Document Detail


Accuracy of electronically reported "meaningful use" clinical quality measures: a cross-sectional study.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23318309     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: The federal Electronic Health Record Incentive Program requires electronic reporting of quality from electronic health records, beginning in 2014. Whether electronic reports of quality are accurate is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the accuracy of electronic reporting compared with manual review.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: A federally qualified health center with a commercially available electronic health record.
PATIENTS: All adult patients eligible in 2008 for 12 quality measures (using 8 unique denominators) were identified electronically. One hundred fifty patients were randomly sampled per denominator, yielding 1154 unique patients.
MEASUREMENTS: Receipt of recommended care, assessed by both electronic reporting and manual review. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and absolute rates of recommended care were measured.
RESULTS: Sensitivity of electronic reporting ranged from 46% to 98% per measure. Specificity ranged from 62% to 97%, positive predictive value from 57% to 97%, and negative predictive value from 32% to 99%. Positive likelihood ratios ranged from 2.34 to 24.25 and negative likelihood ratios from 0.02 to 0.61. Differences between electronic reporting and manual review were statistically significant for 3 measures: Electronic reporting underestimated the absolute rate of recommended care for 2 measures (appropriate asthma medication [38% vs. 77%; P < 0.001] and pneumococcal vaccination [27% vs. 48%; P < 0.001]) and overestimated care for 1 measure (cholesterol control in patients with diabetes [57% vs. 37%; P = 0.001]).
LIMITATION: This study addresses the accuracy of the measure numerator only.
CONCLUSION: Wide measure-by-measure variation in accuracy threatens the validity of electronic reporting. If variation is not addressed, financial incentives intended to reward high quality may not be given to the highest-quality providers.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Authors:
Lisa M Kern; Sameer Malhotra; Yolanda Barrón; Jill Quaresimo; Rina Dhopeshwarkar; Michelle Pichardo; Alison M Edwards; Rainu Kaushal
Related Documents :
12449859 - Energy cycling and hypothetical organisms in europa's ocean.
9386209 - A mathematical analysis of the bioenergetics of hurdling.
9168519 - An energy sensor for control of energy intake.
10921789 - Effect of chronic amiodarone therapy on defibrillation energy requirements in humans.
19350939 - Thermodynamic analysis of resources used in manufacturing processes.
20711179 - Ultrahigh-power micrometre-sized supercapacitors based on onion-like carbon.
22526719 - Quasi-classical trajectory study of the role of vibrational and translational energy in...
16165059 - Solvent and substituent effects on spectroscopical changes of some diazoaminobenzene de...
15785769 - Infrared radiation from an extrasolar planet.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Annals of internal medicine     Volume:  158     ISSN:  1539-3704     ISO Abbreviation:  Ann. Intern. Med.     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-01-15     Completed Date:  2013-03-11     Revised Date:  2013-08-27    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372351     Medline TA:  Ann Intern Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  77-83     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, Weill Cornell Medical College, Institute for Family Health, New York, USA. lmk2003@med.cornell.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Cross-Sectional Studies
Electronic Health Records / standards*
Female
Humans
Likelihood Functions
Male
Meaningful Use*
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
R18 HS 017067/HS/AHRQ HHS
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 15;158(2):131-2   [PMID:  23318313 ]
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 2;159(1):73   [PMID:  23817711 ]
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 2;159(1):73   [PMID:  23817712 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  GI-POP: A combinational annotation and Genomic Island prediction Pipeline for Ongoing microbial geno...
Next Document:  Economic savings versus health losses: the cost-effectiveness of generic antiretroviral therapy in t...