The year in gout: 2011-2012.
|Abstract:||From an epidemiologic view, gout is an increasingly prevalent and increasingly pressing clinical problem. This fact, together with technical advances in biology, pharmacology, and imaging techniques, have led to a decade of increasingly rapid progress in our collective understanding of gout and hyperuricemia. Here we review some of the most important recent advances in gout over the past 12 to 18 months.|
Gout (Development and progression)
Gout (Causes of)
Gout (Care and treatment)
Crittenden, Daria B.
Pillinger, Michael H.
|Publication:||Name: Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases Publisher: J. Michael Ryan Publishing Co. Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2012 J. Michael Ryan Publishing Co. ISSN: 1936-9719|
|Issue:||Date: July, 2012 Source Volume: 70 Source Issue: 3|
|Topic:||Event Code: 310 Science & research|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: United States Geographic Code: 1USA United States|
Our ability to understand and manage gout continues to advance. The
past decade has seen progress in the basic biochemistry, cell biology,
and pathophysiologic mechanisms of gout; a deeper epidemiologic insight
into the populations that suffer from gout; technological advances in
imaging of gout patients; and tremendous strides into new ways of
thinking about managing gout. What has led to this miniature
"Golden Age?" Mainly, a fortuitous conjunction of ability and
need; in particular, the recognition that gout is major disease, with
potentially serious implications, along with the astonishing technical
advancements that allow us to ask new biological questions and to study
old biological questions in newer and more discerning ways. In this
review, we highlight some of the more interesting accomplishments in the
gout field over the past 12 months, focusing on some of the studies that
are most interesting or important and putting these developments in the
context of the evolving landscape of gout research. Our method is
selective, not encyclopedic. For clarity, we will divide the
presentation according to methodologies or areas of interest; it must be
recognized, however, that these subjects are interrelated, and advances
in each particular area would have been unlikely without the
collegiality and collaboration evident across the community of gout
Epidemiology: Disease Presence and Burden
Work by Hyon Choi and his colleagues over the past decade has shed light on gout prevalence and incidence, the importance of nutrition on hyperuricemia and the risk for gouty attack, the burden of alcohol use in hyperuricemia and gout, and the potential role of hyperuricemia in the development of comorbid conditions. An important recent contribution from this group was a study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a large survey conducted roughly every 10 years by the Centers for Disease Control. (1) Using this survey, Choi and colleagues documented a prevalence of gout in 2007 to 2008 of approximately 3.9% in the United States, or approximately 12 million gout sufferers (more than double the number of patients with rheumatoid arthritis). Importantly, when compared with a prior NHANES study (1988 to 1994), the prevalence of gout could be seen to have increased by roughly 45%, continuing a trend seen in the decades from the 1970s to 1990s. Even larger increases were observed among populations at risk, including both males and the elderly. In the latter group (age > 80 years), the prevalence of gout was observed to increase from 5.9% in the earlier study to 12.6% in the latter, an increase of more than 100%. Clearly, gout has risen to the level of a common and highly prevalent disease.
There are several reasons why we should care about this rise in the burden of gout. Notably, gout is associated with increased rates of morbidity (further discussed below) and mortality. Kuo and colleagues undertook a study of 6,631 patients over 5 years, including 53,048 patient-years of follow-up. (2) They observed that gout patients experienced an increased rate of death compared with patients without gout; a difference that grew progressively as the study continued. By the end of 5 years, survival in the control group was still above 95%, whereas survival rates in the gout group had fallen to between 85% and 90%. This increased mortality rate was seen in both men and women, and appears to be accounted for by increased kidney, metabolic, and cardiovascular disease.
Gout is also an expensive disease, both in terms of medical costs and loss of workdays. In a recent study by Wu and colleagues, the cost of medical care for a patient with severe treatment failure gout (six or more attacks a year) was more than $25,000, compared with less than $5,000 for a patient without gout. (3) The added costs included additional ER and clinic visits, hospitalizations, and the management of comorbid conditions. Regarding loss of productivity due to gout, Edwards and colleagues have recently conducted a prospective observational study addressing work loss attributable to gout in patients with chronic refractory gout. (4) Among 81 patients less than 65 years of age, followed for 1 year, the median number of workdays lost to gout flares was between 30 and 60; there were also many lost days of social activities, and many days on which normal self-care activities were compromised.
