| Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21769599 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Abortion is the central issue in the conscientious objection debate. In this article I demonstrate why this is so for two philosophical viewpoints prominent in American culture. One, represented by Patrick Lee and Robert P. George, holds that the fundamental moral value of being human can be found in bare life and the other, represented by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, holds that this fundamental value is found in the life that can choose and determine itself. First, I articulate Lee and George's philosophical theory and demonstrate how the fundamental moral value of their theory, personhood, is represented in the issue of abortion. Second, I examine Beauchamp and Childress' theoretical vision and demonstrate how their fundamental moral value, the right to autonomous self-determination, is represented in abortion. Third, I sketch the theoretical and practical dynamics of the conscientious objection debate as well as each author's understanding of conscience. Fourth, I demonstrate how abortion, which represents their respective fundamental value, shapes each perspectives' approach to the conscientious objection debate. I conclude that because each theory finds its fundamental value represented in the issue of abortion, each perspective is bound to engage the conscientious objection debate in a way that centers on the issue of abortion. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Elliott Louis Bedford |
Related Documents
:
|
11609049 - The mission of social history of medicine: an historical view. 22120789 - Ethical issues in microbiology. 3314849 - Drugs and prisons. 16941909 - Back to the future of abortion law: roe's rejection of america's history and traditions. 788949 - Organomercury poisoning in iraq: history prior to the 1971-72 outbreak. 20103279 - A short history of the society of thoracic surgeons national cardiac database: percepti... 22167989 - Mind the gap: the lack of common language in healthcare ethics. 11609049 - The mission of social history of medicine: an historical view. 18181929 - Implants and/or teeth: consensus statements and recommendations. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2011-7-17 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues Volume: - ISSN: 1572-8498 ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2011 Jul |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-7-19 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8917455 Medline TA: HEC Forum Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Affiliation:
|
Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA, ebedford@slu.edu. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Primary hydatid cyst of the thigh: on seven cases.
Next Document: Age-related changes in the mRNA levels of CYP1A1, CYP2B1/2 and CYP3A1 isoforms in rat small intestin...