Quality of life after electroconvulsive therapy in persons with treatment resistant schizophrenia.
Background & objectives: In recent years, health-related
quality of life (QOL) has been regarded as the most important dimension
of outcome in schizophrenia. Recent research has shown that atypical
antipsychotics improve QOL in patients with schizophrenia. Importance of
electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been demonstrated in restoring
function and health related quality of life in depressed patients.
However, there are no data on patients of schizophrenia. The objective
of the present study was therefore, to assess the improvement in quality
of life after ECT in treatment resistant schizophrenia.
Methods: Thirty consecutive patients of treatment resistant schizophrenia were given ECT sessions twice a week and assessments were made with Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale of Schizophrenia (PANSS), WHO QOL Bref, Global Assessment of Functioning Scale and Clinical Global Impressions.
Results: The group improved significantly on all the domains of quality of life scale except the domain named satisfaction with social relations. There was also significant change in the total score of PANSS after 6 ECT sessions (mean at baseline = 86.7, mean after 6 ECT = 65.5, P< 0.001) as well as on different subscales of PANSS. The score on the global assessment of functioning also changed significantly (mean 26.3 at baseline to 44.5 after 6 ECT sessions).
Interpretation & conclusions: The present findings showed that ECT in addition to improvement in symptomatology led to improvement in QOL in patients of treatment resistant schizophrenia.
Key words Electroconvulsive therapy--quality of life--treatment resistant schizophrenia
Schizophrenia (Care and treatment)
Schizophrenia (Social aspects)
Electroconvulsive therapy (Research)
Electroconvulsive therapy (Economic aspects)
Electroconvulsive therapy (Social aspects)
Quality of life (Research)
|Publication:||Name: Indian Journal of Medical Research Publisher: Indian Council of Medical Research Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Biological sciences; Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2011 Indian Council of Medical Research ISSN: 0971-5916|
|Issue:||Date: June, 2011 Source Volume: 133 Source Issue: 6|
|Topic:||Event Code: 310 Science & research; 290 Public affairs|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: India Geographic Code: 9INDI India|
In recent years, health-related quality of life (QOL) has been
regarded as the most important dimension of outcome in schizophrenia and
other serious mental disorders (1). However, the determinants of quality
of life are poorly understood in this population. Studies have relied on
combined measures of subjective and objective QOL (2). Indicators of QOL
include living situation, marital status, employment status, and
involvement in social activities. Although psychiatric symptoms have
been associated with subjective measures of QOL, symptom reduction alone
often does not result in meaningful improvements in QOL. The results of
a meta-analysis suggest that general psychopathology is the strongest
contributor to poor QOL (3).
Early Identification and treatment of mental disorders generally enhances QOL (4). Improvement in quality of life has become appropriate goal for maintenance pharmacological treatment in schizophrenic patients (5). Atypical antipsychotics have been shown to improve QOL in patients with schizophrenia (6) in comparison with first generation antipsychotics (7).
An emerging literature demonstrates the importance of ECT in restoring function and health related quality of life in depressed patients (8,9). There are no studies that have measured quality of life in schizophrenic patients who received ECT. The present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of ECT in improving quality of life in patients of treatment resistant schizophrenia.
Material & Methods
Settings and patients: The study was conducted at the department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, from February 2006 to August 2007. The sample consisted of 30 consecutive patients of treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) (10). During the study period, a total of 42 patients were diagnosed as treatment resistant schizophrenia and of these, nine patients or their relatives refused to give consent for ECT. All the patients were admitted for ECT purpose but the family members of two patients refused admission. So, these patients were administered ECT on outpatient basis. Inclusion criteria were: Patients in the age group of 16 to 65 yr suffering from treatment resistant schizophrenia (10), as diagnosed by two psychiatrists independently based on ICD 10 (11). Patients accompanied by reliable informants who were willing to participate in the study and who were ready to give consent for ECT and anaesthesia. Exclusion criteria were: (i) Patients who had associated medical problems, which could affect the course of illness as well as their fitness for general anaesthesia. (ii) Patients with co-morbid substance dependence except nicotine dependence. (iii) Patients who had received ECT in the past one-year or received at least four ECTs in the past without any significant improvement. (iv) Patients who were intellectually deficient.
The ethics committee of the institution approved the study protocol.
ECT technique: Patients were given ECT twice a week. The total number of sessions was not pre-determined. Patients were given ECT as long as they showed improvement. It was stopped when patients showed no further improvement on two consecutive ECT sessions or if the patient or informant refused further ECT sessions. The anaesthesia and ECT were carried out using standard procedure.
Concurrent antipsychotic medication: All patients were continued on the same antipsychotic drugs at the same dose that they were taking at the time of inclusion into the study. If the patients responded to ECT, the same medication was continued after ECT. If they did not respond even to 6 ECTs, they were prescribed a different antipsychotic to which they were not resistant earlier and ECT was stopped.