Advances in Basic Science
The wheels of basic science turn slowly, but several reports in the past year clearly deserve notice. One important theme is the increasing recognition of the role of the macrophage in gout. Synovial macrophages may be the first cells to recognize urate crystals in situ and to initiate the inflammation of a gouty attack. However, new evidence suggests that macrophages may also participate in the resolution of gouty inflammation, helping to explain the long-appreciated fact that gout attacks, if left alone, will usually resolve spontaneously. In a 2012 study by Chen and colleagues, macrophages exposed to urate crystals were shown to produce not only IL-1[beta] and TNF-[alpha] but also multiple anti-inflammatory molecules, including IL-10, TGF-[beta], IL-1ra, and soluble TNF-[alpha] receptors. (5)
Neutrophils also play an important role in gout, and studies in general neutrophil biology have experienced significant evolution in the past few years. Mitroulis and colleagues bring these two threads together with their discovery that monosodium urate crystals can lead to the activation to neutrophil extracellular traps, or NETS. (6) NETS are filigree mesh works of chromatin that neutrophils have been shown to elicit under certain conditions of activation. These NETS can capture bacteria, but also may form extracellular frameworks for the assembly of proteases and other tissue destroying enzymes. Thus, NETS could contribute to gout-associated tissue damage.
Other studies in the past year have also examined mechanisms of gout-associated tissue damage. For example, the mechanisms through which tophi lead to bone erosion are not well understood. In a study by Chhana and colleagues, it has recently been demonstrated that tophi may promote increased osteoblast cell death and reduce the populations of osteoblasts surrounded the tophitic lesion. (7) Thus, tophi may contribute to bone destruction, at least in part, by inactivating the mechanisms that would lead to bone healing once damage has taken place.
Comorbidities of Gout and Hyperuricemia
With gout prevalence on the rise, the comorbidities associated with gout pose an increasing health risk. While clinicians caring for patients with gout have long-appreciated the other diseases commonly seen in gout patients, recent studies have confirmed and quantified the extent of comorbidities in the gout population. In a study by Keenan and coworkers, the median number of comorbidities among gout patients cared for in a Veteran Affairs system was between three and four. (8) The most common of these included hypertension (seen in > 90% of patients), hyperlipidemia (seen in > 60% of patients), diabetes and chronic kidney disease (each seen in > 50% of patients), and coronary artery disease (seen in > 45% of patients). More recently, Krishnan and colleagues demonstrated that gout patients may have as much as an 80% increased risk of congestive heart failure, a risk that appeared to increase over time. (9) Thus, the importance of heart failure as gout comorbidity may be underappreciated if patients with recent onset gout are considered. Moreover, Krishan's data suggest that gout patients with CHF have a higher relative risk of mortality than CHF patients without gout, even after adjusting for other known risk factors.
These studies were recently supported and extended in an NHANES study carried out and reported by Zhu and colleagues published this year. (10) In this study of 5,707 participants in the 2007-2008 NHANES, 74% had HTN, 71% had CKD stage 2 or higher, 53% were obese, 26% had diabetes, 24% had nephrolithiasis, 14% had myocardial infarction, 11% had heart failure, and 10% had suffered a stroke; the prevalence of these comorbidities were also noted to increase with the degree of hyperuricemia, supporting the notion that serum urate is related to the presence of several gout comorbidities, either as a marker of disease or perhaps by itself exacerbating other diseases.
Can Controlling Hyperuricemia or Gout Ameliorate Gout Comorbidities?
The question of cause and effect between gout, hyperuricemia, and gout comorbidities has important clinical implications. Clearly, some of the comorbidities seen in gout patients are likely to contribute to the onset of gout itself. For example, renal insufficiency on any basis will impair renal clearance of serum urate, causing hyperuricemia and raising the risk for gout. However, if any of the comorbidities associated with gout are--to any extent--a consequence rather than a cause of hyperuricemia or gout, then our decision-making regarding the pharmacological lowering of serum urate and control of gouty inflammation ought to include an assessment of the impact of such treatments not only on gout but on these accompanying comorbidities. In general, the data available are insufficient proof of such cause-and-effect relationships to allow incorporation into clinical practice. They do, however, reveal trends that suggest more study is strongly warranted.
