Metal concentrations in tissues of American lobsters (Homarus americanus, Milne-Edwards) with epizootic shell disease.
American lobster (Diseases)
Leblanc, Lawrence A.
|Publication:||Name: Journal of Shellfish Research Publisher: National Shellfisheries Association, Inc. Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Biological sciences; Zoology and wildlife conservation Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2012 National Shellfisheries Association, Inc. ISSN: 0730-8000|
|Issue:||Date: June, 2012 Source Volume: 31 Source Issue: 2|
|Topic:||Event Code: 690 Goods & services distribution Advertising Code: 59 Channels of Distribution Computer Subject: Company distribution practices|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: United States Geographic Code: 1USA United States|
ABSTRACT Environmental contaminants have been suggested frequently
as causative factors in crustacean shell disease. This study explored
the relationship of environmental contaminants to epizootic shell
disease in the American lobster (Homarus americanus). Trace metal loads
were analyzed in lobsters showing signs of shell disease and those
without signs of shell disease collected from Narragansett Bay, Rhode
Island Sound, and Long Island Sound in 2007. In addition, trace metals
were analyzed in lobsters collected in 2008 from a single station in
Narragansett Bay and a reference site in Maine for a multiparameter,
multiinvestigator study (the "100 Lobsters" project). Analyses
focused primarily on hepatopancreas and hemolymph tissues, but muscle,
shell, gills, and ovaries were also analyzed to examine the partitioning
of metals between various component tissues. Sediment from the "100
Lobsters" collection site was also analyzed. Inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to measure 10 different
contaminant elements, including arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, chromium,
copper, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, lead, and vanadium. Mercury was
determined using a direct mercury analyzer. Overall, there was no
systematic difference seen in contaminant metal burdens between those
lobsters with signs of shell disease and those without signs, and
hepatopancreas concentrations were generally similar to other reported
values for field-collected lobsters. Contaminant metals were found to be
partitioned between tissues differentially. Hepatopancreas tissue
generally contained the greatest concentrations of contaminants, but
exoskeleton contained the highest levels of manganese, nickel, and lead.
Sediment collected from the "100 Lobster" sampling site showed
that concentrations of several metals were similar to or exceeded the
suggested sediment quality guidelines, consistent with a site that is
moderately impacted by metals. Based on these data, the presence or
absence of shell disease cannot be attributed to the magnitude or
patterns of metal accumulation and disposition.
KEY WORDS: American lobster, Homarus americanus, trace metals, epizootic shell disease, ESD, lobster, body burden, hepatopancreas
Epizootic lobster shell disease (ESD), characterized by discoloration and degradation of the exoskeleton and, in severe cases, deep lesions in the carapace, is a potent threat to the American lobster, Homarus americanus (Milne Edwards), industry throughout New England. Severe outbreaks of this disease have been reported in southern New England (SNE) and eastern Long Island Sound (LIS) (Cobb & Castro 2006). Studies by Vassiliev (2005) and Vassiliev et al. (2005), and other anecdotal information indicate the presence of ESD at a low level of occurrence in Maine, particularly along the southern coast. Identifying causative agents is essential to designing strategies to prevent the spread of this disease, which is critical to the future of the resource.
A number of studies have pointed to environmental stressors (including contaminants, elevated temperatures, hypoxia, high sulfide and ammonia) as being at least partly responsible for the onset of ESD in lobster populations as well as the mass mortality of lobsters observed in LIS (Laufer et al. 2005, Robohm et al. 2005, Valente & Cuomo 2005). Duboise & Moulton (2005) demonstrated that the bacterial infection alone was not sufficient to explain the spread of the disease, and concluded that there may be complex interactions between the environment, genetics, and microbes causing the disease outbreak.
Metals introduced into aqueous environments may contribute to physiological stress in lobsters and other organisms. Trace metals are known to be toxic to aquatic organisms and can affect a number of organ systems. In lower doses, metals are known to affect immune system functioning and endocrine functions, as well as impart oxidative stress (Correa et al. 2005, Valko et al. 2005). In crustaceans, metals have been shown to disrupt molting, inhibit wound repair and limb regeneration (Weis et al. 1992), and act as immunosuppressants (Henroth et al. 2004, Oweson et al. 2006). Because host susceptibility appears to be an important component of shell disease (Tlusty et al. 2007), one can hypothesize that lobsters with compromised wound repair mechanisms or immune systems would be more susceptible to shell disease.
Evidence of a possible link between contaminant metals and shell disease has been provided in several studies. In a comparison of diseased and nondiseased blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun) from the Pamlico-Albemarle estuaries, Weinstein et al. (1992) reported higher concentrations of some trace metals (aluminum (Al), chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), titanium (Ti), uranium (U), and vanadium (V)) in diseased crabs. Differences in the concentration of trace metals in the hepatopancreas of H. americanus were found by Vassiliev (2005) and Vassiliev et al. (2005) between shell-diseased lobsters collected off the Maine coast and Nova Scotia, and nondiseased lobsters from Maine. Initial results showed greater concentrations of mercury (Hg), zinc (Zn), and cadmium (Cd) in the hepatopancreas of shell-diseased lobsters when compared with concentrations in the hepatopancreas from nondiseased lobsters. However, in later results, only Hg was found to be higher in the hepatopancreas of shell-diseased lobsters (Vassiliev 2005).
In 2007 to 2008, as part of a multidisciplinary study to examine shell disease in the American lobster, contaminant metals concentrations in hepatopancreas and hemolymph were surveyed in lobsters with and without signs of the disease. Lobsters from eastern LIS; western LIS; Narragansett Bay, RI; and the coast of Maine were included in this survey. In addition, contaminant metal concentrations were determined for a more focused investigation of a group of lobsters from a single sampling from Narragansett Bay, RI. This group, nicknamed the "100 Lobsters" project (Shields et al. 2012), compared numerous chemical and physiochemical measurements on these lobsters with a reference site off the Maine coast. This article reports the results of multielemental analyses performed on both survey lobsters and "100 Lobster" lobsters. In addition, compartmentalization of elements was examined on 8 lobsters by determining relative metal load in shell, hepatopancreas, muscle tissue, gills, and hemolymph.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Lobsters were obtained from 3 sources: Narragansett Bay transects (n = 70, plus 4 large lobsters from Rhode Island Sound), LIS (n = 26), and from the "100 Lobsters" project (n = 65, plus 15 reference samples) collected from 1 location (41.5073[degrees]N and 71.3463[degrees]W; depth, 35 m) in the East Passage of Narragansett Bay. Lobsters from the Narragansett Bay survey were obtained from the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management's monthly transect. Ten lobsters were obtained (5 with shell disease, 5 not exhibiting the disease) from each of 5 transects during 2007 to 2008. Care was taken to include approximately the same numbers of females and males in each transect. Lobster weights varied between 200 g and 1,000 g wet weight, with an average weight of 470 g. In addition to whole animals, composite samples of hemolymph and hepatopancreas, along with discrete samples of lobster tails from lobsters caught in eastern LIS (offshore from Milton, CT) and western LIS (offshore from Oyster Bay) were obtained from SUNY Stony Brook for chemical analyses. These lobsters were collected in cooperation with the New York Department of Environmental Protection in June and July 2007. Finally, as part of the "100 Lobsters" project, lobsters (mean carapace length, 83 mm) were sampled during summer 2008 and shipped to the laboratory of Dr. Jeffrey Shields, Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS), for coordinated dissection, tissue archival, and storage. Samples of hepatopancreas and muscle tissue were received on ice from VIMS for chemical analysis. In addition, 15 reference lobsters were collected in December 2008 from an offshore site near Mt. Desert Rock, ME, by the Maine State Department of Marine Resources. These lobsters were shipped to VIMS and processed as mentioned.
