Pilomatricoma.
Article Type: Case study
Subject: Epithelial tumors (Risk factors)
Epithelial tumors (Diagnosis)
Epithelial tumors (Care and treatment)
Epithelial tumors (Patient outcomes)
Epithelial tumors (Case studies)
Authors: O'Neill, Jennifer K.
Harries, Simon
Tillett, Rachel
Clarke, Thomas
Saxby, Peter
Bayliss, Christopher R.
Pub Date: 12/01/2009
Publication: Name: Applied Radiology Publisher: Anderson Publishing Ltd. Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2009 Anderson Publishing Ltd. ISSN: 0160-9963
Issue: Date: Dec, 2009 Source Volume: 38 Source Issue: 12
Topic: Canadian Subject Form: Epithelial tumours; Epithelial tumours; Epithelial tumours; Epithelial tumours; Epithelial tumours
Geographic: Geographic Scope: United Kingdom Geographic Code: 4EUUK United Kingdom
Accession Number: 231313777
Full Text: CASE SUMMARY

A 5-month-old female presented with a lump in the right preauricular region that had grown over a 6-week period. It did not appear to be painful and no other abnormalities were apparent. There was no relevant past medical history or family history.

On examination, a 1 cm diameter smooth, solid, subcutaneous lump with a bluish hue to the overlying skin was found anterior to the tragus of the right ear. On review 3 months later the lump had increased to approximately 4 cm in diameter. It felt firm and had a more pronounced blue blush appearance to the overlying skin.

Initially a differential diagnosis of hemangioma or pilomatricoma was clinically made. It was considered likely to be a hemangioma in view of the color even though it was noted to be surprisingly firm. The diagnosis of a sarcoma was considered because of the rapid growth of the lesion.

A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam was performed to provide diagnostic information.

IMAGING FINDINGS

The MRI sequences used were axial T2, axial STIR, axial T1, coronal T1, fat saturation and coronal and axial T1 fat saturation with gadolinium contrast. There was found to be a 3.5 cm x 2 cm subcutaneous mass in the right cheek. It had a well-defined margin and although it appeared to abut the parotid gland and the masseter muscle there was no obvious involvement of either structure. On T1-weighted imaging there was uniform intermediate signal intensity (Figure 1A). On T2-weighted imaging and STIR there was patchy/inhomogeneous intermediate signal (Figure 1B). Following contrast medium, patchy internal enhancement was demonstrated with intense peripheral enhancement (Figure 1C).

None of the characteristic features of hemangioma were present. These include evidence of fat, flow voids or blood products on the MR image.

Demonstration of calcification, which is normally a feature of pilomatricoma (hence its other name of calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe), is variable on MRI. No calcification was demonstrated in this case.

The possibility that it was a sarcoma could not be excluded by MRI.

The diagnosis of hemangioma was ruled out by MRI and therefore an open incisional biopsy of the lesion could be safely performed for diagnosis (under a further general anesthetic).

On pathological assessment, the tissue was found to consist of fragments of a benign pilomatricoma showing the typical elements of basaloid foci, giant-cell reaction, ghost cells and calcification.

A definitive excision of the lesion was performed and at that time the patient was 12 months old. The skin over the lesion had an obvious blue blush (Figure 2A).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The excision specimen was a smooth-surfaced 34 mm diameter yellowish nodule (Figures 2B and 2C). Microscopically, it was a typical pilomatricoma consisting of bands of basaloid cells maturing into ghost keratinocytes. Microcalcification occurred both in ghost cells and in strands of stromal ossification.

DIAGNOSIS

Pilomatricoma

DISCUSSION

Pilomatricomas (also known as pilomatrixomas or calcifying epitheliomas of Malherbe) are benign tumors that arise from the hair matrix. They are usually found in patients <20 years old (1-3) and may be the most common solid cutaneous tumor in that age group. Previously they were thought to be more common in females but recent studies indicate an equal sex distribution. (3) The most frequent site is the neck with the second most frequent being the cheek. (3)

The lesion presents as a solitary, hard, subcutaneous slowly growing mass. The average size at presentation is 1 cm in diameter. (3) Usually the diagnosis is clinical and treatment is excision. Imaging studies are not usually required except when the diagnosis is uncertain or for planning operative management (4) and therefore the radiology literature on the subject is sparse.

