Document Detail


Acute challenge with apomorphine and levodopa in Parkinsonism.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10686467     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of different parkinsonian syndromes and the ability to predict long-term drug efficacy constitute important clinical issues. DESIGN: Motor responses to the acute administration of levodopa and apomorphine were analyzed in a series of 134 parkinsonian patients, including 83 patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD), 28 patients with multiple-system atrophy (MSA), 6 with progressive supranuclear palsy, and 17 with an unclassified parkinsonian syndrome. METHODS: The patients received oral levodopa/carbidopa (250/25 mg) and subcutaneous apomorphine (1.5, 3 and 4.5 mg). Clinical variations of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score were evaluated 1 h following levodopa administration or 20 min following apomorphine. The motor improvement produced by each acute challenge was matched with the clinical diagnosis and with the response to chronic levodopa treatment. The diagnosis was verified by repeated clinical assessments or by autopsy in 2 cases. A receiver operating characteristics curve was plotted comparing PD vs. non-PD, PD vs. MSA and chronic responders vs. nonresponders. Cutoff threshold improvement was defined as the value closest to the crossing point for 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity, corresponding to the best trade-off for a predictive evaluation. RESULTS: UPDRS motor score improvement was on average higher in PD than in non-PD patients (levodopa: 29.8 vs. 12.2%; apomorphine 1.5 mg: 27.1 vs. 10.5%; apomorphine 3 mg: 27.7 vs. 9.7%; apomorphine 4.5 mg: 28.8 vs. 11.8%; p < 0.01 with Student's t test). When PD patients were compared to non-PD patients, levodopa challenge had the best diagnostic accuracy with a threshold improvement of 16%. Apomorphine had the best diagnostic accuracy with a threshold improvement of 13.5% for 1.5 mg, 13% for 3 mg, and 16% for 4.5 mg. This meant that patients improving at least 16% in all tests had the highest probability of having PD. When PD patients were compared to MSA patients, levodopa acute challenge had the best diagnostic accuracy with a threshold improvement of 17%. Apomorphine had the best diagnostic accuracy with an improvement of 13% for 1.5 mg, 15% for 3 mg, and 18% for 4.5 mg. This meant that patients improving at least 18% in all tests had the highest probability of having PD rather than MSA. When patients who responded to chronic levodopa treatment were compared to those who did not, acute challenge with levodopa had the best predictive accuracy with a threshold improvement of 14.5%. Apomorphine had the best predictive accuracy with an improvement of 13% for 1.5 mg, and 14% for 3 and 4.5 mg. This meant that patients improving at least 14.5% in all tests had the highest probability of responding to chronic treatment. CONCLUSION: A good agreement was found between acute challenges with levodopa/carbidopa and apomorphine, and the use of both improved the reliability of the test. Different threshold improvements after acute challenges would support a diagnosis of PD or the exclusion of MSA, and would have a predictive value for subsequent response to chronic levodopa therapy.
Authors:
P Rossi; C Colosimo; E Moro; P Tonali; A Albanese
Related Documents :
24559837 - Ketogenic diet therapy can improve acth-resistant west syndrome in japan.
11576367 - Effect of renal center characteristics on mortality and technique failure on peritoneal...
16773617 - Excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with parkinson's disease: a polysomnography st...
18989347 - Clinical characteristics of pigment dispersion syndrome in chinese patients.
15009767 - Transcatheter coil closure of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations in children.
20088407 - Clinical and pathological features of ascending testis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  European neurology     Volume:  43     ISSN:  0014-3022     ISO Abbreviation:  Eur. Neurol.     Publication Date:  2000  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2000-04-27     Completed Date:  2000-04-27     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0150760     Medline TA:  Eur Neurol     Country:  SWITZERLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  95-101     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Affiliation:
Istituto di Neurologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Age of Onset
Aged
Antiparkinson Agents / pharmacology*
Apomorphine / administration & dosage*,  adverse effects
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Humans
Levodopa / administration & dosage*,  adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Parkinsonian Disorders / diagnosis,  drug therapy*
Sensitivity and Specificity
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Antiparkinson Agents; 0/Levodopa; 58-00-4/Apomorphine

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Type I sialidosis: a clinical, biochemical and neuroradiological study.
Next Document:  An epidemiological study to assess migraine prevalence in a sample of Italian population presenting ...