Sediment was also collected via Smith-McIntyre grab at the "100 Lobsters" site in Narragansett Bay, placed in precleaned pint mason jars, and shipped on ice to the University of Maine. Sediment samples were stored frozen at -20[degrees]C.
Dissection and Sample Preparation
Live lobster samples were processed within 6 h of arrival. Prior to dissection, total weight, carapace length, molt stage, sex, vitality, and disease severity were recorded for each lobster. Several photographs of each lobster were also taken for reference. Hepatopancreas, muscle (primarily from claw), gills, ovary, and exoskeleton (from the crusher claw) were dissected from each lobster. Hemolymph was extracted via syringe prior to removal of other tissues. With the exception of exoskeleton and muscle, each tissue was removed in its entirety, and the remaining viscera were discarded. Hemolymph, hepatopancreas, gills, ovary, and muscle samples were placed in cleaned glass containers, and exoskeleton samples were wrapped in clean aluminum foil. All samples were weighed and stored at 20[degrees]C until analysis.
Homogenization differed with each sample type. Hemolymph homogenization was achieved through the use of a Teflon pestle and glass mortar tissue homogenizer. The pestle was attached to a drill, and hemolymph samples were homogenized on ice for 5 min. Gills were not homogenized, but were cut into smaller pieces with scissors. Exoskeleton was homogenized with mortar and pestle. Hepatopancreas required less physical disruption after the freeze thaw process than other tissues. Samples were stirred with a Teflon spatula to increase sample homogeneity. Muscle tissue, used only for the analysis of Hg, was homogenized using a stainless steel blender after verification of no Hg contamination from blank samples. Moisture and dry matter content were determined for all tissue samples. Samples were initially weighed wet, placed in an oven at 100[degrees]C, and dried to constant weight and reweighed. Frozen sediment was thawed and homogenized by stirring thoroughly in the glass jar container. Moisture content was determined in the same manner as for the tissues.
Digests for multielemental trace metal analyses were prepared following the general protocols outlined in EPA Method 3051A (EPA 2007). Each run typically included 10 tissue samples of approximately 0.5 g homogenized wet sample, 1 standard reference material, TORT-2 (lobster hepatopancreas, National Research Council, Canada), 1 reagent blank, and 1 spiked sample. For sediment, 6 replicate analyses of 0.5 g wet weight were performed, along with the marine reference sediment MESS-2 (National Research Council, Canada) and a reagent blank. All samples were initially digested with 10 mL highly purified, metals-free Optima grade nitric acid (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) and 2 mL hydrogen peroxide (Optima grade; Fisher Scientific). To prevent excessive sample venting during microwave digestion, the initial digestion time was increased to 48 h.
Digestion was completed using a CEM MARS Microwave (CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC). The method consisted of 3 stages: (1) 5-min ramp to 100[degrees]C, hold for 3 min; (2) 2-min ramp to 150[degrees]C, hold for 3 min; (3) 2-min ramp to 180[degrees]C, hold for 10 min. After microwaving, the samples were weighed to ensure no significant sample loss was experienced during digestion. The digested samples were then each diluted with deionized water to 40 mL total volume for analysis.
Multielemental Analysis by ICP-MS
Digested lobster and sediment samples were analyzed using a Thermo-Electron Element 2 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS; Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). A standard quartz cyclonic spray chamber and a self-aspirating Teflon nebulizer were used for sample introduction. A calibration curve was done for each run, and aqueous QC samples (including sample blanks, spiked blanks, and standardized reference tissue) were run along with the digest QC samples. Indium (In) was used as an internal standard for all elements.
Total Mercury Analysis by Direct Mercury Analyzer
Mercury analyses were performed using a Milestone DMA-80 Direct Mercury Analyzer (Milestone, Inc., Shelton, CT). The settings for the instrument allowed for 1.5 min of sample drying at 200[degrees]C, 2 min of decomposition at 750[degrees]C, and 1.5 min of wait time at 750[degrees]C. Quality assurance was maintained by running a system blank (no sample boat), followed by aqueous calibration standards (reagent blank, 1 ppm Hg standard), and TORT-2 and DORM-2 (dogfish muscle; National Research Council, Canada) certified reference materials at the beginning of each sample run. Sample runs generally included a total of l0 samples, with duplicate samples and matrix spikes (a 1-ppm standard) included for each of the 5 samples. Sample runs were concluded with additional quality assurance measurements, which included system blanks, reagent blanks, aqueous standards (0.1 ppm and 1 ppm Hg), and certified reference material as described earlier.
Metal Partitioning and Body Burden Determination
Elemental analyses via ICP-MS of muscle, gill, ovary, and exoskeleton tissues were conducted for 8 individual lobsters from the Narragansett Bay 2007 transects for the determination of partitioning of metals throughout the lobster. For sampling uniformity, muscle tissue was taken from the abdomen, and exoskeletal tissues were taken from the dorsal medial inflation of the crusher claw for these samples.
Determination of body burdens for hepatopancreas, hemolymph, gill, and ovary was made using measured metal concentrations and individual organ weights. Because actual muscle and exoskeleton weights were not available for the 8 lobsters sampled, they were estimated from their proportions of total weight (0.23 and 0.46, respectively) derived from a separate allometric investigation (unpubl. data). Total weight and carapace length were determined for 10 lobsters (5 males, 5 females). Each lobster was dissected carefully, and the weight (both wet and dry) was determined for individual tissues, including hepatopancreas, gills, ovaries, muscle, and carapace. Each weight was expressed as a proportion of the total weight of the lobster. These proportions were then applied to the 8 lobsters for which metal concentrations were determined in the individual tissues, for the purpose of determining the total metal loading in each tissue and the total mass of metal being carried by the lobster.
Concentrations of metal analytes in hepatopancreas tissue and in sediment were expressed as micrograms per gram dry weight of tissue. Hemolymph concentrations were expressed in micrograms per gram wet weight.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on transformed data from each geographical location (LIS, Narragansett Bay, and Narragansett Bay "100 Lobsters" site), with disease state (shell disease, no apparent disease, reference) as the independent grouping variable. For each location, the offshore Maine site was used as a reference location. The focus was on the contaminant elements (arsenic (As), Cd, cobalt (Co), Cr, copper (Cu), Hg, Mn, molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and V). To correct for multiple testing, the P value was modified by dividing by the number of individual l-way ANOVAs performed (n = 33), resulting in a critical P value of 0.0015. Sigma Stat (Systat Software, Inc., Chicago, IL) statistical software was used. All areas were compared with the Maine reference site. Mathematical transformations were performed on each element separately, and included logarithm (log) base 10, reciprocal, the log base 10 of the reciprocal, square root, and arcsine square root. When transformations did not yield normally distributed data, untransformed data were used.
Data were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk W test (Shapiro & Wilk 1965), and homogeneity of variance was tested using Levene's test (Levene 1952). For normally distributed data, the Holm-Sidak multiple comparison method (Sidak 1967) was used to determine significant differences among mean concentrations from lobsters with signs of disease, lobsters without signs of the disease, or reference lobsters. When assumptions of normality or homogeneity of variance were not met, the analysis was performed on ranked data using the Kruskal-Wallis test (Kruskal & Wallis 1952), and post hoc means testing was conducted using Dunn's test (Dunn 1964).
Mean concentrations of contaminant elements in hemolymph were compared between lobsters with signs of shell disease and those with no apparent signs of the disease from the Narragansett Bay transects. Nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum tests (Mann & Whitney 1947) were performed to assess differences between means.