One of the challenges in studying the role of urate and gout on comorbidities is the challenge of adjusting for multiple comorbidities. If a particular comorbidity represents a mechanism through which gout results in poor outcomes, statistical adjustments may obscure the relationship between gout and the diseases with which it is commonly seen. For example, consider the possibility that gout promotes CKD by worsening HTN; by adjusting for HTN, the causality between gout and CKD would be obscured. One approach to exploring causality in this setting is to ask whether lowering urate, or treating gout, reduces comorbid risk. A number of studies have recently begun to employ this approach. (However, it must be noted that to date these studies are either retrospective or small, and so their generalizability may be limited.) For example, Chen and Pan used a large dataset to show that the use of urate-lowering therapy is associated with significantly decreased cardiovascular and stroke mortality. (11) In a similar vein, in a cross-sectional study, we have recently shown that the chronic use of colchicine may be associated with a decreased risk of myocardial infarctions in gout patients. (12)
Several studies have attempted to address the impact of hyperuricemia, or the effects of urate-lowering, on renal function in both gout patients and patients without gout. In one study, Whelton and colleagues reorganized the data compiled in a 5-year febuxostat study into quartiles according to the degree of urate-lowering achieved (regardless of drug and dose). (13) In this study, patients who achieved the most urate lowering experienced preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), rather than the predicted physiologically-based renal deterioration over time. In contrast, those patients who experienced the least urate lowering experienced significant declines in eGFR (approximately 10 mL/min) (Fig. 1). In a 16-week, prospective study of patients with normal-range renal function and no gout, Kanbay and colleagues followed 30 control patients and 37 asymptomatic hyperuricemics, and treated an additional 30 asymptomatic hyperuricemics with 300 mg of allopurinol daily. (14) In this study, the control patients started with higher eGFRs than either of the two hyperuricemia groups, whose mean eGFRs were similar. By the end of the study, both the control and the untreated hyperuricemic groups experienced no significant change in eGFR. In contrast, those patients treated with allopurinol experienced a significant increase in eGFR, bringing their renal function almost to the level of the control patients. An earlier study by Goicoechea and colleagues yielded similar results. (15) These studies point to a potential beneficial effect of urate-lowering in the preservation or even improvement of renal function in hyperuricemic patients.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Uric Acid and Osteoarthritis?
Recently, DeNoble and colleagues have suggested the possibility that uric acid may play a role in the development and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). (16) This interesting hypothesis is predicated on two recent advances in the understanding of crystal biology over the past decade. First is the notion of uric acid as a danger signal. Danger signals are substances that are emitted by cells in extremis and drive antigen presentation to result in immunity (as opposed to the antigen causing immune tolerance). (17) In a seminal observation, Rock and colleagues demonstrated that uric acid crystals are a danger signal produced by damaged cells and can activate immune responses. (18)
The second advance was made by the late Jurg Tschopp and his group. Tschop showed the ability of urate crystals to activate the inflammasome, a multimolecular complex responsible for the generation of IL-1[beta] and IL-18. (19) Interestingly enough, IL-1[beta] is one of the cytokines most strongly associated with osteoarthritis. Could urate therefore play a role in OA? To assess this question, De Noble and colleagues studied the synovial fluid (SF) of 159 patients with OA but no gout. They found that: 1) SF urate levels correlated with levels of both IL-1[beta] and IL-1[beta]; 2) SF IL-1[beta] and IL-1[beta] levels correlated with OA severity; and 3) SF urate levels also correlated with OA severity. From these observations, the De Noble group proposed a model in which early osteoarthritis promotes cell death and local urate release, and micro-crystallization of urate induces IL-1[beta]/IL-18 production from viable chondrocytes, inducing additional inflammation and further OA propagation. (16) This or other models suggesting an interaction between hyperuricemia and OA remain to be validated, but at least one study has suggested an association between crystal deposition and OA of the ankle. (20) Intriguingly, Aran and colleagues have recently shown that daily colchicine reduces osteoarthritis symptoms in the knee. (21) Taken together, these data are provocative and suggest that further research is warranted. If uric acid can be more definitively linked to the progression of OA, the presence or risk of OA may need to be taken into consideration when making decisions to lower serum urate pharmacologically.
Dual Energy CT for Gout Assessment
While our understanding of the basic science behind gouty inflammation and the interplay between gout and its comorbidities expands, technology has also advanced our ability to assess gout burden in individual patients. Dual energy CT (DECT) allows for identification of urate deposition in significantly more areas than physical exam and allows for automated volumetric assessment of total tophus volume load (Fig. 2). In a study by Choi and colleagues in 2009, DECT revealed 440 areas of urate deposition in 20 patients, compared to 111 areas of urate deposition determined by physical exam. (22) DECT has more recently been shown to identify subclinical tophi in gout patients. (23) Recent data suggests high sensitivity and specificity of DECT for diagnosing gout: 93% and 95% respectively in one study published in abstract form, (24) and 78% and 93% in another study; in the latter study, the investigators speculated that longstanding urate lowering therapy may have resulted in a less impressive sensitivity. (25) Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility in assessing tophus volume was excellent in the latter study. While this technology has not yet achieved a role in routine clinical care, it holds promise as a tool to help make diagnostic and perhaps treatment decisions in the future. MRI and ultrasound are also modalities of interest for gout imaging. (26,27)
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Update on Treatment
It has long been appreciated that certain dietary components affect the risk of hyperuricemia and gout. (28) The roles of dietary purines, and of alcoholic beverages, are well-established, and studies over the past decade have shed light additional light on the impact and mechanisms of these agents. (29,30) More recently, dietary fructose has come to attention as a foodstuff that can raise serum urate, although some controversy remains. (31,32)
In contrast to purines, alcohol, and fructose, dairy has recently been suggested to have benefit in managing hyperuricemia. (33) Epidemiologic studies suggest that patients who consume more dairy products have lower serum urates and lower risk for gouty attacks (independent of the effect of dairy consumption on the rest of the consumer's diet), and at least two studies suggest that dairy consumption results in a rapid uricosuric effect. (34-36) In an interesting animal study, Dalbeth and colleagues have shown that consumption of dairy product extracts may also have anti-inflammatory effects. (37) With these observations in mind, Dalbeth recently conducted a prospective, proof-of-principle trial of dairy extracts as prophylaxis against acute gouty attacks. (38) Gout patients daily received either lactose powder (control group), skim milk powder, or skim milk powder supplemented with GMP and G600, two milk sub-fractions that had previously been suggested to contain the most potent urate-lowering effect. As early as 1 month after initiation, and persisting until the end of the study (3 months), subjects in the skim milk/GMP/G600 group demonstrated significantly reduced numbers of gout attacks relative to the other groups. In contrast, the skim milk supplement alone showed little benefit. Collectively, these data suggest a benefit from dairy in the management of gout; whether they also suggest that dairy extract supplementation would be needed, rather than just dietary alterations, remains to be further clarified.
The last 5 years have seen the arrival of a handful of new agents for treating gout and advances in the use of some older agents as well. Among the older agents, colchicine has recently been found to work at a lower dose than used historically for acute gout, at 1.2 mg followed by 0.6 mgs 1 hour later, leading to FDA approval of the agent for the first time. (39) Possibly the most important publication relating to colchicine this year, however, was the report by Terkeltaub and colleagues providing a dose-reduction algorithm for patients taking other drugs that are metabolized by the CYP450 3A4 and P-Glycoprotein systems, such as the commonly prescribed calcium channel blockers verapamil and diltiazem. (40) This information should help make a generally safe drug (when used at appropriate doses) even safer.
