|Aflatoxin contamination in stored rice variety PAU 201 collected from Punjab, India.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 22885269 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: The present study was carried out on stored rice variety PAU 201 in Punjab that was not permitted for milling and public distribution due to the presence of damaged grains at levels exceeding the regulatory limits of 4.75 per cent. The aim of the study was to determine fungal and aflatoxin contamination in the rice samples to assess hazard from the presence of damaged grains. Presence of iron in discoloured rice grains was also assessed.
METHODS: Stored samples of paddy of PAU 201 rice variety were collected from six districts of Punjab, milled and analysed for presence of fungal and aflatoxin contamination. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis and Prussian blue staining was used to determine fungal spores and presence of iron, respectively.
RESULTS: Aflatoxin analysis of rice samples indicated that none exceeded the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011 tolerance limit of 30 μg/kg and majority of the samples had levels <15 μg/kg. The proportion of damaged grains exceeding the limit of 5 per cent was observed in 85.7 per cent of the samples. SEM and Prussian blue staining and EDX analysis of black tipped and pin point damaged rice grains did not show presence of fungal structures and presence of iron.
INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study indicated that the stored rice samples did not pose any health concern with respect to aflatoxin contamination as per the criteria laid down by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India.
|Vasanthi Siruguri; P Uday Kumar; P Raghu; M Vishnu Vardhana Rao; B Sesikeran; G S Toteja; Priyanka Gupta; Spriha Rao; K Satyanarayana; V M Katoch; T S Bharaj; G S Mangat; Neerja Sharma; J S Sandhu; V K Bhargav; Shobha Rani|
Related Documents :
|19321559 - Plant foods and plant-based diets: protective against childhood obesity?
19130879 - Leptin signaling in brain: a link between nutrition and cognition?
20876719 - Differential adaptation of human gut microbiota to bariatric surgery-induced weight los...
20144369 - Eating for life: designing foods for appetite control.
10071759 - Melanocortin and leptin signaling systems: central regulation of catabolic energy balance.
10333369 - Leptin in human reproduction.
231789 - Self-administration of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol by rats.
1852729 - Changes in the nutritive value of soy protein concentrate during autoclaving.
19885099 - Replacements for trans fats-will there be an oil shortage?
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't|
|Title: The Indian journal of medical research Volume: 136 ISSN: 0971-5916 ISO Abbreviation: Indian J. Med. Res. Publication Date: 2012 Jul|
|Created Date: 2012-08-13 Completed Date: 2012-12-26 Revised Date: 2013-07-12|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 0374701 Medline TA: Indian J Med Res Country: India|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 89-97 Citation Subset: IM|
|Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Food Contamination / analysis*
Food Microbiology / standards, statistics & numerical data*
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Oryza sativa / chemistry*, microbiology*
Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission
Spores, Fungal / isolation & purification*
|0/Aflatoxins; 0/Ferrocyanides; TLE294X33A/ferric ferrocyanide|
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Indian J Med Res
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Indian J. Med. Res
Journal ID (publisher-id): IJMR
Publisher: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd, India
Copyright: © The Indian Journal of Medical Research
Received Day: 01 Month: 12 Year: 2011
Print publication date: Month: 7 Year: 2012
Volume: 136 Issue: 1
First Page: 89 Last Page: 97
Publisher Id: IJMR-136-89
PubMed Id: 22885269
|Aflatoxin contamination in stored rice variety PAU 201 collected from Punjab, India|
|P Uday Kumar1|
|M Vishnu Vardhana Rao1|
|G. S. Toteja2|
1National Institute of Nutrition (ICMR), Hyderabad, India
2Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India
3Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
4Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India
5Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering & Technology, Ludhiana, India
6Directorate of Rice Research (ICAR), Hyderabad, India
|Correspondence: Reprint requests: Dr G.S. Toteja, Scientist F & Head (Nutrition), Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi & “Centre for Promotion of Nutrition Research & Training with special focus on North-East, Tribal & Inaccessible population” (ICMR), ICMR Campus II, 3 Red Cross Road, Tuberculosis Association of India Building, 1st Floor, Near Parliament, New Delhi 110 001, India e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Aflatoxins are secondary metabolites produced by the Aspergillus species namely A. flavus, A. parasiticus that contaminate a variety of agricultural and food commodities1. These mycotoxins are recognized to be hepatotoxins and carcinogens for humans2. Because aflatoxins are unavoidable contaminants of foods, the World Health Organization (WHO) urged that their level be reduced to as low as reasonably achievable2. Regulatory authorities in different countries have set tolerance limits for aflatoxins that range from 0 to 50 μg/kg to control their levels in the food supply3. In India, a tolerance limit of 30 μg/kg has been prescribed under the Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, Toxins and Residues) Regulations, 2011, for all foods meant for human consumption4.