There is currently no method of imaging a pilomatricoma that produces a firm definitive diagnosis. Ultrasound imaging of pilomatricomas demonstrates lesions with an ovoid complex mass at the junction of the dermis and subcutaneous fat with focal thinning of the overlying dermis. (5) Pilomatricomas appear as target lesions with a hyperechoic rim (corresponding to the connective tissue capsule) and an echogenic center (corresponding to the central island of epithelial cells). (5) Ultrasonography may also depict calcification. (5) While ultrasound imaging may be helpful in diagnosis, it is not completely reliable. (5)

Computed tomography has also been used to investigate pilomatricomas. They appear as well-delineated subcutaneous tumors containing microcalcifications. However, the differential diagnosis for lesions with this appearance is wide and includes: sebaceous cysts, ossifying hematomas, giant-cell tumors, chondromas, dermoid cysts, foreign body reactions, degenerating fibroxanthomas, metastatic bone formations and osteoma cutis. (6) There is also a significant radiation burden to take into consideration, especially in children.

There have been few previous reports of the MR appearance of pilomatricomas in the literature. (7,8,9,10) In all reports the lesions are described as subcutaneous and well-defined. Most demonstrate uniform, homogeneous signal on T1 weighting, either low (10), intermediate (7) (similar to the appearance of skeletal muscle as in the case presented in this paper) or high. (9)

On T2 weighting the appearance of the lesions was variable: some are inhomogeneous with multiple areas of intermediate signal intensity (such as the case presented here); (7,8,10) others are homogeneous with intermediate signal intensity (7); and others exhibit high signal bands radiating from the center to a higher signal periphery. (9)

On T1 with contrast, some enhance, (8,10) some do not (7) and some only enhance peripherally. (8) In this case there was patchy internal enhancement with intense peripheral enhancement.

One report demonstrated mottled hypointense areas corresponding to areas of calcification (8) there was no evidence of calcification on MR imaging in this case.

Often pilomatricomas result in bluish or pink discoloration of the overlying skin1 that may cause the clinician to suspect a diagnosis of hemangioma. The management of hemangiomas and pilomatricomas differs--hemangiomas tend to involute with time and are initially managed conservatively where as pilomatricomas are surgically excised. A surgical excision on the face carries with it the risk of visible scarring. MRI can be used to identify hemangioma cases.

CONCLUSION

This is a case of an unusually large pilomatricoma in an infant. It shares some features with other reports of MR imaging of pilomatricomas but the reports vary. The nonspecific features of pilomatrixoma on MRI make it difficult to diagnose.

At present, the role of MRI in these types of cases is to exclude hemangioma and thus determine whether the lesion is suitable for either biopsy or excision.

REFERENCES

(1.) Danielson-Cohen A, Lin SJ, Hughes CA, et al. Head and neck pilomatrixoma in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127: 1481-1483.

(2.) Marrogi AJ, Wick MR, Dehner LP. Pilomatrical neoplasms in children and young adults. Am J Dermatopathol. 1992;14:87-94.

(3.) Lan MY, Lan MC, Ho CY, et al. Pilomatricoma of the head and neck: A retrospective review of 179 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:1327-1330.

(4.) Pirouzmanesh A, Reinisch JF, GonzalezGomez I, et al. Pilomatrixoma: A review of 346 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(7): 1784-1789.

(5.) Hughes J, Lam A, Rogers M. Use of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of childhood pilomatrixoma. Pediatr Dermatol. 1999;16:341-344.

(6.) Som PM, Shugar JM, Silvers AR. CT of pilomatrixoma in the cheek. Am J Neuroradiol. 1998; 19:1219-1220.

(7.) De Beuckeleer LH, De Schepper AM, Neetens I. Magnetic resonance imaging of pilomatricoma. Eur Radiol. 1996;6:72-75.

(8.) Ichikawa T, Nakajima Y, Fujimoto H, et al. Giant calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe (pilomatrixoma): Imaging features. Skeletal Radiol. 1997; 26:602-605.

(9.) Hoffmann V, Roeren T, Moller P, Heuschen G. MR imaging of a pilomatrixoma. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:272.

(10.) Fitzgerald JJ, Jaspan T, Cartmill M. A benign pilomatrixoma mimicking a skull vault tumour in a 9 month old. Br J Neurosurg. 2003;17:469-470.

Jennifer K. O'Neill, MRCS, Simon Harries, FRCR, Rachel Tillett, MRCS, Thomas Clarke, FRCPath, Peter Saxby, FRCS Plast, and Christopher R. Bayliss, FRCR

Prepared by Jennifer K. O'Neill, MRCS, Simon Harries, FRCR, Rachel Tillett, MRCS, Thomas Clarke, FRCPath, Peter Saxby, FRCS Plast, and Christopher R. Bayliss, FRCR, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, U.K.
Gale Copyright: Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.