Evolution of ornamentation and courtship behavior in Schizocosa: insights from a phylogeny based on morphology (Araneae, Lycosidae).
Subject: Sexual behavior in animals (Research)
Spiders (Research)
Spiders (Sexual behavior)
Spiders (Physiological aspects)
Phylogeny (Research)
Behavior evolution (Research)
Cladistic analysis
Author: Stratton, Gail E.
Pub Date: 05/01/2005
Publication: Name: Journal of Arachnology Publisher: American Arachnological Society Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Biological sciences; Zoology and wildlife conservation Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2005 American Arachnological Society ISSN: 0161-8202
Issue: Date: May, 2005 Source Volume: 33 Source Issue: 2
Topic: Event Code: 310 Science & research Canadian Subject Form: Animal sexual behaviour; Behavioural evolution
Geographic: Geographic Scope: Austria Geographic Code: 4EUAU Austria
Accession Number: 159864159
Full Text: ABSTRACT. A phylogenetic analysis for the North American Schizocosa species was undertaken by scoring 49 morphological characters for 31 taxa representing all of the Nearctic species of Schizocosa plus individuals that are hybrids between S. ocreata and S. rovneri. Rabidosa rabida, Allocosa georgicola and Gladicosa pulchra were used as outgroups. Three clades are recognized: a large clade from eastern North America (Clade A) within which is nested the S. ocreata clade; Clade B, which includes the widespread S. avida and the western S. mccooki, and a smaller, third clade, Clade C. Sexual ornamentation occurs on the first legs of mature males of several species within the Schizocosa and takes the form of pigmentation and or bristles primarily on the tibia of leg I; there is at least one species with bristles in each of the three main clades. Mapping the occurrence of male ornamentation on the preferred phylogeny suggests that ornamentation evolved 5 or 6 separate times and was subsequently lost 2 or 3 times. The ornamentation is concentrated in the S. ocreata clade, a clade defined by a finger like projection on the paleal process of the male pedipalp. Courtship behavior is known for 20 of the 31 taxa. All species studied utilize chemical communication and seismic signals for communication; some species also have distinct visual signals. Seismic signals are produced by palpal drumming (as is seen in several species within Clade B), or by stridulation (seen in Clade A). Visual signals consisting of movements of the first pair of legs are common in species that are distinctly ornamented. This study provides the first phylogenetic study of a North American genus of wolf spider and provides morphometric comparisons of the North American species in Schizocosa.

Keywords: Cladistics, sexual selection, secondary sexual characteristics, evolution of behavior, spiders, multimodal signal, seismic signal

**********

In spiders, sexual ornamentation is most evident in groups that have exceptional eyesight (e.g., Salticidae and Lycosidae) with ornaments being found on mature males in places that are visible to females or other males. In contrast to the colorful salticids (e.g. the North American genus Habronattus F.O.P Cambridge 1901, Peckham & Peckham 1889, 1890; Griswold 1987; Maddison & Hedin 2003), the ornamentation on lycosids tends to be in black or white, and is generally limited to the first pair of legs or to the pedipalps of mature males. Examples of such ornaments in wolf spiders are wide spread and include dark pigmentation on some part of the first pair of legs as seen in Alopecosa aculeata (Clerck 1757) and A. barbipes (Sundevall 1833) (Kronestedt 1990) or on the pedipalps as seen in Pardosa wagleri (Hahn 1822) and P. saturatior Simon 1937 (Barthel & Helversen 1990) or P. saxatilis (Hentz 1844) (Dondale & Redner 1984). In addition, many members of the North American Geolycosa Montgomery 1904 have contrasting pigmented hairs on their first legs (Wallace 1942a). And, as reported in Dondale & Redner (1978) and in this study, males of several members of the genus Schizocosa Chamberlin 1904 have darkly pigmented legs and or tibial bristles.

Revised by Dondale & Redner (1978), the Nearctic species of the Schizocosa include the 20 species recognized by Dondale & Redner plus S. rovneri Uetz & Dondale 1979, S. stridulans Stratton 1984 and S. uetzi Stratton 1997 and at least one undescribed species. Males of several members of the genus have conspicuous ornamentation in the form of pigmentation and/or bristles on the first legs of mature males. The ornamentation varies considerably from a complete lack of dark pigment [e.g., S. saltatrix (Hentz 1844), or S. rovneri], to slight pigment on the tibia of males (e.g., S. uetzi), to concentrated tufts of bristles at one end of the tibia (e.g., S. salsa Barnes 1953), to bristles that extend the length of the tibia and to the metatarsus [as in S. ocreata (Hentz 1844) from Florida]. Indeed, it is this variability in ornamentation that makes this genus particularly interesting for behavioral and evolutionary studies. For some species, the ornamentation has proven useful in species descriptions (Uetz & Dondale 1979; Stratton 1991, 1997a) as well as in mate choice studies (McClintock & Uetz 1996; Scheffer et al. 1996; Hebets & Uetz 1999, 2000). In some cases, tibial bristles are seen in species that have similar genital morphology, e.g., S. ocreata and S. crassipes, both commonly called "the brush-legged spider", suggesting a common origin of the trait, but it is also seen in species with different genitalia [e.g. compare S. ocreata with S. bilineata (Emerton 1885)], suggesting the possibility of independent origins. Closely related species may be very divergent with respect to ornamentation, as is seen in S. ocreata and S. rovneri, two species long considered to be sibling to each other.

Ornamentation and courtship behavior in Schizocosa wolf spiders have been the focus of studies addressing sexual selection and signal evolution, fluctuating asymmetry and reproductive isolation (Hebets & Uetz 1999, 2000; Uetz et al. 1996, Uetz & Smith 1999; McClintock & Uetz 1996; Scheffer et al. 1996; Hebets 2003, 2005). Perhaps most surprisingly, the ornamentation on at least one species (S. uetzi) appears to be important in a social learning context (Hebets 2003).

