| Accuracy and Reliability of a Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference Measurement Procedure Implemented within a Behind-the-Ear Hearing Aid. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 22192606 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Background: Measurement of the real ear response of a fitted hearing aid allows matching of the frequency response to prescriptive targets, as well as comparison of the response to both threshold and loudness discomfort level (LDL). These processes are recommended procedures for hearing aid fittings. The real ear aided response (REAR) is often predicted based on the coupler response of the device, the real-ear-to-coupler difference (RECD), and the microphone location effect (MLE). Individualized measurement of the RECD tends to increase the accuracy of this prediction. A commercial hearing aid has been developed that measures the individual RECD and incorporates the data into the software-assisted fitting process. Purpose: This study evaluated the test-retest reliability and predictive validity of this particular method for measuring the RECD. Research Design: A repeated measures design was used to evaluate differences between subsequent measures of the RECD in the same ear, and prediction differences associated with using the RECD (and other information) to predict the REAR. Study Sample: Fifteen ears, on a convenience sample of ten adults (45-86 yr) and five children (6-15 yr) were tested. All participants were hearing aid users. Data Collection and Analysis: Predicted and measured REARs were collected using normal clinical procedures, on an Audioscan Verifit VF-1 for two test signals/levels. Reliability, mean differences between predicted and measured REARs, and 95% confidence intervals of the prediction accuracy are reported. Results: The RECD procedure had test-retest reliability within 2.5 dB for 14 out of 15 ears between 500 and 4000 Hz, and had predictive accuracy within 5 dB between 500 and 4000 Hz for 14 out of 15 ears. However, errors associated with earhook misalignment were discovered. Also, the RECD values measured using this hearing-aid-specific procedure differ somewhat from the normative data available from insert earphone RECDs. Conclusions: This procedure, when measured according to recommendations, provides a reasonably accurate prediction of the REAR. Functionally, this procedure does not replace the range of measures offered by modern real ear measurement systems. However, given the inaccuracy of software-assisted fittings without a measure of individual ear canal acoustics, use of this procedure may have the potential to improve the accuracy of fittings versus fittings completed without real ear measurement. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Susan Scollie; Marlene Bagatto; Sheila Moodie; Jeff Crukley |
Related Documents
:
|
15092706 - Limitation of communal latrines in changing the prevalence of parasites and diarrhoeal ... 17153816 - Trauma history and severity of gambling involvement among horse-race gamblers in a sout... 16690996 - Severity of gambling problems and psychosocial functioning in older adults. 15217196 - A prospective study of problem and regular nonproblem gamblers living in the community. 355046 - Iatrogenic problems following gastric surgery. 8039366 - Extracting the coherent core of human probability judgement: a research program for cog... |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Volume: 22 ISSN: 1050-0545 ISO Abbreviation: J Am Acad Audiol Publication Date: 2011 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-12-23 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9114646 Medline TA: J Am Acad Audiol Country: Canada |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 612-22 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
American Academy of Audiology. |
Affiliation:
|
School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Western Ontario; National Centre for Audiology, University of Western Ontario. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Patterns of Abnormality in cVEMP, oVEMP, and Caloric Tests May Provide Topological Information about...
Next Document: Improving speech perception in noise for children with cochlear implants.