Document Detail

Accuracy of blood pressure measurement in the family practice center.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9719346     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
BACKGROUND: Equipment, physiologic, and technique factors can influence the accuracy of blood pressure measurement. The current study was designed to isolate certain technique factors and then assess the accuracy of nursing personnel measurements of blood pressure in three residency family practice centers. METHODS: An experienced registered nurse was trained in applying the American Heart Association recommendations for determining blood pressure by sphygmomanometry; three 1.5-hour practice sessions demonstrated her accuracy. Nine full days were then spent in the family practice centers rechecking as many staff blood pressure readings as possible while controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: The following findings were significant: (1) the average absolute differences between control and study nurse systolic and diastolic blood pressure readings were 6.2 mmHg and 4.7 mmHg, respectively; (2) a unidirectional error of 3.8 mmHg in the measurement of diastolic blood pressure was found in one center, possibly because less care was taken with afternoon measurements; (3) variability in systolic blood pressure readings was higher in all three centers (+/- 8.5 mmHg) than attained during the training sessions for the control nurse (+/- 5.8 mmHg); (4) the average errors attributable to technique factors studied that were potentially correctable by training were only 1.8 mmHg for systolic and 0.7 mmHg for diastolic pressures. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of inaccuracy in ambulatory nursing blood pressure readings attributable to errors in technique is quantified by this study. Training can reduce, but not abolish, this inaccuracy. Careful attention to proper blood pressure measurement technique and such variables as equipment calibration is essential for both nursing and physician observers. Taking multiple blood pressure measurements before making clinical decisions can limit the effect of these inaccuracies.
L E Kay
Related Documents :
11712656 - Continuous mean arterial pressure measurement in the fingers: the influence of local ar...
25041826 - Interfacial microstructure and growth mechanism of al4c3 in grf/al composites fabricate...
2656456 - Doppler techniques for lower extremity arterial diagnosis.
17054886 - Responsiveness of two methods for measuring foot and ankle volume.
23389556 - Vortices formed on the mitral valve tips aid normal left ventricular filling.
1862646 - Pressure sores: an overview and update.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice / American Board of Family Practice     Volume:  11     ISSN:  0893-8652     ISO Abbreviation:  J Am Board Fam Pract     Publication Date:    1998 Jul-Aug
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-11-16     Completed Date:  1998-11-16     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8807505     Medline TA:  J Am Board Fam Pract     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  252-8     Citation Subset:  IM    
Polyclinic Hospital Family Practice Residency, PinnacleHealth System, Harrisburg, PA 17110, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Analysis of Variance
Blood Pressure Determination / standards*
Clinical Competence / standards*
Family Practice
Nursing Audit*
Observer Variation
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Quinoline antimalarials: mechanisms of action and resistance and prospects for new agents.
Next Document:  Barriers to recognition of erectile dysfunction among diabetic Mexican-American men.