Assessment: World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale--brief version (WHO QOL--Bref) (12) was used to assess quality of life. It was applied at the baseline and at the end of ECT course. WHOQOL Bref produces a quality of life profile. It is possible to derive 4 domain scores. The 4 domain scores denote an individual's perception of quality of life. Higher domain scores denote higher quality of life. There are also two items that are examined separately: question 1 asks an individual's overall perception of quality of life and question 2 asks an individual's overall perception of their health.
All the patients were assessed at baseline and at the end of ECT course on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (13), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) (14) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) (15).
Statistical analysis: The baseline and post-treatment scores were analyzed by within patient contrast wilcoxon signed ranks test.
Results & Discussion
Of the 30 patients, 21 (70%) were males. 13 patients (43.3%) were between 26 and 35 yr of age and 20 (66.7%) were unmarried; 26 patients (86.7%) were unemployed at the time of intake into the study and 21 (70%) had a total family income of less than Rs. 3500 per month. Majority of patients (25, 83.3%) were living in a nuclear family and in urban areas (22, 73.3%). The mean age of the patients was 31.53 [+ or -] yr with a range of 21 to 45 yr. The mean duration of illness was 9.67 [+ or -] 3.956 yr (range 4-17 yr).
Prior to inclusion in the study, majority of patients had taken risperidone (22, 73.33%) and olanzapine (17, 56.67%) in the past; 12 (40%) patients were resistant to clozapine. Other antipsychotics received were haloperidol, quetiapine, chlorpromazine, loxapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and trifluperazine. Many patients were resistant to more than two antipsychotics before inclusion into the study. The mean number of antipsychotics received was 2.8 with a range of 2-5.
Throughout the course of ECT, patients were continued on same antipsychotics that they were taking before induction into the study so that the treatment response could not be attributed to antipsychotic medication. Seven patients (23.33%) were on two antipsychotics at the time of entry into the study and the remaining 23 patients (76.67%) were on a single antipsychotic.
Outcome measures: The Table shows the score on four different domains of WHO-QOL at baseline and at the end of ECT course. The group improved significantly (P<0.01) on three domains which are classified as satisfaction with physical capacity, health and environment. The improvement seen on the third domain, which is classified as satisfaction with social relations was not significant. The total score on PANSS also changed significantly from 86.7 ([+ or -] 14.05) at baseline to 65.5 ([+ or -] 19.11) at the end of ECT course (P<0.001). There was significant change on three different domains of PANSS namely positive syndrome scale, negative syndrome scale and general psychopathology scale. There was a significant change in mean score between baseline and at the end of ECT course on GAF from 26.3 [+ or -] 7.18 at baseline to 44.5 [+ or -] 15.70 (P<0.001) and CGI from 5.6 [+ or -] 0.67 to 4.4 [+ or -] 1.24 (P<0.001). When the results were adjusted for possible confounding factors like age, gender, education, income, socio-economic status, it was found that none of these factors affected the results.
This was an open label, non-randomized, prospective study in which 30 patients of schizophrenia who were ill for 9.67 yr (range 4-17 yr) and were resistant to multiple antipsychotics, were started on ECT. In routine psychiatry practice in India, majority of patients and their family members carry multiple misconceptions related to ECT and getting consent for ECT is very difficult (16). In the present study also, it was difficult to convince patients and their relatives to undergo ECT as is evident from the fact that 9 out of 42 patients refused ECT (refusal rate 21.4%).
There was significant improvement in QOL in three domains of WHOQOL-Bref i.e., physical capacity, satisfaction with health and environment. However, the change in score for the fourth dimension depicting satisfaction with social relation was not significant. The findings demonstrate that medication alone may not be sufficient to improve QOL in all spheres of life. Community perception towards a person suffering from mental illness may not change even after improvement in symptoms. Similar observations have been made earlier (6). Psychosocial intervention targeting family members, friends, employers and community leaders should be made adjunct to medication.
The finding of a systematic review demonstrated that atypical antipsychotics have advantage over conventional medication in terms of improving subjective quality of life (7). However, another study did not support these observations (6). It has been documented that ECT results in a net improvement in function and quality of life for a period of at least 1 year after treatment (17,18). Our data also support the fact that ECT improves the QOL of treatment resistant patients of chronic schizophrenia.
In our study, the improvement in QOL from baseline to last ECT may be attributed to significant improvement in depressive, somatic concern and anxiety score on general psychopathology scale of PANSS. Earlier studies have also reported that psychiatry symptoms are the best independent predictors of subjective and objective QOL in schizophrenia (4,5). The depressive symptoms and better cognitive functioning are associated with poor life satisfaction. The better insight because of better cognitive functioning can lead to self-devaluation and depression (19).
