Territorial fidelity to nectar sources by Purple-throated Caribs, Eulampis Jugularis.
|Abstract:||We present the first record of territorial site-fidelity across multiple years by Purple-throated Caribs (Eulampisjugularis) on three different islands in the eastern Caribbean: St. Kitts, Dominica, and St. Vincent. Marked male Purple-throated Caribs were monitored throughout the flowering season of their main nectar resources, Heliconia caribaea (St. Kitts and Dominica) and Il. bihai (St. Vincent), both native perennial herbs. Individual males were observed defending the same Heliconia patches for 3 years (St. Vincent), 4 years (St. Kitts), and 5 years (Dominica), and remained near these patches even when they were not in flower. The territorial behavior and resource dependence of Purple-throated Cafibs on native heliconias likely have a key role in the coevolution of this specialized plant-pollinator interaction.|
Nectar (Environmental aspects)
Caribs (Physiological aspects)
Temeles, Ethan J.
Kress, W. John
|Publication:||Name: The Wilson Journal of Ornithology Publisher: Wilson Ornithological Society Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Biological sciences Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2012 Wilson Ornithological Society ISSN: 1559-4491|
|Issue:||Date: March, 2012 Source Volume: 124 Source Issue: 1|
|Topic:||Event Code: 310 Science & research|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: United States Geographic Code: 1USA United States|
Territoriality is a costly and often complex behavior involving
exclusive possession and/or defense of an area against conspecific and
heterospecific animals (Carpenter 1958; Brown 1964, 1969; Pyke 1979).
Territorial defense of food resources is common by nectar-feeding birds
(Gill and Wolf 1975, Cruden and Hermann-Parker 1977, Frost and Frost
1980, Armstrong 1992, Evans 1996). Non-hermit hummingbirds
(Trochilinae), in particular, defend nectar-rich flower patches from
both conspecific and heterospecifics (Wolf and Hainsworth 1971,
Kodric-Brown and Brown 1978, Cotton 1998, Temeles et al. 2005).
Territories, in some species, also function as central breeding areas
for males to attract females by offering them flowers rich in
high-energy nectar (Wolf 1975, Temeles et al. 2005, Temeles and Kress
Territorial defense by hummingbirds may vary in duration from several hours a day (e.g., Stiles 1978, Cotton 1998) to several days, weeks or months per year (e.g., Temeles et al. 2005). Territorial defense by hummingbirds of the same areas over multiple years, however, has been rarely reported (but see Bassett and Cubie 2009). Specifically, territorial fidelity by hummingbirds, where the same individual uses the same plants for consecutive years, is undocumented.
Species in the Heliconia (Heliconiaceae) are primary sources of nectar for hummingbirds in the Neotropics, and territorial defense of Heliconia flowers by hummingbirds is common (Linhart 1973, Stiles 1975, Kress 1983, Dobkin 1984). Heliconias on the islands of the eastern Caribbean are a primary and predictable source of nectar for hummingbirds, especially the Purple-throated Carib (Eulampis jugularis) (Wolf and Hainsworth 1971, Wolf 1975, Temeles and Kress 2003, Gowda and Kress 2008). Only two native species of heliconias occur on the islands of the eastern Caribbean: H. bihai and H. caribaea. The flowering season of H. caribaea ranges from March to July with a peak in May, although rarely individual plants may produce single inflorescences from August to February. In contrast, H. bihai flowers all year with a peak in April (Gowda 2009). Male Purple-throated Caribs, depending on the island, defend feeding and/or breeding territories of either H. caribaea or H. bihai, or both, whereas female Purple-throated Caribs traplineforage at undefended plants or rarely defend feeding territories (Wolf 1975; Temeles et al. 2005, 2006). Heliconia plants are long-lived (Berry and Kress 1991), and individual birds may use the same plants over successive years. We report on long-term territoriality and sitefidelity of Purple-throated Caribs of the same patches of heliconias over several years on St. Kitts, Dominica, and St. Vincent, three islands in the Lesser Antillean Archipelago of the Eastern Caribbean. We also report on additional food plants used by this species.