Rice under normal conditions is not considered a commodity conducive for growth of Aspergillus and aflatoxin contamination but when exposed to heavy rains or high humidity could become susceptible to aflatoxin contamination5, 6. In India, high levels of aflatoxins have been detected in rain damaged rice grains and paddy7. High aflatoxin levels have also been reported in parboiled rice8. Various surveys conducted in different parts of the world indicated considerable levels of aflatoxins and ochratoxins in rice9, 10. Since rice is a staple food for majority of the worlds’ population, occurrence of aflatoxins as contaminants can be a serious health concern.
A high yielding rice variety PAU201 was released in 2007 for cultivation in Punjab region by the Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), Ludhiana, India. The PAU 201 rice variety was reported to have a high percentage of black tipped/pin point damaged grains classifiable as ‘damaged grains’ under the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) regulations, the limit of which should not be more than 5 per cent11. Damaged grains have been defined as kernels or pieces of kernels that are sprouted or internally damaged as a result of heat, microbe, moisture or weather, namely, ergot affected grain and karnal bunt affected grains11. Uniform quality specifications to food grains specifications are set by the Food Corporation of India (FCI)12. The uniform specifications for presence of damaged grains in rice are 3 per cent and 1 per cent over this is permitted for presence of pin point damaged grains giving a total limit of 4 per cent12. These specifications were relaxed for PAU 201 variety from 4 to 4.75 per cent that include pin point damaged grains13.
During 2009-2010 the paddy of PAU 201 variety rice was not permitted for milling and subsequent public distribution due to the presence of damaged grains at levels exceeding the regulatory limits. As a result, 40 lakh tonnes of the paddy were retained in storage in rice mills and FCI godowns. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) of the Department of Health Research at the request of the Ministry of Health, Government of India, undertook a survey with the objective to assess the extent of fungal and aflatoxin contamination in the stored paddy samples of PAU 201 collected from different districts of Punjab, and to assess whether black tipped or pinpoint damaged grains contain iron.
The study was carried out in samples collected from six districts of Punjab namely Barnala, Bathinda, Faridkot, Mansa, Moga and Muktsar on the basis of availability of PAU 201 stocks in mills of these districts. Sample collection was done from August 21-23, 2010.
Collection of samples: Samples were collected from 35 rice mills in 23 locations in six districts of Punjab (Table I). A total of 35 paddy samples of PAU 201 variety were collected. In addition, 11 damaged rice samples containing discoloured, mould and insect damaged grains that were segregated by a sortex machine in the mills were also collected. Sorted damaged samples could not be collected from all the mills as only a few were functional at the time of collection of samples.
Sampling procedure: Samples were collected as per procedures recommended by the Directorate General of Health Services (DHGS)14. The quantity of paddy stored at each location ranged from 27,000 to 1,60,000 bags with 35 kg paddy per bag. At each location 2 to 10 stacks were randomly selected. An aggregate of 15-20 kg paddy sample was collected from each of the 35 mills. After thoroughly mixing about 7-10 kg per sample was separated for analysis of aflatoxin. Damaged rice sample weighing 1 kg each were collected from sortex machines in 11 rice mills.
Sub-sampling for analytical work: From each sample collected around 1 kg sample was separated using the method of quartering. The paddy samples were milled and polished in a laboratory mill resulting in an average yield of 34±7.4 per cent of head rice (range 23 to 52%) and average brokens of 35.96±7.57 (range 23-64%). A total of 150 g of the milled rice was homogenized in a laboratory mill for aflatoxin analysis. Damaged rice samples obtained from the sortex machine at the rice mills were similarly sampled and homogenized.
Estimation of percentage of damaged grains: Damaged grains were segregated into discoloured, black tipped and pin point damaged grains from a sub-sample of 20 g of milled and polished rice obtained from the paddy samples, weighed and the percentage of damaged grains in each sample was calculated as per Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) protocols15.
Analysis of aflatoxins: Aflatoxins were analysed at the National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad, using HPLC methods as per protocol of AOAC Official Method 990.3316. The method had a Limit of Quantification (LOQ) of 5μg/kg. Aflatoxin analysis was performed by two additional laboratories viz., Vimta Labs, Hyderabad and Export Inspection Agency (EIA), Kochi for quality assurance of the data generated by the main laboratory. EIA used HPLC-MS-MS method using immunoaffinity column cleanup as per AOAC official method 991.3 with an LOQ of 2.5 μg/kg for total aflatoxins17. Vimta Labs used LC-MS-MS method with an LOQ of 1 μg/kg for total aflatoxins18.