Our study had certain limitations viz, short duration, lack of control group, and it was an open, non-randomized study. The patients were continued on antipsychotics that they were taking before entering into the study. All the patients were resistant to these drugs, however, ECT augmenting their effect cannot be ruled out.
In summary, ECT in addition to improvement in symptomatology leads to improvement in QOL in the domain of physical capacity, satisfaction with health and environment. However, lack of improvement in the domain of social relation necessitates the use of adjunct psychosocial interventions (cognitive behaviour therapy, social skill training, assertiveness training and supported employment) in the treatment of schizophrenia.
Received October 20, 2009
(1.) Narvaez JM, Twamley EW, McKibbin CL, Heaton RK, Patterson TL. Subjective and objective quality of life in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2008; 98 : 201- 8.
(2.) Eack SM, Newhill CE. Psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 2007; 33 : 1225-7.
(3.) Green CA, Fenn DS, Moussaoui D, Kadri N, Hoffman WF. Quality of life in treated and never treated schizophrenic patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001; 103 : 131-42.
(4.) Franz M, Lis S, Pluddemann K, Gallhofer B. Conventional versus atypical neuroleptics: subjective quality of life in schizophrenic patients. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 170 : 422-5.
(5.) Kwon JS, Choi JS. Social functioning and quality of life as measures of effectiveness in the treatment of schizophrenia. World Psychiatry 2009; 8 : 35-6.
(6.) Kilian R, Dietrich S, Toumi M, Angermeyer MC. Quality of life in persons with schizophrenia in out-patient treatment with first or second generation antipsychotics. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004; 110 : 108-18.
(7.) Gentile S. A systematic review of quality of life and weight gain- related issues in patients treated for severe and persistent mental disorders: focus on aripiprazole. Neuropsychiatry dis Treat 2009; 5 : 117-25.
(8.) McCall WV, Rosenquist PB, Kimball J, Haskett R, Isenberg K, Prudic J, et al. Health-related quality of life in a clinical trial of ECT followed by continuation pharmacotherapy: effects immediately after ECT and at 24 weeks. J ECT 2011; 27 : 97-102.
(9.) McCall WV, Prudic J, Olfson M, Sackeim H. Health-related quality of life following ECT in a large community sample. J Affect Disord 2006; 90 : 269-74.
(10.) Kane J, Honigfeld G, Singer J, Meltzer H. Clozapine for the treatment resistant schizophrenic: A double blind comparison with chlorpromazine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45 : 789-96.
(11.) World Health Organization. The ICD -10 classification of mental and behavioral disorder: Diagnostic criteria for research. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992.
(12.) Skevington SM, Lofty M, O'connell KA, WHOQOL group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL--Bref quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. QualLife Res 2004; 13 : 299-310.
(13.) Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenia (PANSS). Schizophr Bull 1987; 13 : 261-76.
(14.) Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL. The Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976; 33 : 766-71.
(15.) Guy WR. Clinical global impressions. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Publication no. 76-338. Rockville MD: DHEW; 1976.
(16.) Chavan BS, Kumar S, Arun P, Bala C, Singh T. Knowledge and attitude towards ECT among Indian patients. Indian J Psychiatry 2006; 48 : 34-8.
(17.) McCall WV, Dunn A, Rosenquist PB. Quality of life and function after electroconvulsive therapy. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 185 : 405-9.
(18.) McCall WV, Reboussin BA, Cohen W, Lawton P. Electroconvulsive therapy is associated with superior symptomatic and functional change in depressed patients after psychiatric hospitalization. J Affect Disord 2001; 63 : 17-25.
(19.) Casey P, Meagher D, Butler E. Personality, functioning, and recovery from major depression. J Nerv Ment Dis 1996; 184 : 240-5.
Reprint requests: Dr B.S. Chavan, Professor & Head, Department of Psychiatry, 5th floor, D block, Government Medical College & Hospital Sector 32, Chandigarh 160 032, India
Rohit Garg, B.S. Chavan & Priti Arun
Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh, India
Table. Score on the WHO QOL scale--Brief version after ECT course WHO QOL Domain Mean at Mean after baseline last [+ or -] SD ECT [+ or -] SD Domain 1 11.2 [+ or -] 2.63 12.6 [+ or -] 2.24 ** (Physical capacity) Domain 2 11.1 [+ or -] 2.79 12.6 [+ or -] 2.79 ** (Satisfaction with health) Domain 3 11.6 [+ or -] 3.63 11.9 [+ or -] 3.93 (Satisfaction with social relations) Domain 4 12.2 [+ or -] 2.54 12.9 [+ or -] 2.18 ** (Satisfaction with environment) Question 1 2.9 [+ or -] 1.11 3.2 [+ or -] 0.96 * (Overall quality of life) Question 2 3.1 [+ or -] 1.21 3.5 [+ or -] 1.06 * (Overall health) P * <0.05, ** <0.01 compared to baseline
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|