Multivariate analyses were conducted with Systat statistical software (Systat Software, Inc.). Principal component analyses were conducted after mean centering the data, which involved subtraction of the mean concentration for a given element from each individual sample and sample replicate. Discriminant analyses were also performed, using both mean-centered and log-transformed data. Only those data that met the assumption of homogeneity of variance were used. To meet these assumptions, a logarithm base 10 transformation was performed on the "100 Lobsters" data, which produced normality in a subset of the data. For the Narragansett Bay transect data, a combination of log base 10 transformations, reciprocal transformations, and the log base 10 of the reciprocal were used.
For ICP-MS, percent recovery of 17 different elements from spiked samples ranged from 84-118% across all analytes, and had an overall mean of 104 [+ or -] 2%. Procedural blanks of contaminant elements were generally low and ranged from 0.01-2% of the sample concentration. However, higher concentrations of some critical elements (Pb, Ni, Cd) during later sample runs necessitated blank subtraction from all samples. A blank was run with every 10 samples, as mentioned earlier, and sample blanks were matched to their respective samples for the purpose of subtraction.
Sample blanks for Hg were very low (<1%) and were not subtracted from samples. Duplicates deviated less than 10% from one another, and standard reference materials were within 90-110% of reported values.
Comparison of Mean Concentrations in Shell Diseased, Nondiseased, and Reference Lobsters
Concentrations of contaminant metals in the hepatopancreas of shell-diseased lobsters collected from different sites in SNE and LIS were characterized by nonnormal distributions and distributions skewed heavily in the positive direction. Mean, SD, and range of concentrations of 11 metals associated with anthropogenic contamination are presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3, along with the results of the statistical comparison of the mean concentrations. Differences were observed between geographical locations and between shell-diseased and nondiseased groups within a geographical location, although patterns were not consistent with a scenario of higher body burdens in lobsters showing signs of shell disease. For the "100 Lobsters" and LIS sites, differences in Cd, Cu, and Pb were seen between lobsters from these sites and those from the Maine reference site, with these metals (along with V and Mn) being higher compared with the offshore Maine reference site (Tables 1 and 3). No differences were seen between lobsters with signs of shell disease and lobsters without signs of shell disease at these sites. In the Narragansett Bay transect data, differences were seen between lobsters in the diseased and nondiseased groups for 4 metals (Cr, Cu, Mn, and Pb). However, mean hepatopancreas concentrations were lower in the lobsters with signs of ESD compared with the lobsters without signs (Table 2). Cu concentrations were significantly different between all 3 groups (diseased, nondiseased, and reference), with the lowest concentrations from reference site lobsters and the highest concentrations found in lobsters not exhibiting signs of shell disease.
Concentrations in Hemolymph
Concentrations of contaminant hemolymph metals are presented in Table 4 for Narragansett Bay lobsters. Data were distributed nonnormally (even after mathematical transformations) and were low in concentration. No consistent trends were apparent, although a couple of statistically significant differences were noted, with Mn being higher in concentration in the lobsters with no apparent signs of shell disease, and As being slightly higher in the hemolymph of lobsters with shell disease.
Multivariate Analysis Investigations
Recognizing the multivariate nature of the data sets generated, data were examined using a number of multivariate analyses, including principal components analysis and discriminant analysis. Running principal component analysis on covariances, using the contaminant metals As, boron (B), Cd, Co, Cr, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, V, and Hg produced axes that accounted for 83-95% of the variance on principal component 1, 5-20% on axis 2, and 1-2% on axis 3. Very little to no separation was seen when 2-D plots of eigenvalues from any 2 of the main 3 axes, or 3-dimensional plots of the first 3 axes were examined (Fig. 1). This is consistent with multivariate analyses of variance and discriminant analysis, both performed using contaminant metals. Results of the canonical scores plot from the discriminant analysis are displayed in Figure 2. It can be seen that there was no separation between groups. This is also reflected in the MANOVA test statistics; both Wilk's Lambda and Pillai's Trace showed nonsignificance (P = 0.295 and P = 0.206, respectively) between groups, suggesting that the disease state (shell disease, no disease, reference) had no influence on ordering the data. Similar results were obtained with the Narragansett Bay transect data.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
Results for the sediment samples obtained from the "100 Lobsters" collection site are given in Table 5. When compared with sediment quality guidelines, Narragansett Bay sediment collected from the "100 Lobsters" sampling site where shell disease is prevalent showed that concentrations of several metals were intermediate between effect range low (ERL) and effect range median (ERM) sediment quality values, which are based on an extensive compilation of sediment toxicity tests. One metal, Ni, exceeded sediment quality guidelines.
Metals Partitioning and Body Burden Determination
Elemental concentrations were not distributed uniformly throughout all tissues, in particular, concentrations of contaminants such as As, Cd, Co, and Cu were highest in hepatopancreatic tissues (Table 6). Other contaminants, such as Cr, Mn, Ni, and Pb, had different distributions, with the highest levels of Cr seen in gills, and the highest levels of Pb, Mn, and Ni found in the exoskeleton. Concentrations of all contaminant metals were generally lowest in hemolymph, although hemolymph Cu concentrations were similar to those found in ovary and gill.
Contaminant metal body burden estimates (i.e., total mass of metal) are shown in Table 7. Hepatopancreas had the greatest burden for Cd (91%) and Cu (64%), whereas the exoskeleton had the greatest burden of Cr (86%), Co (39%), Mn (93%), Ni (93%), and Pb (84%). Muscle tissue contained the highest burden of As (45%; Fig. 3).
The results showed that major differences in hepatopancreas contaminant metals did not exist among lobsters showing signs of ESD, not showing signs of ESD, and reference groupings for Rhode Island transects, LIS samples, and the "100 Lobsters" site. The results were not consistent with a scenario of higher body burdens present in diseased versus nondiseased or reference organisms. Thus, one cannot infer that greater body burdens of metals in shell-diseased lobsters were contributing to the onset of the disease, compared with lobsters that were not exhibiting the disease caught in the same location, or in a less impacted reference site. Furthermore, there was no clear pattern to suggest that any singular element or combination of elements was more associated with the disease state than not. Univariate F tests and post hoc analyses revealed differences in mean concentrations of contaminant metals, although, in general, differences were seen between different geographical locations more often than between diseased and nondiseased groups. The multivariate analyses also did not show any significant trends between contaminants and the presence of shell disease.
Like hepatopancreas, hemolymph concentrations of contaminants showed a similar lack of disease-related trends. Although measurable levels of contaminant metals were found, values for all metals were consistently very low in comparison with hepatopancreas, and did not justify the use of hemolymph for metals measurement. As expected, hemolymph Cu concentrations were highest for all contaminant metals. However, Cu content did not appear to have been indicative of disease state, as it was similar to those reported for H. americanus (Engel et al. 2001) and other crustacean species (Norum et al. 2003).
Our analysis of the relationship of shell disease to contaminant metal burdens was undoubtedly complicated by the high degree of variability associated with the samples. Recent literature confirms the challenges of interpreting contaminant levels for crustacean tissue resulting from high degrees of both interand intraspecific variability in concentrations (Wang & Rainbow 2008, Reichmuth et al. 2010). Variability is known to arise from a variety of sources including size, sex, molt stage and season, and geographical origin in many crustacean species (Canli & Furness 1993, Paez-Osuna et al. 1995, Barrento et al. 2009). In H. americanus, variation in metal content has been related to the molt cycle by Engel et al. (2001), who observed that hepatopancreas Cu and Zn concentrations decreased by a factor of 2 at ecdysis. Geographical origin is also known to influence metals concentrations strongly in lobsters such that lobsters from different areas can be identified by their different metals signatures (Chou et al. 2003). In our study, some variability was likely attributable to size (e.g., mean hepatopancreas Cd concentration equaled 41.4 [micro]g/g dry weight for Narragansett Bay/Rhode Island Sound lobsters larger than 600 g), but no definitive relationship for sex and metals content was evident. Molt stage was essentially the same across all lobsters sampled (intermolt), so its influence on sample concentrations could not be assessed. Lobster origin likely represented the largest source of sample variability we experienced, yet metal concentrations in the "100 Lobsters" animals still displayed individual variability despite being collected from the same geographical location. Thus, there may have been other unknown factors, such as routes of exposure and/or geochemical availability (Luoma & Rainbow 2005) that contributed to the metal concentrations found in lobsters.