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) study for detection of fungal growth: SEM studies using Hitachi S-3400N scanning electron microscope were performed on the rice samples milled from paddy19 in NIN, Hyderabad, to look at the surface as well as in the transverse sections of the rice grain samples that were segregated as apparently normal appearing, pin point damaged, partially damaged and fully damaged rice. As control, a local market variety was used. Before scanning grains were cleaned to remove dust and other visible particles and coated with Gold (600 A°) using E-1010 Sputter coating unit and studied at 15 KV. Pictures were captured from 50 to 7500X magnification.
Detection of iron in black tipped/pin point damaged rice grains: Prussian blue staining method: The test is based on the formation of a bright blue pigment called Prussian blue, or ferric ferrocyanide in the presence of any ferric ion(+3) in the tissue/grains20. Prussian blue staining was performed on the rice grain samples segregated as normal, black tipped, pin point damaged, partially damaged and fully damaged. As controls local market rice and Ultra rice which is a reconstructed artificial rice made from iron fortified rice flour, were used.
Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis: The technique was used for identifying the elemental composition of the specimen, or an area of interest thereof. The EDX analysis system works as an integrated feature of a scanning electron microscope. For EDX analysis, the samples were placed on the microscope stub with double sided adhesive tape to study the elemental composition of the rice samples21.
Statistical analysis: The data were analysed using SPSS Windows Version 19.0, USA. Intra-class correlation was computed to see the agreement between the analytical laboratories. Correlation between per cent damage and aflatoxin levels was also computed.
Of the 35 paddy samples analyzed after milling, none was found to be contaminated with aflatoxins at levels exceeding the prescribed regulatory limits of 30 μg/kg. Aflatoxin levels were below 15 μg/kg in 97.1 per cent of the samples. Similar results were also obtained by EIA and Vimta Labs where 94.3 and 91.4 per cent of samples had aflatoxins at less than 15 μg/kg, respectively (Table II). Results of three laboratories indicated good agreement as revealed by average measures of intra-class correlation coefficient (0.70, P<0.001).
Aflatoxin analysis of damaged rice grains segregated by sortex machine in rice mills indicated that the regulatory limit of 30 μg/kg exceeded in 7, 7 and 8 samples of the 11 damaged rice samples analysed by NIN, EIA and Vimta Labs, respectively with levels ranging from below the limit of quantification (BLOQ) to 573 μg/kg (Table II).
The percentage of damaged grains consisting of discoloured, black tipped and pin point damage ranged from 3.1 to 12.25 per cent (Table III). Around 14 per cent of the samples had below 5 per cent damage, as per FSSAI limits. The percentage of pin point damaged grains ranged from 0.47 to 2.53 with 40 per cent of the samples having less than 1 per cent damage whereas 60 per cent of the samples exceeded the FCI specifications of 1 per cent. The percentage of damaged grains remained almost same with or without presence of pin point damaged grains. No significant correlation was observed between per cent damage and aflatoxin levels as shown by spearman's rank correlation (rs= -1.34 and P=0.44).
No evidence of fungal contamination was seen in the rice samples collected (control) from the local market (Figs. 1 and 2). SEM studies of the rice samples indicated no evidence of fungal presence on surface or at a deeper plane in the apparently normal, pin point damaged and partially damaged grains of PAU-201 rice variety (Figs. 3–6). On the other hand, SEM study of the sorted, fully damaged rice grains showed fungal structures with spores both on surface and deeper regions (Fig. 7).
Prussian Blue staining to assess presence of iron in different categories of damaged/discoloured grains of the PAU 201 rice revealed that except for the Ultra rice (reconstituted artificial rice with iron fortified rice flour) none of the other samples stained blue thus indicating that the black spots of PAU-201 variety are not due to presence of iron. EDX analysis of pin point damaged grains also did not indicate presence of iron.
Damaged food grains resulting from fungal invasion and subsequent spoilage may produce mycotoxins that are known to be toxic to humans and animals22. Thus the presence of damaged grains in rice is an important factor that is considered for mould contamination and the FSSAI regulations established norms to ensure that such damaged grains do not exceed 5 per cent in rice11. The extent of aflatoxin contamination, found in the PAU 201 stored rice in the present study was consistent with reported studies on aflatoxin contamination in rice with majority of samples having levels below the tolerance limits for aflatoxin in India6, 7. On the other hand, aflatoxin levels exceeded the tolerance limits in damaged rice grains.
