Document Detail


Accuracy of early and delayed FDG PET-CT and of contrast-enhanced CT in the evaluation of lung nodules: a preliminary study on 30 patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19579015     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of our prospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of early, delayed and dual-time-point positron emission tomography (PET) acquisition with contrast enhanced computed tomography (CT) within a PET-CT examination in the evaluation of pulmonary solitary nodules (SPNs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study. All the patients underwent a dual-time-point PET-CT examination. Whole-body PET images were acquired at 50 min after fluorine18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) administration (early), followed by a chest acquisition (delayed). Lung nodules with maximum standardised uptake value SUVmax > or =2.5 were considered malignant. SUVmax was calculated on early and delayed images; SUV increasing > or =10% (Delta SUVmax) was considered suggestive of malignancy. Absence of significant lung nodule enhancement (<15 Delta HU) at CT was considered strongly predictive of benignity. For the CT morphological assessment, the irregularity of the shape of each lesion was rated. PET-CT results were related to histological assays and clinical records. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by area under the receiveroperarting characteristic (ROC) curves analysis. RESULTS: Early and delayed SUVmax of malignant nodules were significantly higher than those of benign disease. Early SUVmax sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 77%, 91%, 79.5% and 66.7%; delayed SUVmax corresponding values were 77%, 66%, 74% and 66%; dual-time-point SUVmax values were 83%, 67%, 75% and 74%; DeltaHU values were 94%, 34%, 67%, 96%; CT morphologic evaluation values were 61%, 46%, 60%, 47%. Area under the curve (AUC) for early SUVmax was 0.79, for delayed SUVmax 0.80, for dual-time-point SUVmax 0.85, for DeltaHU 0.63 and for CT morphologic assessment 0.58. CONCLUSIONS: In our small series of patients, early and delayed SUVmax showed comparable accuracies, whereas morphological and contrast enhanced CT evaluations showed the lowest accuracies. Dual-time-point SUVmax showed the largest AUC. However, dual-time-point SUVmax was most sensitive, whereas single-time-point SUVmax was most specific.
Authors:
O Schillaci; L Travascio; F Bolacchi; F Calabria; C Bruni; C Cicciò; M Guazzaroni; A Orlacchio; G Simonetti
Related Documents :
18769975 - Clinical value of image fusion from mr and pet in patients with head and neck cancer.
17321235 - The role and clinical value of eus in a multimodality esophageal carcinoma staging prog...
2294545 - Lymphoma of the mediastinum and neck: evaluation with ga-67 imaging and ct correlation.
19184245 - The early use of pet-ct alters the management of patients with esophageal cancer.
18291625 - Interictal hyperemia correlates with epileptogenicity in polymicrogyric cortex.
21525535 - Acoustic neuroma diagnosis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article     Date:  2009-07-04
Journal Detail:
Title:  La Radiologia medica     Volume:  114     ISSN:  1826-6983     ISO Abbreviation:  Radiol Med     Publication Date:  2009 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-10-02     Completed Date:  2009-12-08     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0177625     Medline TA:  Radiol Med     Country:  Italy    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng; ita     Pagination:  890-906     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Molecular Imaging Interventional Radiology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy. orazio.schillaci@uniroma2.it
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Contrast Media
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 / diagnostic use
Humans
Lung Neoplasms / radiography*,  radionuclide imaging*
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Radiopharmaceuticals / diagnostic use
Sensitivity and Specificity
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule / radiography*,  radionuclide imaging*
Tomography, Emission-Computed / methods*
Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*
Whole Body Imaging
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Contrast Media; 0/Radiopharmaceuticals; 63503-12-8/Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Small (&lt;/=2 cm) atypical hepatic haemangiomas in the non-cirrhotic patient: pattern-based classif...
Next Document:  Leukocyte recruitment and ischemic brain injury.