Document Detail


475748 - ventilatory management in non-selected patients with ards.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18753592     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Introduction: Mechanical ventilation is known to affect outcome in ARDS. Guidelines for ventilatory management have been published, but little is known about actual practice. The aim of this study was to describe ventilatory management in non-selected consecutive patients with ARDS in an academic centre. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study was approved by the REB who did not require patient consent. Over a 12-month period, we enrolled all consecutive critically ill adult with ARDS according to American-European Consensus Conference in a single multidisciplinary tertiary intensive care unit with a long history of participation in ARDS trials. No trials were underway during this period of observation. According to a local guideline for low volume ventilation, initial tidal volume is set at 6 mL/kg predicted body weight (PBW) and titrated down to target plateau pressure lower than 30 cmH(2)O, while PEEP and FiO(2) are set according to the control arm of the Lung Open Ventilation Study.(1) However, management decisions are ultimately left to the attending intensivists who were not aware of the present study. Demographic data at baseline and outcome data were recorded. Morning mechanical ventilation and gas exchange data were recorded daily for the first seven days. RESULTS: Among the 37 patients cohort (age 54.8+/-17.4, 54% male), the most frequent risks factors for ARDS were sepsis/septic shock (73%) and pneumonia (70%). Mean APACHE II score was 23.1+/-7.6 and mean PaO(2)/FiO(2) was 122.1+/-40.6; these did not differ between survivors and non-survivors. Primary ventilation modes included: volume control +/- autoflow (30 patients), pressure regulated volume control (6 patients) and pressure control (1 patient). Mean expired tidal volume was 7.3+/-1.4 mL/kg PBW (survivors 7.2+/-1.5, non-survivors 7.3+/-1.3). PEEP was 9.7+/-3.7 cmH(2)O (highest 22 cmH(2)O). Mean plateau pressure was 27.4+/-5.8 cmH(2)O and was slightly in survivors (25.7+/-6.2) than non-survivors (29.0+/-5.0) (P<0.0001, Figure). Recruitment manoeuvres (5 patients) and prone positioning (1 patient) were uncommon. ICU and hospital mortalities were 51%.Discussion: In this academic unit, uptake of an established low tidal volume ventilation strategy for ARDS has been moderate, PEEP levels are moderately high, and use of rescue therapies is minimal. The relatively high mortality rate may be related primarily to the high rate of sepsis as the underlying etiology of ARDS.Mean expired tidal volume (Vt) for all patients. Mean plateau pressure (Pplat) was lower for survivors (s) than for non-survivors (ns) (P<0.0001).
Authors:
Martin Lessard; Natasha Langis; Niall Ferguson; Maureen Meade; Alexis Turgeon
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthésie     Volume:  55 Suppl 1     ISSN:  0832-610X     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2008 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-08-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8701709     Medline TA:  Can J Anaesth     Country:  Canada    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  475748     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  475743 - reconstructive head and neck surgery: predicting complication.
Next Document:  475757 - patient-controlled oral airway insertion facilitating awake fiberoptic intubation in an obe...