Intake of sweet drinks and sweet treats versus reported and observed caries experience.
Aim: This was to study the intakes of sweet drinks and sweet treats
of children and their caries risk using the Paediatric Risk Assessment
Tool (PRAT, 2003) and Caries-risk Assessment Tool (CAT, 2007-8). STUDY
DESIGN: Parents of 266 healthy primary school children completed the
PRAT questionnaire during their child's dental appointment at the
Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne, Australia, describing their fluid
and sweet treat intakes in the past 24 hours, oral hygiene practices and
past caries. A subgroup (n = 100) was examined clinically (CAT) for
caries requiring restoration, visible plaque, gingivitis, orthodontic
appliances, enamel defects, and use of dental care. RESULTS: The
estimated mean daily fluid intake was 1.5 [+ or -] 0.5L; fluids were
consumed 3-5/ day by 57% of children and 78% usually had evening/night
drinks. Fluids consumed were: tap water by 90%, milk by 74%, juice by
50%, regular soft drink by 30%; sweet treats were consumed by 62% and
confectionery by 25%. Most children (69%) brushed their teeth >2/day;
5% flossed daily. Parentally-reported caries was associated
significantly with increasing treats frequency (p = 0.006). In the
subgroup, 81% were at high caries risk; 47% had irregular dental care;
21% had sweet drinks/foods frequently between meals; 49% had visible
plaque/gingivitis, and 34% had enamel demineralisation. Caries observed
in the past 12 months was associated significantly with evening sweet
drinks (p = 0.004), and suboptimal fluoride exposure (p = 0.009). Caries
observed in the past 24 months was associated significantly with treats
frequency (p = 0.006), intake of sweet drinks plus treats (p = 0.000),
enamel demineralisation (p = 0.000) and irregular dental care (p =
0.000). CONCLUSIONS: The PRAT and CAT are valuable tools in assessing
children's caries risk. The risk of caries from frequent intake of
sweet drinks, either alone or in addition to sweet treats, must be
emphasised to parents. All parents, and particularly those of children
assessed at high risk from intakes of sweet drinks and sweet treats,
suboptimal fluoride exposure, or enamel demineralisation, must be
encouraged to obtain regular dental care for their children.
Key words: Sweet drinks, sweet treats, reported caries, observed caries
Dental caries (Risk factors)
Dental caries (Research)
Dental caries (Care and treatment)
Carbonated beverages (Health aspects)
Carbonated beverages (Research)
|Publication:||Name: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Publisher: European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2010 European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry ISSN: 1818-6300|
|Issue:||Date: Feb, 2010 Source Volume: 11 Source Issue: 1|
|Topic:||Event Code: 310 Science & research|
|Product:||Product Code: E121920 Children; 2086000 Canned & Bottled Soft Drinks NAICS Code: 312111 Soft Drink Manufacturing SIC Code: 2086 Bottled and canned soft drinks|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: Australia Geographic Code: 8AUST Australia|
An increase in dental caries in young children in Australia was reported recently by the School Dental Service (SDS). Since SDS data collection commenced in 1977, decreasing dmft/DMFT scores and improved dental health of Australian children had been attributed to the introduction of community water fluoridation [AIHW, 1998]. However, increasing caries experience of 6 yr-old and 12 yr-old children has been reported from the mid to late 1990's by the SDS [Armfield and Spencer, 2008]. In the most recent Australian child dental health survey conducted in 2002 and reported in 2007, 47.4% of 6 yr-olds had experienced caries in the primary dentition; the mean dmft was 1.96 (SD: 3.01), and the 10% of children with the greatest caries experience had more than nine cariously-affected teeth [Armfield et al., 2007]. For 12 yr-olds, over 40% had experienced caries in their permanent teeth; the mean DMFT was 1.02 (SD: 1.73) and the 10% of children with the greatest caries experience had nearly five cariously-affected teeth, exceeding the national average by almost five and a half-fold [Armfield et al., 2007]. Children living in low-fluoride areas had poorer dental health than those living in optimally-fluoridated areas, regardless of socioeconomic disadvantage [Armfield et al., 2007].
Speculation on the caries increase has focussed on fluid intakes, noting that societal changes such as expanding urbanisation and ready access to sweet drinks and fast and processed foods, have altered children's diets in Australia and elsewhere [Sivaneswaran and Barnard, 1993; Ismail et al., 1997; Shenkin et al., 2003]. International reports indicate a common trend of increasing consumption of soft drinks by children. In 2000, the most frequently-reported form of added sugars in the USA diet was regular soft drink, accounting for one third of dietary sugar intake [Touger-Decker and van Louveren, 2003]. In the UK, soft drink intake in 11-12 yr-old children increased in the last 20 years [Tahmassebi et al., 2006; Rugg-Gunn et al., 2007]. A similar shift in fluid consumption towards sweet drinks may be occurring in Australia [NHMRC, 2008], and concerns over increasing childhood obesity in Australian children has led to the restriction of sales of sweet drinks in public schools [Sanigorski et al., 2006; Tam et al., 2006].
The intake of dairy products by Australian children appears to be decreasing. In 1998, the National Nutrition Survey (conducted in 1995) reported a low intake of dairy products in children, with about 30% of 2-18 yr-olds consuming less than one serving of dairy product daily, and a mean milk intake for 4-7 yr-olds of 0.38L and 0.39L for 8-11 yr-olds [ABS, 1999]. The Australian dietary guidelines recommend 2-3 servings/day of dairy products including milk for 4-11 yr-olds, and 3-5 serves/day for adolescents [NHMRC, 2008]. Due to the low milk intake, studies reporting increased intake of sweet drinks, without displacing milk, may reflect displacement of other fluids such as water, rather than the small volume of milk currently consumed.
A high consumption of non-milk extrinsic sugars is a risk for caries development [Sheiham, 2001]. A cross-sectional survey of 1,681 primary school-aged children in Victoria, Australia, reported one third were drinking water and another third were consuming juice or cordial while at school [Sanigorski et al., 2005]. The high consumption of sweet drinks and low intake of dairy products amongst Australian children may be contributing to the recent caries increases.
Responding to apparent increases in soft drink intake and decreases in dairy consumption by USA children, a Paediatric Risk Assessment Tool (PRAT) was devised [Shenkin et al., 2003]. The PRAT questionnaire is completed by carers, recording fluid intake in the past 24 hours and the number of drinks per day, especially after the evening meal and during the night. Meal-time foods are not examined, but carbohydrate intake between meals (confectionery, baked starches), fluoride exposure, oral hygiene practices and past caries experience are noted. The PRAT does not include a clinical examination.
Caries risk assessment is the standard of care in modern paediatric dentistry [Fontana and Zero, 2006; Trueblood et al., 2008], defining a child's risk for developing caries at a given time; it should be reconsidered periodically throughout life [Selwitz et al., 2007]. Recently, a Caries-risk Assessment Tool (CAT) was developed by the American Academy of Paediatric Dentistry [AAPD, 2007-08]. The CAT records a child's use of dental care, past caries, orthodontic appliances, diet cariogenicity, fluoride exposure, oral hygiene habits and the carer's socio-economic status. A clinical examination records visible plaque, gingivitis, and enamel defects (demineralisation, hypoplasia, molar-incisor hypomineralisation). Allowing utilisation of the CAT by other professionals, dental equipment and diagnostic tools (e.g., periodontal probe, radiographs, salivary or microbial tests) are not used, but dentists can add these in as a supplemental assessment. Caries risk is classified as high, moderate or low.
Using the PRAT and the CAT, this study examined intake of fluids and sweet treats, oral hygiene habits, reported caries and observed caries of as a convenience sample of primary school-aged children attending a public dental hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Approval and Selection of Subjects. The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of The University of Melbourne and the Department of Human Services Victoria, Australia. Children were selected from those attending the Paediatric Dentistry Clinic, Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne (RDHM), for preventive and restorative treatment between April 2007 and June 2008. All parents gave written informed consent for their child's participation. Individuals receiving care at the RDHM hold a means-tested health care card or pension card. The two inclusion criteria were: (a) healthy child (ASA I or II), (b) living in and attending school in metropolitan Melbourne.
A convenience sample (253 parents of 290 children) was invited to participate; 24 parents declined (due to lack of time or uncertainty of their child's diet); the remaining 229 parents (of 266 children) completed usable PRAT questionnaires free of uncertain responses. Clinical examinations (CAT) were conducted also for 100 of these children.
The PRAT Questionnaire. A preliminary questionnaire was trailed with 5 parents of 7-12 yr-old children during their child's appointment (these children were not included in the study). Their comments were included in the final questionnaire1 which was completed for each child by their parent during their appointment. One author (JL) answered queries and ensured completion of all questionnaire fields. Fluid and sweet treat intakes between meals were recorded for the previous 24 hours; parents indicated if these were typical. Questionnaires and consents were stored separately to preserve anonymity.
The CAT Examination. Subjects were categorised for 11 caries risk factors as follows:
* Use of a 'dental home': Low risk: regular attendance in an established 'dental home'; moderate risk: irregular attendance; high risk: no usual source of care.
* Time elapsed since the last diagnosis or treatment of caries: Low risk: greater than 24 months; moderate risk: between 12-24 months ago and caries free in past 12 months; high risk: within the past 12 months.
* Current orthodontic appliance: Low risk: none worn; high risk: appliance worn.
* Daily between-meal exposures to simple sugars or foods strongly associated with caries initiation: Low risk: consumption primarily at meal times; moderate risk: occasional (1-2/day) exposures; high risk: frequent (3 or more/ day) exposures.
* Fluoride exposure: Low risk: age-appropriate fluoride toothpaste used at least twice daily and fluoridated water consumed (i.e., optimal topical and systemic fluoride exposure); moderate risk: age-appropriate fluoride toothpaste used at least twice daily and fluoridated water not usually consumed (i.e., optimal topical but suboptimal systemic fluoride exposure); high risk: fluoride toothpaste of inadequate strength for chronologic age and fluoridated water not usually consumed (i.e., suboptimal topical and systemic fluoride exposure).
* Times per day teeth are brushed: Low risk: brushes twice or more; moderate risk: brushes once; high risk: brushes less than once.
* Visible plaque on anterior teeth: Low risk: none; high risk: present.
* Gingivitis on anterior teeth: Low risk: none; high risk: present.
* Enamel demineralisation: Low risk: none; moderate risk: one demineralised area present; high risk: more than one demineralised area present.
* Enamel hypoplasia: Low risk: none; high risk; present.
* Molar-incisor hypomineralisation: Low risk: none; high risk: present.
Use of Dental Care. Dental care use was determined from patient records. The RDHM recall guidelines are between 6 and 24 months, depending on the child's history, and are typically 12 months. Attendance at the child's recommended intervals was denoted 'regular use of dental care in an established dental home'; attendance at greater intervals was denoted 'irregular use of dental care'; sporadic attendance was noted as 'no usual source of dental care'.
Caries Histories. Patient records were reviewed for caries histories and available radiographs were examined for caries requiring restoration (radiographs were not taken for the purpose of this study). Fissure sealants were assumed to have been placed on non-carious pits and fissures. Past caries was diagnosed by noting restorations and treatment dates, categorising the child as follows:
* 'Carious teeth in past 12 months': Caries present at this examination, or caries diagnosed/restored within the past 12 months.
* 'Carious teeth in past 12-24 months': Caries diagnosed/ restored between 12 and 24 months ago, but caries-free for the past 12 months.
* 'No carious teeth in past 24 months': No caries diagnosed/ restored in the past 24 months and caries-free at this examination.
Available bitewing radiographs (n = 26 subjects) were read blindly by the examiner (JL) on two occasions to determine intra-examiner reliability for caries diagnosis.
A mirror and explorer examination was conducted by one author (JL) using a dental light and triplex syringe. Carious teeth requiring restoration were diagnosed by WHO criteria [WHO, 1997], using an explorer instead of a CPI probe if diagnosis needed light tactile sensation. Caries was diagnosed if visible dentinal cavitation was present or radiographs showed dentinal caries, and recorded as 'carious teeth in past 12 months'. No further classification of individual teeth or tooth surfaces was undertaken.
Cariogenic Exposures. The child's intake of cariogenic drinks and foods in the past 24 hours was assessed from the PRAT responses. The number of cariogenic exposures was estimated; each glass of sweet drink was counted as one exposure and this number was added to the number of reported occasions of confectionery, cakes, biscuits and sugar-containing gum. Subjects were classified as follows:
* Consumption of simple sugars or foods strongly associated with caries initiation primarily at mealtimes: Subjects with 0-2 total exposures.
* Occasional between-meal exposures to simple sugars or foods strongly associated with caries: Subjects with 3-4 total exposures.
* Frequent between meal exposures to simple sugars or foods strongly associated with caries: Subjects with 5 or more total exposures.
Fluoride Exposure. The child's fluoride exposure was assessed from PRAT questions on use of fluoride toothpaste and fluoridated water. Current Australian guidelines deem use of non- or low-fluoride toothpaste in fluoridated areas by children aged over 6 years as suboptimal [ARCPOH, 2006]. The guidelines recommend 'for people aged 6 years or more, the teeth should be cleaned twice a day or more with standard fluoride toothpaste (1mgF/g)'; subjects brushing less than twice daily or using toothpaste without an age-appropriate fluoride concentration were recorded as 'suboptimal topical fluoride exposure', regardless of their intake of fluoridated water. The guidelines for optimum fluoride use in children aged 6 years and above include consumption of fluoridated water. Subjects meeting both criteria were recorded as receiving 'optimal systemic and topical fluoride exposure'. Subjects under 6 years of age consuming fluoridated water and brushing twice daily with 400-500 ppmF toothpaste were recorded as receiving 'optimal systemic and topical fluoride exposure'.
Oral Hygiene and Gingival Health. Visible plaque and gingivitis on anterior teeth were assessed by the Modified Plaque (MPI) and Gingival Inflammation (GII) Indices [Loe and Silness, 1963; Silness and Loe, 1964]. An MPI score of 2 or 3 was denoted 'visible plaque'; bleeding on probing was not recorded. For subjects with an MPI of 0 or 1, the GII was also used. A GII score of 1, 2 or 3 was recorded as 'gingivitis present'. An MPI of 0 or 1 and GII of 0 were recorded as 'no visible plaque or gingivitis'.
Enamel Demineralisation and Developmental Defects of Enamel. Air-dried teeth were inspected visually for enamel demineralisation using ICDAS II codes [Ismail et al., 2007], recording chalky opaque, white-brown lesions diagnosed in clinically-appropriate locations (ICDAS II codes 1, 2 or 3). Enamel hypoplasia was noted for non-carious enamel defects of reduced enamel thickness such as pitting [Winter and Brook, 1975]. For molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH), permanent first molars and incisors were examined for white-brown opaque demarcated opacities, post-eruptive breakdown, and atypical restorations in the cuspal/incisal coronal one third [Weerheijm et al., 2003].
Caries Risk. Caries risk was determined from the 11 risk factors, assessing risk based on the highest category assigned to any factor. One factor scored as high risk constituted high caries risk', regardless of status of other factors [AAPD, 2007-08]. For example, a child scored high risk for visible plaque, but low risk for all other factors, was classified as 'high caries risk' based solely on this risk factor. Subjects at 'moderate caries risk' had one or more factors scored as moderate with the remainder at low risk and none at high risk. A child scored at low risk for all factors was classified as 'low caries risk'.
Data Management and Statistical Analysis. Observed caries categories were collapsed and compared as follows: 'no carious teeth in past 12 months' (subjects with no observed caries in the past 12-24 months + those with no observed caries in past 24 months) were compared with 'carious teeth in past 12 months' (subjects with caries observed currently or within the past 12 months); 'no carious teeth in past 24 months' (subjects with no observed caries in the past 12 months + those with no observed caries in the past 12-24 months) were compared with 'carious teeth in past 24 months' (subjects with observed current caries + those with observed caries in the past 12 months + those with observed caries in the past 12-24 months).
Data were entered into Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft Corp., Seattle, WA, USA) and analysed using the SPSS Graduate Pack 16.0 for Windows[R] (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The intra-examiner reliability (weighted Cohen Kappa coefficient) was 1.0. Descriptive statistics were prepared for independent and dependent variables; categorical data were examined using Pearson Chi-squared tests. Noting the potential for inflating Type II errors (possibility of accepting a null hypothesis when the alternative hypothesis was true) in clinical data, Bonferroni adjustment of the p value for multiple comparisons was not applied [Perneger, 1998] and alpha was set conservatively at 0.01. A multiple risk factor model was constructed using odds ratios for caries risk factors (binary logistic regression), and backward logistical regression using Chi-squared tests (p = 0.1). Multi-variable modelling of independent variables (caries risk factors) was performed (backward elimination) until remaining variables were significant at p = 0.05.
Distribution of Sample and Parental Report of Past Caries. The sample of 266 children (136 males, 130 females) completing the PRAT were aged 56-152 months (mean: 110[+ or -]23 months; Table 1). The subgroup (50 males, 50 females) also examined clinically (CAT) were aged 56-152 months (109[+ or -]25). Most children (91%) were aged 72-143 months (6-12 years). Caries in the past 12 months was reported for 37.2% of the sample (subgroup: 36.0%); 29.7% (subgroup: 34%) reported no caries experience. A few parents (sample: 5.6%; subgroup: 6.0%) were unsure of their child's past caries. The subgroup appeared representative of the sample for age, gender and past caries.
Oral Hygiene Habits. In the sample, 30.8% (82/266) of subjects (subgroup: 18.0%), brushed less than twice daily (Table 1). Most subjects (80.8%; subgroup: 82.9%) did not floss; daily flossing was rare (5.3%; 5.9%). All subjects used toothpaste, citing Colgate[TM] (Colgate Palmolive Pty Ltd., Sydney, Australia) products most frequently (sample: 88.3%; subgroup: 92%), in either child (400-500 ppmF) or adult strengths (1,000 ppmF). Some children used toothpastes of inappropriate fluoride concentration; among 4-7 yr-olds, adult strength (1,00 0ppmF) toothpaste was used inappropriately by 16.5%, and 13.2% of 8-12 yr-olds used child strength (400-500 ppmF) toothpaste (not tabulated).
Fluid Consumption. Most children reported drinking 3-5 times/day, and over one third reported [greater than or equal to] 6 occasions (Table 2). Most children (78.6%; 209/266) reported drinking fluids in the evening and/or night and for 86.1% (subgroup: 88.7%) these drinks included water. Of note, 35.9% (75/209) of children (subgroup: 35.2%, 25/71) reported drinking juices, cordials or soft drinks in the evening/night. Drinks without added sugars were consumed in the evening/night by 64.1% (subgroup: 64.8%). Of drinks consumed in the past 24 hours, tap water was the most popular, consumed by 90.2% (subgroup: 92%; Table 2). Few children (8.6%) reported drinking bottled, rain or mineral water. While 55.6% of the sample (subgroup: 52.0%) drank plain milk, 26.0% (subgroup: 25%) had not drunk milk in the past 24 hours. Almost half the sample (subgroup: 48.0%) drank juice, and 19.0% had drunk cordial. The intake of diet soft drink was lower than for regular soft drink (sample: 5.6% vs 30.5%).
Parental estimates of fluid consumed (number of glasses) in the past 24 hours are not tabulated. Milk consumption was low: less than one glass was consumed by 30.1% of the sample (subgroup: 28%), and two or more glasses were consumed by 31.1% (subgroup: 37%). Over half a glass of juice was consumed by 37.6% (subgroup: 43%). The intake of cordial was less frequent than juice: 18% had consumed over half a glass and 80% had not drunk cordial. More than half a glass of regular soft drink was consumed by 23.7% (subgroup: 17%), and a similar volume of diet soft drink was consumed by 4.9% (subgroup: 7%). Sports drinks or tea were rarely consumed.
Fluid volumes drunk in the past 24 hours were calculated from parental estimates of the number of 250mL glasses consumed (Table 3). The total fluid intake range was 0.25-3.25L (mean: 1.50 [+ or -] 0.50L) for the sample (subgroup: 0.50-3.00L; 1.50 [+ or -] 0.40L). The intake range for waters was 0-2.5L (0.82 [+ or -] 0.42L), and 0-1.25L (0.30 [+ or -] 0.24L) for milks.
The reported intakes of waters, milks and sweet drinks by 40, 4-7 yr-olds and 226, 8-12 yr-olds were estimated as proportions of their total fluid intakes (Table 4). Among 4-7 yr-olds, waters were 51-100% of fluid intake for 60% of the sample (subgroup: 58.8%); milks were 26-75% of fluid intake for 42.5% (subgroup: 53%), and sweet drinks were 26-75% of fluid intake for 40% (subgroup: 47.1%). Among 8-12 yr-olds, waters were 51-100% of fluid intake for 54.9% of the sample (subgroup: 57.8%); milks were 26-75% of fluid intake for 28.3% (subgroup: 31.3%), and sweet drinks were 51-100% of fluid intake for 13.3% (subgroup: 13.2%). Parents of 87.0% of the sample (subgroup: 88%) reported that the responses for fluid consumption in the last 24 hours were typical of their child's usual intake. The subgroup appeared representative of the sample for fluid intake.
24-hour Recall of Intakes of Confectionery, Baked Starches and Chewing Gum. The range in the number of treat occasions (excluding sugar-free gum) in the past 24 hours was 0-9 (1.1 [+ or -] 1.3) for the sample (subgroup: 0-4; 0.8 [+ or -] 0.9; Table 5). No treats were consumed by 38.3% (subgroup: 49%). One or two confectionery treats were consumed by 35% (subgroup: 34%), and one or two baked treats were eaten by 36.1% (subgroup: 27%). Very few children chewed either sugared (5.6%) or sugar-free gum (11.3%). Parents of 72.9% of the sample (subgroup: 83%) considered the reported treat intake for the past 24 hours was typical of their child's usual intake.
Caries Risk Factors and Categories. About half the subgroup examined clinically had regular dental care; 47% accessed dental care irregularly (Table 6). No child was without a usual source of dental care. Patient records and clinical examinations showed 47.0% of subjects had experienced caries in the past 12 months, and 44.0% were caries-free in the past 24 months. The consumption of simple sugars or foods primarily associated with caries initiation was typically at mealtimes for 40.0% of children; occasional between-meal exposures were noted for 39.0% and frequent between-meal exposures for 21.0%. While most subjects had optimal topical and systemic fluoride exposure, for 23.0% the topical fluoride exposure was suboptimal. Visible plaque on anterior teeth was seen in 35.0% of subjects and 49% had gingivitis. Areas of enamel demineralisation were present in 34% of subjects, enamel hypoplasia in 3%, and MIH in 5%. Except for fluoride exposure, risk factors were distributed similarly for both genders.
Parental report of past caries and the observed caries for their child were compared (not tabulated) and parental underestimates were noted: no carious teeth in the past 24 months: 53% subjects reported vs. 49% observed; carious teeth in the past 12-24 months: 5% vs. 9%; carious teeth in the past 24 months: 36% vs. 47%.
Children were categorized by caries risk (Table 7). In decreasing order, factors most likely to place a child at high risk were: gingivitis (affecting 42%), time since last caries diagnosis/restoration (35%), visible plaque (29%), and enamel demineralisation (23%). The age groups were distributed similarly for caries risk: 4-7 yr-olds: 82% high, 6% moderate, 12% low; 8-12 yr-olds: 81% high, 10% moderate, 10% low. Collapsing age groups, 81% were at high risk, 9% moderate, and 10% at low risk.
Reported Past Caries, Fluid Intakes and Treats. Associations between intakes of fluids and treats in the past 24 hours and reported caries of 251 children (15 subjects were excluded due to parental uncertainty of past caries) were examined. No significant associations were seen between reported caries in the past 12 mths, or reported past caries at any time, and the variables: drinking frequency, fluids (water, milk, sweet drinks) in the evening/night, number of glasses of fluids in the past 24 hrs, fluid intakes as proportion of total fluid intake, and frequency of daily tooth brushing. The association between treats (confectionery, baked starches, sugared chewing gum) in the past 24 hrs and reported past caries at any time was statistically significant (p = 0.006), but not with caries in the past 12 mths (p = 0.244) (Table 8).)
Observed Caries, Fluid Intakes, Treats and Caries Risk Factors. Associations between intakes of fluids and treats in the past 24 hours, caries risk factors, and observed caries were examined for the subgroup. No significant associations were seen between observed caries in the past 12 months and 24 months and the following variables: drinking frequency, fluids (waters, milks, sweet drinks) in the evening/ night, number of glasses of fluids consumed in the past 24 hours, fluid intakes as proportion of total fluid intake, daily tooth brushing frequency, flossing, visible plaque/gingivitis, enamel defects, and MIH.
Statistically significant associations (Table 8) were seen between the following: sweet drinks in the evening/night and observed caries in the past 12 months (p = 0.004); treats in the past 24 hours and observed caries in both the past 12 months and 24 months (p = 0.002; p = 0.006); daily between-meal exposure to sweet drinks/foods and observed caries in the past 12 months and 24 months (p = 0.001; p = 0.000); suboptimal fluoride exposure and observed caries in the past 12 months (p = 0.009); enamel demineralisation and observed caries in the past 12 months and 24 months (p = 0.000; p = 0.000); irregular dental care and observed caries in past 12 months and 24 months (p = 0.000; p = 0.000).
Multiple logistic regression and odds ratios of observed caries in the past 12 and 24 months and independent variables. The final model for observed caries in the past 12 and 24 months showed statistically significant associations with these independent variables: in the past 12 months: increasing frequency of treats consumption in the previous day, suboptimal fluoride exposure, presence of enamel demineralisation; in the past 24 months: presence of enamel demineralisation, irregular dental visitation (Table 9).
This study examining dental caries experience and intakes of fluids and sweet treats was conducted on a convenience sample of 266 primary school children aged 4-12 years. It is acknowledged that the sample size was small but it was within the range of similar clinical studies [Blum et al., 2005; Tam et al., 2006]. Parental recall of caries experience and of dietary intakes in the past 24 hours was intrinsic to the study. This method is commonly used in epidemiological studies, to provide an indication of overall fluid and treat intakes. Assessing response reliability, parents indicated the information given was typical of their child's usual intake of fluids (for 87.0%) and treats (for 72.9%). However, a child's diet may have changed since past diagnosis/restoration of caries, and the responding parent may have been unaware of their child's caries history or diet.
The subgroup of 100 children examined clinically appeared similar to the sample population in many aspects, allowing generalizations to be made to the sample population. The subgroup appeared to be a representative subset of the sample with respect to age and gender distribution; frequency and pattern of fluid intake; types, volumes and distributions of fluids consumed; distribution and frequency of treats consumed; oral hygiene practices, and distribution of parentally-reported past caries.
The original PRAT questionnaire [Shenkin et al., 2003] was modified for the present study, expanding questions on fluid intake and omitting a scoring system for caries risk which was replaced with the CAT [AAPD, 2007-08]. The CAT includes socio-economic status (SES) as a risk factor; this factor was omitted as the sample population was limited to children of low SES parents holding health-care cards allowing care at a public dental hospital. Using the other CAT risk factors, the final caries risk status was similar for subjects aged 4-7 years and those aged 8-12 years: overall, 81% were categorized as high caries risk, 9% were moderate caries risk and 10% were low risk. However, if SES were included as a risk factor, all children in the study would be considered high caries risk.
In the last 24 hours, most children had consumed tap water and milk; a few drank bottled water; half drank fruit juice; and less than one third consumed soft drink. The mean fluid intake of 1.50 [+ or -] 0.50L was approximately 500mL higher than reported in other studies of similarly-aged children in Australia by the 1995 NNS survey [ABS, 1999] and others [Bell et al., 2005], and in the USA [Forshee and Storey, 2003]. This may reflect parental overestimation of volumes or fluid exposures, or differing approaches to estimations by researchers. Accurate measurement of fluid intake in such studies is only possible with direct observation, potentially altering intake patterns resulting in atypical observations.
The study was conducted in the fluoridated city of Melbourne. Water was the most popular drink consumed, with 90.2% of the sample drinking at least one glass of tap water in the past 24 hours. Information was not obtained on whether families filtered the reticulated water, potentially removing fluoride. The mean volume of water consumed (0.82 [+ or -] 0.42L) was higher than that reported in the 1995 NNS survey (0.54L for 4-7 yr-olds and 0.69L for 8-11 yr-olds) [ABS, 1999]. Although both studies obtained information by 24-hour recall, the difference may be due to parental misinterpretation of volumes or number of drinks. The low intake of bottled water in the past 24 hours (by 8.6% in the sample, 12% in the subgroup) suggests that these primary school children were not consuming bottled water preferentially to fluoridated tap water.
The low mean milk intake for the sample (0.30 [+ or -] 0.24L) was similar to that reported in the 1995 NNS survey (0.28L for 4-7 yr-olds and 0.28L for 8-11 yr-olds) [ABS, 1999]. The Australian Dietary Guidelines recommend consuming two to three serves of dairy product per day, where one serving is equivalent to 0.25L of milk [NHMRC, 2008]. These findings of low milk intake over the past decade support reports of declining dairy consumption in children elsewhere [Rampersaud et al., 2003; Friedman et al., 2007]. In the present study 26.0% of the sample had not drunk milk in the past 24 hours, but sweet drinks did not appear to be displacing milk intake as children who did or did not drink milk differed little in their proportional consumption of other fluids, agreeing with other reports of children in Australia [Tam et al., 2006] and the USA [Story et al., 2004].
Fruit juice was consumed in the previous 24 hours by almost half the sample population, with almost 90% drinking less than one glass. The mean juice intake of 0.13L was less than that reported by the 1995 NNS survey (0.31L for 4-7 yr-olds and 0.29L for 8-11 yr-olds) [ABS, 1999]. Juice intake per se was not associated significantly with either parentally-reported or observed caries, agreeing with the findings of a 1971-1974 USA national survey [Ismail, 1986]. Regular soft drink was consumed by 30.5% of the sample in the last 24 hours, approximating the proportion (29.7%) reported in a larger survey of children conducted in the same Australian state [Sanigorski et al., 2006]. In the present study, 76.3% of the sample had consumed less than half a glass of soft drink, with a mean intake of 0.12L. This was less than the mean intake of 0.17L calculated in the 1995 NNS survey for 7-11 yr-olds [ABS, 1999], but similar to the frequency of soft drink intake reported from a mail-in questionnaire survey of USA children [Grimm et al., 2004].
The significant association between observed caries in the past 12 months and the intake of sweet drinks at night corroborates an earlier report from a much larger study in the USA on the cariogenicity of sweet drinks in children [Ismail et al., 1984]. The latter study showed significant associations between the frequencies of intakes of sweet drinks between meals and with meals, and high DMFT scores [Ismail et al., 1984]. Parents may well be unaware of the cariogenic risk to the teeth of sweet fluids consumed overnight.
The number of treat occasions in the past 24 hours and parentally-reported past caries at any time were associated significantly. This was confirmed in the subgroup, where statistically significant associations were seen between the frequency of treat occasions in the past 24 hours and observed past caries, and between the frequency of intake of sweet drinks plus treats and observed caries. These findings support those of others [Ismail et al., 1984; Marshall et al., 2003]. Of note, these significant findings were obtained from parental recall of past caries and 24 hour dietary recall, rather than direct observation, and with caries data recorded as either parental report or as simple binary data (i.e., clinical observation of caries/restorations present or absent). These findings suggest that the two tools used, the Paediatric Risk Assessment Tool and the Caries-risk Assessment Tool, can be valuable adjuncts in both clinical practice for dentists and as survey tools.
For the purposes of the CAT, caries was defined as a lesion requiring restoration, i.e., the end stage of the lesion. Enamel demineralisation and observed caries in the past 12 months and 24 months were associated significantly, as expected, since enamel demineralisation is the earliest visible sign of caries. In comparison with caries observed in the CAT examination, parents of children in the subgroup underestimated their caries history. This is of note, as no significant associations were found between parentally-reported caries in the sample and either fluid intake or oral hygiene habits. Given the close representation of the sample by the subgroup, it is likely that parentally-reported caries was also underestimated in the sample population.
Clinical examination showed 47.0% of the subgroup had experienced caries in the past 12 months, 9.0% had experienced caries in the past 12-24 months, and 44.0% had no caries in the past 24 months. Strong associations between irregular dental care and increasing caries experience within the last 12 months and 24 months were found. These observations highlight the importance of regular dental visits to identify early disease, review caries risk and educate parents in their role in caries prevention. Similar associations between caries and lack of dental visits in the last 12 months for young children in the USA were noted by others [Dye et al., 2004].
No significant associations were seen between oral hygiene habits and parentally-reported caries, in agreement with a USA study of low income children [Kolker et al., 2007]. However, in the present study, observed caries in the subgroup in the past 12 months was associated significantly with suboptimal fluoride exposure. In the sample, 13.9% were using a lower fluoride concentration toothpaste than recommended by age, thereby receiving suboptimal fluoride exposure, and 16.7% used a higher fluoride concentration toothpaste than recommended in the Australian guidelines [ARCPOH, 2006]. Since it is not known for how long the children had been using these toothpastes, no conclusions can be drawn as to the level of caries protection afforded. The use of fluoride toothpaste of the appropriate concentration for age and caries risk should be addressed by dentists and dental auxiliaries in clinical practice to ensure children are receiving the full benefits of fluoride. Dental professionals should also consider each child's exposure to other fluoride modalities such as fluoridated water when recommending the appropriate fluoride toothpaste, in accordance with current guidelines.
This retrospective study of the intakes of fluids and sweet treats of 266 primary school children aged 4-12 years, 81% of whom were deemed to be at high caries risk, draws three conclusions:
* The PRAT and CAT are valuable tools in assessing children's caries risk.
* Noting that observed caries was associated significantly with suboptimal fluoride exposure, evening sweet drinks, frequency of treats, and frequency of sweet drinks plus sweet treats in the last 24 hours, the cariogenic risk of these intakes must be emphasised to parents.
* All parents, and particularly those of children assessed at high risk from intakes of sweet drinks and sweet treats, suboptimal fluoride exposure, or enamel demineralisation, must be encouraged to obtain regular dental care for their children.
AAPD, American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Council on Clinical Affairs. Policy on use of a caries-risk assessment tool (CAT) for infants, children and adolescents. Pediatr Dent 2007-08;29:29-33.
Armfield J, Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Water fluoridation and children's dental health: The child dental health survey. Australia 2002. Cat. No. DEN 170. Dental statistics and research series. No. 36. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2007.
Armfield J, Spencer AJ. Quarter century of change: caries experience in Australian children, 1977-2002. Aust Dent J 2008;53:151-9.
ABS, Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Nutrition Survey Nutrient Intakes and Physical Measurements Australia 1995. Canberra, AGPS, 1999.
AIHW, Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. International health--how Australia compares, AIHW Cat. No. PHE 8. Canberra: AIHW 1998.
ARCPOH, Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health. The use of fluorides in Australia. Aust Dent J 2006;61:195-9.
Bell A, Kremer PJ, Magarey AM, Swinburn BA. Contribution of 'noncore' foods and beverages to the energy intake and weight status of Australian children. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59: 639-45.
Blum J, Jacobsen D, Donnelly J. Beverage consumption patterns in elementary school aged children across a two-year period. J Am Coll Nutr 2005;24: 93-8.
Dye B, Shenkin JD, Ogden CL, et al. The relationship between healthful eating practices and dental caries in children aged 2-5 years in the United States, 1998-1994. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135: 55-66.
Fontana M, Zero DT. Assessing patients' caries risk. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1231-9.
Forshee R, Storey M. Total beverage consumption and beverage choices among children and adolescents. Int J of Food Sciences and Nutrition 2003;54:297-307.
Friedman L, Snetselaar L, Stumbo P, et al. Influence of intervention on beverage choices: trends in the Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC). J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107: 586-94.
Grimm G, Harnack L, Story M. Factors associated with soft drink consumption in school-aged children. J Am Diet Assoc 2004;104: 1244-9.
Ismail, A. Food cariogenicity in Americans aged from 9 to 29 years assessed in a national cross-sectional survey, 1971-74. J Dent Res 1986;65: 1435-40.
Ismail A, Burt BA, Eklund SA. The cariogenicity of soft drinks in the Unite States. J Amer Dent Assoc 1984;109:241-5
Ismail A, Tanzer JM, Dingle JL . Current trends of sugar consumption in developing societies. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25: 438-43.
Ismail A, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:170-8.
Kolker J, Yuan Y, Burt B, Sandretto A, Sohn W, Lang S, Ismail A. Dental caries and dietary patterns in low-income African American children. Pediatr Dent 2007;29: 457-64.
Loe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy: increased prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:533-8.
Marshall T, Levy SM, Broffitt B, et al. Dental caries and beverage consumption in young children. Pediatrics 2003;112: 184-91.
NHMRC Dietary Guidelines for Children and Adolescents in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government; 2003. Available at: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/_files/n34.pdf. Last accessed 16 July 2008.
Perneger T. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. Br Med J 1998;316:1236.
Rampersaud G, Bailey LB, Kauwell GP. National survey beverage consumption data for children and adolescents indicate the need to encourage a shift toward more nutritive beverages. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;103: 97-100.
Rugg-Gunn A, Fletcher ES, Matthews JNS, et al. Changes in consumption of sugars by English adolescents over 20 years. Public Health Nutr 2007;10: 354-63.
Sanigorski A, Bell AC, Kremer PJ, Swinburn, BA. Lunchbox contents of Australian school children: room for improvement. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:1310-16.
Sanigorski, A., Bell AC, Swinburn, BA. Association of key foods and beverages with obesity in Australian schoolchildren. Public Health Nutr 2006;10: 152-7.
Selwitz R, Ismail AI, Pitts NB. Dental caries. Lancet 2007;369:51-9. Sheiham A. Dietary effects on dental diseases. Public Health Nutr 2001;4:569-91.
Shenkin J, Heller KE, Warren JJ, Marshall TA. Soft drink consumption and caries risk in children and adolescents. Gen Dent 2003; 51: 30-6.
Silness J, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35.
Sivaneswaran A, Barnard PD. Changes in the pattern of sugar (sucrose) consumption in Australia 1958-1988. Community Dent Health 1993; 10: 353-63.
Story M, Forshee RA, Anderson PA. Associations of adequate intake of calcium with diet, beverage consumption, and demographic characteristics among children and adolescents. J Am Coll Nutr 2004; 23: 18-33.
Tam C, Garnett SP, Cowell CT, Campbell K, Baur LA. Soft drink consumption and excess weight gain in Australian school students: results from the Nepean study. Int J Obes 2006;30: 1091-3.
Tahmassebi J, Duggal MS, Malik-Kotru G, Curzon MEJ. Soft drinks and dental health: A review of the current literature. J Dent 2006; 34: 2-11.
Touger-Decker R, van Louveren C. Sugars and dental caries. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 78: 881S-892S.
Trueblood R, Kerins CA, Seale S. Caries risk assessment practices among Texas pediatric dentists. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:49-53.
Weerheijm K, Duggal M, Mejare I, et al. Judgement criteria for molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European meeting on MIH held in Athens, 2003. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;4:110-13.
Winter G, Brook AH. Enamel hypoplasia and anomalies of the enamel. Dent Clin North Am 1975;19:3-24.
World Health Organisation. Oral health surveys: Basic Methods. Geneva, World Health Organisation, 1997.
J.G. Lee, L.B. Messer Dept. Paediatric Dentistry, Melbourne Dental School, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Postal address: Emeritus Prof. L. B. Messer, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, 720 Swanston Street, Victoria 3010 Australia.
(1) A copy of the questionnaire is available from the corresponding author.
Table 1: Distribution of primary school-aged Australian children in the sample population (N = 266) and the subgroup (N = 100) by age, gender, parentally-reported past caries experience and oral hygiene habits. Distribution of children Age, past caries experience and oral hygiene habits sample subgroup (N = 266) (N = 100) n (%) n (%) Age (months) 56-95 Males 40 15 Females 39 16 Subtotal 79 (29.7) 31 (31) 96-131 Males 69 25 Females 64 22 Subtotal 133 (49.9) 47 (47) 132-152 Males 27 10 Females 27 12 Subtotal 54 (20.4) 22 (22) Total males 136 (50) 50 (50) Total females 130 (50) 50 (50) parentally- None 79 (29.7) 34 (34) reported past Over 2 years ago 66 (24.8) 19 (19) caries Between 12-24 months ago 7 (2.6) 5 (5) experience Within past 12 months 99 (37.2) 36 (36) Unsure 15 (5.6) 6 (6) Frequency of Never/rarely 7 (2.6) 1 (1.0) tooth brushing Less than once per day 6 (2.3) 4 (4.0) Once per day 69 (25.9) 13 (13.0) Twice per day 176 (66.2) 77 (77.0) More than twice per day 8 (3.0) 5 (5.0) Frequency of Never/rarely 215 (80.8) 82 (82.9) flossing Once per week 37 (13.9) 13 (13.9) Once per day 14 (5.3) 5 (5.9) Type of Child strength fluoride 68 (25.6) 26 (26.0) toothpaste used Adult strength fluoride 196 (73.7) 73 (73.0) Fluoride-free 2 (0.8) 1 (1.0) Table 2: Distribution of daily drinking frequency, pattern and drinks consumed in the evening/night and past 24 hours by the sample (W = 266) population and a subgroup (N=100) of Australian children. Distribution Daily drinking of children frequency, pattern and Sample drinks consumed (N = 266) in the evening/ n (%) night No. of drink 1-2 15 (5.6) occasions 3-5 152 (57.1) per day 6-9 82 (30.8) 10 or more 17 (6.4) Drinking pattern No drinks consumed 57 (21.4) in evening/night Drinks in evening only 162 (60.9) Drinks in night only 5 (1.9) Drinks in evening and night 42 (15.8) Drinks (a) Water (tap, rain, bottled, mineral) 180 (86.1) consumed Milk (plain, flavoured, soy) 98 (46.9) (evening/night) Juice, cordial 47 (22.5) Soft drink (regular, diet) 24 (11.5) Drinks (a) +/- Water, milk (b), unsugared tea 204 (97.6) added sugars Non-milk drinks, sugars added (c) 58 (27.8) consumed Drinks with added sugars (d) 75 (35.9) (evening/night) Drinks without added sugars (e) 134 (64.1) Drinks (a) Tap water 240 (90.2) consumed (in Bottled water 23 (8.6) past 24 hours) Rain water 7 (2.6) Mineral water 3 (1.1) Milk (plain) 148 (55.6) Milk (flavoured) 64 (24.1) Milk (soy) 3 (1.1) No milks 70 (26.0) Fruit juice 115 (43.2) Cordial 50 (18.8) Soft drink (regular) 81 (30.5) Soft drink (diet) 15 (5.6) Sports drink 3 (1.1) Distribution Daily drinking of children frequency, pattern and Subgroup drinks consumed (N = 100) in the evening/ n (%) night No. of drink 1-2 3 (3.0) occasions 3-5 61 (61.0) per day 6-9 32 (32.0) 10 or more 4 (4.0) Drinking pattern No drinks consumed 29 (29.0) in evening/night Drinks in evening only 58 (58.0) Drinks in night only 13 (13.9) Drinks in evening and night 0 Drinks (a) Water (tap, rain, bottled, mineral) 63 (88.7) consumed Milk (plain, flavoured, soy) 33 (46.5) (evening/night) Juice, cordial 18 (25.4) Soft drink (regular, diet) 8 (11.3) Drinks (a) +/- Water, milk (b), unsugared tea 71 (100.0) added sugars Non-milk drinks, sugars added (c) 21 (29.6) consumed Drinks with added sugars (d) 25 (35.2) (evening/night) Drinks without added sugars (e) 46 (64.8) Drinks (a) Tap water 92 (92.0) consumed (in Bottled water 12 (12.0) past 24 hours) Rain water 1 (1.0) Mineral water 2 (2.0) Milk (plain) 52 (52.0) Milk (flavoured) 32 (32.0) Milk (soy) 0 No milks 25 (25.0) Fruit juice 48 (48.0) Cordial 19 (19.0) Soft drink (regular) 22 (22.0) Soft drink (diet) 7 (7.0) Sports drink 3 (3.0) (a) Multiple responses permitted; (b) One or more of the following: Water (tap, rain, bottled, mineral), milk (plain, flavoured, soy), unsugared tea; (c) One or more of the following: Juice, cordial, soft drink (regular, diet), sports drink, sugared tea; (d) One or more of the following: Juice, cordial, soft drink (regular, diet), sports drink, sugared tea, flavoured milk; (e) One or more of the following: Water (tap, rain, bottled, mineral), milk (plain, soy), unsugared tea. Table 3: Distribution of fluids consumed as recalled for past 24 hours by sample population (W = 266) and subgroup (W = 100) of Australian children. Fluids consumed in past 24 hours Volume of fluid consumed (Litres) Sample (N = 266) Range (Mean [+ or -] SD) Waters (a) 0-2.50 (0.82 [+ or -] 0.42) Milks (b) 0-1.25 (0.30 [+ or -] 0.24) Sweet drinks (excl. flavoured milk) (c) 0-1.5 (0.35 [+ or -] 0.32) Sweet drinks (incl. flavoured milk) (d) 0-1.75 (0.42 [+ or -] 0.35) Total fluid intake 0.25-3.25 (1.50 [+ or -] 0.50) Fluids consumed in past 24 hours Volume of fluid consumed (Litres) Subgroup (N = 100) Range (Mean [+ or -] SD) Waters (a) 0-2.50 (0.84 [+ or -] 0.43) Milks (b) 0-1.25 (0.29 [+ or -] 0.24) Sweet drinks (excl. flavoured milk) (c) 0-1.25 (0.32 [+ or -] 0.27) Sweet drinks (incl. flavoured milk) (d) 0-1.25 (0.42 [+ or -] 0.31) Total fluid intake 0.50-3.00 (1.50 [+ or -] 0.40) (a) Waters: tap, rain, bottled, mineral, unsugared tea; (b) Milks: plain, soy; (c) Sweet drinks: Juice, cordial, soft drink (regular, diet) sports drink, sugared tea; (d) Sweet drinks: Juice, cordial, soft drink (regular, diet), sugared tea, flavoured milk. Table 4: Distribution of fluids consumed as a proportion of total fluid intake recalled for past 24 hours by sample population (N = 266 children) and subgroup (N = 100 children). Distribution of fluids consumed Proportion of total fluid intake By 4 to 7-year-olds n (%) (24 hour recall) Waters (a) Milks (b) Sweet drinks (c) Sample 0 0 14 (35.0) 14 (35.0) (N = 266) 1-25% 1 (2.5) 9 (22.5) 10 (25.0) 26-50% 15 (37.5) 15 (37.5) 13 (32.5) 51-75% 15 (37.5) 2 (5.0) 3 (7.5) 76-100% 9 (22.5) 0 0 Subtotal 40 40 40 Subgroup 0 0 3 (17.6) 5 (29.4) (N = 100) 1-25% 0 5 (29.4) 4 (23.5) 26-50% 7 (41.2) 8 (47.1) 6 (35.3) 51-75% 7(41.2) 1 (5.9) 2 (11.8) 76-100% 3 (17.6) 0 0 Subtotal 17 17 17 Distribution of fluids consumed Proportion of total fluid intake By 8 to 12-year-olds n (%) (24 hour recall) Waters (a) Milks (b) Sweet drinks (c) Sample 0 12 (5.3) 59 (26.1) 42 (18.6) (N = 266) 1-25% 9 (3.9) 103 (45.6) 64 (28.3) 26-50% 81 (35.8 62 (27.4) 90 (39.8) 51-75% 91 (40.3) 2 (0.9) 18 (8.0) 76-100% 33 (14.6) 0 12 (5.3) Subtotal 226 226 226 Subgroup 0 3 (3.6) 22 (37.3) 11 (13.3) (N = 100) 1-25% 3 (3.6) 35 (42.2) 28 (33.7) 26-50% 29 (34.9) 25 (30.1) 33 (39.8) 51-75% 39 (47.0) 1 (1.2) 8 (9.6) 76-100% 9 (10.8) 0 3 (3.6) Subtotal 83 83 83 (a) Waters: Tap, rain, bottled, mineral, unsugared tea; (b) Milks: Plain, soy; (c) Sweet drinks: Juice, cordial, soft drink (regular, diet), sports drink, sugared tea, flavoured milk. Table 5: Distribution of occasions when treats were used in the previous 24 hours for sample population (W = 266) and subgroup of (N = 1000) Australian children. Number of treat occasions Distribution of children in previous 24 hours Sample Subgroup (N = 266) (N = 100) n (%) n (%) Total treat occasions None 102 (38.3) 49 (49.0) (excl. sugar-free chewing 1 87 (32.7) 31 (31.0) gum) 2 47 (17.7) 16 (16.0) 3-5 27 (10.2) 4 (4.0) 6-9 3 (1.1) 0 Occasions for sweets None 166 (62.4) 66 (66.0) and/or chocolate 1 66 (24.8) 26 (26.0) 2 27 (10.2) 8 (8.0) 3-5 7 (2.7) 0 Occasions for biscuits None 166 (62.4) 73 (73.0) and/or cake 1 69 (25.9) 22 (22.0) 2 27 (10.2) 5 (5.0) 3-4 4 (1.6) 0 Occasions for sugared None 251 (94.4) 98 (98.0) chewing gum 1 12 (4.5) 2 (2.0) 2 3 (1.1) 0 Occasions for sugar-free None 236 (88.7) 87 (87.0) gum 1 20 (7.5) 10 (10.0) 2-3 10 (3.8) 3 (3.0) Table 6: Distribution of caries risk factors in subgroup of 100 Australian children. Distribution of children Caries risk factors in Male Female Total Caries-risk Assessment Tool (N = 50) (N = 50) children (N = 100) n (%) Regular use of dental care, 27 26 53 (53) established 'dental home' Irregular use of dental care 23 24 47 (47) No usual source of dental care 0 0 0 No carious teeth in the past 24 22 22 44 (44) months Carious teeth in the past 12-24 4 5 9 (9) months Carious teeth in the past 12 24 23 47 (47) months No orthodontic appliance worn 50 49 99 (99) Orthodontic appliance worn 0 1 1 (1) Consumption of simple sugars or 22 18 40 (40) foods strongly associated with caries initiation primarily at mealtimes Occasional between-meal exposures 20 19 39 (39) to simple sugars or foods strongly associated with caries Frequent between-meal exposures 8 13 21 (21) to simple sugars or foods strongly associated with caries Tooth brushing 2 or more times/ 42 40 82 (82) day Tooth brushing once/day 5 8 13 (13) Tooth brushing less than once/ 3 2 5 (5) day Optimal systemic and topical 33 39 72 (72) fluoride exposure Optimal topical but suboptimal 1 4 5 (5) systemic fluoride exposure Suboptimal topical fluoride 16 7 23 (23) exposure No visible plaque or gingivitis 24 27 51 (51) Gingivitis, and no visible plaque 10 4 14 (14) Visible plaque on anterior teeth 16 19 35 (35) and gingivitis No enamel demineralisation 32 34 66 (66) One area of enamel 2 1 3 (3) demineralisation More than one area of enamel 16 15 31 (31) demineralisation No enamel hypoplasia present 48 49 97 (97) Enamel hypoplasia present 2 1 3 (3) No molar-incisor 41 41 82 (82) hypomineralisation Molar hypomineralisation present 7 6 13 (13) Molar and incisor 2 3 5 (5) hypomineralisation present Table 7: Distribution of caries risk factors and categories of caries risk for subgroup (N = 100) of Australian children. Caries risk factors in caries- Distribution of children by risk Assessment Tool (CAT) caries risk categories Age 4 to 7 years (N = 17) Low Moderate High risk risk risk n (%) n (%) n (%) Use of 'dental home' 7 (7) 10 (10) 0 Time since last caries 5 (5) 0 12 (12) diagnosis/restoration Currently wears orthodontic/ 17 (17) na (a) 0 oral appliance/s Daily between-meal exposures to 5 (5) 9 (9) 3 (3) cariogenic foods and drinks Fluoride exposure 9 (9) 0 8 (8) Times per day child's teeth 12 (12) 5 (5) 0 brushed Visible plaque 11 (11) na 6 (6) Gingivitis 10 (10) na 7 (7) Areas of enamel 9 (9) 0 8 (8) demineralisation Enamel hypoplasia 17(17) na 0 Molar-incisor 14 (14) na 3 (3) hypomineralisation Distribution of 4-7 yr-olds by 2 (12) 1 (6) 14 (82) caries risk category (n = 17) Distribution of 8-12 yr-olds by -- -- -- caries risk category (n = 83) Caries risk factors in caries- Distribution of children by risk Assessment Tool (CAT) caries risk categories Age 8 to 12 years (N = 83) Low Moderate High risk risk risk n (%) n (%) n (%) Use of 'dental home' 46 (46) 37 (37) 0 Time since last caries 39 (39) 9 (9) 35 (35) diagnosis/restoration Currently wears orthodontic/ 82 (82) na 1 (1) oral appliance/s Daily between-meal exposures to 35 (35) 30 (30) 18 (18) cariogenic foods and drinks Fluoride exposure 63 (63) 5 (5) 15 (15) Times per day child's teeth 70 (70) 8 (8) 5 (5) brushed Visible plaque 54 (54) na 29 (29) Gingivitis 41 (41) na 42 (42) Areas of enamel 57 (57) 3 (3) 23 (23) demineralisation Enamel hypoplasia 80 (80) na 3 (3) Molar-incisor 68 (8) na 15 (15) hypomineralisation Distribution of 4-7 yr-olds by -- -- -- caries risk category (n = 17) Distribution of 8-12 yr-olds by 8 (10) 8 (10) 67 (81) caries risk category (n = 83) (a) na: No moderate category designated in the Caries-risk Assessment Tool Table 8: Significant associations between fluid intake and treat occasions in past 24 hours and caries experience. Distribution of children Caries in Caries Reported intake of past 12 free in fluids and sweet treats months past 12 months Sample (a) No. treat occasions in N = 251 past 24 hours: 0 32 65 1-2 55 70 3 or more 12 17 Subgroup (b) sweet drinks (swD) N = 100 consumed in eve/night (c) None 29 46 SwD consumed 18 7 No. treat occasions in past 24 hours: 0 16 33 1 15 16 2 or more 16 4 Daily between-meal cariogenic foods & drinks: Mainly at meals 10 30 Occasionally 23 16 Frequently 14 7 Fluoride exposure: Optimal 28 44 Suboptimal 19 9 Enamel demineralisation: None 20 46 Present 27 7 Dental visits: Regular 41 12 Irregular 12 35 Distribution of children Total signif Reported intake of [chi square] fluids and sweet treats (df) Sample (a) No. treat occasions in N = 251 past 24 hours: 0 97 2.824 (2) 1-2 125 p = 0.244 3 or more 29 Subgroup (b) sweet drinks (swD) N = 100 consumed in eve/night (c) None 75 8.363 (1) SwD consumed 25 p = 0.004 * No. treat occasions in past 24 hours: 0 49 12.816 (2) 1 31 p = 0.002 * 2 or more 20 Daily between-meal cariogenic foods & drinks: Mainly at meals 40 13.278 (2) Occasionally 39 p = 0.001 * Frequently 21 Fluoride exposure: Optimal 72 6.791 (1) Suboptimal 28 p = 0.009 * Enamel demineralisation: None 66 21.725 (1) Present 34 p = 0.000 * Dental visits: Regular 53 28.860 (1) Irregular 47 p = 0.000 * Distribution of children past No past Reported intake of caries caries fluids and sweet treats experience experience or in past or caries 24 months free in past 24 months Sample (a) No. treat occasions in N=251 past 24 hours: 0 55 42 1-2 95 30 3 or more 22 7 Subgroup (b) sweet drinks (swD) N=100 consumed in eve/night (c) None 37 38 SwD consumed 19 6 No. treat occasions in past 24 hours: 0 21 28 1 18 13 2 or more 17 3 Daily between-meal cariogenic foods & drinks: Mainly at meals 13 27 Occasionally 27 12 Frequently 16 5 Fluoride exposure: Optimal 37 35 Suboptimal 19 9 Enamel demineralisation: None 28 38 Present 28 6 Dental visits: Regular 17 36 Irregular 39 8 Distribution of children Total signif. Reported intake of [chi square] fluids and sweet treats (df) Sample (a) No. treat occasions in N = 251 past 24 hours: 0 97 10.250 (2) 1-2 125 p=0.006 * 3 or more 29 Subgroup (b) sweet drinks (swD) N = 100 consumed in eve/night (c) None 75 5.411 (1) SwD consumed 25 p = 0.020 No. treat occasions in past 24 hours: 0 49 10.315 (2) 1 31 p = 0.006 * 2 or more 20 Daily between-meal cariogenic foods & drinks: Mainly at meals 40 15.210 (2) Occasionally 39 p = 0.000 * Frequently 21 Fluoride exposure: Optimal 72 2.219 (1) Suboptimal 28 p = 0.136 Enamel demineralisation: None 66 14.520 (1) Present 34 p = 0.000 * Dental visits: Regular 53 26.195 (1) Irregular 47 p = 0.000 * (a) PRAT questionnaire group; (b) PRAT questionnaire and CAT examination subgroup; (c) Sweet drinks: Juice, cordial, soft drink (regular, diet), sports drink, sugared tea, flavoured milk; * p<0.01 Table 9: Logistic regression model for the occurrence of observed caries in subgroup (N = 100 children) and association with independent variables. Observed caries Independent Reference Com- variable independent parative variable independent variable In past 12 months Reported treat 0 1 occasions in past 24 hours 1 [less than or equal to] 2 0 [less than or equal to] 2 Reported fluoride Optimal Suboptimal exposure Enamel None Present demineralisation In past 24 months Enamel None Present demineralisation Dental visitation Regular Irregular pattern Observed caries Independent OR (95% CI) variable In past 12 months Reported treat 3.50 (1.42, 8.62) occasions in past 24 hours 4.41 (1.25, 15.63) 5.88 (1.34, 25.64) Reported fluoride 3.02 (1.01, 9.07) exposure Enamel 8.42 (2.90, 24.47) demineralisation In past 24 months Enamel 4.17 (1.37, 12.66) demineralisation Dental visitation 8.00 (2.97, 21.74) pattern Observed caries Independent p value Overall variable p value In past 12 months Reported treat 0.328 0.007 * occasions in past 24 hours 0.019 * 0.002 * Reported fluoride 0.049 * 0.049 * exposure Enamel 0.000 * 0.000 * demineralisation In past 24 months Enamel 0.000 * 0.000 * demineralisation Dental visitation 0.012 * 0.012 * pattern * significant p<0.05
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2010 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|