,Seggewiss H. Percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: managing the risk of procedure-related AV conduction disturbancesInt J CardiolYear: 2007119216316717067708
25. Faber L,Seggewiss H,Welge D,et al. [Predicting the risk of atrioventricular conduction lesions after percutaneous septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy]Z KardiolYear: 2003921394712545300
26. Knight CJ. Alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathyHeartYear: 20069291339134416908721
27. Gietzen FH,Leuner CJ,Raute-Kreinsen U,et al. Acute and long-term results after transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH). Catheter interventional treatment for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyEur Heart JYear: 199920181342135410462469
28. Kuhn H,Seggewiss H,Gietzen FH,Boekstegers P,Neuhaus L,Seipel L. Catheter-based therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. First in-hospital outcome analysis of the German TASH RegistryZ KardiolYear: 2004931233114740238
29. Hori Y,Ueda M,Nakayama T,et al. Occurrence of de novo sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia induced after percutaneous transluminal alcohol septal myocardial ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyInt J CardiolYear: 2007119340340717069908
30. Simon RD,Crawford FA 3rd,Spencer WH 3rd,Gold MR. Sustained ventricular tachycardia following alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyPacing Clin ElectrophysiolYear: 200528121354135616403169
31. Boltwood CM,Jr Chien W,Ports T. Ventricular tachycardia complicating alcohol septal ablationN Engl J MedYear: 2004351181914191515509832
32. McGregor JB,Rahman A,Rosanio S,Ware D,Birnbaum Y,Saeed M. Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia: a late complication of percutaneous alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathyAm J Med SciYear: 2004328318518815367880
33. Valeti US,Nishimura RA,Holmes DR,et al. Comparison of surgical septal myectomy and alcohol septal ablation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 200749335035717239717
34. van Dockum WG,ten Cate FJ,ten Berg JM,et al. Myocardial infarction after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: evaluation by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imagingJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 2004431273414715178
35. Zeng Z,Wang F,Dou X,Zhang S,Pu J. Comparison of percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation versus septal myectomy for the treatment of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy--a meta analysisInt J CardiolYear: 20061121808416507323
36. Fifer MA. Controversies in cardiovascular medicine. Most fully informed patients choose septal ablation over septal myectomyCirculationYear: 2007116220721617620520
37. Nagueh SF,Buergler JM,Quinones MA,Spencer WH 3rd,Lawrie GM. Outcome of surgical myectomy after unsuccessful alcohol septal ablation for the treatment of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 200750879579817707185
38. Ralph-Edwards A,Woo A,McCrindle BW,et al. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: comparison of outcomes after myectomy or alcohol ablation adjusted by propensity scoreJ Thorac Cardiovasc SurgYear: 2005129235135815678046
39. Nagueh SF,Ommen SR,Lakkis NM,et al. Comparison of ethanol septal reduction therapy with surgical myectomy for the treatment of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathyJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 20013861701170611704383
40. Firoozi S,Elliott PM,Sharma S,et al. Septal myotomy-myectomy and transcoronary septal alcohol ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. A comparison of clinical, haemodynamic and exercise outcomesEur Heart JYear: 200223201617162412323162
41. Qin JX,Shiota T,Lever HM,et al. Outcome of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation and septal myectomy surgeryJ Am Coll CardiolYear: 20013871994200011738306
42. Maron BJ. Controversies in cardiovascular medicine. Surgical myectomy remains the primary treatment option for severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathyCirculationYear: 2007116219620617620519
43. Olivotto I,Ommen SR,Maron MS,Cecchi F,Maron BJ. Surgical myectomy versus alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Will there ever be a randomized trial?J Am Coll CardiolYear: 200750983183417719467

Article Categories:
  • Article

Keywords: Key Words Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular outflow obstruction, alcohol ablation..

Previous Document:  Roles of IL-6-gp130 Signaling in Vascular Inflammation.
Next Document:  Progression of renal dysfunction in patients with cardiovascular disease.