Field Procedures.--Field work was conducted between 2003 and 2009 on St. Kitts (17[degrees] 20' N, 62[degrees] 45' W), Dominica (15[degrees] 25' N, 61[degrees] 20' W), and St. Vincent (13[degrees] 15' N, 61[degrees] 12' W; Fig. 1). The understory in tropical wet forests on these islands is dominated by abundant H. bihai and H. caribaea, although both species are usually allopatrically distributed within a given island. Plants in the genus Heliconia are long-lived (20 yrs), perennial, rhizomatous herbs in which each rhizome (genet) generates several ramets (clones; 2 to [greater than or equal to] 100 ramets) in a given year (Berry and Kress 1991). Each ramet bears one multitiered inflorescence which consists of several sequentially opening flowers within a bract and several sequentially opening bracts within an inflorescence. Each flower within a bract lasts only a single day and flowers remain open from dawn to dusk (Temeles et al. 2005, Gowda and Kress 2008).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Purple-throated Caribs were banded at each site (Table 1) during March and April with unique color-coded darvic bands (www.avinet.com) and observed for 24 hrs (8 hrs/day x 3 days) per month in March, April, May, June, July, September, November, December, and January. These months represent both the peak (Mar to Jul) and the nonpeak (Aug to Feb) flowering seasons of the two native heliconias (Gowda 2009) and also cover the breeding period of Purple-throated Caribs (Mar to Jul) (Wolf 1975, Temeles and Kress 2010). All observations of territoriality by Purple-throated Caribs on St. Kitts and Dominica were made at marked clumps of H. caribaea plants over multiple years. H. caribaea is very rare on St. Vincent (only 2 clumps found in the forest); thus, observations of territoriality by Purple-throated Caribs were conducted on marked clumps of H. bihai. We delineated the boundaries of territories by noting the point at which territorial males evicted intruders, which included both conspecific males and females, and heterospecifics (Temeles et al. 2005). We concluded that males were displaying 'territorial fidelity' if the same marked territorial bird was observed and recaptured at the same marked feeding plants for [greater than or equal to] 2 yrs after first capture. We also recorded the number of flowers within the clump on each observation day to assess use of Heliconia patches by males in relation to flowering.
Territoriality at Heliconia caribaea.--We observed few visits (4-5 visits/day) by male Purplethroated Caribs to clumps of H. caribaea in the beginning of March when budding inflorescences were visible but no open flowers were available. Male Purple-throated Caribs on all islands, but especially on Dominica, increased their visitation frequency as the flowering season progressed (Fig. 2) and spent more time on the territory defending against incoming visitors to single flowering inflorescences or often even at inflorescences without flowers. Male Purple-throated Caribs rarely left the vicinity for more than a few hours a day or rarely for an entire day during the beginning of the flowering season of H. caribaea. Only two male Purple-throated Caribs in Dominica were not observed on their territory on two separate days. Male Purple-throated Caribs showed aggressive territorial defense (Fig. 2A) by mid-April, the peak flowering season of H. caribaea, and allowed only females to feed within territories, which often consummated in a mating event. Conspecific females, males, and heterospecifics (Green-throated Carib [Eulampis holosericeus], Antillean Crested Hummingbird [Orthorhynchus cristatus], Lesser Antillean Bullfinch [Loxigilla noctis], Bananaquit [Coereba flaveola]) were chased from the territory by the resident male Purple-throated Carib. Displacement of a resident male Purple-throated Carib was observed only once during the study (Dominica, Carholme site). A new male Purple-throated Carib displaced the resident focal male in the second year of observation after a rapid aerial chasing and scrublevel scuffle.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Territorial defense at H. caribaea by male Purple-throated Caribs lasted from March to July on Dominica (Table 1). Territorial defense had higher temporal variation on St. Kitts and St. Vincent (Fig. 2B, C; Table 1). For example, on St. Kitts, an all-day territorial presence at H. caribaea clump by Purple-throated Caribs was observed only from March to May, whereas territorial defense by Purple-throated Caribs on St. Vincent was observed only in April and May and was further restricted within a day, between 0900 to 1500 hrs (Fig. 2C). Territorial defense by females was rare and only observed on St. Vincent where females chased conspecific females (4 times) and conspecific males (2 times). However, females chasing males could not be distinguished from their mating repertoire.