The other potentially important advance in the field of gout inflammation has been the concept that agents capable of blocking interleukin-1[beta] (IL-1[beta]) activity may be effective in gout. The basis for this concept stems from the recognition that urate crystals activate the inflammasome; this observation places IL-1[beta] at the center of the gouty response. (19) Three biologic agents are available that bind and inactivate extracellular IL-1[beta]: anakinra, the IL-1[beta] receptor antagonist developed for rheumatoid arthritis; rilonacept, or IL-1 Trap, consisting of two IL-1[beta] receptors linked to an immunoglobulin Fc tail; and canakinumab, an anti-IL-1[beta] antibody approved for childhood periodic fever syndromes. In 2011-2012, several important studies regarding the latter two agents were published. Schlesinger and colleagues published the results of a dose-finding study comparing canakinumab against intramuscular triamcinolone for the treatment of acute gout, showing that canakinumab was equal to or superior triamcinolone at all doses tested. (41) Subsequently, this observation was supported by two phase III trials of canakinumab 150 mg subcutaneously for treatment of acute flare in patients who could not take non-steroidal anti-inflammatories or colchicine, also evaluating time to next flare. (42) In the weeks after treatment, the number of recurrent gout flares was much lower in the canakinumab vs. the triamcinolone group, consistent with the long half-life of canakinumab (approximately 26 days). Canakinumab has also been compared with colchicine, 0.5 mg daily, for the prevention of acute gout attacks during the initiation of urate lowering and found to be superior to colchicine for flare prevention during the 16-week active comparator phase of the study. (43) Similar studies have demonstrated the potential benefit of rilonacept as a prophylactic agent. In two different trials, rilonacept 80 mg or 160 mg weekly was superior to placebo at suppressing gouty attacks in patients starting allopurinol. (44,45) Of note, assessments of rilonacept vs. an active comparator (e.g., colchicine) have not yet been reported. (46)
In the realm of urate-lowering therapy, the workhorse agent has long been the xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor allopurinol. Since 2009, febuxostat has represented an alternative XO inhibitor. Febuxostat has several theoretical advantages over allopurinol, including greater potency and specificity and a reduced reliance on renal excretion. As a non-competitive XO inhibitor, we may expect febuxostat to have an advantage over the competitive XO inhibitor allopurinol in settings of high levels of xanthine and hypoxanthine (i.e., among urate overproducers) since in that setting xanthine and hypoxanthine levels might have the potential to overwhelm the allopurinol but not febuxostat effect. However, whether these potential advantages outweigh febuxostat's increased cost remains uncertain. A study by Singh and colleagues presented at this year's American College of Rheumatology meeting, may shed some light. (47) In a study of real-world use of the two agents, Singh and colleagues observed that a higher proportion of patients using febuxostat achieved a serum target level of either < 6.0 or < 7.0 mg/dL, although the relative advantage was modest. Further study is needed to clarify how to select between these two agents.
Another new agent for lowering serum urate levels is pegloticase, a recombinant mammalian uricase coated with polyethylene glycol strands to reduce immunogenicity (FDA approved in 2010). Although the pegloticase is highly effective at lowering serum urate, it loses efficacy in approximately half of patients that take it, and some patients may suffer severe allergic reactions. Recently published results of two phase III studies of the drug shed considerable light on this situation, and may help practitioners to better utilize the agent. (48) These studies demonstrated that pegloticase is almost always highly effective in its initial usage, but that pegloticase patients rapidly diverge into two distinct groups. About half of the patients remain responders indefinitely. For the others, the drug rapidly loses activity, a condition related to the development of anti-pegloticase antibodies. This same group of patients is susceptible to severe infusion reactions. Accordingly, pegloticase use can be optimized by identifying those patients who cease to respond to pegloticase (detected by a rise in serum urate to greater than 6 mg/dL) and discontinuing use to prevent adverse outcomes. The remaining patients can utilize pegloticase indefinitely, maintaining low serum urate levels rarely seen with oral agents. Using this strategy, infusion reactions can be reduced by as much as 90%. Accordingly, the pegloticase package insert now recommends that serum urate should be assessed prior to every infusion, and that discontinuation should be considered if levels increase to above 6.0 mg/dL on two consecutive assessments.
Gout is an increasingly important disease in the United States and around the world, yet its complexity and clinical significance are frequently underestimated. Fortunately, our understanding of the risk factors, biology, and treatment of gout is advancing steadily. With persistent focus, it is likely that our ability to prevent and treat gout and its related comorbidities will continue to improve as the decade advances.
Daria B. Crittenden, M.D., and Michael H. Pillinger, M.D., serve as site investigators for a clinical trial sponsored by Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc. Both Drs. Pillinger and Crittenden have previously served as consultants for Savient Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(1.) Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):3136-41.
(2.) Kuo CF, Yu KH, See LC, et al. Elevated risk of mortality among gout patients: a comparison with the national population in Taiwan. Joint Bone Spine. 2011 Dec;78(6):577-80.
(3.) Wu EQ, Forsythe A, Guerin A, Yu AP, et al. Comorbidity Burden, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs in Chronic Gout Patients Refractory to Conventional Urate-Lowering Therapy. Am J Ther. 2011 Feb 10. [Epub ahead of print].
