| Agreement between directly measured blood pressure and pressures obtained with three veterinary-specific oscillometric units in cats. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20707750 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether veterinary-specific oscillometric blood pressure units yield measurements that are in good agreement with directly measured blood pressures in cats. DESIGN: Evaluation study. ANIMALS: 21 cats undergoing routine spaying or neutering. PROCEDURES: A 24-gauge catheter was inserted in a dorsal pedal artery, and systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were directly measured with a validated pressure measurement system. Values were compared with indirect blood pressure measurements obtained with 3 veterinary-specific oscillometric blood pressure units. RESULTS: There was poor agreement between indirectly and directly measured blood pressures. For unit 1, bias between indirectly and directly measured values was -14.9 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement [LOA], -52.2 to 22.4 mm Hg), 4.4 mm Hg (95% LOA, -26.0 to 34.8 mm Hg), and -1.3 mm Hg (95% LOA, -26.7 to 24.1 mm Hg) for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, respectively. For unit 2, bias was -10.3 mm Hg (95% LOA, -52.9 to 32.2 mm Hg), 13.0 mm Hg (95% LOA, -32.1 to 58.0 mm Hg), and 9.1 mm Hg (95% LOA, -32.9 to 51.2 mm Hg) for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, respectively. For unit 3, bias was -13.4 mm Hg (95% LOA, -51.8 to 25.1 mm Hg), 8.0 mm Hg (95% LOA, -25.5 to 41.6 mm Hg), and -3.6 mm Hg (95% LOA, -31.6 to 24.5 mm Hg) for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggested that none of the 3 veterinary-specific oscillometric blood pressure units could be recommended for indirect measurement of blood pressure in cats. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Mark J Acierno; Diana Seaton; Mark A Mitchell; Anderson da Cunha |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association Volume: 237 ISSN: 0003-1488 ISO Abbreviation: J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. Publication Date: 2010 Aug |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-08-16 Completed Date: 2010-09-21 Revised Date: 2010-11-22 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 7503067 Medline TA: J Am Vet Med Assoc Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 402-6 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA. macierno@vetmed.lsu.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Animals Blood Pressure / physiology* Blood Pressure Monitors / veterinary* Cats / physiology* Oscillometry / instrumentation, veterinary* |
| Comments/Corrections | |
Comment In:
|
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010 Nov 1;237(9):1018-9; author reply 1019-20
[PMID:
21090153
]
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Effects of infiltration of the incision site with bupivacaine on postoperative pain and incisional h...
Next Document: Diagnosis and treatment of myelo-osteolytic plasmablastic lymphoma of the femur in a domestic ferret...