Document Detail


Agreement and coding reliability of the Minnesota and Mayo electrocardiographic coding systems.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9817213     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PROBLEM: To determine whether diagnoses of myocardial infarction assigned by a system that uses Marquette 12SL electrocardiographic (ECG) codes with manual over-reading agree with diagnoses assigned by Minnesota ECG codes.
STUDIES UNDERTAKEN: Agreement and recode reliability of Minnesota and Mayo coding systems based on 768 ECGs plus chest pain history and serum enzyme values were analyzed for a stratified random sample of 141 patients with an event in 1990 or 1991 coded as HICDA 410.x, 411, 413 or 796.9. The population was reconstructed from the stratified random sample so that population-based inferences could be made from the analysis.
RESULTS: For the stratified random sample, exact agreement on 4 categories (evolving diagnostic, diagnostic, equivocal, or other ECG) between Mayo and Minnesota ECG coding was 53.9% (kappa = 0.37 +/- 0.05). Code-recode agreement was higher for Minnesota coding (83.0%; kappa = 0.74 +/- 0.05) compared with Mayo coding (73.8%; kappa = 0.64 +/- 0.05). The same pattern was present for the reconstructed population. For coding myocardial infarction based on the ECG, serum enzyme levels, and the presence or absence of ischemic chest pain, agreement between Mayo and Minnesota coding was 84.4% (kappa = 0.72 +/- 0.05) based on the stratified random sample and 81.7% (kappa = 0.67 +/- 0.06) based on the reconstructed population. For the stratified random sample, reliability of diagnosis of myocardial infarction was 93.6% (kappa = 0.88 +/- 0.04) for the Minnesota system and 94.3% (kappa = 0.90 +/- 0.03) for the Mayo system.
CONCLUSION: ECG interpretation by the Mayo and Minnesota coding systems differs significantly, and Mayo ECG coding is less reliable than Minnesota ECG coding. Coding of myocardial infarction on the basis of ECGs, serum enzymes, and ischemic chest pain, however, is equally reliable for both systems.
Authors:
T E Kottke; H Daida; K R Bailey; S C Hammill; R S Crow
Related Documents :
23803233 - Decision making and results of coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with poor l...
17478463 - An unusual mechanism causing inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock...
16884503 - Upgrading of vvir pacemakers with nonfunctional endocardial ventricular leads to vdd pa...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of electrocardiology     Volume:  31     ISSN:  0022-0736     ISO Abbreviation:  J Electrocardiol     Publication Date:  1998 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-01-21     Completed Date:  1999-01-21     Revised Date:  2013-07-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0153605     Medline TA:  J Electrocardiol     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  303-12     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Chest Pain / diagnosis,  enzymology
Clinical Enzyme Tests
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted*
Electrocardiography / methods*
Humans
Minnesota
Myocardial Infarction / diagnosis*,  enzymology
Observer Variation
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
AR 30582/AR/NIAMS NIH HHS; HL 24326/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cardiac electrophysiological actions and interactions of ethanol, cocaine, and the metabolite ethylc...
Next Document:  Relation between ventricular fibrillation voltage and probability of defibrillation shocks. Analysis...