Members of the genus Schizocosa use a variety of modes of communication during courtship, including chemical, seismic and visual signals. In two comparative studies, Hebets & Uetz (1999, 2000) found that among six species of Schizocosa, females of three species exhibited a vibratory bias during courtship and three showed a visual bias. Hebets & Uetz (2000) found that in species with active visual displays but without ornamentation, an artificial increase in male ornamentation resulted in increased female receptivity. In an attempt to test the hypothesis that ornamentation evolved secondarily in this family to enhance pre-existing visual movement displays, they presented a summary of North American lycosid species which complied information on the presence/absence of ornamentation and leg waving displays. However, a phylogenetic study including more lycosid species, as in the present study, will provide a more thorough test of such a hypothesis. The mixture of ornamented species and non- ornamented species plus the complexity of courtship interactions makes the Schizocosa genus particularly well suited for testing ideas concerning multimodal signaling (Uetz & Roberts 2002; Hebets 2005) and the evolution of complex behaviors. The relative importance of phylogeny compared with sexual selection can be assessed with a robust phylogeny.

McClintock & Uetz (1996) presented evidence that females of S. rovneri, a species without leg ornamentation, showed a higher level of response to video images of conspecific males that had been visually manipulated to have tufts on their tibia and to courting heterospecific males than to controls (un-manipulated conspecific males). The preliminary phylogeny presented in their 1996 study (including 16 characters for 7 species) suggested that the female preference for ornamentations may have preceded the evolution of the ornaments themselves and thus be an example of the sensory bias hypothesis (Ryan & Rand 1993). A more complete phylogenetic study of the genus involving more species and more characters will provide a more robust test of the sensory bias hypothesis.

Here, I present the results of a comparison of the sexual ornamentation found in members of Schizocosa and the results of a phylogenetic study addressing the Nearctic members of this wolf spider genus. Using the results from my phylogenetic analysis, I address the following four hypotheses: 1. Ornamentation in the form of tibial bristles arose once within this genus; 2. Monophyletic groups show similarities in courtship behavior; 3. Schizocosa ocreata and S. rovneri are sibling species as was suggested by Uetz & Dondale (1979) and supported by the successful interbreeding reported in Stratton & Uetz (1986); and 4. Finally, this study presents a test of the sensory bias hypothesis presented by McClintock & Uetz (1996) that female preference seen in S. rovneri females for males with ornamentation preceded the evolution of ornamentation in closely related species.

METHODS

Ornamentation and courtship behavior.--As comparative data on male ornamentation and courtship behavior were not available for all species of Schizocosa, I initially measured the form and extent of male tibial bristles for all members of the genus and recorded the courtship behavior for selected (available) species. To document the ornamentation of each species, a lateral view of the first pair of legs for males of all species included in the study was photographed using a dissecting microscope (Olympus SZX12) and dedicated digital camera (Olympus 750). Courtship behavior (for available species not reported in the literature) was documented by collecting subadult males and females, maintaining them in the laboratory until mature (see Stratton et al. 1996, Miller et al. 1998) and then videotaping courtship behavior. The standard protocol for recording behavior was as follows. Twenty-four hours before testing, females were fed an appropriately-sized cricket and were placed in a recording chamber with filter paper as substrate. Males were introduced to the chamber and all interactions were recorded with either a Panasonic WD-5000 camera with Kiron 105 mm f2.8 macrolens on standard VHS tapes or by using a Sony TRV-22 taping to a mini-DV tape. Seismic recordings were made by using a sound transducer attached to an EG&G PARC Model 113 pre-amp connecting to the video recorder. Video and seismic recordings were made for the following species, whose behavior is not yet described in the literature (summarized in Table 5): S. avida, S. crassipalpata, S. floridana, S. saltatrix, S. nr saltatrix, Gladicosa pulchra and Allocosa georgicola. As courtship behavior remains unknown for several species, the behavior was not used in the parsimony analysis.

Phylogenetic study: choice of taxa and material examined.--There are 63 species currently listed in the genus Schizocosa (Platnick 2005) from all over the world. However, in this study, I chose to focus solely on the Nearctic species; explicit in the exclusion the species from the Philippines, South Africa and other localities outside of North America is the assumption that the Nearctic species are monophyletic, an hypothesis not tested in this study. However, the names of several large genera of wolf spiders (e.g., Lycosa, Schizocosa and others) were often categories of convenience rather than hypotheses of relationship for some earlier workers. For example, recent taxonomic work of New Zealand wolf spiders suggests that previous placement of species into Holarctic genera is erroneous (Vink 2002) and Schizocosa berenice L. Koch 1877 from Australia actually belongs in the genus Artoria (Framenau pers. comm.).

Additionally, I excluded species that were excluded from the genus by Dondale & Redner (1978). Many of these, e.g., S. incerta (Bryant 1934), S. perplexa Bryant 1936, S. puebla Chamberlin 1925, S. tamae (Gertsch & Davis 1940), S. tristani (Banks 1909) and Avicosa ceratiola (Gertsch & Wallace 1935) have yet to be placed in another genus but were judged to be outside the scope of this project.