Although the sensitivities of the analytical methods used by the three laboratories for aflatoxin analysis differed, a reasonably good agreement in the results was observed. Variability in the results of aflatoxin analysis of contaminated commodities have been discussed earlier23.
Rice kernels discoloured by fungi are classified as damaged grains/kernels by FSSAI and FCI4, 12. The black tip, pin point or peck damage is reported to be the cause of insect and fungal activity and occurs under conditions of heavy rainfall during kernel development24. Such discoloured grains were observed to break easily during milling reducing the percentage of head rice and lowering quality as well as the price of rice25. Earlier studies on black tipped rice did not indicate presence of aflatoxins or other mycotoxins and were not found to be toxic in experimental studies with chicks and ducklings26. The SEM studies of the damaged and discoloured rice grains in the present study revealed fungal growth only in fully damaged grains as reported earlier27, 28.
The presence of discoloured and damaged grains is reported to be high in the PAU 201 rice29. This was observed in the present study where pin point damage and other discoloured grains exceeded the regulatory limits. The FCI had relaxed these specifications up to 4.75 per cent at the request of the Government of Punjab, to expedite the milling of paddy of PAU 201 and other varieties and to maximize the procurement of rice in drought year13.
The black tipped discolouration in rice was earlier attributed to the presence of iron26. The presence of high levels of iron in certain pigmented varieties of rice such as black rice that had high levels of anthocyanins have been reported earlier30. However, in the present study Prussian blue staining and EDX analysis of discoloured rice grains did not reveal presence of iron. These results rule out the possibility that the black tips on rice are due to presence of high iron content.
In conclusion, the results of the study indicated that the stored paddy of PAU-201 rice variety were in compliance with the food safety and standard regulations of the FSSAI with respect to aflatoxin contamination.
Support provided by Directors of Directorate of Rice Research (DRR) (ICAR), Hyderabad, & Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology (CIPHET) (ICAR), Ludhiana is gratefully acknowledged. Assistance in the collection and analysis of samples by staff of the following organizations is also acknowledged: Department of Food, Civil Supplies & Consumer Affairs, Government of Punjab; Food Corporation of India, Vice Chancellor and Director Research, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana; Dr S.K. Dutta, Deputy Director General (Crop Sciences), ICAR; Dr S. K. Saxena, Director, and staff of Export Inspection Agency (Ministry of Commerce and Industry, GOI), Kochi; VIMTA Laboratories, Hyderabad; project staff at National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad. Authors acknowledge the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India for the support, and all project staff in the sampling and aflatoxin analysis of rice samples. Assistance provided by Shri P. Madhusudhana Chary, Technician, Pathology & Electron Microscopy Division, National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, is also acknowledged.
|1.||Bhat RV,Vasanthi S. Unneyehr LJMycotoxin food safety risk in developing countriesInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Focus 10 Vision 2020 Food Safety in food security and food tradeYear: 2003Washington DCInternational Ford Policy Research Institute Brief 3.|
|2.||WHO. Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminantsWHO Food Additive Series 40Year: 1998RomeWorld Health Organization|
|3.||FAO. Worldwide regulations for mycotoxins in food and feed in 2003FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 81Year: 2004RomeFood and Agriculture Organization|
|4.||FSSAIFood safety and standards (contaminants, toxins and residues) regulations, 2011. F.No. 2-15015/30/2010Year: 2011New DelhiFood Safety and Standards Authority of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare|
|5.||Vasanthi S,Bhat RV. Mycotoxins in foods- Occurrence, health and economic significance and food control measuresIndian J Med ResYear: 1998108212249863277|
|6.||Vasanthi S,Bhat RV. Aflatoxins in stored riceInt Rice Res NewslettYear: 1990153940|
|7.||Reddy KRN,Reddy CS,Muralidharan K. Detection of Aspergillus spp.and aflatoxin B1 in rice in IndiaFood MicrobiolYear: 200926273119028301|