Territorial Fidelity at Heliconia Patches.--All marked males on the three islands were faithful to their feeding territories across multiple years (Table 1). Individual males remained faithful to their Heliconia patches for 3 years on St. Vincent, 4 years on St. Kitts, and 5 years on Dominica. Females did not show territorial behavior during the breeding season but the same female was recaptured in 2 years in the same feeding clump of H. bihai and H. caribaea on Dominica. Similarly, a banded, non-territorial female Purple-throated Carib was repeatedly observed at the same patch of H. bihai on St. Lucia over 2 years (EJT, unpubl. data) and in St. Vincent for 2 years. Thus, females may not defend territories, but they apparently exhibit site fidelity to Heliconia patches when traplining.
Purple-throated Carib Territoriality and Site Fidelity in the Absence of Heliconias.--Male Purple-throated Caribs exhibited territorial behavior around flowers of other plant species during times of the year when H. caribaea was not flowering. We observed the birds defending Citrus sp., Costus sp., Gesneria cymosa, Heliconia psittacorum, H. wagneriana, Inga ingoides, Lobelia cirsiifolia, Marcgravia umbellate, Musa sp., and Wercklea tulipiflora. Seven of nine resident males, despite the complete absence of flowers of H. caribaea from August to March, were observed in the general vicinity of their H. caribaea territory in September, November, December, and January on St. Kitts (2 of 3 birds) and Dominica (5 of 6 birds). One or more of the non-H, caribaea species was present within 200-1,000 m of Heliconia patches for ali of these males. Male Purple-throated Caribs shifted their territorial defense to these plant species, although one of the marked birds was observed in a citrus farm >1 km distant.
Territoriality, foraging, and mate-selection in hummingbirds are behaviors strongly known to be influenced by local energy sources (Carpenter 1958, Gass et al. 1976, DeBenedictis et al. 1978, Gass 1978, Kodric-Brown and Brown 1978, Montgomerie et al. 1984, Gass and Sutherland 1985, Temeles and Kress 2010). The abundant heliconias in the eastern Caribbean Islands represent critical sources of nectar for hummingbirds due to the: (1) clonal habit of the plant that assures high density within a small radius (2 to 34 individuals/[m.sup.2]), (2) nectar rich flowers within the same inflorescence (up to 10 to 12/inflorescence), and (3) long flowering season lasting several months (Apr to Jul) that assures a steady, dependable food source (Temeles et al. 2005, Gowda 2009, Temeles and Kress 2010). The presence of territoriality by Purple-throated Caribs throughout the flowering season of the heliconias and their associated multi-year site-fidelity confirms the two heliconias (H. caribaea in St. Kitts and Dominica, and H. bihai on St. Vincent) are critical nectar sources for Purple-throated Caribs. The presence of the same individuals at specific Heliconia clumps within a flowering season and across years suggests the Purple-throated Caribs on these islands have a long-term imprint of highquality foraging sites that are not abandoned either within or between years. Hummingbirds use both fine (Miller et al. 1985, Sutherland and Gass 1995) and coarse-grained memory (Armstrong et al. 1987) to locate optimal food resources. Purple-throated Caribs likely use coarse-grained spatial memories to re-defend the same clump of H. caribaea year after year (Balda and Kamil 1989).
Our observations of Purple-throated Caribs in the general vicinity of their territorial sites during the non-H, caribaea flowering season suggest they may be aiding their spatial memory by maintaining site-fidelity even when heliconias are not in flower. On a broader level, many migratory North American hummingbird species have been recaptured at the same general locations between successive years (Bassett and Cubie 2009), and some lekking hummingbird species return to the same leks between years (Stiles and Wolf 1979). Long-term spatial memory may be a general characteristic of hummingbirds, although it may have evolved through a variety of different contexts (feeding, migration, and mating).
Our observation of strong fidelity to Heliconia patches by Purple-throated Caribs has implications for coevolution between hummingbirds and Heliconia. Bill morphology, body size, and energetics of male and female Purple-throated Caribs are closely related to one or the other species of Heliconia on the islands of St. Lucia and Dominica (H. caribaea with males; H. bihai with females; Temeles et al. 2000, Temeles and Kress 2003). Close correspondence between hummingbirds and flowers suggests these islands are 'hotspots' (Thompson 2005) of reciprocal evolution. Thompson (2005) noted that gene flow among populations can dilute and weaken reciprocal adaptation. However, year-to-year fidelity by territorial male Purple-throated Caribs to the same patches of heliconias combined with territorial exclusion of intruding conspecifics and heterospecifics would reduce gene flow in both plants and hummingbirds, resulting in strong coevolution of Purple-throated Caribs with H. caribaea through reciprocal selection for flower numbers and male size, and fighting ability (Temeles and Kress 2010). Similar fidelity by traplining females may also contribute to strong ecological interactions and evolutionary interactions with H. bihai through flower size and shape and bill morphology (Temeles et al. 2009). Benkman et al. (2003) reported a case of coevolutionary interactions between a non-migratory population of Red Crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) and lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta spp. latifolia) where reciprocal selection has largely shaped their bill morphology and seed defenses, respectively.
Our observations indicate that male Purplethroated Caribs continue to associate with patches of H. caribaea even when these plants are not in flower. This raises the questions of whether males are defending and exhibiting fidelity to the Heliconia species, or to the sites in which these plant species occur. We suggest it may be both and have no doubt that heliconias are the resource magnet that attracts hummingbirds to these sites. Our contention is supported by the observation that with the exception of introduced plants (e.g., bananas, citrus, and some ornamentals); we have found no native plant species on these islands that are as rewarding as heliconias in terms of overall nectar production (flowers of these heliconias produce 60 to 300 gl per day; Gowda and Kress 2008). Thus, fidelity to a long-lived, highlyrewarding resource, even when it is not in flower, may be a viable territorial strategy, especially if alternative low-quality resources are locally available. Once a territory is abandoned, it may be energetically more costly to re-establish it than to maintain it during times of low flower availability.
We thank the Ministry of Agriculture and the Environment; Forestry, Wildlife, and Parks Division; Commonwealth of Dominica, Government of St. Christopher and Nevis, and Forestry Department, Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, St. Vincent and the Grenadines for facilitating this study. We also thank Arlington James, Eric Hypolite, Ida Lopez, Anne Jno Baptiste, and Gregory Pereira for logistic help and discussion. We thank C. E. Braun and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and assistance on this manuscript. This work was supported by a Weintraub Graduate Fellowship from the Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University to VG and also by the Cosmos Club, Sigma-Xi, and the Smithsonian Institution. Field work for this study was supported by grants from National Science Foundation (DEB-0614218) to E. J. Temeles and W. J. Kress.
Received 17 March 2011. Accepted 2 August 2011.
ARMSTRONG, D. 1992. Correlation between nectar supply and aggression in territorial honeyeaters: causation or coincidence? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 30:95-102.
ARMSTRONG, D. A., C. L. GASS, AND G. D. SUTHERLAND. 1987. Should foragers remember where they've been? Explorations of a simulation model based on the behaviour and energetics of territorial hummingbirds. Pages 563-586 in Foraging behaviour (A. C. Kamil, J. R. Krebs, and H. R. Pulliam, Editors). Plenum Press, New York, USA.
BALDA, R. P. AND A. C. KAMIL. 1989. A comparative study of cache recovery by three corvid species. Animal Behavior 38:486-495.
BASSETT, F. AND D. CUBIE. 2009. Wintering hummingbirds in Alabama and Florida: species diversity, sex and age ratios, and site fidelity. Journal of Field Ornithology 80:154-162.
BENKMAN, C. W., T. L. PARCHMAN, A. FAVIS, AND A. M. SIEPIELSK1. 2003. Reciprocal selection causes a coevolutionary arms race between crossbills and lodgepole pine. American Naturalist 162:182 194.
BERRY, F. AND W. J. KRESS. 1991. Heliconia: an identification guide. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
BROWN, J. L. 1964. The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bulletin 76:160-169.
BROWN, J. L. 1969. Territorial behavior and population regulation in birds: a review and re-evaluation. Wilson Bulletin 81:293-329.
CARPENTER, C. R. 1958. Territoriality: a review of concepts and problems. Pages 224-250 in Behavior and evolution (A. Roe and G. G. Simpson, Editors). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
COTTON, P. A. 1998. Temporal partitioning of a floral resource by territorial hummingbirds. Ibis 140:647 653.
CRUDEN, R. W. AND S. M. HERMANN-PARKER. 1977. Defense of feeding sites by orioles and Hepatic Tanagers in Mexico. Auk 94:594-596.
DEBENEDICTIS, P. A., F. B. GILL, F. R. HAINSWORTH, G. H. PYKE, AND L. L. WOLF. 1978. Optimal meal size in hummingbirds. American Naturalist 112:301-316.
DOBKIN, D. S. 1984. Flowering patterns of long-lived Heliconia inflorescences: implications for visiting and resident nectarivores. Oecologia 64:245-254.
EVANS, M. R. 1996. Nectar and flower production of Lobelia telekii inflorescences, and their influence on territorial behaviour of the Scarlet-tufted Malachite Sunbird (Nectarinia johnstoni). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 57:89-105.
FROST, S. K. AND P. G. H. FROST. 1980. Territoriality and changes in resource use by sunbirds at Leonotis leonurus (Labiatae). Oecologia 45:109-116.
GASS, C. L. 1978. Experimental studies of foraging in complex laboratory environments. American Zoologist 18:729-738.
GASS, C. L. AND G. D. SUTHERLAND. 1985. Specialization by territorial hummingbirds on experimentally enriched patches of flowers: energetic profitability and learning. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:2125-2133.
GASS, C. L., G. ANGEHR, AND J. CENTA. 1976. Regulation of food supply by feeding territoriality in the Rufous Hummingbird. Canadian Journal of Zoology 54:2046 2054.
GILL, F. B. AND L. L. WOLF. 1975. Economics of feeding territoriality in the Golden-winged Sunbird. Ecology 56:333-345.
GOWDA, V. 2009. Pollination biology and inter-island geographical variation in the mutualistic Heliconia (Heliconiaceae)-hummingbird (Trochilidae) interaction of the eastern Caribbean Islands. Dissertation. George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA.
GOWDA, V. AND J. W. KRESS. 2008. Nectar characteristics of two eastern Caribbean heliconias (Heliconia: Heliconiaceae). Heliconia Society International Bulletin 14:6-10.
KODR1C-BROWN, A. AND J. li. BROWN. 1978. Influence of economics, interspecific competition, and sexual dimorphism on territoriality of migrant Rufous Hummingbirds. Ecology 59:285-296.
KRESS, W. J. 1983. Self-incompatibility in Central American Heliconia. Evolution 37:735-744.
LINHART, Y. B. 1973. Ecological and behavioral determinants of pollen dispersal in hummingbird-pollinated Heliconia. American Naturalist 107:511 523.
MILLER, R. S., S. TAMM, G. D. SUTHERLAND, AND C. L. GASS. 1985. Cues for orientation in hummingbird foraging: color and position. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:18-21.
MONTGOMERIE, R. D., M. J. EADIE, AND L. W. HARDER. 1984. What do foraging hummingbirds maximize? Oecologia 63:357-363.
PYKE, G. H. 1979. The economics of territory size and time budget in the Golden-winged Sunbird. American Naturalist 114:131-145.
STILES, F. G. 1975. Ecology, flowering phenology, and hummingbird pollination of some Costa Rican Heliconia species. Ecology 56:285-301.
STILES, F. G. 1978. Possible specialization for hummingbird-hunting in the Tiny Hawk. Auk 95:550-553.
STILES, F. G. AND L. L. WOLF. 1979. Ecology and evolution of lek mating behavior in the Long-tailed Hermit Hummingbird. Ornithological Monographs 27.
SUTHERLAND, G. D. AND C. L. GASS. 1995. Learning and remembering of spatial patterns by hummingbirds. Animal Behaviour 50:1273-1286.
TEMELES, E. J. AND W. J. KRESS. 2003. Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association. Science 300:630-633.
TEMELES, E. J. AND W. J. KRESS. 2010. Mate choice and mate competition by a tropical hmnmingbird at a floral resource. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 277:1607-1613.
TEMELES, E. J., R. S. GOLDMAN, AND A. U. KUDLA. 2005. Foraging and territory economics of sexually dimorphic Purple-throated Caribs (Eulampis jugularis) on three heliconia morphs. Auk 122:187-204.
TEMELES, E. J., I. L. PAN, J. L. BRENNAN, AND J. N. HORWITT. 2000. Evidence of ecological causation of sexual dimorphism in a hummingbird. Science 289:441M-43.
TEMELES, E. J., K. C. SHAW, A. U. KUDLA, AND S. E. SANDER. 2006. Traplining hy Purple-throated Carib Hummingbirds: behavioral responses to competition and nectar availability. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61 : 163-172.
TEMELES, E. J., C. R. KOULOURIS, S. E. SANDER, AND W. J. KRESS. 2009 Effect of flower shape and size on foraging performance and trade-offs in a tropical hummingbird. Ecology 90:1147-1161.
THOMPSON, J. N. 2005. The geographic mosaic of coevolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
WOLF, E. L. 1975. "Prostitution" behavior in a tropical hummingbird. Condor 77:140 144.
WOLF, L. L. AND F. R. HAINSWORTH. 1971. Time and energy budgets of territorial hummingbirds. Ecology 52:980-988.
VINITA GOWDA, (1, 2, 4) ETHAN J. TEMELES, (3) AND W. JOHN KRESS (2)
(1) Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, 2023 G Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20052, USA.
(2) Current address, Department of Botany, MRC-166, P. O. Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20013, USA.
(3) Department of Biology, Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.
(4) Corresponding author; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
TABLE 1. Territorial defense of 11 male Purple-throated Caribs from three eastern Caribbean Islands. Number of individuals monitored per island = n, individuals displaying temtoriality = T, and individuals displaying site fidelity = S. Island Territorial Territorial durations months on (Obs yrs) Heliconia (a) St. Kitts (n = 3, T = 2, S = 3) 4 yrs (2003-2008) Mar-May Dominica (n = 6, T = 6, S = 5) 5 yrs (2004-2009) Mar-Jul St. Vincent (a) 3 yrs (2005-2008) Apr-May (n = 2, T = 2, S = 2) Island Territorial months on non-Heliconia (a) St. Kitts (n = 3, T = 2, S = 3) Aug-Feb Dominica (n = 6, T = 6, S = 5) Aug-Feb St. Vincent (a) Unknown (n = 2, T = 2, S = 2) (a) Heloconia caribaea on St. Kitts and Dominica, and H. bihai on St. Vincent.
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|