This study is thus based on direct examination of preserved specimens of the 20 Schizocosa species recognized by Dondale & Redner (1978), plus S. rovneri, S. stridulans, S. uetzi and one undescribed species. In addition, I scored 3 populations of Schizocosa ocreata: one from Cincinnati, OH that has been used extensively in behavioral research (see references by Uetz, Hebets, McClintock and Stratton), a second from Central Mississippi (see Miller et al. 1998) and a third from Gainesville, Florida; and two populations of Schizocosa crassipes: (separate populations from Florida and Mississippi). Finally, I also scored individuals that are hybrids between S. ocreata (OH) and S. rovneri (available from a previous study [Stratton & Uetz 1986]). Appendix 2 summarizes the specimens of the 31 taxa used and their deposition. Voucher specimens from my own collection will be deposited at the AMNH.

Outgroups.--The choice of outgroups for this study was difficult due to the incomplete knowledge of lycosid generic relationships. As the sister-group for the Schizocosa is not known, representatives from several different North American lycosid genera were scored and included in this analysis. Gladicosa pulchra (Keyserling 1877), Allocosa georgicola (Walckenaer 1837) and Rabidosa rabida (Walckenaer 1837) were chosen as outgroups for the final analysis as they all share some characters with Schizocosa but also have clearly distinguishing features (locality, deposition and citations for figures are given in Appendix 2). Allocosa georgicola has affinities to the H. helluo species group (Brady pers. comm.).

Choice of characters.--Forty nine morphological characters were found to be informative and were scored by direct examination of specimens (data matrix in Appendix 1; details of the characters are provided below). During the course of the study numerous additional characters were identified and scored but discarded as too variable or uninformative. Characters were chosen by comparing the different subfamilies of Lycosidae (Dondale 1986), by screening revisions, descriptions and illustrations of other wolf spiders and by direct examination of the specimens. Figures from the following references were found to be useful: Schizocosa (Dondale & Redner 1978), Trochosa (Brady 1979); Gladicosa (Brady 1986); Rabidosa (Brady & McKinley 1994); Geolycosa (Wallace 1942a); Hogna georgicola (Chamberlin & Ivie 1944) and Isohogna lenta (Wallace 1942b).

As characters were treated as unordered, hypotheses of polarity are an emergent property of the analysis. Forty characters are binary; nine are multistate characters. Six of the characters are morphometric (characters 1, 17, 20, 33, 37, 39) with three being expressed as ratios (characters 17, 33, 37). To assign states for the morphometric data, I examined the data for gaps. In several cases, I opted for independent coding of variables for a given structure as opposed to coding as a multistate character with linked states to minimize assumptions of congruence (e.g., characters 21-25). However, a potential problem with this is the duplication of absences (Maddison 1993).

For the final analysis, the 49 characters were grouped in the following manner: 19 somatic characters, 14 male palpal characters, 10 female epigynal characters and six male secondary sexual characters. Several additional characters (e.g., behavioral and ecological characters) were used a posteriori and mapped onto the resulting cladograms. As data for these latter characters were not available for all species, they were not used in the parsimony analysis (Platnick et al. 1991; Maddison 1993).

Data analysis.--Maximum parsimony analyses were conducted using [PAUP.sup.*] (Version 4.0b10) (Swofford 2002) with 1000 random starting point heuristic searches using Stepwise-addition option and 1000 random taxon addition sequences and tree-bisection-reconnection (TBR) branch swapping. The results from other swapping algorithims were compared to TBR branch swapping. All characters were unordered and several weighting schemes were examined. The trees were rooted by setting the three non-congeners as out-groups. Characters were mapped using MacClade Version 3.0 (Maddison & Maddison 1992). The degree of internal support for the resulting clades was estimated using bootstrap analysis (using 100 random addition sequence replicates and 100 bootstrap replicates).

Weighting options.--The data set was first analyzed with all characters weighted equally. However, preliminary analyses suggested there was little phylogenetic signal in the somatic characters. Subsequent analysis investigated several different weighting options including reweighting with the rescaled consistency index as well as weighting the genitalic characters more heavily. As most modern students of wolf spiders use genitalic characters extensively in revisions and descriptions (Dondale & Render 1978, 1990; Brady 1962, 1979, 1986; Brady & McKinley 1994) and because wolf spiders appear to be very conservative in their somatic morphology, I favor the trees produced by weighting the genitalic characters more heavily. In the final analysis, I used the following weighting scheme: somatic characters weighted as "2"; genitalic characters weighted as "3" and secondary sexual characters weighted as "1." Finally, as I was interested in the evolution of secondary sexual characters, I compared trees produced by excluding secondary sexual characters with trees including those characters.

Description of characters.--Somatic characters: 1. Body size: 0 = medium; 1 = large; 2 = small. Measurements of the carapace were made as the best representation of body size, as unlike the spider's abdomen, it does not vary with a recent meal. Carapace length and width were measured dorsally using an ocular micrometer. The ratio of the carapace length to width was similar across all species used in this study (Table 1). Carapace length as states: carapace length [greater than or equal to] 4.5 mm for "large", carapace length between 3.5 and 4.5 mm for "medium" and carapace length [less than or equal to] 3.5 mm for "small".

2. Median band (MB) width: 0 = narrow; 1 = medium; 2 = broad. The median band is a light band on the dorsal surface of the carapace. It may be a thin line (as in A. georgicola, Fig. 1, which is distinctly thinner than the posterior median eyes) or it may be "broad," or as broad as the posterior median eyes (as in G. pulchra, Fig. 2, and members of Schizocosa, Figs. 3-6). A medium-sized median band is present in Rabidosa spp. (Brady and McKinley 1994, p. 140, figs. 1-5).

[FIGURES 1-6 OMITTED]

3. Median band edges: 0 = straight; 1 = not straight. The edges of the median band can be straight as in Fig. 1, 3, 5, 6), or can have some constriction as is seen in G. pulchra or S. retrorsa Banks 1911 (Figs. 2, 4).

4. Submarginal band (SMB), edges: 0 = absent; 1 = smooth; 2 = wavy or spots. The submarginal band is a light band near the edges of the carapace. It can be present as either a relatively smooth band (as in S. avida and S. rovneri, Figs. 3, 5) or diffuse or lacking as in A. georgicola (Fig. 1). In S. retrorsa (Fig. 4) the SMB consists of spots at the edges of the carapace.

5. Submarginal band, size: 0 = absent; 1 = narrow; 2 = broad. In most species of Schizocosa, the SMB is narrow or absent. In Rabidosa spp. (Brady & McKinley 1994, figs. 1-5, p. 140) and in S. salsa, the SMB is wider than the median band and scored as broad (Barnes 1953, fig. 16).

[FIGURE 16 OMITTED]

6. Heart mark (HM): 0 = absent or faint; 1 = strong. In some Lycosinae, the heart mark is a darkened region on the dorsum of the abdomen where the heart is located (e.g. A. georgicola & S. avida, Figs. 1, 3).

7. Light bands on abdomen: 0 = absent; 1 = present. In some cases, the HM is apparently accentuated by the presence of white lines on either side of the HM (as in S. avida, Fig. 3).

8. Sternum color: 0 = yellow or light brown; 1 = orange, dark brown or black.

9. Bands on sternum: 0 = absent; 1 = present. Sternum bands, as used for this study, are longitudinal bands that extend from the anterior to the posterior end of the sternum.

10. Shield on venter: 0 = absent; 1 = present. When present, this is a light patch on black background on the venter of the animal as in S. avida (Fig. 10). The shape of the light patch varies between individuals from the same geographic area (Stratton, unpublished data).

[FIGURE 10 OMITTED]

11. Ventral color of abdomen: 0 = light or mostly light; 1 = black or mostly black; 2 = light shield on black. Light or mostly light is as in S. crassipes or S. bilineata (Emerton 1885) (Figs. 7, 9); black or mostly black, as in S. retrorsa (Fig. 8); and light shield on black as in S. avida (Fig. 10).

[FIGURES 7-9 OMITTED]

12. "V" on venter: 0 = absent; 1 = present. The "V" is formed by dark pigmented spots near the lateral edges of the venter (S. bilineata, Fig. 12). The inner "V" on S. bilineata is not pigmented and originates in points of muscle attachment.

[FIGURE 12 OMITTED]

13. Spots on venter: 0 = absent; 1 = present. Similar to character 12 but in some cases and in S. crassipes, the spots on the venter are scattered.

14. Color of coxae: 0 = light to light brown; 2 = dark brown.

15. Color of coxae relative to the femur: 0 = same as femora; 1 = lighter than femur; 2 = darker than femur.

16. Dark lines on chelicerae: 0 = absent; 1 = present. When present, these are vertical lines running the length of the chelicerae when viewed from the front.

17. Relative tibial length of males: 0 = short to medium; 1 = long. Examination of the specimens suggested that some of the species had particularly stout legs, others were relatively long-legged, while many fell between these extremes (also noted by Kronestedt 1990). Since there was a wide range of body sizes in the examined species, I took a relative measure for leg length. Tibia 1 (measured with an ocular micrometer along the dorsal edge) divided by the carapace length was taken as the relative measure of leg length that could be potentially informative. Values for this ratio ranged from 0.5 for S. cespitum Dondale & Redner 1978 to 0.92 for S. salsa (Table 2). Gaps were identified by examination of the distribution of values. These data were first collapsed into a binary coding (0 = short to medium, tl/cl [less than or equal to] 0.71 and 1 = long tl/cl > 0.71). The data were also scored as a multistate character with any gap > 0.03 used to define states. With this coding there were seven character states. During character exploration, analyses were run both ways; this character was judged to have a large amount of homoplasy and in the final analysis, I used the binary coding.

18. Femur I annulations (male): 0 = absent; 1 = present.

19. Femur II-IV annulations (male): 0 = absent; 1 = present.

Male palpal characters: Palpal structures have been successfully employed in spider taxonomy and have been central in wolf spider revisions. Eberhard (1994) suggested that the complexity of genitalic characters has been shaped by sexual selection. The complexity of the pedipalps has made determination of homologies of structures between families difficult. Even within a single family, such as the Lycosidae, terms have been used in a variety of ways. I here follow the terminology suggested by Dondale & Redner (1978) with comparisons to Brady (1986) and have focused primarily on structures that aid in the determination of species.

The cymbium of the tarsus (terminal segment) forms the body of the tarsus of the pedipalp and holds the sclerites (genital bulb) involved in copulation. At the tip of the cymbium there may be macrosetae (MS, Fig. 12), which function to hold the pedipalp in place while the spider stridulates [e.g., S. saltatrix and R. rabida (Walckenaer 1837), Rovner 1975]. The genital bulb is an inter-connected assemblage of sclerites and distensible sacs (the hematodocha). During copulation, the hematodocha becomes visible as an expanding sac of haemolymph. The cymbium is attached to the palpal tibia (Tib, Fig. 14).

[FIGURE 14 OMITTED]

Located on the genital bulb is the terminal apophysis (TA, Fig. 11) which in Schizocosa is a small, free sclerite near the base of the intromittent portion of the embolus (IPE) (Figs. 11-18; see also Dondale & Redner 1978). In Gladicosa and Hogna, the TA is an elongate structure that parallels the embolus and may assist in the proper placement of the IPE in the female epigynum (see Brady 1986, p. 314, fig. 41). Also clearly visible is the median apophysis (MA, Figs. 11-18) which is directed retrolaterally and has a sinuous channel on the dorsal surface, which are defining characters of the subfamily Lycosinae. A spur of the median apophysis engages the hood of the female epigynum during copulation. The palea is a partly sclerotized pad at the distal end of the genital bulb that sometimes bears processes or extensions (PPR) (Figs. 14-18). An ear-like lobe (ELL, Fig. 11) is also present in Schizocosa and Gladicosa (called the conductor by Dondale & Redner 1978). The base of the cymbium holds the scraper portion of the stridulatory structure, not visible in the ventral view shown. The tip of the tibia has the file of the stridulatory organ, found only in mature males.