Concentrations of metal contaminants in lobster hepatopancreas from Narragansett Bay and LIS were similar to levels found in lobsters from environments known to be impacted (Table 8). Only Cu deviated from known ranges for lobster, with values exceeding those recorded prior to this study. Higher Cu concentrations could have reflected anthropogenic influences, as lobsters are known to accumulate Cu according to its availability in the environment (Engel et al. 2001, Yeats & Chou 2001). Alternatively, higher Cu concentrations may have been indicative of enhanced hemocyanin production in response to environmental conditions such as hypoxia, temperature, or food availability (DeFur et al. 1990, Engel et al. 2001).
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
Historically, development of shell disease in lobsters and other crustaceans has been associated with polluted or degraded habitat (Young & Pearce 1975, Ziskowski et al. 1996, Vogan et al. 2008). Sediment contaminant concentrations at the "100 Lobsters" sample site were typical of many sediments of northeastern U.S. estuaries, where the regional sediment quality is generally rated "fair to poor" (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2008). The levels of As, Cr, Ni, and Pb found at that site suggested that potential adverse biological effects may have occurred in lobsters living in that environment (Table 5). However, it was difficult to predict the likelihood of adverse effects from sediment concentrations alone, because lobsters harvested at this site are not permanent residents, but are migrating through the site; the bioavailability of contaminant metals was not determined as part of this study; and contaminant concentrations in lobster tissues do not always correspond to contaminant concentrations in sediment (Engel et al. 2001, Yeats & Chou 2001). Furthermore, a direct association of sediment contaminant metals levels at the "100 Lobsters" site to shell disease was not evident, given that lobsters inhabit even more highly contaminated sediments throughout their range without exhibiting signs of shell disease (Glenn & Pugh 2006). If sediment metals are important to ESD development, a more complex relationship must exist among the lobster, the environment and the pathogen than was discerned from this study (Tlusty et al. 2007).
Metals Partitioning and Body Burdens
Our measured contaminant metals concentrations for muscle, ovary, gill, and exoskeleton were comparable with previous investigations. For muscle, Barrento et al. (2008) found similar concentrations of As and Pb in H. arnericanus. Cd was an order of magnitude lower in that study, however, and concentrations from the current investigation paralleled concentrations more closely observed in lobsters from polluted environments (Uthe et al. 1987). Muscle tissue concentrations of Cu, Cr, and Ni were also within established ranges for lobster (Reid et al. 1982, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection 1987 (cited in Mercaldo-Allen & Kuropat 1994)). For ovary, Cu and Mn were higher than previously recorded for H. americanus (Barrento et al. 2009). Information on metal concentrations found in gills and exoskeleton is limited for H. americanus. Eriksson & Baden (1998) found high concentrations (1,560 [micro]g/g dry weight) of Mn in the gills of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus (L.), reflective of exposure to hypoxic conditions. Baden & Eriksson (2006), in a review of Mn in crustaceans, found that concentrations ranging from 0.5-508 [micro]g/g were present in the gills of N. norvegicus collected from pristine areas. Concentrations found in Narragansett Bay lobsters (2.65 [micro]g/g wet weight, approximately 13 [micro]g/g dry weight) were apparently not reflective of a hypoxic environment.
The current study represented the first attempt in the American lobster to document whole body burdens of multiple contaminant metals using a variety of tissues. Earlier investigations were limited to single tissues (Chou et al. 2000). Here, we observed a pattern of contaminant burden by tissue that could be summarized as hepatopancreas/exoskeleton > gills/ gonads > muscle > hemolymph. This pattern approximated that described for other lobster species (Canli & Furness 1993, Paez-Osuna et al. 1995, Morales-Hernandez et al. 2004). Comparisons of percent of body burden between H. americanus and N. norvegicus suggested similar distributions of Cd (91%) and Cu (65%) in the hepatopancreas of the 2 species. And although the percentage of Pb in the exoskeleton was different between the American and the Norwegian lobsters (84% vs. 42%), it was comparable between the American lobster and the spiny lobster Panulirus inflatus (Bouvier) (Paez-Osuna et al. 1995). Body burden percentages for exoskeletal Mn and Ni were also roughly equivalent between H. americanus and P. inflatus (Paez-Osuna et al. 1995). The consequence of the total contaminant body burden is uncertain because field-collected lobsters are known to carry high metal loads with no apparent ill effects (Chou et al. 2002).
The observed intraorganismal partitioning likely reflected the distinct functions of each organ in metals processing, and may have also been indicative of the intake route (diet vs. seawater) (Rainbow 2002). Relatively high hepatopancreas concentrations and burdens of metals were expected given this organ's prominent role in metal absorption, sequestration, and detoxification processes in crustaceans (Ahearn et al. 2004). In H. americanus, the hepatopancreas is known to regulate both essential and toxic metal ions by metallothionein binding (Engel & Brouwer 1986, Chou et al. 1991, Chavez-Crooker et al. 2003). High levels of exoskeletal metals are also typical of decapod crustaceans (Paez-Osuna et al. 1995, Morales-Hernandez et al. 2004). Metals accumulate in the exoskeleton by binding with chitin or other physiological processes (Keteles & Fleeger 2001), and may be subsequently depurated through molting or shifted to soft tissues prior to molting (Bergey & Weis 2007). Crustacean gills are known to represent major sites of metals uptake (Rainbow 2002), intermediate sites of accumulation (Chavez-Crooker et al. 2003), and possibly elimination (Ahearn et al. 2004), whereas hemolymph and hemocytes are responsible for metals binding and transport to various tissues of the body (Chavez-Crooker et al. 2003, Ahearn et al. 2004). Ovary and muscle tissue in metal metabolism are less defined, but metal accumulation is known to occur to some degree in both tissues (Jeckel et al. 1996). Muscle tissue accumulation appears more limited, presumably because it contains low metallothionein levels (Chavez-Crooker et al. 2003).
As a result of inherent sample variability and limited size of this partitioning experiment, it was difficult to determine whether there were disease-associated differences in contaminant concentrations or loads in any tissue. However, notably lower mean ([+ or -] SD) concentrations of calcium (80 [+ or -] 6 mg/g for shell diseased vs. 108 [+ or -] 9 mg/g for nondiseased) and strontium (4.3 [+ or -] 0.6 [micro]g/g for shell diseased vs. 1,280 [+ or -] 970 [micro]g/g for nondiseased) were found in the exoskeletal tissues of diseased lobsters. These results were presumably attributable to the physical loss of mineralized shell material via lesion development, but further investigation of this phenomenon may be warranted to ascertain its relationship to shell disease.
Contaminant trace metals were detected in the tissues of lobsters showing signs of shell disease collected in Rhode Island and LIS. These concentrations were reflective of environments that are impacted moderately. The concentrations of contaminant metals in sediment collected from the "100 Lobsters" site were consistent with this scenario, with concentrations that were intermediate between ERL and ERM concentrations. The study focused mainly on concentrations in the hepatopancreas, the known site of metal sequestration. The data were highly variable and skewed, which is typical of metal concentrations in aquatic organisms. Although differences in concentration patterns were observed between diseased lobsters and those not exhibiting disease symptoms, no consistent picture emerged that would lead one to conclude that metal burdens were a causative agent in lobster shell disease. Metal concentrations in hemolymph were highly skewed and also did not indicate a relationship to the presence of shell disease.
We thank Kathy Castro and Barbara Somers of the University of Rhode Island, Tom Angell of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, Margaret Homerding of Stony Brook University, Jeff Shields of VIMS, and Carl Wilson of the Maine Department of Marine Resources for their assistance in obtaining lobster samples for this study. Gratitude is also extended to Brian Perkins and Denise Skonberg of the University of Maine's Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, and to John Cangelosi, Clive Devoy, Mike Handley, and Marianne Lagerklint of University of Maine's Sawyer Environmental Chemistry Research Lab for providing laboratory facilities and guidance. This work was supported by the National Marine Fisheries Service as the New England Lobster Research Initiative: Lobster Shell Disease under NOAA grant NA06NMF4720100 to the University of Rhode Island Fisheries Center. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies. The U.S. government is authorized to produce and distribute reprints for government purposes, notwithstanding any copyright notation that may appear hereon.
Ahearn, G. A., P. K. Mandal & A. Mandal. 2004. Mechanisms of heavy-metal sequestration and detoxification in crustaceans: a review. J. Comp. Physiol. B 174:439-452.
Baden, S. P. & S. P. Eriksson. 2006. Role, routes and effects of manganese in crustaceans. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 44:61-83.
Barrento, S., A. Marques, B. Texeira, M. L. Carvalho, P. Vaz-Pires & M. L. Nunes. 2009. Influence of season and sex on the contents of minerals and trace elements in brown crab (Cancer pagurus, Linnaeus, 1758). J. Agric. Food Chem. 57:3253-3260.
Barrento, S., A. Marques, B. Texeira, P. Vaz-Pires, M. k. Carvalho & M. L. Nunes. 2008. Essential elements and contaminants in edible tissues of European and American lobsters. Food Chem. I11:862-867.
Bergey, L. L. & J. S. Weis. 2007. Molting as a mechanism of depuration of metals in the fiddler crab, Ucapugnax. Mar. Environ. Res. 64:556-562.
Canli, M. & R. W. Furness. 1993. Toxicity of heavy metals dissolved in sea water and influences of sex and size on tissue distribution in the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus. Mar. Environ. Res. 36:217-236.
Chavez-Crooker, P., P. Pozo, H. Castro, M. S. Dice, I. Boutet, A. Tanguy, D. Moraga & G. A. Ahearn. 2003. Cellular localization of calcium, heavy metals, and metallothionein in lobster (Homarus americanus) hepatopancreas. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 136:213-224.
Chou, C. L., R. D. Guy & J. F. Uthe. 1991. Isolation and characterization of metal-binding proteins (metallothioneins) from lobster digestive gland (Homarus americanus). Sci. Total Environ. 105:41-59.
Chou, C. L., L. A. Paon & J. D. Moffat. 2002. Metal contaminants for modeling lobster (Homarus americanus) migration patterns in the inner Bay of Fundy, Atlantic Canada. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44:134-141.
Chou, C. L., L. A. Paon, J. D. Moffatt & T. King. 2003. Selection of bioindicators for monitoring marine environmental quality in the Bay of Fundy, Atlantic Canada. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46:756-762.
Chou, C. L., L. A. Paon, J. D. Moffat & B. Zwicker. 2000. Copper contamination and cadmium, silver and zinc concentrations in the digestive gland of the American lobster (Homarus americanus) from the inner Bay of Fundy, Atlantic Canada. Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 65:470-477.
Cobb, J. S. & K. M. Castro. 2006. Lobster shell disease: a synthesis. Kingston, RI: Fisheries Center, University of Rhode Island. 16 pp. Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. 1987. Report on Long Island Sound study activities: FY 85 and FY 86 (Draft); p. 121-155. Available from: Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, 79 Elm Street, 6th Fl., Hartford, CT 06104.
Correa. J. D., Jr., M. R. da Silva, A. C. B. da Silva, S. M. A. de Lima, O. Malta & S. Allodi. 2005. Tissue distribution, subcellular localization and endocrine disruption patterns induced by Cr and Mn in the crab Ucides cordatus. Aquat. Toxicol. 73:139-154.
DeFur, P. L., C. P. Magnum & J. E. Reese. 1990. Respiratory responses of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus to long-term hypoxia. Biol. Bull. 178:46-54.
Duboise, S. M. & K. D. Moulton. 2005. Defining the etiology of epizootic shell disease: the importance of genetic investigations of the associated bacterial and viral ecology. In: M. F. Tlusty, H. O. Halvorson, R. Smolowitz & U. Sharnaa, editors. Lobster shell disease workshop. Forum Series 05-1. Boston, MA: New England Aquarium. pp 26-34.
Dunn, O. J. 1964. Multiple contrasts using rank sums. Technometrics 6:241-252.
Engel, D. W. & M. Brouwer. 1986. Cadmium and copper metallothioneins in the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Environ. Health Perspeet. 65:87-92.
Engel, D. W., M. Brouwer & R. Mercaldo-Allen. 2001. Effects of molting and environmental factors on trace metal body-burdens and hemocyanin concentrations in the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Mar. Environ. Res. 52:257-269.
Eriksson, S. P. & S. P. Baden. 1998. Manganese in the haemolymph and tissues of the Norway lobster, Nephrops norvegicus (L.) along the Swedish west coast, 1993-1995. Hydrobiology 375/ 376:255-264.
Gardner, G. R. & R. J. Pruell. 1987. A histopathological and chemical assessment of winter flounder, lobster, and soft-shelled clam indigenous to Quincy Bay, Boston Harbor and an in situ evaluation of oyster including sediment (surface and cores) chemistry. Narragansett, RI: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 108 pp.
Glenn, R. P. & T. L. Pugh. 2006. Epizootic shell disease in American lobster (Homarus americanus) in Massachusetts coastal waters: interactions of temperature, maturity, and intermolt duration. J. Crustac. Biol. 26:639-645.
Henroth, B., S. P. Baden, K. Holm, T. Andre & I. Sodehall. 2004. Manganese induced immune suppression of the lobster, Nephrops norvegicus. Aquat. Toxicol. 70:223-231.
Jeckel, W. H., R. R. Roth & L. Ricci. 1996. Patterns of trace metal distribution in tissues of Pleoticus muelleri (Crustacea: Decapoda: Solenoceridae). Mar. Biol. 125:297-306.
Keteles, K. A. & J. W. Fleeger. 2001. The contribution of ecdysis to the fate of copper, zinc, and cadmium in grass shrimp, Palaemonetes pugio Holthis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 42:1397-1402.
Kruskal, W. H. & W. A. Wallis. 1952. Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47:583-621.
Laufer, H., X. J. Pan, W. J. Biggers, C. P. Capulong, J. D. Stuart, N. Demir & U. Koehn. 2005. Lessons learned from inshore and deep-sea lobsters concerning alkylphenols. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 48:109-117.
Levene, H. 1952. On the power function of tests of randomness based upon runs up and down. Ann. Math. Star. 23:34-56.
Long, E. R., D. D. MacDonald, S. L. Smith & F. D. Calder. 1995. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ. Manage. 19:81-97.
Luoma, S. N. & P. S. Rainbow. 2005. Why is metal bioaccumulation so variable? Environ. Sci. Technol. 39:1921-1931.
Maine Department of Environmental Protection. 2007. Surface Water Ambient Toxic Monitoring Program 2007 report. DEPLW-0896, Augusta, Maine, Maine Department of Environmental Protection.
Mann, H. B. & D. R. Whitney. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18:404-407.
Mercaldo-Allen, R. & C. A. Kuropat. 1994. Review of American lobster (Homarus americanus) habitat requirements and responses to contaminant exposures. NOAA technical memorandum NMFS-NE-105. Silver Springs, Maryland, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 52 pp.
Morales-Hernandez, F., M. F. Soto-Jiminez & F. Paez-Osuna. 2004. Heavy metals in sediments and lobster (Panulirus gracilis) from the discharge area of the submarine sewage outfall in Mazatlan Bay (SE Gulf of California). Arch. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 46:485-491.
Norum, U., M. Bondgaard & P. Bjerregaard. 2003. Copper and zinc handling during the moult cycle of male and female shore crabs Carcinus maenas. Mar. Biol. 142:757-769.
Oweson, C., S. P. Baden & B. E. Hernroth. 2006. Manganese induced apoptosis in haematopoietic cells of Nephrops norvegicus (L.). Aquat. Toxicol. 77:322-328.
Paez-Osuna, F., R. Perez-Gonzalez, G. Izaguirre-Fierro, H. M. Zazueta-Padilla & L. M. Flores-Campana. 1995. Trace metal concentrations and their distribution in the lobster Panulirus inflatus (Bouvier, 1895) from the Mexican Pacific coast. Environ. Pollut. 90:163-170.
Rainbow, P. S. 2002. Trace metal concentrations in aquatic invertebrates: why and so what? Environ. Pollut. 120:497-507.
Reichmuth, J. M., P. Weis & J. S. Weis. 2010. Bioaccumulation and depuration of metals in blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) from a contaminated and clean estuary. Environ. Pollut. 158:361-368.
Reid, R. N., J. E. O'Reilly & J. S. Zdanowicz. 1982. Contaminants in the New York Bight and Long Island Sound sediments and demersal species, and effects on benthos, summer 1980. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/NEC-16; Silver Springs Maryland, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 31 pp.
Robohm, R. A., A. F. J. Draxler, D. Wieczorek, D. Kapareiko & S. Pitchford. 2005. Effects of environmental stressors on disease susceptibility in American lobsters: a controlled laboratory study. J. Shellfish Res. 24:773-779.
Shapiro, S. S. & M. B. Wilk. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611.
Shields, J. D., K. N. Wheeler, J. Moss, B. Somers & K. Castro. 2012. The "100 Lobsters" project: a cooperative demonstration project for health assessments of lobsters from Rhode Island. J. Shellfish Res. 31:431-438.
Sidak, Z. 1967. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 62:626-633.
Tlusty, M. F., R. M. Smolowitz, H. O. Halvorson & S. E. DeVito. 2007. Host susceptibility hypothesis for shell disease in American lobsters. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 19:215-225.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Method 3051A. 2007. Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils. Revision I. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 30 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. National coastal condition report III. EPA842-R-08-002. Washington, D.C., U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 300 pp.
Uthe, J. F., D. P. Scott & C. L. Chou. 1987. Cadmium concentrations in American lobster (Homarus americanus) near a coastal lead smelter: use of multiple linear regression for management. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 38:687-694.
Valente, R. M. & C. Cuomo. 2005. Did multiple sediment-associated stressors contribute to the 1999 lobster mass mortality event in western Long Island Sound? Estuaries 28:529-540.
Valko, M., H. Morris & M. T. D. Cronin. 2005. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr. Med. Chem. 12:1161-1208.
Vassiliev, T. 2005. Detection of heavy metals in Maine lobster populations. Draft report to Lobster Institute. Orono, ME: University of Maine. 25 pp.
Vassiliev, T., R. Bayer, W. Congelton, R. Bushway & J. Vetelino. 2005. Heavy metal concentrations in lobster (Homarus americanus). Abstract from the 2005 annual meeting of the National Shellfisheries Association, Philadelphia, PA, April 10-14, 2005.
Vogan, C. L., A. Powell & A. F. Rowley. 2008. Shell disease in crustaceans: just chitin recycling gone wrong? Environ. Microbiol. 10:826-835.
Wang, W. & P. S. Rainbow. 2008. Comparative approaches to understand metal bioaccumulation in aquatic animals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 148:315-323.
Weinstein, J. E., T. L. West & J. T. Bray. 1992. Shell disease and metal content of blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, from the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine System, North Carolina. Arch. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 23:355-362.
Weis, J. S., A. Cristini & K. Ranga Rao. 1992. Effects of pollutants on molting and regeneration in Crustacea. Am. Zool. 32:495-500.
Yeats, P. A. & C. L. Chou. 2001. Covariance of copper concentrations in lobsters and seawater. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 67:455-462.
Young, J. S. & J. B. Pearce. 1975. Shell disease from crabs and lobsters from the New York Bight. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 6:101-105.
Ziskowski, J., R. Spallone, D. Kapareiko, R. Robohm, A. Calabrese & J. Pereira. 1996. Shell disease in American lobster (Homarus americanus) in the offshore, northwest Atlantic region around the 106-mile sewage-sludge disposal site. J. Marine Environ. Eng. 3:247-271.
LAWRENCE A. LEBLANC * AND DEANNA PRINCE School of Marine Sciences, 5741 Libby Hall, Room 215, School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5741
* Corresponding author. E-mail: email@example.com
TABLE 1. Comparison of mean concentrations of contaminant metals * in the hepatopancreas of diseased and nondiseased lobsters from the "100 Lobster" study. As Cd ([dagger]) Co ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 43.9 11.7 A 1.26 SD 50.9 16.6 5.71 Range 20.0-65.7 2.76-36.7 0.105-0.809 (n = 32) None apparent Mean 28.0 9.77 A 0.26 SD 10.4 5.47 0.14 Range 15.1-60.0 2.30-23.0 0.09-0.76 (n = 32) Maine reference Mean 35.4 18.8 B 0.29 SD 17.4 15.1 0.22 Range ([section]) 16.8-90.5 0.397-74.5 0.110-0.829 (n = 32) Cr Cu ([dagger]) Mn ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 1.31 2150 A 10.6 SD 5.75 912 25.7 Range 0.049-2.86 197-3730 0.621-164 (n = 32) None apparent Mean 0.32 1,780 A 8.33 SD 0.26 1,070 4.69 Range 0.056-1.10 264-3,730 2.57-22.9 (n = 32) Maine reference Mean 0.21 189 B 7.42 SD 0.29 230 2.22 Range ([section]) 0.027-1.26 16.7-802 4.97-12.63 (n = 32) Mo Ni Pb ([dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 2.33 2.27 0.22 A SD 2.33 2.27 0.51 Range 0.179-48.2 0.303-34.9 0.010-3.27 (n = 32) None apparent Mean 1.53 1.23 