Document Detail

Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10413394     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: The study sought to determine if there were race/ethnicity or gender differences in access to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery among patients who have been designated as appropriate and as necessary for that surgery according to the RAND methodology. METHODS: RAND appropriateness and necessity criteria were used to identify a race/gender stratified sample of postangiography patients who would benefit from coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These patients were tracked for 3 months to determine if they had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. Subjects were a total of 1,261 postangiography patients in eight New York hospitals in 1994 to 1996. Measures included percentages of patients for whom coronary artery bypass graft surgery was appropriate and necessary undergoing surgery by race/ethnicity and gender, as well as multivariate odds ratios for race/ethnicity and gender. RESULTS: After controlling for age, payer, number of vessels diseased, and presence of left main disease, African-American and Hispanic patients were found to be significantly less likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery than white non-Hispanic patients (respective odds ratios 0.64 and 0.60). When "necessity" was used as a criterion instead of "appropriateness," significant differences in access for African-American patients remained. The gatekeeper physician recommended surgery only 10% of the time that patients did not undergo "appropriate" coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and this percentage did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity or gender of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Even after controlling for appropriateness and necessity for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a prospective study, African-American patients had significant access problems in obtaining coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These problems appeared not to be related to patient refusals.
E L Hannan; M van Ryn; J Burke; D Stone; D Kumar; D Arani; W Pierce; S Rafii; T A Sanborn; S Sharma; J Slater; B A DeBuono
Related Documents :
10413394 - Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients wh...
16781174 - Certification of vascular centers - a project of the german society for vascular surgery.
20399114 - Comparison of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis with continuous thermodi...
15390344 - Percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in multivessel disease? a tailored...
8284384 - Palmaz stent in the treatment of central venous stenosis: safety and efficacy of redila...
1914274 - Catheter balloon valvuloplasty of stenotic porcine bioprosthetic valves: part i: anatom...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Medical care     Volume:  37     ISSN:  0025-7079     ISO Abbreviation:  Med Care     Publication Date:  1999 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-07-29     Completed Date:  1999-07-29     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0230027     Medline TA:  Med Care     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  68-77     Citation Subset:  IM    
State University of New York, University at Albany, Rensselar, 12144-3456, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
African Americans / statistics & numerical data*
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Bypass / utilization*
European Continental Ancestry Group / statistics & numerical data*
Health Services Accessibility / standards,  statistics & numerical data*
Health Services Research
Hispanic Americans / statistics & numerical data*
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
New York
Patient Selection
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Referral and Consultation / statistics & numerical data
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Factors
Comment In:
Med Care. 1999 Jan;37(1):3-4   [PMID:  10413386 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  An international comparison of the reliability and responsiveness of the Duke Health Profile for mea...
Next Document:  Differences between family physicians' and general internists' medical charges.