(4.) Edwards NL, Sundy JS, Forsythe A, et al. Work productivity loss due to flares in patients with chronic gout refractory to conventional therapy. J Med Econ. 2011;14(1):10-5.
(5.) Chen YH, Hsieh SC, Chen WY, et al. Spontaneous resolution of acute gouty arthritis is associated with rapid induction of the anti-inflammatory factors TGFbeta1, IL-10 and soluble TNF receptors and the intracellular cytokine negative regulators CIS and SOCS3. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Sep;70(9):1655-63.
(6.) Mitroulis I, Kambas K, Chrysanthopoulou A, et al. Neutrophil extracellular trap formation is associated with IL1beta and autophagy-related signaling in gout. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29318.
(7.) Chhana A, Callon KE, Pool B, et al. Monosodium urate monohydrate crystals inhibit osteoblast viability and function: implications for development of bone erosion in gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Sep;70(9):1684-91.
(8.) Keenan RT, O'Brien WR, Lee KH, et al. Prevalence of contraindications and prescription of pharmacologic therapies for gout. Am J Med. 2011 Feb;124(2):155-63.
(9.) Krishnan E. Gout and the risk for incident heart failure and systolic dysfunction. BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 15;2(1):e000282.
(10.) Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Comorbidities of gout and hyper uricemia in the US general population: NHANES 2007-2008. Am J Med. 2012 Jul;125(7):679-87 e1.
(11.) Chen J-H, Pan W-H. Effects of urate lowering therapy on cardiovascular mortality: a Taiwanese cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:S872-3(2008).
(12.) Crittenden DB, Lehmann RA, Schneck L, et al. Colchicine use is associated with decreased prevalence of myocardial infarction in patients with gout. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jul;39(7):1458-64.
(13.) Whelton A, Macdonald PA, Zhao L, et al. Renal function in gout: long-term treatment effects of febuxostat. J Clin Rheu matol. 2011 Jan;17(1):7-13.
(14.) Kanbay M, Huddam B, Azak A, et al. A randomized study of allopurinol on endothelial function and estimated glomular filtration rate in asymptomatic hyperuricemic subjects with normal renal function. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Aug;6(8):1887-94.
(15.) Goicoechea M, de Vinuesa SG, Verdalles U, et al. Effect of allopurinol in chronic kidney disease progression and cardiovascular risk. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Aug;5(8):1388-93.
(16.) Denoble AE, Huffman KM, Stabler TV, et al. Uric acid is a danger signal of increasing risk for osteoarthritis through inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 1; 108(5):2088-93.
(17.) Gallucci S, Matzinger P. Danger signals: SOS to the immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001 Feb;13(1):114-9.
(18.) Shi Y, Evans JE, Rock KL. Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells. Nature. 2003 Oct 2;425(6957):516-21.
(19.) Martinon F, Petrilli V, Mayor A, et al. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006 Mar 9;440(7081):237-41.
(20.) Muehleman C, Li J, Aigner T, et al. Association between crystals and cartilage degeneration in the ankle. J Rheumatol. 2008 Jun;35(6):1108-17.
(21.) Aran S, Malekzadeh S, Seifirad S. A double-blind randomized controlled trial appraising the symptom-modifying effects of colchicine on osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011 May-Jun;29(3):513-8.
(22.) Choi HK, Al-Arfaj AM, Eftekhari A, et al. Dual energy computed tomography in tophaceous gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Oct;68(10):1609-12.
(23.) Manger B, Lell M, Wacker J, et al. Detection of periarticular urate deposits with dual energy CT in patients with acute gouty arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Mar;71(3):470-2.
(24.) Bongartz T, Glazebrook KN, Kavros SJ, et al. Diagnosis of Gout Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography: An Accuracy and Diagnostic Yield Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(10 Suppl):S77.
(25.) Choi HK, Burns LC, Shojania K, et al. Dual energy CT in gout: a prospective validation study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Sep;71(9):1466-71.
(26.) McQueen FM, Doyle A, Dalbeth N. Imaging in gout--what can we learn from MRI, CT, DECT and US? Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(6):246.
(27.) Howard RG, Pillinger MH, Gyftopoulos S, et al. Reproducibility of musculoskeletal ultrasound for determining monosodium urate deposition: concordance between readers. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Oct;63(10):1456-62.