0.20 A SD 2.48 1.10 0.18 Range 0.436-11.5 0.272-5.02 0.039-0.817 (n = 32) Maine reference Mean 1.47 1.69 0.05 B SD 0.75 0.79 0.02 Range ([section]) 0.19-3.04 0.781-3.25 0.018-0.105 (n = 32) Hg ([double V dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 1.26 A 0.56 SD 5.56 0.29 Range 0.031-31.7 0.226-1.09 (n = 32) None apparent Mean 0.33 A 0.36 SD 0.35 0.17 Range 0.085-1.58 0.005-0.733 (n = 32) Maine reference Mean 0.87 B 0.26 SD 0.57 0.11 Range ([section]) 0.187-2.29 0.181-0.310 (n = 32) * All concentrations are in hepatopancreas tissue except for Hg, which is in muscle tissue. Concentrations are averaged across disease stage and sex. Statistically significant differences, tested with either Holm-Sidak or Dunn's (when the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used) are indicated by letters in bold type. ([dagger]) One-way analysis of variance and post hoc means testing using Dunn's test performed on rank-transformed data. ([double dagger]) For Hg: diseased, n = 14; no disease, n = 15; reference, n = 15. ([section]) The range of values for the Maine reference site appears only in Table 1. TABLE 2. Comparison of mean concentrations of contaminant metals * in the hepatopancreas of diseased and nondiseased lobsters from the Narragansett Bay transects. As Cd Co ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 28.1 26.3 0.40 SD 17.4 28.7 0.35 Range (n = 14) 5.61-340 28.74 0.35 None apparent Mean 48.9 15.4 0.86 2SD 24.7 9.0 0.82 Range (n = 17) 15.1-120 2.3-39.0 0.086-2.87 Maine reference Mean 35.4 18.8 0.29 2SD 17.4 15.1 0.22 Cr Cu Mn ([dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 0.30 A 816 A 6.83 A SD 0.26 1,040 4.43 Range (n = 14) 0.26 1,045 4.43 None apparent Mean 0.59 B 1,400 B 14.0 B 2SD 0.58 1,410 7.9 Range (n = 17) 0.056-1.96 141-5,270 2.57-38.3 Maine reference Mean 0.21 A 189 C 7.42 A 2SD 0.23 230 2.22 Mo Ni Pb ([dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 0.94 3.43 0.09 A SD 0.40 9.07 0.07 Range (n = 14) 0.40 9.07 0.07 None apparent Mean 1.77 1.66 0.31 B 2SD 0.98 1.04 0.38 Range (n = 17) 0.43-11.5 0.27-5.02 0.02-1.61 Maine reference Mean 1.47 1.69 0.05 A 2SD 0.75 0.79 0.02 Hg ([double V dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 0.763 0.43 SD 1.06 0.23 Range (n = 14) 0.031-31.7 0.176-1.09 None apparent Mean 1.22 3.57 2SD 2.31 6.54 Range (n = 17) 0.08-9.71 ND-23.1 Maine reference Mean 0.87 0.26 2SD 0.57 0.11 * All concentrations are in hepatopancreas tissue except for Hg, which is in muscle tissue. Concentrations are averaged across disease stage and sex. Statistically significant differences, tested with either Holm-Sidak or Dunn's (when the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used) are indicated by letters in bold type. ([dagger]) One-way analysis of variance and post hoc means testing using Dunn's test performed on rank-transformed data. ([double dagger]) For Hg: diseased, n = 15; no disease, n = 17; reference, n = 15. ND, not detected. TABLE 3. Comparison of mean concentrations of contaminant metals * in the hepatopancreas of diseased and nondiseased lobsters from Long Island Sound. As Cd ([dagger]) Co ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 39.9 A 26.2 A 0.68 A SD 13.1 7.4 0.47 Range 16.9-59.8 11.5-37.1 0.28-1.89 (n = 9) None apparent Mean 18.7 B 12.1 B 0.53 A SD 11.4 6.5 0.24 Range 4.56-53.0 1.53-21.0 0.088-0.924 (n = 17) Maine reference Mean 35.4 A 18.8 B 0.29 B SD 17.4 15.1 0.22 Cr Cu Mn ([dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 0.21 792 A 18.5 A SD 0.11 628 17.1 Range 0.096-0.396 45.7-2280 2.34-61.4 (n = 9) None apparent Mean 0.65 977 A 12.9 A SD 1.50 1,000 5.8 Range 0.090-6.42 10.34-3710 2.42-28.8 (n = 17) Maine reference Mean 0.21 189 B 7.42 B SD 0.23 230 2.22 Mo Ni Pb ([dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 1.63 1.76 0.19 A SD 0.96 1.03 0.14 Range 0.805-3.99 0.884-4.22 0.090-0.539 (n = 9) None apparent Mean 2.60 1.58 0.13 A SD 5.22 1.25 0.08 Range 0.368-22.7 0.367-6.05 0.044-0.328 (n = 17) Maine reference Mean 1.47 1.69 0.05 B SD 0.75 0.79 0.02 Hg ([double V dagger]) ([micro]g/g ([micro]g/g dry wt.) dry wt.) Shell disease Mean 1.18 1.76 SD 0.73 1.26 Range 0.313-2.82 0.546-3.68 (n = 9) None apparent Mean 1.19 1.15 SD 1.73 0.29 Range 0.246-7.62 0.291-1.54 (n = 17) Maine reference Mean 0.87 0.26 SD 0.57 0.11 * All concentrations are in hepatopancreas tissue except for Hg, which is in muscle tissue. Concentrations are averaged across disease stage and sex. Statistically significant differences, tested with either Holm-Sidak or Dunn's (when the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was used) are indicated by letters in bold type. ([dagger]) One-way analysis of variance and post hoc means testing using Dunn's test performed on rank-transformed data. ([double dagger]) For Hg: diseased, n = 7; no disease, n = 11; reference, n = 15. TABLE 4. Mean, SD, and minimum and maximum values for selected metal contaminants in hemolymph from lobsters from the Narragansett Bay transects. As * Cd Co Cr ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) No apparent shell disease (n = 17) Mean 0.41 0.0004 0.009 0.113 SD 0.72 0.0007 0.005 0.167 Range 0.05-3.04 0-0.0022 0.004-0.021 0.004-0.579 Shell disease (n = 13) Mean 0.58 0.001 0.01 0.52 SD 0.28 0.002 0.01 1.72 Range 0.13-1.02 0-0.008 0.003-0.035 0.01-6.93 ([dagger]) Cu Mn * Ni Pb ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) No apparent shell disease (n = 17) Mean 46.1 0.774 0.071 0.002 SD 21.9 0.369 0.067 0.003 Range 14.0-97.5 0.383-1.7 0.012-0.22 0.0005-0.013 Shell disease (n = 13) Mean 59 0.436 0.116 0.003 SD 23.4 0.568 0.264 0.005 Range 24-121 0.081-2.2 0.013-1.07 0-0.02 * Statistically significant differences, conducted with nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum tests. ([dagger]) High value is from one very large lobster heavily impacted by shell disease. Concentrations of cadmium were approximately twice as high as in any other sample. TABLE 5. Comparison of mean trace metal concentrations in sediment collected from Narragansett Bay, RI, for the "100 Lobster" project. As Cd Co ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Mean (n = 5) 15.3 0.2 25.1 SD [+ or -]1.3 [+ or -]0.1 [+ or -]2.1 ERL * 8.2 1.2 ERM ([dagger]) 70 9.6 Cr Cu Mn ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Mean (n = 5) 104 30.6 815 SD [+ or -]2.2 [+ or -]2.8 [+ or -]37.7 ERL * 81 34 ERM ([dagger]) 370 270 Mo Ni ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Mean (n = 5) 1.4 420 SD [+ or -]0.1 [+ or -]24.7 ERL * 30 ERM ([dagger]) 50 Pb V ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Mean (n = 5) 106 170 SD [+ or -]82.4 [+ or -]42.8 ERL * 47 ERM ([dagger]) 218 Sediment