[FIGURES 11, 13, 15, 17-18 OMITTED]

20. Palpal tibia: 0 = length > width; 1 = length [less than or equal to] width. Measured ventrally using an ocular micrometer. For some species (i.e., A. georgicola), the tibia of the pedipalp is long and thin (nearly twice as long as wide) (Table 3). For others, as in S. ocreata (FL), it is very stout and is wider than long (Table 3). A short, stout tibial palp is probably related to muscle mass needed for stridulation during courtship (Rovner 1975). Although all members of the Schizocosa and outgroups included here possess a stridulatory organ, for some, palpal drumming is an important component of the courtship behavior (Table 5; see discussion below).

21. Terminal apophysis (TA): 0 = present; 1 = small or absent.

22. Terminal apophysis, size: 0 = elongate; 1 = small or absent. The TA in Schizocosa is generally present but relatively small compared to that in the outgroups, A. georgicola and G. pulchra (Figs. 11-18; compare to, Brady 1986, p. 314, fig. 41), where the TA is an elongate structure.

23. Terminal apophysis with slight arch: 0 = absent; 1 = present. The TA may form a slight arch, as seen in Figs. 15 and 16.

24. Terminal apophysis, with tear-drop shape: 0 = absent; 1 = present. See fig. 13 in Dondale & Redner (1978).

25. Terminal apophysis as inverted triangle: 0 = absent; 1 = present.

26. Embolus, basic shape: 0 = hair-like; 1 = sword-like. All pedipalps in Figs. 11-18 show a hair-like embolus. The sword-like embolus is found in Gladicosa, whose name refers to a sword (Brady 1986, p. 314, fig. 41).

27. Width of intromittent portion of embolus (IPE, Fig. 11): 0 = thin; 1 = stout.

28. Palea of pedipalp with triangular process: 0 = absent; 1 = present. In a few species, notably S. duplex, S. saltarix and an undescribed species, the pedipalp has a triangular shaped process (Fig. 13, 14).

29. Palea of pedipalp with finger-like process: 0 = absent; 1 = present. A finger-like process (PPR) is shown in Fig. 15-18. During copulation this process pushes against the cuticle to the side of the female epigynum (Stratton, unpublished data).

30. Number of macrosetae: 0 = few (4-9); 1 = many (10 or more). The macrosetae can be found on the tip of the cymbium. Often there is a dense cluster, but sometimes they are much fewer and easily counted.

31. Long hair-like setae between macrosetae and genital bulb: 0 = absent; 1 = present.

32. Relative size of macrosetae: 0 = thin; 1 = stout or very stout.

33. Cymbium (tarsus) of pedipalp, length to width: 0 = short to regular; 1 = long and thin. Measured ventrally with an ocular micrometer (Table 3). As with other quantitative characters, the data were examined for gaps. During character analysis, this character was first scored as a multistate character but for the final analysis, it was treated as a binary character. The species that showed palpal drumming during courtship had relatively long, thin pedipalps (e.g. S. avida, S. retrorsa, S. mccooki, and S. communis; Tables 3 & 5).

Female epigynal characters: The prominent features of the female epigynum include the well sclerotized median septum (MS, Figs. 19-22), the posterior transverse piece (TP, Fig. 19). The edges of the median septum can be flared at the posterior end, parallel, or can be widest at the center. The anterior end of the median septum has a funnel-like hood (Hood, Fig. 19) that generally is double but is single in S. bilineata and S. crassipalpata Roewer 1951. The median apophysis of the male "catches" on the hood of the female epigynum during the first stages of copulation; this serves to brace the pedipalp and immediately following the engagement of the MA with the hood, one can see the expansion of the hematodocha of the male pedipalp (Dondale & Redner 1978; Stratton, unpublished data) The depth of the hood varies between species and is much deeper in G. pulchra and A. georgicola than most of the Schizocosa species (Table 4; compare Figs. 19-22).

[FIGURES 19-22 OMITTED]

The transverse piece (TP) in Schizocosa is either truncate as in S. avida and S. retrorsa (Figs. 19 & 20) or has excavations (Figs. 21 & 22). The excavations can be located at the lateral edges of the transverse piece as seen in S. duplex (Fig. 22) and S. saltatrix, or the excavations can be almost touching near the center of the transverse piece as seen in S. uetzi (see Stratton 1997a). More often, the location of the excavations are somewhat between these extremes.

In lycosids, the copulatory opening is near lateral edges of the transverse piece and the genital opening (where the eggs leave the genital tract) is in the epigastric furrow. When the female genitalia are dissected and the dorsal side is examined, the spermathecae are the dominant structures (see Stratton 1997, fig. 5).

34. Edges of median septum (MS): 0 = MS widest at center; 1 = edges of MS parallel; 2 = MS widest at base. For MS widest at center, see Figs. 19 and 20 (S. avida and S. retrorsa). Schizocosa duplex provides an example of the parallel edges (Fig. 22) while S. crassipes shows a MS widest at its base (Fig. 21).

35. Excavations on transverse piece of epigynum: 0 = absent; 1 = present; see Figs 19-22.

36. Separations of excavations: 0 = absent; 1 = widely separated with excavations near lateral edge; 2 = intermediate in placement; 3 = narrowly separated. The excavations were considered widely separated if a hypothetical additional excavation could fit between the excavations.

37. Ratio of median septum to transverse piece: 0 = MS/TP [less than or equal to] 0.72; 1 = MS/TP < 1.179; 2 = MS/TP < 1.357; 3 = MS/TP [less than or equal to] 1.52; 4 = MS/TP = 1.583. As with other quantitative characters, the ratio of MS to TP was sorted, graphed and examined for gaps. The ratio of the overall length to width was also examined but for this latter ratio, there were no clear gaps.

38. Epigynal hood, single or double: 0 = double; 1 = single. Figs 19-22 show a double hood; a single hood seen in S. bilineata and S. crassipalpata (Dondale & Redner 1978; figs. 47 & 49).

39. Depth of epigynal hood: 0 = deep; 1 = shallow. See Table 4.

40. Spermathecae, shape: 0 = rounded; 1 = elongate; 2 = pointed.

41. Spermathecae texture: 0 = smooth; 1 = bumpy. The "bumpy" texture was visible with light microscopy; the function of these bumps is unknown.

42. Copulatory tube: 0 = simple; 1 = complex. The copulatory ducts for Schizocosa (Dondale & Redner 1978; e.g. figs. 28, 32 & 37) have a single elbow and were scored as simple. The copulatory duct in R. rabida (Brady & McKinley 1994; fig. 13) is convoluted and was scored as complex.

[FIGURES 28, 32 & 37 OMITTED]

43. Pigment around the epigynum: 0 = absent; 1 = present. In some species, there is a distinct "box" of dark pigment surrounding the epigynum.

Male secondary sexual characters (ornamentation): Male secondary sexual characters include both pigmentation on the first legs and bristles or brushes, primarily on the tibia of legs 1. Work by Stratton & Uetz (1986) showed that through hybridization of S. ocreata and S. rovneri these characters are inherited independently.

44. Femur I with dark stripe: 0 = absent; 1 = present.

45. Femur I with dark pigment: 0 = absent; 1 = present.

46. Femur II-IV with longitudinal stripe: 0 = absent; 1 = present.

47. Presence of bristles on tibia: 0 = absent; 1 = present (see Figs. 23-31 for examples of species with bristles).

[FIGURES 23-27, 29-31 OMITTED]

48. Dark pigment covering tibia I: 0 = absent; 1 = present.

49. Metatarsus I bristles: 0 = absent; 1 = present (e.g., S. ocreata, FL, Fig. 29).

RESULTS

Sexual ornamentation.--Sexual ornamentation in the Nearctic genus Schizocosa consists of pigmentation on all or part of the legs I of mature males and/or bristles which are generally limited to all or part of the tibia of legs I. Dark pigmentation can be limited to the femur of leg I (as in S. retrorsa, Fig. 4), or to part of the femur and extending to the tibia (as in S. stridulans) (Fig. 28), or may be limited to the tibia (as in S. uetzi, Fig. 35), or extend from the patella to the metatarsus (as in S. floridana Bryant 1934, Fig. 35). In some cases, such as S. humilis and S. retrorsa, the dark pigmentation of the femur contrasts sharply with light hairs found on the tibia. Dark pigmentation can occur without bristles, as is seen in S. retrorsa, S. uetzi and in the outgroup, Rabidosa rabida.

[FIGURE 35 OMITTED]

When present, the bristles are always associated with the tibia of legs I of mature males but may be found only on the distal end of the tibia (as in S. salsa, Fig. 24), may extend to much of the metatarsus, as is seen in S. ocreata from Florida (Fig. 29), or may be limited to the tibia as is seen in S. bilineata (Fig. 25). In S. aulonia Dondale 1969 and S. segregata, the bristles are longest along the ventral side of the tibia (Figs. 23, 26), while in S. crassipes and S. ocreata (Figs. 27, 29, 30, 31), the bristles extend both dorsally and ventrally, providing a large rectangular appearance when viewed from the side. In general, the bristles are largest when viewed from the side, at eye-level with the spider. A discussion of the phylogenetic distribution of the bristles follows the presentation of the preferred phylogeny.

Comparison of courtship behavior.--Courtship behavior for 20 of the 31 taxa represented in this study has been documented (summarized in Table 5), including all members of the S. ocreata clade, as well as the hybrids between S. ocreata (OH) and S. rovneri. All species studied to date show chemoexploration by males in the presence of females or female silk (indicating the presence of chemical signals) and males of all species produce seismic signals either by stridulation by the male palp (first described by Rovner 1975), palpal drumming (Stratton & Lowrie 1984; Hebets et al. 1996), body vibration or some combination of these (Table 5). Many species (but not all) also have some movement that appears to be a visual signal produced by males during courtship. Several species incorporate an arch of legs 1 (scored as a "+" in Fig. 36). For example, this is seen in S. avida, and S. saltatrix as well as S. ocreata (OH) (Table 5). Other species have movements that appear to be more intense visual signals. For example, S. retrorsa males have a vigorous leg 1 wave that is associated with courtship (Hebets et al. 1996), and S. ocreata (FL) has a bilateral double arch of the first pair of legs. These more overt visual signals are scored as "++" in Fig. 36. One species that apparently lacks visual signals is S. duplex. All populations of S. ocreata and S. crassipes have leg arching plus either leg waving or tapping. When the different populations of S. crassipes were compared, each population showed similar elements of courtship but differed in the proportion of time spent doing each behavior and in the sequences of behavior (e.g., Miller et al. 1998; Germano et al., unpublished data). Kaston (1936) included S. bilineata in his comparative courtship study but he did not see any behaviors preceding copulation in this species. Finally, the behavior of several species remains unknown and it is hoped that this study may stimulate interest in the behavior and ecology of these species.