(28.) Li S, Micheletti R. Role of diet in rheumatic disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2011 Feb;37(1):119-33.
(29.) Zhang Y, Chen C, Choi H, et al. Purine-rich foods intake and recurrent gout attacks. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Sep;71(9):1448 53.
(30.) Choi HK, Liu S, Curhan G. Intake of purine-rich foods, protein, and dairy products and relationship to serum levels of uric acid: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Jan;52(1):283-9.
(31.) Choi HK, Curhan G. Soft drinks, fructose consumption, and the risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008 Feb 9;336(7639):309-12.
(32.) White JS. Fructose as a significant cause of gout is unfounded and premature. QJM. 2012 Aug;105(8):809-10.
(33.) Dalbeth N, Palmano K. Effects of dairy intake on hyperuricemia and gout. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2011 Apr;13(2):132-7.
(34.) Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, et al. Purine-rich foods, dairy and protein intake, and the risk of gout in men. N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 11;350(11):1093-103.
(35.) Lipkowitz MS, Leal-Pinto E, Cohen BE, Abramson RG. Galectin 9 is the sugar-regulated urate transporter/channel UAT. Glycoconj J. 2004;19(7-9):491-8.
(36.) Dalbeth N, Wong S, Gamble GD, et al. Acute effect of milk on serum urate concentrations: a randomised controlled crossover trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Sep;69(9):1677-82.
(37.) Dalbeth N, Gracey E, Pool B, et al. Identification of dairy fractions with anti-inflammatory properties in models of acute gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Apr;69(4):766-9.
(38.) Dalbeth N, Ames R, Gamble GD, et al. Effects of skim milk powder enriched with glycomacropeptide and G600 milk fat extract on frequency of gout flares: a proof-of-concept randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):929-34.
(39.) Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Bennett K, et al. High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare: Twenty-four-hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison colchicine study. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Apr;62(4):1060-8.
(40.) Terkeltaub RA, Furst DE, Digiacinto JL, et al. Novel evidence-based colchicine dose-reduction algorithm to predict and prevent colchicine toxicity in the presence of cytochrome P450 3A4/P-glycoprotein inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Aug;63(8):2226-37.
(41.) Schlesinger N, De Meulemeester M, Pikhlak A, et al. Canakinumab relieves symptoms of acute flares and improves health-related quality of life in patients with difficult-to-treat Gouty Arthritis by suppressing inflammation: results of a randomized, dose-ranging study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Mar 25;13(2):R53.
(42.) Schlesinger N, Alten RE, Bardin T, et al. Canakinumab for acute gouty arthritis in patients with limited treatment options: results from two randomised, multicentre, active-controlled, double-blind trials and their initial extensions. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 May 14. [Epub ahead of print].
(43.) Schlesinger N, Mysler E, Lin HY, et al. Canakinumab reduces the risk of acute gouty arthritis flares during initiation of allopurinol treatment: results of a double-blind, randomised study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jul;70(7):1264-71.
(44.) Schumacher HR, Jr., Evans RR, Saag KG, et al. Rilonacept (Interleukin-1 Trap) for prevention of gout flares during initiation of uric acid-lowering therapy: Results of the presurge-1 trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 May 1. [Epub ahead of print].
(45.) Schumacher HR, Jr., Sundy JS, Terkeltaub R, et al. Rilonacept (interleukin-1 trap) in the prevention of acute gout flares during initiation of urate-lowering therapy: results of a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Mar;64(3):876-84.
(46.) Abeles AM. The need to compare rilonacept against active treatment for prevention of gout flares: comment on the article by Schumacher et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jul;64(7):2415-6; author reply 2416.
(47.) Pandya BJ, Pinsky BW, Rey GG, Singh JA. Serum urate lowering effectiveness of febuxostat compared with allopurinol and switching to febuxostat from allopurinol in the real world setting. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(Suppl 10):891.
(48.) Sundy JS, Baraf HS, Yood RA, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2011 Aug 17;306(7):711-20.
Daria B. Crittenden, M.D., and Michael H. Pillinger, M.D., are from The Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases; and the Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, New York Harbor Health Care System, New York Campus of the Department of Veterans Affairs, New York, New York.
Correspondence: Michael H. Pillinger, M.D., Division of Rheumatology, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases Room 1410, 301 East 17th Street, New York, New York 10003; email@example.com.
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|