quality guidelines for 6 contaminant metals are also listed (from Long et al. (1995)). * ERL, effects range low; the 10h percentile of the concentration range where biological effects were seen for a given analyte in biological test organisms exposed to sediment. ([dagger]) ERM, effects range median; the 50th percentile value of the concentration range where biological effects were seen for a given analyte in biological test organisms exposed to sediment. TABLE 6. Mean concentrations of selected contaminant metals in tissues of Homarus americanus from Narragansett Bay, RI. As Cd ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Tissue wet wt.) wet wt.) Muscle Mean 10.5 1.13 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 2.17 [+ or -] 3.12 Gills Mean 6.82 1.22 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 2.57 [+ or -] 1.20 Exoskeleton Mean 2.21 0.024 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 1.56 [+ or -] 0.017 Ovary Mean 14.2 0.059 (n = 5) SD [+ or -] 2.82 [+ or -] 0.062 Hemolymph Mean 0.444 0.002 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.306 [+ or -] 0.002 Hepatopancreas Mean 16.1 15.5 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 6.68 [+ or -] 16.2 Co Cr ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Tissue wet wt.) wet wt.) Muscle Mean 0.005 0.012 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.001 [+ or -] 0.006 Gills Mean 0.103 0.338 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.106 [+ or -] 0.259 Exoskeleton Mean 0.021 0.283 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.007 [+ or -] 0.194 Ovary Mean 0.079 0.052 (n = 5) SD [+ or -] 0.033 [+ or -] 0.034 Hemolymph Mean 0.008 0.073 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.003 [+ or -] 0.130 Hepatopancreas Mean 5.2 0.155 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.212 [+ or -] 0.160 Cu Mn ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Tissue wet wt.) wet wt.) Muscle Mean 5.28 0.853 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 2.11 [+ or -] 1.21 Gills Mean 47 2.65 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 22.4 [+ or -] 1.42 Exoskeleton Mean 0.944 50.1 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.340 [+ or -] 49.9 Ovary Mean 44.6 4.28 (n = 5) SD [+ or -] 22.5 [+ or -] 2.54 Hemolymph Mean 42 0.448 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 16.9 [+ or -] 0.001 Hepatopancreas Mean 433 3.63 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 428 [+ or -] 2.69 Ni Pb ([micro]g/g) ([micro]g/g) Tissue wet wt.) wet wt.) Muscle Mean 1.25 0.074 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 3.44 [+ or -] 0.199 Gills Mean 0.474 0.089 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.153 [+ or -] 0.074 Exoskeleton Mean 5.88 0.12 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.888 [+ or -] 0.064 Ovary Mean 0.151 0.009 (n = 5) SD [+ or -] 0.040 [+ or -] 0.007 Hemolymph Mean 0.053 0.002 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.387 [+ or -] 0.001 Hepatopancreas Mean 0.543 0 (n = 8) SD [+ or -] 0.265 [+ or -] 0.112 TABLE 7. Mean burdens of selected contaminant metals [+ or -] SD in tissues of Homarus americanus from Narragansett Bay, RI. Tissue As Cd (mg) (mg) Muscle Mean 1,400 70.7 (n=8) SD [+ or -]2.17 [+ or -]3.12 Gills Mean 113 28.8 (n = 8) SD [+ or -]2.57 [+ or -]1.20 Exoskeleton Mean 734 7.06 (n = 8) SD [+ or -]1.56 [+ or -]0.017 Ovary Mean 248 1.11 (n = 5) SD [+ or -]2.82 [+ or -]0.062 Hemolymph Mean 17.6 0.063 (n = 8) SD [+ or -]0.306 [+ or -]0.002 Hepatopancreas Mean 592 1140 (11 = 8) SD [+ or -]6.68 [+ or -]16.2 Mean body burden 3,100 1,250 Tissue Co Cr Cu (mg) (mg) (mg) Muscle 0.614 1.72 771 (n=8) [+ or -]0.001 [+ or -]0.006 [+ or -]2.11 Gills 1.06 5.28 687 (n = 8) [+ or -]0.106 [+ or -]0.259 [+ or -]22.4 Exoskeleton 5.37 86.3 303 (n = 8) [+ or -]0.007 [+ or -]0.194 [+ or -]0.340 Ovary 1.35 1.06 695 (n = 5) [+ or -]0.033 [+ or -]0.034 [+ or -]22.5 Hemolymph 0.268 2.48 1,430 (n = 8) [+ or -]0.003 [+ or -]0.130 [+ or -]16.9 Hepatopancreas 5.15 3.69 6,980 (11 = 8) [+ or -]0.212 [+ or -]0.160 [+ or -]428 Mean body burden 13.8 100 10,800 Tissue Mn Ni Pb (mg) (mg) (mg) Muscle 90.4 77.7 4.61 (n=8) [+ or -]1.21 [+ or -]3.44 [+ or -]0.199 Gills 29.5 6.73 0.776 (n = 8) [+ or -]1.42 [+ or -]0.153 [+ or -]0.074 Exoskeleton 8,600 1,500 28.2 (n = 8) [+ or -]49.9 [+ or -]0.888 [+ or -]0.064 Ovary 49.5 2.68 0.104 (n = 5) [+ or -]2.54 [+ or -]0.040 [+ or -]0.007 Hemolymph 11.7 1.68 0.048 (n = 8) [+ or -]0.001 [+ or -]0.387 [+ or -]0.001 Hepatopancreas 96.3 17.8 0 (11 = 8) [+ or -]2.69 [+ or -]0.265 [+ or -]0.112 Mean body burden 8,900 1,600 33.8 TABLE 8. Comparison of trace metals in 100 lobster hepatopancreas * with hepatopancreas concentrations found in other studies. Cd ([micro]g/g dry Disease State wt.) Current study Shell disease (n = 32) 2.9-100 (11.7 [+ or -] 6.6) No apparent disease 2.6-2.3 (n = 25) (9.77 [+ or -] 5.47) Other studies Boston Harbor([dagger]) 1.2-6.6 Long Island Sound([double dagger]) 5.4-50.8 Outfall (GOC)([subsection]) 11.5 + 7.5 Maine([paragraph) 1.8-59.8 Cr ([micro]g/g dry Disease State wt.) Current study Shell disease (n = 32) 0.08-35 (1.31 [+ or -] 5.75) No apparent disease 0.08-1.2 (n = 25) (0.32 [+ or -] 0.26) Other studies Boston Harbor([dagger]) 0.1-2.5 Long Island Sound([double dagger]) 0-0.75 Outfall (GOC)([subsection]) 0.9 + 0.5 Maine([paragraph) 0.07-1.3 Cu ([micro]/g dry Disease State wt.) Current study Shell disease (n = 32) 200-4,300 (2150 [+ or -] 912) No apparent disease 300-3,700 (n = 25) (1,780 [+ or -] 1,070) Other studies Boston Harbor([dagger]) 37-640 Long Island Sound([double dagger]) 180-3,880 Outfall (GOC)([subsection]) 380 + 500 Maine([paragraph) 12-500 Ni([micro]g/g dry Disease State wt.) Current study Shell disease (n = 32) 0.32-31 (2.27 [+ or -] 4.83) No apparent disease 0.27-5.1 (n = 25) (1.28 [+ or -] 1.1) Other studies Boston Harbor([dagger]) -- Long Island Sound([double dagger]) 0.90-5.97 Outfall (GOC)([subsection]) 4.4+77 Maine([paragraph) 0.07-2.4 Pb([micro]g/g dry Disease State wt.) Current study Shell disease (n = 32) 0.04-3.3 (0.22 + 0.51) No apparent disease 0.04-0.72 (n = 25) (0.21 [+ or -] 0.18) Other studies Boston Harbor([dagger]) 0.51-0.85 Long Island Sound([double dagger]) 1.2-15 Outfall (GOC)([subsection]) 350 + 77 Maine([paragraph) 0.02-0.46 * Concentrations are the range from minimum to maximum, and mean [+ or -] SD are included in parentheses. ([dagger]) From Gardner and Pruell (1987). ([double dagger] From Olsen (1989, 1990). ([subsection]) From Morales-Hernandez et al. (2004). ([paragraph] From Maine Department of Environmental Protection, 2007.
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|