onto-ethical question of care for the intra- and inter-acting
   generations is not asked often enough in technoculture,
   especially not about its own progenitors and offspring. The
   question is not found in the false opposition of nature and
   technology. Rather what matters is who and what lives and dies,
   where, when and how? What is the heritage for which
   technocultural beings are both accountable and indebted? (6)

in installation it is the body in its entirety which is asked to
   participate through its sensations, through vision obviously, but
   also hearing, touch, on occasions smell. As if these artists, in
   the place of an 'object' sought to place us in a space at
the
   limits of the sacred, and asked us not to contemplate images but to
   communicate with beings. (7)

in the post-partum document, I am trying to show the reciprocity of
   the process of socialization in the first few years of life. It is
   not only the infant whose future personality that is formed at this
   crucial moment, but also the mother whose 'feminine
psychology' is
   sealed by the sexual division of labour in childcare. (9)

questions and thoughts I have about the body/my body/other
   bodies and life within the context of contemporary science,
   biotechnologies ... move between materiality and metaphor;
   investigating productions of knowledges, meaning and
   engagement within a terrain of fleshy semantics, and a poetic
   corporeality, resonating with Donna Haraway's ideas of a
   sacramental consciousness. (27)

allows for an audience engagement that is singular, individual and
   potentially intimate. The [sic] is an incredible tenderness that I
   would like to bring to this work that can be more facilitated by
   the situation being framed and constructed as private and
   particular. Bodies touching, breathing, simply being in this
   altogether out of the ordinary event. (29)