| Advance directives and the promotion of autonomy: a comparative Australian statutory analysis. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20329457 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Legislation governing advance directives has been enacted in six Australian jurisdictions. As evidenced by parliamentary debates, the goal of enacting legislation was to enshrine the common law and to remove any doubt about whether a competent individual was entitled to complete an advance directive that refused life-sustaining medical treatment. The common law cases contain many judicial pronouncements about the importance of the principle of autonomy in shaping the law in this field. It should therefore follow that the principle of autonomy would also be promoted by the legislation. This article argues that the statutory regimes have, for the most part, eroded rather than promoted the principle of autonomy. While some of the statutory regulation can be justified as seeking to promote autonomous decision-making of a competent person, many of the restrictions about when an advance directive refusing treatment can be entered into or operate, or be disregarded by medical professionals, have effectively undermined an individual's ability to ensure that her or his refusal of medical treatment at the end of life is followed. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Lindy Willmott |
Related Documents
:
|
10126217 - The patient as citizen. a common-good approach to medical treatment decisions balances ... 12752897 - Questioning the decision-making capacity of surrogates. 18002967 - Towards sustainable decision-support system facilitating ebm. 19618357 - Rationing of resources: ethical issues in disasters and epidemic situations. 19503687 - Development of korean academy of medical sciences guideline rating the physical impairm... 20520047 - Perspective: redefining context in the clinical encounter: implications for research an... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Legal Cases |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of law and medicine Volume: 17 ISSN: 1320-159X ISO Abbreviation: J Law Med Publication Date: 2010 Feb |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-03-24 Completed Date: 2010-05-04 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9431853 Medline TA: J Law Med Country: Australia |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 556-81 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Health Law Research Program, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia. l.willmott@qut.edu.au |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Advance Directives
/
legislation & jurisprudence* Australia Humans Personal Autonomy* Treatment Refusal / legislation & jurisprudence |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: A right to die? Euthanasia and the law in Australia.
Next Document: Donor gametes and frozen embryos: should there be a right to withdraw consent?