Intestinal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour.
Background. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours (IMFTs) are rare
tumours characterised by nosologic, histogenetic and aetiopathogenetic
controversy and variable clinicopathological features. We report our
experience with intestinal-IMFTs (I-IMFTs) that have been reported
mainly as single case reports to date.
Methods. Five patients with I-IMFTs, identified between 2005 and 2008, formed the study cohort. The clinicopathological features were obtained from departmental and hospital records.
Results. The median patient age was 13 years. While 4 patients presented with symptoms and signs of intestinal obstruction, one IMFT was an incidental finding at laparotomy for trauma. Three I-IMFTs were located in the small bowel and 2 in the colon. Complete resection with end-to-end anastomoses was performed. The gross morphology included 1 polypoid myxoid tumour that served as a lead point for an intussusception, 3 multinodular whorled masses and 1 firm circumferential, infiltrative tumour. Microscopically, all tumours had typical features of IMFT with variable expression of ALK-1, a low proliferation index and tumour-free resection margins. All patients had an uneventful recovery. One patient was lost to further follow-up. Four patients were well, without local recurrence or metastases at 6 months to 3 years.
Conclusions. Surgery with tumour-free resection margins is the gold standard of care of adult and paediatric I-IMFTs. Heightened recognition of I-IMFT, albeit rare, as a cause of intestinal obstruction, including intussusception, is necessary for preoperative suspicion of I-IMFT.
Connective tissue tumors
Connective tissue tumors (Care and treatment)
Inflammation (Care and treatment)
Gastrointestinal tumors (Diagnosis)
Gastrointestinal tumors (Care and treatment)
|Publication:||Name: South African Journal of Surgery Publisher: South African Medical Association Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2011 South African Medical Association ISSN: 0038-2361|
|Issue:||Date: Nov, 2011 Source Volume: 49 Source Issue: 4|
|Topic:||Canadian Subject Form: Connective tissue tumours; Connective tissue tumours; Gastrointestinal tumours; Gastrointestinal tumours|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: South Africa Geographic Code: 6SOUT South Africa|
Since its first description in 1937,1 the understanding of
inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMFT) has evolved from a reactive
inflammatory process to a neoplasm of intermediate biological potential.
(2-9) Associated with nosologic, histogenetic and aetiopathogenetic
controversy, IMFTs occur in all age groups and in diverse body sites,
with no definite gender bias. (1,8,10-12) Notwithstanding their
existence for more than half a century, gastrointestinal IMFTs are
reported rarely. In reporting the clinicopathological features of 5
intestinal IMFTs (I-IMFTs) that were identified in the archives of the
University of KwaZulu-Natal teaching hospitals over a 4-year period, we
compare and contrast the clinicopathological findings with those
recorded globally, and discuss the associated nosologic controversies
and aetiopathogenetic advances posed by these heterogeneous spindle cell
Five patients with I-IMFTs were identified between 2005 and 2008, using the SNOMED word and code search engines. The clinical and gross pathological features were obtained from departmental and hospital records. All resected specimens were fixed in 10% formal saline. Archival haematoxylin and eosin (H & E), immunohistochemical (Table I) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) chromogen in situ hybridisation (EBER)-stained sections were re-appraised. The retrospective analysis was approved by the institution's bioethics committee.
Clinical features (summarised in Table II)
The age range was 2-49 (median 13) years. Clinical intestinal obstruction, suspected in 4 patients, necessitated diagnostic and therapeutic laparotomy, while in patient 5 the I-IMFT was an incidental finding during laparotomy for a traumatic insult. The abdominal X-ray of patients 1, 3 and 4 demonstrated dilated small bowel loops with fluid levels in keeping with intestinal obstruction. The contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan of patient 1 demonstrated a large homogeneously enhancing left iliac fossa mass that displaced the colon and appeared to encase the sigmoid colon; and that of patient 4 demonstrated a sausage-shaped ileal mass typical of 'ileo-ileal' intussusception (Fig. 1A). While the postoperative course was uneventful for all patients, one patient was lost to further follow-up. The other 4 patients were well, without local recurrence or metastases being recorded in the 6 months to 3 years follow-up period.
Pathological features (summarised in Table II)
Gross pathology: In contrast to the uniform grey-white colour and lack of necrosis in all tumours, there was striking heterogeneity in terms of the architecture and consistency (Table II). The tumours ranged in size from 1.5 to 20 cm in their largest diameters. One tumour (from patient 4) that served as a polypoid lead point of an intussusception had a soft, myxoid consistency with cystic degeneration on cut section (Fig. 1B). Three tumours had a firm, multinodular, whorled appearance on cut section; the largest of these (in patient 3) presented as an ileocaecal mass with dominant mesenteric growth (Fig. 1C). The resection specimen from patient 2 contained a firm, ulcerated, circumferential, transmural infiltrative mass (Fig. 1D).
Microscopic features: All the IMFTs demonstrated a fibromyxoid/vascular pattern characterised by a variable admixture of capillary-calibre blood vessels, inflammatory cells, a plump spindle cell infiltrate and variable fibrosis, myxoid change and oedema (Figs 2 and 3A). The individual spindle cells were randomly disposed or arranged in small aggregates and short fascicles. They contained amphophilic cytoplasm, oval- to spindle-shaped nuclei with vesicular nuclei and variable nucleolar prominence. Stellate and ganglion-like polygonal cells with basophilic cytoplasm were noted focally in all tumours. The inflammatory background comprised lymphocytes, histiocytes, plasma cells and eosinophils and focal lymphoid aggregates in all, and neutrophils in 2 tumours. The mitotic count in all tumours was <3 per 10 high power fields. Hypercellular spindle cell aggregates, atypical mitoses or necrosis were not seen. The spindle cells demonstrated variable immunopositivity with the calponin, anti-smooth muscle actin (Fig. 3B), muscle-specific actin, desmin (Fig. 3C), AE1/AE3, p53, Ki67 and ALK-1 antibodies (Fig. 3D) (Table I). EBER studies were negative in all I-IMFTs.
IMFT, a rare neoplasm of intermediate malignant potential that was originally described in the lungs, (2) is typified by a myofibroblastic and mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate. (2,12,13) Disagreement and uncertainty about the histogenesis of IMFTs has resulted in a number of synonyms that include plasma cell granuloma, plasma cell pseudo-tumour, inflammatory myofibrohistiocytic proliferation, omental-mesenteric myxoid hamartoma and, most commonly, inflammatory pseudo-tumour (IPT). (6,14) While IPT (the original term) encompassed the cellular phenotypic spectrum, including spindle cells, plasma cells, leucocytes and occasional histiocytes, the term 'plasma cell granuloma' was coined to highlight the prominent intratumoral plasmacytic component. (14) The recognition of the myofibroblast as the principal spindle cell type in this tumour resulted in the term 'inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour' being coined in 1990. (15) However, 'inflammatory fibrosarcoma' was proposed in 1991 to describe the presence of cytologically atypical spindle cells and a more aggressive clinical course. (5,16) Despite the controversy over the terminology, definition and criteria used for the diagnosis of IMFT and inflammatory fibrosarcoma, (6,16) there is growing consensus that they are an interrelated myofibroblastic continuum, typified by a spectrum of histomorphological features and potentially aggressive behaviour and shared clinicopathological features. (2,5,12,14,16-20)
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 3 OMITTED]
The aetiology of I-IMFTs is poorly understood. While some authors propose a neoplastic origin, others believe that it is an immunological response to an infectious (11) or inflammatory process, especially since IMFTs may be seen following abdominal surgery and trauma. (12-14,18,21) While the IMFT in patient 5 was identified at laparotomy for post-traumatic purposes, none of the patients in the present study had a past history of abdominal trauma or surgery. Ancillary histopathological investigations did not demonstrate EBV or human herpes virus 8 staining. Based on the role of oncogenic viruses and cytogenetic abnormalities, including ALK gene rearrangements on chromosome 2p23, clonal chromosome abnormalities and DNA aneuploidy, (7) recent literature favours a neoplastic origin for IMFTs. (1,7,17,20,22,23) Over-expression of interleukin-6 and cyclin D1 has also been described. (10,22) While ALK gene re-arrangements studies were not undertaken, the present study demonstrated ALK-immunopositivity in all tumours, favouring a neoplastic origin.
While most documented I-IMFTs have been in the small intestine, some have in fact been found on closer examination to be located in the mesentery. (2,11,18,24) Two index I-IMFTs in this small series that demonstrated dominant serosal and mesenteric growth were found to have significant submucosal and muscularis propria bowel wall extension.
The clinical presentation of I-IMFT depends on the region affected. (11,12,18) The onset of the disease may be rapid or insidious. (11) Patients with intra-abdominal tumours may present with an abdominal mass, abdominal pain, vomiting, constipation and bowel obstruction. Children with I-IMFT present with diarrhoea and intestinal obstruction. (11) Systemic features, present in 15-30% of symptomatic patients, include fever, weight loss, malaise and night sweats. (22) Four patients in the present study were symptomatic, with abdominal pain and change in bowel habits being the most common presenting symptoms. Although speculative, the lack of symptoms in the fifth patient may be a function of the smaller size and the predominant serosal-based growth. Because I-IMFT was a cause of chronic obstruction in one child and of acute obstruction owing to intussusception in one adult in the present study, these tumours should be considered, albeit rarely, as a cause of intestinal obstruction.
As documented in the literature, there were no specific or characteristic clinical, haematological or biochemical features that could differentiate I-IMFTs from other spindle cell neoplasms. (13,18) Laboratory abnormalities associated with IMFT include hypochromic microcytic anaemia which is usually unresponsive to iron supplementation, thrombocytosis, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia, which may resolve after excision of the tumour. (5,12,24) Although not specific to IMFT, these laboratory findings may be used as early indicators of tumour recurrence. (10) While the available radiological investigations confirmed obstructive features and the presence of intraabdominal mass lesions, neither the origin nor the extent of bowel wall involvement could be confirmed on imaging studies, emphasising the global view that I-IMFTs are not a radiographically distinct entity. (10,18) In contrast, the confirmation of ALK protein or ALK gene re-arrangements is useful in distinguishing I-IMFT from other spindle cell neoplastic mimickers that include mainly gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST), inflammatory leiomyosarcoma and paediatric congenital/infantile fibrosarcoma. In contrast to IMFTs, GISTs demonstrate CD117 and CD34 immunopositivity. (25) Inflammatory leiomyosarcoma contains fascicles of spindle cells with a dominant smooth muscle immunophenotype whereas the presence of long sweeping fascicles and a 'herringbone' appearance distinguish I-IMFTs from congenital/infantile fibrosarcomas. (26)
While surgery with complete excision is the mainstay of treatment, there are no distinctive clinical, histopathological or molecular markers of recurrence or metastasis. (1,5,8,9,27) Regression following steroid or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and infliximab has been documented, (19) but the benefit of adjunctive radiotherapy or chemotherapy is unproven. (7,10,11,17,24) Intra-abdominal--specifically intestinal--IMFTs have a propensity for more aggressive clinical behaviour than the extra abdominal lesions. (5) Recurrences appear to be more frequent in extrapulmonary, and especially abdominal, lesions (6,10) that are larger than 8 cm and are locally invasive. (2,12) While most tumours recur within a year of the initial surgery, (18,21) recurrence has been reported 9 years after incomplete resection of the primary tumour. (10) When recurrences occur, complete resection of the recurrences is recommended although spontaneous regression has been reported. (10,12) The occurrence of multiple IMFTs--a rare phenomenon--is purported to be a function of multifocality rather than metastatic spread. (28)
Despite the relatively limited follow-up period of the index patients to date, the lack of recurrences or metastases to date--even of IMFTs with diameters of 14 and 20 cm--strengthens the view that adequate surgical excision is the gold standard in the management of I-IMFTs. The proposed pathological predictors of unfavourable biological behaviour, lacking in the present study, include round cell transformation, a hypercellular proliferative pattern, cellular atypia/nuclear pleomorphism, ganglion-like cell predominance, aneuploidy and p53 over-expression. (12,17,18,21) Furthermore, a low mitotic rate, Ki67 proliferation index and p53 expression were evident in all tumours, congruent with the favourable outcome of the present study. It has been suggested that ALK immunopositivity, noted more frequently in younger patients, may profile tumours with a banal outcome. (7,29) The presence of ALK1 immunopositivity in all I-IMFTs, including those from older patients in the present study, lends credence to this view.
In conclusion: I-IMFT is typified by a spectrum of gross and microscopic features, the key features of which include myofibroblastic proliferation and variable inflammation. Complete surgical excision is the mainstay of treatment. The prognosis is generally good, with only rare reports of malignant transformation, recurrence or distant metastases. Follow-up with long-term clinical and radiological review with serial ESR estimation is advised to ensure early detection of recurrence or metastases.
Acknowledgements. We thank Mrs M Moodley for literature retrieval, manuscript typing and formatting, and Messrs D Sookhdeo and C Sydney for laboratory work and data management.
(1.) Karnak I, Senocak ME, Ciftci AO, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour in children: Diagnosis and treatment. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:908-912.
(2.) Coffin CM, Dehner Lp, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour, inflammatory fibrosarcoma and related lesions: A historical review with differential diagnostic considerations. Sem Diag Pathol 1998;15:102-110.
(3.) Coffin CM, Fletcher JA. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour. In: Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, eds. Pathology and Genetics of Soft Tissue and Bone. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002:91-93.
(4.) Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:509-520.
(5.) DiFiore JW, Goldblum JR. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the small intestine. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:502-506.
(6.) Makhlouf HR, Sobin LH. Inflammatory Myofibroblastic tumours (inflammatory pseudotumour) of the gastrointestinal tract: How closely are they related to inflammatory fibroid polyps. Hum Pathol 2002;33:307-315.
(7.) Milne ANA, Sweeney KJ, O'Riodain DS, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour with ALK/TPM3 fusion presenting as ileocolic intussusception: An usual presentation of an unusual neoplasm. Hum Pathol 2006;37:112-116.
(8.) Park S-H, Kim J-H, Min BW, et al. Exophytic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the stomach in an adult woman: a rare cause of hemoperitoneum. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:136-139.
(9.) Pratap A, Tiwari A, Agarwal B, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the abdominal wall simulating rhabdomyosarcoma: report of a case. Surg Today 2007;37:352-355.
(10.) Bajaj P, Harris L, Vermillion JM, et al. An uncommon presentation of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour. Hosp Physician 2007;43:27-30.
(11.) Demirkan NC, Akalin T, Yilmaz F, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the small bowel in childhood: Report of a case and a review of the literature. Pathol Int 2001;51:47-49.
(12.) Sanders BM, West KW. Inflammatory pseudotumour of the alimentary tract: Clinical and surgical experience. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:169-173.
(13.) Ciftci AO, Caglar M, Tanyel FC, et al. Diagnostic aids in inflammatory pseudotumour of the liver. Pediatr Surg Int 1995;10:161-164.
(14.) Apa H, Diniz G, Saritas T, et al. Abdominal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour: review of literature by means of case report. Turk J Cancer 2002;32:28-31.
(15.) Pettinato G, Manivel JC, De Rosa N, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (plasma cell granuloma). Clinicopathologic study of 20 cases with immunohistochemical and ultrastructural observations. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;94:538-546.
(16.) Meis-Kindblom JM, Kjellstrom C, Kindblom LG, et al. Inflammatory fibrosarcoma: Update, reappraisal and perspective on its place in the spectrum of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours. Sem Diag Pathol 1998;15:133-143.
(17.) Atilli SVS, Chandra CR, Hemant D, et al. Retroperitoneal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour--a case report. World J Surg Oncol 2005;3:66.
(18.) Ciftci AO, Akcoren Z, Tanyel FC, et al. Inflammatory pseudotumour causing intestinal obstruction: Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1843 1845.
(19.) Germanidis G, Xanthakis I, Tsitouridis I, et al. Regression of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the gastrointestinal tract under infliximab treatment. Dig Dis Sci 2005;50:262-265.
(20.) Pungpapong S, Geiger XJ, Raimondo M. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour presenting as a pancreatic mass: A case report and reiew of literature. J Pancreas 2004;5:360-367.
(21.) Souid AK, Ziemba MC, Dubansky AS, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour in children. Cancer 1993;72:2042-2043.
(22.) Khoddami M, Sanae S, Nikkhoo B, et al. Rectal and appendiceal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours. Arch Iran Med 2006;9:277-281.
(23.) Tsuzuki T, Magi-Galluzzi C, Epstein JL. ALK-1 expression in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:1609-1614.
(24.) Bonnet JP, Basset T, Dijoux D. Abdominal Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour in children: Report of an appendiceal case and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:1311-1314.
(25.) Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Sarlomo-Rikala M. Immunohistochemical spectrum of GISTs at different sites and their differential diagnosis with CD117 (KIT). Modern Pathol 2000;13:1134-1142.
(26.) Shima Y, Ikegami E, Migita M, et al. Congenital fibrosarcoma of the jejunum in a premature infant with meconium peritonitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2003;13:134-136.
(27.) Yousem. S.A., Shaw H, Cieply K. Involvement of 2p53 in pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumors. Hum Pathol 2001;32:428-433.
(28.) 28. Coffin CM, Watterson J, Priest JR, et al. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (inflammatory psuedotumour): A clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 84 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1995;19:859-872.
(29.) Fletcher CDM. Soft Tissue Tumours. In: Fletcher CDM, ed. Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumours. Philadelphia, USA: Churchill Livingstone, 2007:1527-1592.
S. NTLOKO, M.B. CH.B.
A. GOUNDEN, M.B. CH.B., F.C.S. (S.A.)
M. NAIDOO, F.C.S. (S.A.)
T. E. MADIBA, M.B. CH.B., M.MED., PH.D., F.C.S. (S.A.), F.A.S.C.R.S.
Department of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
Y. SING, F.C.PATH. (ANAT.) S.A.
P. K. RAMDIAL, F.C.PATH. (ANAT.) S.A.
Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of KwaZulu-Natal
G. P. HADLEY, M.B. CH.B., F.R.C.S., F.C.S. (S.A.)
Department of Paediatric Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal
TABLE I. IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL FEATURES OF IMFTS No. Antibody Clone Source Dilution Control 1 MSA HHF35 S1 1:1000 Myometrium 2 SMA 1A4 S1 1:1500 Myometrium 3 Calponin CALP S1 1:200 Myometrium 4 Desmin D33 S1 1:1000 Myometrium 5 Myogenin F5D S1 1:100 Rhabdomyosarcoma 7 ALK1 ALK1 S1 1:300 Anaplastic lymphoma 8 AE1/AE3 AE1/AE3 S1 1:100 Skin: epidermis 9 CD34 QBEND10 S1 1:25 Skin: Blood vessels 10 S100 polyclonal S1 1:1000 Skin: Nerves 11 CD117 C--KIT S1 1:500 Gastric stromal tumour 12 HHV8 13B10 S2 1:40 Kaposi's sarcoma 13 p53 DO7 S1 1:100 Nodal lymphocytes 14 Ki67 MIB1 S1 1:40 Nodal lymphocytes Result No. Antibody P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 1 MSA 1+ 2+ 1+ 3+ 1+ 2 SMA 2+ 2+ 2+ 3+ 2+ 3 Calponin 2+ 2+ 2+ 3+ 2+ 4 Desmin 1+ 1+ 1+ 3+ 1+ 5 Myogenin -- -- -- -- -- 7 ALK1 1+ 1+ 2+ 1+ 1+ 8 AE1/AE3 1+ 1+ -- 1+ -- 9 CD34 -- -- -- -- -- 10 S100 -- -- -- -- -- 11 CD117 -- -- -- -- -- 12 HHV8 -- -- -- -- -- 13 p53 1+ 2+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 14 Ki67 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ P = patient; MSA = muscle--specific actin; SMA = anti--smooth muscle actin; S1 = Dakopatts, Carpinteria, Denmark; S2 = Novocastra, Newcastle--upon--Tyne, UK; S3 = Signet Pathology Systems, Inc, Dedham, MA; Immunohistochemical scoring: 1 + = 6-25% immunopositivity; 2 + = 26-50% immunopositivity; 3+ = 51-75% immuno-positivity; 4+ = > 75% immunopositivity. TABLE II. SUMMARY OF CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS Clinical P Age Gender Presentation Outcome 1 13 y Male Fever, LOW, lethargy: 18 m Well: 3 y 2 2 y Female Constipation:1m; AD: 2 w Well: 1 y 3 34 y Female Right iliac fossa pain: 1 w LTFU 4 49 y Male Acute abdominal pain, V, D Well: 6 m 5 3 y Male Laparotomy for trauma Well: 18 m Pathological P Site Size (cm) Appearance 1 Jejunum 14x9x6 Firm multinodular 2 Ileum 2 cm stricture Ulcero-nodular, firm 3 Caecum 20x15x18 Nodular, soft, myxoid 4 Ileum 3x2, 5x3 Polyp, firm, myxoid (f) 5 AC 1.5x1 x 0.5 Polyp, firm, myxoid (f) Pathological P Bowel involvement 1 SM, MP, serosa, * mesentery 2 * M, * SM, MP, 3 * SM, * MP, serosa 4 * M, * SM, MP 5 SM, * MP, * serosa P = patient number; M = mucosa; SM = submucosa; MP = muscularis propria; * = dominant tumor site; f = focally; m = month/s; y = year/ s; w = week/s; AC = ascending colon; V = vomiting; D = diarrhoea; LOW = loss of weight; AD = abdominal distension; LTFU = lost to follow/ up; cm = centimetre /s.
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|