Document Detail

The ActivityStat Hypothesis : The Concept, the Evidence and the Methodologies.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23329607     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
BACKGROUND: The ActivityStat hypothesis suggests that when physical activity is increased or decreased in one domain, there will be a compensatory change in another domain, in order to maintain an overall stable level of physical activity or energy expenditure over time. The ActivityStat debate is gaining momentum in the literature and most of the research to date is based on observational studies.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to conceptually clarify the ActivityStat hypothesis and to examine the experimental research aiming to demonstrate or refute compensation using a systematic review process.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic database searches with the aim of detecting studies experimentally investigating the ActivityStat hypothesis or compensation in physical activity or energy expenditure. Included studies were critically appraised using a specifically designed tool to address the conceptual considerations of the ActivityStat hypothesis.
RESULTS: Searches identified 28 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Publications spanned 26 years and had multiple methodological approaches, including randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, crossover designs, cluster randomized controlled trials and pre-post trials. Populations of the included studies ranged from children, to adults and the elderly, across a range of weight statuses and used both aerobic, resistance and mixed-exercise interventions. The timeframe of interventions ranged from 1 day to 4 years and outcomes were measured using doubly labelled water, accelerometry, heart rate monitoring, resting metabolic rate, indirect calorimetry, pedometry, subjective recall questionnaire and the activity-related time index. Fifteen of 28 included studies provided evidence of compensation, while 13 did not. Subgroup analyses by population, type and duration of intervention, weight status and study quality also showed mixed findings.
CONCLUSION: There is a substantial body of experimental literature investigating compensation that has largely been overlooked in the ActivityStat debate. However, this evidence is currently inconclusive and lacks a cohesive approach to the question of an ActivityStat. Recommendations for the design of future experimental research investigating the ActivityStat hypothesis are presented.
Sjaan R Gomersall; Alex V Rowlands; Coralie English; Carol Maher; Tim S Olds
Related Documents :
24099157 - The influence of workplace injuries on work-family conflict: job and financial insecuri...
24951717 - A review of the impact of exclusion criteria on the generalizability of schizophrenia t...
24229457 - Xtreme everest 2: unlocking the secrets of the sherpa phenotype?
24667107 - Study design and implementation of the pine study.
17644997 - Science and scientists in victorian and edwardian literary novels: insights into the em...
24388127 - Mendelian randomization in health research: using appropriate genetic variants and avoi...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)     Volume:  43     ISSN:  0112-1642     ISO Abbreviation:  Sports Med     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-24     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8412297     Medline TA:  Sports Med     Country:  New Zealand    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  135-49     Citation Subset:  IM    
Health and Use of Time (HUT) Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia,
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The effect of exercise on the cardiovascular risk factors constituting the metabolic syndrome : a me...
Next Document:  Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes.