Document Detail


Accuracy of clinical diagnosis versus the World Health Organization case definition in the Amoy Garden SARS cohort.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17466127     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of emergency department (ED) physicians with the World Health Organization (WHO) case definition in a large community-based SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) cohort.
METHODS: This was a cohort study of all patients from Hong Kong's Amoy Garden complex who presented to an ED SARS screening clinic during a 2-month outbreak. Clinical findings and WHO case definition criteria were recorded, along with ED diagnoses. Final diagnoses were established independently based on relevant diagnostic tests performed after the ED visit. Emergency physician diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of the WHO SARS case definition. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were calculated using standard formulae.
RESULTS: During the study period, 818 patients presented with SARS-like symptoms, including 205 confirmed SARS, 35 undetermined SARS and 578 non-SARS. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 91%, 96% and 94% for ED clinical diagnosis, versus 42%, 86% and 75% for the WHO case definition. Positive likelihood ratios (LR+) were 21.1 for physician judgement and 3.1 for the WHO criteria. Negative likelihood ratios (LR-) were 0.10 for physician judgement and 0.67 for the WHO criteria, indicating that clinician judgement was a much more powerful predictor than the WHO criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician clinical judgement was more accurate than the WHO case definition. Reliance on the WHO case definition as a SARS screening tool may lead to an unacceptable rate of misdiagnosis. The SARS case definition must be revised if it is to be used as a screening tool in emergency departments and primary care settings.
Authors:
W N Wong; Antonio C H Sek; Rick F L Lau; K M Li; Joe K S Leung; M L Tse; Andy H W Ng; Robert Stenstrom
Related Documents :
9892917 - Limitations of standardized skin surface biopsy in measurement of the density of demode...
9638377 - Personal performance profiles: a useful adjunct to quality assurance in cervical cytology.
20010157 - Novel swine-origin (s-oiv) h1n1 influenza a pneumonia in a lung transplant patient: a c...
23702317 - Tracheal invasion and perforation from advanced primary thyroid lymphoma: a case report...
18752027 - Cefdinir-induced hepatotoxicity: potential hazards of inappropriate antibiotic use.
24732097 - Post-traumatic humero-ulnar synostosis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  CJEM : Canadian journal of emergency medical care = JCMU : journal canadien de soins médicaux d'urgence     Volume:  5     ISSN:  1481-8035     ISO Abbreviation:  CJEM     Publication Date:  2003 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-04-30     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100893237     Medline TA:  CJEM     Country:  Canada    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  384-91     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Hospital Accident & Emergency Department Research Team, United Christian Hospital Emergency Department, Hong Kong.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
CJEM. 2004 Jan;6(1):6; author reply 7-8   [PMID:  17433133 ]
CJEM. 2004 Jan;6(1):8-9   [PMID:  17433136 ]
CJEM. 2004 Jan;6(1):6-7; author reply 7-8   [PMID:  17433135 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Production from dairy cows of semi-industrial quantities of milk-protein concentrate (MPC) containin...
Next Document:  What is the risk of bacterial meningitis in infants who present to the emergency department with fev...