|8.||Toteja GS,Mukherjee A,Diwakar S,Singh P,Saxena BN,Sinha KK,et al. Aflatoxin B1 contamination of parboiled rice samples collected from different states of India: a multicentre studyFood Addit ContamYear: 200623411416546887|
|9.||Gummert M,Balingbing CB,Barry G,Estevez LA. Management options, technologies and strategies for minimised mycotoxin contamination of riceWorld Mycotoxin JYear: 200921519|
|10.||Tanaka K,Sago Y,Zheng Y,Nakagawa H,Kushiro M. Mycotoxins in riceInt J Food MicrobiolYear: 2007119596617913273|
|11.||FSSAIFood safety and standards (food products standards and food additives) regulations, 2011. F.No. 2-15015/30/2010Year: 2011New DelhiFood Safety and Standards Authority of India. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare|
|12.||Specifications of food grainsFood Corporation of Indiaaccessed on January 16, 2011 Available from: http://fciweb.nic.in/qualities/index.|
|13.||Specifications of food grains. RelaxationsFood Corporation of Indiaaccessed on January 16, 2011 Available from: http://fciweb.nic.in//upload/quality/Punjab-KMS-relaxation-2009-10.pdf.|
|14.||Manual of methods of analysis of foods mycotoxinsYear: 2005New DelhiDirectorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India|
|15.||Bureau of Indian StandardsMethods of analysis for foodgrains. Part I Refractions. IS 4333 (Part I)Year: 1996New DelhiBIS|
|16.||Horwitz W,Latimer GWAOAC Official method 990.33. Aflatoxin in corn and peanut butter Liquid Chromatography MethodOfficial methods of analysis of AOAC internationalYear: 200518th edGaithersburg, Maryland, USAAOAC International|
|17.||Horwitz W,Latimer GWAOAC. Official method 991.31. Aflatoxin in corn, raw peanuts and peanut butter. Immunoaffinity column (Aflatest) MethodOfficial methods of analysis of AOAC internationalYear: 200518th ed|
|18.||Spanjer MC,Rensen PM,Scholten JS. LC–MS/MS multi-method for mycotoxins after single extraction, with validation data for peanut, pistachio, wheat, maize, cornflakes, raisins and figsFood Addit ContamYear: 20082547289|
|19.||Mangala UN,Reddy KRN,Singotamu L,Chary PMS,Reddy CS,Muralidharan K. Scanning electron microscope studies on Aspergilli colonize and produce Aflatoxin B1 in discolored rice grainsJ Mycol Plant PatholYear: 20063641826|
|20.||Sivaprakash KR,Krishnan S,Datta SK,Parida AK. Tissue specific histochemical localization of iron and ferritin gene expression in transgenic indica rice Pusa Basmati (Oryza sativa L.)J GenetiYear: 20068515760|
|21.||Singotamu L,Madhusudhanachary P. Scanning electron microscope and energy dispersive X-ray (EDAX-ray) analysis of milletsScanning- J MicroscYear: 200426979|
|22.||Proctor DL. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin No.109Grain storage techniques evolution and trends in developing countriesYear: 1994RomeFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations|
|23.||Whitaker TB,Dickens JW. Variability of aflatoxin test resultsJ Am Oil Chem SocYear: 19745121484855369|
|24.||Logrieco A,Bottalico A,Mulé G,Moretti A,Perrone G. Epidemiology of toxigenic fungi and their associated mycotoxins for some Mediterranean cropsEur J Plant PatholYear: 200310964567|
|25.||Schroeder HW. Milling quality of Belle Patna Rice in experimental storage: A study of the effects of field fungi on subsequent invasions by storage fungiJ Stored Prod ResYear: 196732933|
|26.||Bhat RV,Deosthale YG,Roy DN,Vijayaraghavan M,Tulpule PG. Nutritional and toxicological evaluation of ‘Black tip’ riceJ Sci Food AgricYear: 1982334177070059|
|27.||Singotamu L,Shetty PH. Scanning electron microscopic studies on normal and discoloured rice grainsScanning- J MicroscYear: 1998202758|
|28.||Reddy KRN,Reddy CS,Abbas CA,Abel K,Muralidharan K. Mycotoxigenic fungi, mycotoxins, and management of rice grainsToxin RevYear: 200827287317|
|29.||Report on the investigation of higher blackened grains in paddy variety of PAU-201 in PunjabYear: 2009LudhianaCentral Institute of Post Harvest Engineering & Technology|
|30.||Wang Q,Han P,Zhang M,Xia M,Zhu H,Ma J,et al. Supplementation of black rice pigment fraction improves antioxidant and anti-inflammatory status in patients with coronary heart diseaseAsia Pac J Clin NutrYear: 200716Suppl 129530117392122|
Keywords: Aflatoxins, damaged grains-rice, fungal growth.
Previous Document: Beneficial effect of Lisosan G on cultured human microvascular endothelial cells exposed to oxidised...
Next Document: To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers.