Surveillance for West Nile virus in American White Pelicans, Montana, USA, 2006-2007.
West Nile virus
West Nile virus (Demographic aspects)
West Nile virus (Risk factors)
Disease transmission (Risk factors)
|Publication:||Name: Emerging Infectious Diseases Publisher: U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases Audience: Academic; Professional Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2010 U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases ISSN: 1080-6040|
|Issue:||Date: March, 2010 Source Volume: 16 Source Issue: 3|
|Topic:||Temporal Scope: 2006 AD|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: United States Geographic Code: 1USA United States|
After West Nile virus (WNV; family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus)
was detected in the Great Plains of the United States in 2002, programs
were initiated to identify the spatial distribution of WNV transmission
risk throughout the region. Surveillance activities included compiling
case counts for human and equine disease, and testing mosquitoes, avian
carcasses, and sentinel chicken serum samples for WNV infection. Corvid
(primarily crows and magpies) death surveillance was an effective early
warning system for human disease shortly after WNV was detected in this
region (1). However, carcasses of numerous other bird species also were
positive for WNV (2). Avian deaths caused by WNV infection typically
result in widely dispersed carcasses; for the extent of these deaths to
be recognized, substantial public cooperation is required in reporting
deaths (3). In contrast to this cryptic pattern of deaths,
geographically focused deaths among juvenile American white pelicans
(Pelecanus erythrorhynchos Gmelin; order Pelecaniformes, family
Pelecanidae) have occurred as a result of WNV transmission at numerous
pelican-breeding colonies throughout the northern Great Plains (4). This
region of the United States has the highest incidence of human West Nile
neuroinvasive disease (WNND) recorded (5).
Concurrent with the arrival of WNV to the northern Great Plains region, high death rates of pelican chicks were observed at 4 major colonies in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota. WNV was presumed to be the etiologic agent for >9,000 American white pelican deaths in 7 states in 2002-2003 on the basis of testing of a sample of carcasses from various affected colonies (6). At Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge (MLNWR) in Montana, the chick death rate from mid-July until fledging, a time when pelican chicks are less vulnerable to severe weather and predation, typically averages [less than or equal to] 4%. However, this death rate reached as high as 44% among colonies in the region after the arrival of WNV in 2002, and annual losses since then have remained elevated (typically 7-8x) in most years (4). Although a spatiotemporal link between WNV detection and pelican chick deaths seems evident, the cause of most of these deaths remains presumptive. Furthermore, the potential public health consequences of American white pelican deaths need to be evaluated.
Pelican deaths may indicate increased risk for WNV transmission to persons living in nearby communities. We evaluated pelican deaths and human WNND cases for potential associations. In addition, we captured and tested mosquitoes from MLNWR in 2006 and 2007 to determine the risk for vector-borne transmission of WNV and identify the vertebrate source of mosquito blood meals. Finally, we collected a series of tissue types from a subset of pelican carcasses at our field site to identify the most efficient tissue for maximizing the probability of WNV detection and to confirm WNV infection as a contributing factor to elevated prefledgling pelican death rates.
Materials and Methods
MLNWR (elevation 590 m) is located in Sheridan County in northeastern Montana (48[degrees]27'N, 104[degrees]23'W). The refuge covers 13,000 hectares, including Medicine Lake (3,320 hectares), the largest natural lake in eastern Montana. Extensive wetlands provide suitable breeding habitat for mosquitoes and aquatic birds. Cropland and short-grass prairie surround the lake and provide nesting grounds to [approximately equal to] 125 species of birds. Approximately 4,000 breeding pairs of pelicans nest on a narrow peninsula (length [approximately equal to] 500 m) (7).
Spatiotemporal Associations between Pelican Deaths and Human WNV Disease
Data for human WNV disease cases were obtained from ArboNET, an internet-based passive surveillance system maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Fort Collins, CO, USA) in collaboration with state and local health departments. Locations of colonies were obtained from King and Anderson (8). Wildlife Mortality Quarterly Reports published by the US Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center provided locations and dates of WNV-related pelican deaths during 2003-2007 (www.nwhc.usgs.gov/publications/quarterly_reports/indexjsp). We used an odds ratio to compare incidence of WNND cases in counties with reported WNV-associated deaths at pelican-nesting colonies to that in all other counties with pelican colonies during 2003-2007. Positive and negative predictive values were defined as the percentage of counties with pelican-nesting colonies in which a pelican WNV die-off and human WNND case(s) occurred, and in which neither a pelican WNV die-off nor a human WNND case occurred, respectively, during a given year.
Although neuroinvasive and nonneuroinvasive disease cases are reportable, reporting of nonneuroinvasive WNV disease has varied substantially by jurisdiction and over time. Therefore, only WNND cases were considered. For each year and county that pelican and human WNV disease were observed, we determined the interval between the earliest collection date of WNV-positive pelicans and the earliest onset date of human WNV disease.
Surveillance of Mosquitoes
For WNV testing by reverse transcription-PCR (RTPCR), weekly trap collections were sorted by species and location. Pools of [less than or equal to] 50 adult female mosquitoes were homogenized in vials containing 4.5 mm-diameter coppercoated steel beads (BB pellets) in BA-1 medium (medium 199 with Hanks balanced salt solution, 0.05 mol/L Tris buffer, pH 7.6, 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.35 g/L of NaHCO3, 100 mg/L streptomycin, 100 U/mL penicillin G, 1 [micro]g/ mL amphotericin B) and clarified by centrifugation. RNA was extracted from the supernatant and purified through an EasyMag extractor (bioMerieux, Durham, NC, USA) by using automated magnetic silicon extraction. Purified RNA was transcribed into cDNA and amplified by using specific WNV primers as described (10) in an EasyQ thermocycler (bioMerieux). Detection of WNV cDNA was achieved by agarose gel electrophoresis. Prevalence of WNV infection in mosquito populations was estimated by using PooledInfRate (www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/software. html). Vector index was calculated as the product of the LTI and infection rate (11).
Identification of Mosquito Blood Meals
Blood-engorged Aedes vexans and Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes were stored individually at -20[degrees]C and processed for blood meal identification as described (12). Briefly, each mosquito was homogenized and DNA was extracted. A portion of the mitochondrial cytochrome B gene was amplified and sequenced, and the resulting sequence was compared with sequences in a database for species identification.
Pelican Sample Collection and Preparation
Moribund pelican chicks ([approximately equal to] 6-12 weeks of age) showing clinical signs suggestive of WNV infection (e.g., ataxia, torticollis, reluctance or inability to move) (Figure) were killed by cervical dislocation and stored frozen until necropsy. In 2006, carcasses were collected from July 25 through August 11 (n = 8) during a period of maximum chick deaths, and in 2007 from July 11 through August 1 (n = 24) after confirmation of WNV in mosquito pools. Also in 2007, oropharyngeal and cloacal swab samples, skin, and feather samples were collected from 23 carcasses in the field before they were frozen for comparison with samples collected from the same animals in the laboratory during necropsy.
For swab samples, dacron-tipped applicators were inserted into the oropharyngeal cavity (behind the pouch) or into the cloaca and then submerged and swirled in vials containing 1 mL BA-1 medium and discarded. In 2007, eye swab samples were collected from 17 carcasses by placing the applicator tip between the inner membrane of the eyelid and the eye. In addition, pouch lice (Piagetiella peralis) were individually removed from the inner lining of the pouch of each pelican and pooled in cryovials ([less than or equal to] 40 lice/pool). Four flight feathers were removed from each carcass (2/wing). Feathers were removed from the follicle, and the calamus (quill tip) was aseptically cut and placed with the associated pulp into a vial containing 1 mL BA-1 medium. Approximately 0.5 [cm.sup.3] each of skin, kidney, spleen, heart, lung, and brain was aseptically collected and placed in cryovials containing 1 mL BA-1 medium for cryopreservation.
Tissues and chewing lice, obtained from the inside of throat pouches, were homogenized in a mixer mill (5 min at 25 cycles/s; Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) in 1 mL of BA-1 medium containing 20% fetal bovine serum and a BB pellet. Homogenates were clarified by centrifugation (12,000 x g for 3 min), and an aliquot was removed for immediate testing. Remaining supernatants were stored at -80[degrees]C.
Detection of WNV in Pelican Samples
Virus isolation was performed for tissues, lice homogenates, and swabs by using a Vero cell plaque assay as described (13). Viral plaques were confirmed as WNV by RTPCR or VecTest WNV Antigen Detection Assay (Medical Analysis Systems, Camarillo, CA, USA) as described (2). RT-PCR and plaque assay detection methods were compared within tissue types by using the Fisher exact test with Bonferroni correction for 9 comparisons ([alpha] = 0.0056). For specimens collected in the field and their carcass-matched controls collected in the laboratory, test results were compared by using the k statistic for concordance.
RT-PCR methods for detection of WNV RNA in tissues were according to those of Lanciotti et al. (14), except for use of the Viral RNA Minikit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) for RNA extraction and the Bio-Rad Icycler IQ Realtime Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) for cDNA amplification. A cycle threshold value [less than or equal to] 37 was considered positive for target sequence amplification. Samples were screened with 1 pair of primers (genome positions were 10668 for forward primer, 10770 for reverse primer, and 10691 for probes) and positive results were confirmed with a second pair of primers (genome positions were 1160 for forward primer, 1229 for reverse primer, and 1186 for probe).
Association of Pelican Deaths and Human WNV Disease
The probability of human WNND cases in counties with pelican nesting colonies increased 5x when WNV-associated deaths occurred among the pelicans (odds ratio 5.0, 95% confidence interval 1.9-13.0, n = 135 county-years). The positive predictive value of pelican deaths for human WNND cases was 55%, and negative predictive value was 81%. Pelican deaths were observed an average of 23.1 days (median 13.5 days) before human case onset and occurred before human disease onset in 12 (75%) of 16 county-years (Table 1).
In 2006, a total of 414 Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes were captured in 67 light trap-nights from July 1 through August 5. Weekly LTI values for Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes ranged from 4.1 to 9.0 during July and early August (Table 2) when mosquito populations were low because of severe drought (larval production sites were dry or contained ephemeral water). None of 12 pools of Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes assayed were positive for WNV RNA.
In 2007, a total of 25,291 Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes were captured in 42 light trap-nights from June 30 through August 8 (Table 2). Weekly LTI values during this period ranged from 169 to 1,643. WNV was detected in 28 (32.2%) of 87 mosquito pools by RT-PCR, with the first positive mosquito samples collected during the week of July 8, 2007. WNV was detected in 10 of 20 pools of mosquitoes collected during the last week of July; we observed an estimated infection rate of 10.7/1,000 mosquitoes.
Vertebrate DNA sequences were obtained from bloodengorged abdomens of 22 mosquitoes collected in 2007, including 8 Ae. vexans and 14 Cx. tarsalis. All 22 mosquitoes had fed on American white pelicans.
WNV in Pelican Samples
Twenty-seven (84.4%) of 32 pelicans sampled had [greater than or equal to] 1 tissues positive for WNV by plaque assay compared with 7 (87.5%) of 8 positive by RT-PCR (Table 3). Pelicans with WNV-positive tissues were collected from July 25 through August 11, 2006, and July 11 through August 1, 2007. Be cause pelicans were not collected before these dates, the timing of initial onset of WNV outbreaks in pelicans is unknown.
Skin was the most efficacious tissue for WNV detection in pelican carcasses. Viral loads were greatest in feather pulp, brain, heart, and skin. RT-PCR and plaque assay results were similar; detection rates did not differ among specific tissues or between field-collected vs. laboratory-derived samples (Table 4). Concordance (i.e., test agreement) was 82% ([kappa] = 0.82) among matched field and laboratory samples from the same carcasses. All pouch lice samples were negative for WNV.
We observed an association between human cases of WNND and WNV-induced juvenile pelican deaths in counties with pelican-nesting colonies. The positive and negative predictive values of pelican WNV-associated deaths for human WNND cases were similar in magnitude to those of American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) deaths. These findings suggest that monitoring of pelican deaths in colonies near human populations could be of potential use in public health-oriented WNV surveillance programs, many of which use crow deaths as indicators of local WNV activity and human risk (15).
Surveillance of pelican colonies for WNV activity could assist in presaging human WNV infection and associated disease. Pelican deaths were generally detected [greater than or equal to] 2 weeks before WNV disease onset in humans. However, our observations were limited by numerous assumptions inherent to surveillance data, such as that human case-patients were infected in their home counties, that all human residents of each county were equally at risk for WNV infection, and that only residents of a county with a colony were potentially at risk. Because human settlements nearest a colony may pertain to a different county, a more accurate analysis would evaluate distance from the nesting colony as a risk factor for human cases, independent of county lines.
Most pelican colonies are remote from human population centers and are not currently actively monitored for WNV-associated deaths. Although human population densities near pelican colonies are low, infected host-seeking mosquitoes may travel >10 km in search of a blood meal, especially because breeding pelicans and other birds disperse from the region, typically in August. Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes have traveled distances [less than or equal to] 12.6 km (16). Other mosquito species, such as Ae. vexans, could serve as bridge vectors between infectious juvenile pelicans and susceptible humans. Blood meal analyses from engorged Ae. vexans and Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes showed that these well-known biters of humans also feed on pelicans. Furthermore, dispersing pelicans may be infectious and introduce the virus to competent mosquitoes near human population centers. Pelicans forage daily [less than or equal to] 80 km from colony sites (17).
We confirmed vector-borne transmission of WNV to pelicans at MLNWR in Sheridan County, Montana. Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes appeared to be the major vector for transmission of WNV to pelicans in 2007 because vector and trap indices were high for this mosquito species, and blood meal identification linked these vectors to the pelicans. WNV was detected in pelican carcasses in 2006 despite low populations of Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes and lack of WNV detection in mosquitoes, which suggested that pelican deaths may be a sensitive indicator of local WNV activity. Juvenile pelican deaths caused by WNV infection have been observed (4,6) but never targeted for WNV avian mortality surveillance, i.e., to generate public health-related data to be used for WNV prevention and control. In the reports of juvenile pelican deaths, comparison of WNV tissue loads in pelicans was not rigorously evaluated.
Biologic specimens collected from avian carcasses have proven useful in WNV surveillance; the American crow has been a useful sentinel (2,3,18). Oral swabs and feather pulp are preferred target samples for diagnosis of WNV infection in corvids (19,20). To help guide future WNV surveillance efforts, we sought to determine which pelican samples would be most useful for WNV detection. Our results showed that skin and feather pulp are the most ideal specimens. Previous research showed that feather pulp was slightly more efficacious than oral swabs for detecting WNV when the VecTest assay was used for corvids (21), and that 100% of feather pulp samples were positive among WNV-infected American crows and blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata) (20). Feather pulp and skin meet criteria for a low-resource approach to dead bird surveillance: samples require a minimal amount of time for field collection, dissection of the carcass is not required, exposure of laboratory personnel to infected carcasses is avoided, samples can be easily transported and shipped, and laboratory processing costs can be kept to a minimum. Oropharyngeal, cloacal, and eye swab samples were relatively insensitive for detecting WNV in pelicans.
Continued surveillance of American white pelican colonies is useful for assessing long-term effects of WNV in colonies and in populations in the northern plains and upper Midwest region of the United States. The role of these colonial nesting birds in WNV ecology, and conversely that of WNV on pelican ecology, remains unknown. WNV-amplifying hosts and vectors are generally plentiful at pelican colonies, and recurring chick deaths since 2003 suggest that WNV-induced reductions in pelican populations will continue. Because juvenile pelicans are likely more susceptible to WNV-associated illness and death than adults, the effects of WNV on pelican population growth would manifest as failed recruitment of new birds into the population in affected colonies, rather than loss of fertile adults. Indirect environmental effects of pelican nest failures are unknown.
The association we observed between WNV disease among pelicans and humans does not imply that pelicans are the source of human WNV infections, or vice versa, and may merely be a consequence of geographic autocorrelation. However, this link highlights the benefit of communication between wildlife and public health sectors. Knowledge of WNV infections in either sector may signal a problem requiring attention in the other. This study of deaths in pelicans caused by WNV serves as a reminder that wildlife disease investigations may play an useful role in mitigating risk for zoonotic infections in humans.
We thank J. Rodriguez, T. Rodriguez, S. Cross, E. Madden, and R. Flagan for assistance with bird collections; A. Jackson and J. Dinkins for assisting with necropsies and sample collection; S. Zanto and the Montana Public Health Laboratory for testing mosquitoes; A.W. Layton for access to the necropsy area of the State of Montana Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory; K. Burkhalter, J. Velez, and G. Young for laboratory support; and B. Biggerstaff and M. Fischer for sharing statistical and epidemiologic expertise, respectively.
This study was supported by the Montana Department of Health and Human Services, the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
(1.) Patnaik JL, Juliusson L, Vogt RL. Environmental predictors of human West Nile virus infections, Colorado. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1788-90.
(2.) Nemeth NM, Beckett S, Edwards E, Klenk K, Komar N. Avian mortality surveillance for West Nile virus in Colorado. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:431-7.
(3.) Eidson M, Kramer L, Stone W, Hagiwara Y. Avian mortality surveillance as an early warning system for West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:631-5. DOI: 10.3201/eid0704.010405
(4.) Sovada MA, Pietz PJ, Converse KA, King DT, Hofmeister EK, Scherr P, et al. Impact of West Nile virus and other mortality factors on American white pelicans at breeding colonies in the northern plains of North America. Biological Conservation. 2008;141:102131. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.01.019
(5.) Lindsey NP, Kuhn S, Campbell GL, Hayes EB. West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease incidence in the United States, 2002-2006. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:35-9. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0137
(6.) Rocke T, Converse K, Meteyer C, McLean R. The impact of disease in the American white pelican in North America. Waterbirds. 2005;28:87-94. DOI: 10.1675/1524-4695(2005)28[87:TIODIT]2.0.CO;2
(7.) Madden EM, Restani M. History and breeding ecology of the American white pelican at Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Montana. Waterbirds. 2005;28:23-6. DOI: 10.1675/1524-4695(2005)28[23:HABEOT]2.0.CO;2
(8.) King DT, Anderson DW. Recent population status of the American white pelican: a continental perspective. Waterbirds. 2005;28:48-54. DOI: 10.1675/1524-4695(2005)28[48:RPSOTA]2.0.CO;2
(9.) Hale KM. Investigations of the West Nile virus transmission cycle at Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, 2005-2006 [master's dissertation]. Bozeman (MT): Montana State University; 2007.
(10.) Lanciotti RS, Kerst AJ. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification assays for rapid detection of West Nile and St. Louis encephalitis viruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4506-13. DOI: 10.1128/ JCM.39.12.4506-4513.2001
(11.) Gujral IB, Zielinski-Gutierrez EC, LeBailly A, Nasci R. Behavioral risks for West Nile virus diseases, northern Colorado, 2003. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:419-25. DOI: 10.3201/eid1303.060941
(12.) Kent R, Juliusson L, Weissman M, Evans S, Komar N. Seasonal blood feeding behavior of Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae) in Weld County, Colorado, 2007. J Med Entomol. 2009;46:380-90. DOI: 10.1603/033.046.0226
(13.) Panella NA, Kerst A, Lanciotti RS, Bryant P, Wolf B, Komar N. Comparative West Nile virus detection in organs of naturally infected American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos). Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:754-5. DOI: 10.3201/eid0704.010430
(14.) Lanciotti RS, Kerst AJ, Nasci RS, Godsey MS, Mitchell CL, Savage HM, et al. Rapid detection of West Nile virus from human clinical specimens, field-collected mosquitoes, and avian samples by a TaqMan reverse transcriptase-PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4066-71.
(15.) Julian KG, Eidson M, Kipp AM, Weiss E, Petersen LR, Miller JR, et al. Early season crow mortality as a sentinel for West Nile virus disease in humans, northeastern United States. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2002;2:145-55. DOI: 10.1089/15303660260613710
(16.) Reisen WK, Milby MM, Meyer RP. Population dynamics of adult Culex mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) along the Kern River, Kern County, California, in 1990. J Med Entomol. 1992;29:531-43.
(17.) O'Malley JB, Evans RM. Flock formation in white pelicans. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1982;60:1024-31. DOI: 10.1139/z82-143
(18.) Mostashari F, Kulldorff M, Hartman JJ, Miller JR, Kulasekera V. Dead bird clusters as an early warning system for West Nile virus activity. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:641-6.
(19.) Komar N, Lanciotti R, Bowen R, Langevin S, Bunning M. Detection of West Nile virus in oral and cloacal swabs collected from bird carcasses. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:741-2.
(20.) Docherty DE, Long RR, Griffin KM, Saito EK. Corvidae feather pulp and West Nile virus detection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:907-9.
(21.) Stone WB, Okoniewski JC, Therrien JE, Kramer LD, Kauffman EB, Eidson M. VecTest as diagnostic and surveillance tool for West Nile virus in dead birds. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:2175-81.
Author affiliations: Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA (G. Johnson, K. Hale); and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA (N. Nemeth, N. Lindsey, N. Panella, N. Komar)
Dr Johnson is professor of veterinary entomology in the Department of Animal and Range Sciences at Montana State University in Bozeman. His research focuses on insects that affect domestic livestock and wildlife, with a particular emphasis on arthropod-borne diseases of veterinary importance.
Address for correspondence: Gregory Johnson, Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Rm 19, Linfield Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA; email: email@example.com
Table 1. Deaths in pelicans infected by WNV and WNV human disease in counties with nesting American white pelican colonies, United States, 2003-2007 * Earliest date Earliest date of pelican of disease Difference, Year County, state death in humans d 2003 Big Stone, MN Jul 1 Aug 25 56 Phillips, MT Aug 1 Aug 15 14 Sheridan, MT Jul 23 Aug 1 9 Stutsman, ND Jul 15 Jul 26 11 Day, SD Jul 28 Jul 14 -14 2004 Big Stone, MN May 30 Sep 1 93 2005 Sheridan, MT Jun 23 Jul 14 52 Stutsman, ND Jun 17 Jul 18 31 Day, SD Jul 6 Aug 26 51 2006 Big Stone, MN Jun 15 Jul 27 42 Washoe, NV Jul 14 Jul 10 -4 Stutsman, ND Jul 24 Aug 1 8 Day, SD Jul 19 Aug 1 13 Brown, WI Jul 15 Aug 10 26 2007 Stutsman, ND Jul 7 Jul 1 -6 Day, SD Jul 9 Jun 27 -12 * WNV, West Nile virus. Table 2. Culex tarsalis mosquito infection data for WNV calculated weekly during 2 WNV transmission seasons, Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, USA * 2006 Light No. positive Week of trap Light trap pools/no. collection nights index [+ or -] SD ([dagger]) tested Jul 1-7 13 4.1 [+ or -] 4.3 0/17 Jul 8-14 9 6.6 [+ or -] 11.6 0/59 Jul 15-21 10 9.0 [+ or -] 8.8 0/88 Jul 22-28 11 7.0 [+ or -] 5.9 0/69 Jul 29-Aug 4 13 7.1 [+ or -] 10.4 0/74 2007 No. positive Week of Light trap Light trap index pools/no. collection nights [+ or -] SDT tested Jul 1-7 4 448.5 [+ or -] 549.5 0/100 Jul 8-14 9 325.3 [+ or -] 131.4 5/800 Jul 15-21 10 1,643.0 [+ or -] 899.8 7/1,000 Jul 22-28 8 259.6 [+ or -] 301.9 4/1,000 Jul 29-Aug 4 7 169.0 [+ or -] 105.3 10/937 2007 Infection rate Vector index Week of ([double dagger]) ([section]) collection (95% CI) (95% CI) Jul 1-7 0.0 0.0 Jul 8-14 6.3 (0.8-11.7) 2.0 (0.3-3.8) Jul 15-21 7.0 (1.8-12.2) 11.5 (3.0-20.0) Jul 22-28 4.0 (0.1-7.9) 1.0 (0.03-2.1) Jul 29-Aug 4 10.7 (4.1-17.3) 1.8 (0.7-2.9) * WNV, West Nile virus: CI, confidence interval. ([dagger]) Light trap index is mean number of adult female Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes collected per trap night. Seven traps were used in 2006, and 5 traps were used in 2007. ([double dagger]) Infection rate is in units of 1,000 mosquitoes and determined by maximum-likelihood estimate. Infection rate was 0 for all collection dates in 2006. ([section]) Vector index is the product of light trap index and infection rate. Unit of measure is number of infected female Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes per trap night. Vector index values were 0 for all collection weeks in 2006. Table 3. WNV detected by plaque assay or RT-PCR in tissues from American white pelican carcasses collected at Medicine Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, USA, 2006-2007 * No. (%) plaque Median viral titer, assay positive, log PFU/0.5 [cm.sup.3] Specimen n = 27 (range) ([dagger]) Feather pulp 18 (66.7) 3.5 (1.3-5.9) Kidney 18 (66.7) 2.6 (2.0-3.9) Spleen 4 (14.8) 1.6 (0.7-2.0) Brain 21 (77.8) 2.7 (1.7-5.9) Heart 14 (51.9) 3.6 (0.7-5.3) Lung 6 (22.2) 2.4 (1.7-3.3) Skin 25 (92.6) 3.1 (0.7-5.0) Oral swab 9 (33.3) 2.1 (0.7-3.7) Cloacal swab 7 (25.9) 1.8 (0.7-3.7) Eye swab ([double dagger]) 2 (11.8) 2.2 (1.7-2.6) No. (%) RT-PCR positive, Specimen n = 8 Feather pulp 6 (75.0) Kidney 3 (37.5) Spleen 1 (12.5) Brain 5 (62.5) Heart 2 (25.0) Lung 1 (12.5) Skin 5 (62.5) Oral swab 3 (37.5) Cloacal swab 2 (25.0) Eye swab ([double dagger]) -- * WNV, West Nile virus; RT-PCR, reverse transcription--PCR. All carcasses were WNV positive by virus isolation or detection of specific WNV RNA by RT-PCR. ([dagger]) Median titers were calculated from the positive specimens only. Unit of measurement for swabs is per swab rather than per 0.5 [cm.sup.3]. ([double dagger]) Eye swabs were collected from only 17 WNV-positive chicks. Table 4. Virus titers of field-collected samples from WNV-positive American white pelican chicks and test agreement with carcass-matched specimens, Montana, USA, 2006-2007 * Median viral titer, No. (%) WNV log PFU/0.5 Sample positive, n = 19 [cm.sup.3] (range) [kappa] Skin ([dagger]) 15 (88.2) 3.6 (1.7-5.0) 0.88 Feather pulp 15 (78.9) 4.9 (1.3-5.6) 0.84 Oral swab 7 (36.8) 1.2 (0.7-2.1) 0.79 Cloacal swab 4 (21.1) 1.5 (0.7-2.7) 0.79 * WNV, West Nile virus; k, concordance. All carcasses were positive for WNV infection by virus isolation or detection of specific WNV RNA by reverse transcription-PCR. Only plaque assay results are presented for field-collected samples. ([dagger]) Skin was collected from only 17 carcasses in the field.
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|