[FIGURE 36 OMITTED]

Results of phylogenetic analysis.--Parsimony analysis with all characters weighted equally and trees not rooted resulted in very little resolution of clades. The agreement subtree for these trees did not include the three outgroups, suggesting their position in the tree was not stable. When the preferred weighting option was applied and the trees rooted with the three outgroups, there was more resolution. A single most parsimonious was tree resulted from the analysis with the secondary sexual characters excluded and is the preferred tree presented here (Fig. 32; bootstrap values above 50% shown on figures; 570 steps, Consistency Index = 0.271, Retention Index = 0.567, Homoplasy Index = 0.729). When secondary sexual characters were included, a consensus of seven trees had 578 steps (Consistency Index = 0.265, Homoplasy Index = 0.735 and Retention Index = 0.549) and when compared to the preferred tree, differed only in the positions of S. aulonia and S. maxima Dondale & Redner 1978.

[FIGURES 32 OMITTED]

The analysis resulted in three main clades, with S. minnesotensis basal to these clades. The largest clade (Fig. 32, Clade A) is comprised of species found in the eastern half of North America; the range of some of the species is limited to the Northeast, some to the Southeast and some ranges extend to the Midwest (see range maps, Dondale & Redner 1978; Stratton 1991, 1997a). Clade A includes 9 of the 11 taxa with tibial bristles (Fig. 34). Nested within Clade A is a clade that includes S. duplex, S. saltatrix and S. nr. saltatrix plus the S. ocreata clade, all defined by a process on the palea of the pedipalp of the male (either a triangular process, Fig. 14, or a finger-like process, Fig. 15) and all found in deciduous woods, or a mix of deciduous and pine forests. Also within Clade A is a clade that includes S. bilineata + S. crassipalpata, one of the few clades with significant support from the bootstrap analysis and defined by six characters shared in common.

[FIGURE 34 OMITTED]

Also nested within Clade A is the S. ocreata clade, which consists of S. ocreata (multiple populations), S. crassipes (multiple populations), S. rovneri, S. stridulans, S. uetzi and S. floridana. The clade is unified by the very distinctive finger-like process on the palea of the male pedipalp (Character 29), sternum color (Character 8), long setae on the ventral surface of the pedipalp (Character 31), and the relative size of the macrosetae (Character 32). Of these characters, only Character 29 is not lost or reversed. Members of this clade have been the most intensively studied with respect to courtship and mating behavior. Two of the taxa in this clade are paraphyletic (S. ocreata and S. crassipes), suggesting that there are possibly multiple (yet unrecognized) cryptic species.

Clade B includes the widespread eastern S. avida, the western S. mccooki, as well as S. maxima, S. aulonia, S. cespitum, S. communis and S. retrorsa.

The third clade, Clade C include S. chiracahua, S. mimula and S. salsa. The former two are western, while S. salsa is found on the Gulf Coast and Atlantic coast.

Mapping ornamentation and behavior on preferred phylogenies.--An examination of the distribution of pigmentation on the first legs of males and bristles on the first pair of legs in males across all taxa in this study suggests that pigmentation may have evolved independently of the bristles, and that both traits can be gained and lost (Figs. 33, 34). For example, pigmentation without bristles is seen in S. retrorsa, S. uetzi and R. rabida, while bristles without pigmentation is seen in S. bilineata. When the tibial bristles are mapped onto the preferred phylogeny (Fig. 34) it appears that it evolved independently five or six times with two or three losses in the S. ocreata clade. A more detailed comparison of ornamentation on legs of males in the S. ocreata clade is presented in Fig. 35. It is clear that in this clade, the full range of pigmentation and bristles occur.

[FIGURE 33 OMITTED]

Mapping the major patterns of seismic communication (i.e., drumming vs. stridulation) onto the preferred cladogram shows that the palpal drumming is concentrated in Clade B, while stridulation is prevalent in Clade A (Fig. 36). The S. ocreata clade is of particular interest with respect to courtship behavior as within the clade there is the full range of secondary sexual characters (full tibial bristles, pigment on tibia and or femur, or complete lack of pigmentation or bristles). Within the S. ocreata clade, there is a correlation between overt visual signals and the presence of ornamentation. Several species within the clade have reduced or absent pigmentation (S. rovneri and S. uetzi); these also have reduced visual signals. This study suggests that S. rovneri, S. uetzi and S. stridulans evolved from ancestors that had overt visual signals and these species have subsequently lost visual signals in their courtship. However, as courtship behavior is still unknown for several species with tibial bristles outside of the S. ocreata clade (e.g. S. bilineata, S. salsa, S. segregata and S. aulonia) strong conclusions concerning the correlation of ornamentation and behaviors throughout the genus is not yet possible.

Comparison of genital morphology.--Examination of the pedipalps of these species in light of the hypothesized phylogeny sheds some light on potential homologies of genitalic structures. The most distinctive feature in the male pedipalp of some members of Schizocosa is the finger like paleal process (Fig. 16), which is solely found in the S. ocreata group. However, the presence of a triangular structure in the same location in the species immediately basal to the S. ocreata clade, e.g., S. saltatrix (Fig. 13) and S. duplex (Fig. 14), suggests that both forms of the paleal process are homologous.

DISCUSSION

This phylogenetic study confirms that members of Lycosidae are conservative in morphology with large amounts of homoplasy in many characters and low bootstrap support for several branches. The preferred phylogeny presented here (Fig. 32) is a hypothesis of relationships within Schizocosa based on a weighting scheme that weights genitalia more heavily than somatic characters and excludes secondary sexual characters. The main clades that are proposed in this study are grouped either by geography (i.e. Clade A) or by a suite of morphological characters (i.e. S. ocreata clade, Clade B and Clade C) .

This genus is of particular interest for evolutionary biologists because of the relatively large number of species with ornamentation (Figs. 33 & 34). Mapping the tibial bristles on the preferred phylogeny shows the distribution (and variation) of the ornamentation. For the tibial bristles, there appears to be five or six independent gains of this character across all of the species in this study, with losses occurring in S. rovneri, S. uetzi and S. floridana. In Clade A, the character possibly evolved two or three separate times.

While it is challenging to trace the evolution of specific courtship elements, there is clearly a grouping of taxa that show palpal drumming in courtship and a grouping of those that show stridulation in courtship. If the phylogeny presented in this study is correct, it appears that the species immediately basal to the S. ocreata clade (e.g., S. duplex and S. saltatrix) rely primarily on seismic signals in their courtship. The brush-legged taxa within the S. ocreata clade (e.g. populations of both S. ocreata and S. crassipes) have courtship that involves both seismic signals and visual signals. And, several species within the S. ocreata clade have apparently subsequently lost some of the more visual aspects of courtship (e.g., S. uetzi, S. stridulans and S. rovneri).

Early work on S. ocreata from Ohio and S. rovneri suggested that these two species were sibling species (Uetz & Denterlein 1979; Stratton & Uetz 1983, 1986). The subsequent discovery of additional species in the clade (S. stridulans and S. uetzi) raised questions about the relationship between S. ocreata and S. rovneri. However, this phylogenetic analysis confirms that these two taxa are each other's closest relatives.

Some currently recognized species within this genus may not reflect phylogenetic line-ages as several of the taxa used in this study are paraphyletic (e.g., S. ocreata, S. crassipes and S. saltatrix). The separation of S. ocreata (OH) from S. ocreata (FL and MS) suggests that these populations are diverging and could be considered separate taxa if a phylogenetic species concept is applied. Miller et al. (1998) showed reduced breeding between crosses composed of S. ocreata (OH) and S. ocreata (MS, population from Washington Count, Leroy Percy State Park, indicated LP in that study). Likewise, the clear separation of S. crassipes (MS) from S. crassipes (FL) also suggests divergence. An unpublished study showed reduced interbreeding but a similarity of courtship behavior between both populations of S. crassipes (Germano et al. unpublished data). It is intriguing that the S. ocreata from Mississippi is basal in the S. ocreata clade. The Mississippi River valley has been suggested to be a refuge of deciduous woods during the last ice ages (Delcourt et al. 1980; Delcourt & Delcourt 1987); it is tempting to speculate that perhaps the S. ocreata clade diverged from populations along the Mississippi River valley in the time since the last glaciers. By this scenario, as glaciers retreated in the north, and deciduous woods expanded in the southeast, S. ocreata spread first across the southeast and, as populations became isolated they speciated to S. ocreata (FL), then S. crassipes and the other species within the clade eventually spreading north. The S. ocreata clade is now found throughout the eastern U.S.A. with most species found in the southeast. Molecular data could provide an independent test of this hypothesis.

McClintock & Uetz (1996) showed that females of S. rovneri preferred S. rovneri males that were artificially given tibial bristles. Their preliminary phylogenetic study suggested that S. rovneri was basal to S. ocreata, thus potentially providing an example of the sensory bias hypothesis or an example where the female preference for a trait (in this case, ornamentation in the form of tibial bristles) preceded the evolution of the trait and provided selection for the trait in subsequent species (in this case S. ocreata). However, based on the analyses presented here, S. rovneri is derived relative to S. ocreata and thus the S. rovneri female preference for males with bristles (reported by McClintock & Uetz 1996) is a retained characteristic.

The finger-like process on the palea of the pedipalp seen in the S. ocreata clade is unique in wolf spiders. The somewhat similar process seen in Sosippus does not appear to be homologous to this structure (Sierwald 2000, fig. 7). High magnification video from the ventral view during copulation confirms that the median apophysis of the male engages the epigynal hood of the female, and the paleal process of the male pinches against the side of the epigynum of the female (Stratton, Miller & Miller, unpub. data). Eberhard (1994) suggested that any time there is physical contact between structures during copulation, the potential exists for that trait to be influenced through female choice during copulation. Thus, this character may give females an additional means to evaluate mates and potentially exercise female choice of gametes. After the examination of thousands of male specimens I have never seen the paleal process broken. It is curious that the clade with a concentration of species with conspicuous secondary sexual characters also has the unique trait of the paleal process that could also be shaped by female choice. It is suggested here that the morphology of primary and secondary genitalic characters in males in this clade may be largely shaped by sexual selection by female choice.

As may be expected due to a lack of informative characters in Lycosinae, the preferred phylogeny did not have strong bootstrap support and a combined morphological and molecular analysis may show better supported results in regard to the phylogenetic relationships of Schizocosa.

Indeed, further clarification of this genus and its relatives will provide the phylogenetic context to best interpret behavioral, ecological and evolutionary questions.

Appendix 2

Specimens examined for this study and literature references for figures. Deposition of specimens are as indicated: GES (collection of G. Stratton), PRM (collection of P. Miller), AMNH (American Museum of Natural History), FSCA (Florida State Collection of Arthropods), and MCZ (Museum of Comparative Zoology). Coordinates are provided for as many collecting localities as possible, either by transcribing data included on collecting labels, or searching for localities on the USGS National Mapping Information website (http://geonames. usgs.gov/) search under "U.S. and territories query." Coordinates not included on original labels are in brackets.

Schizocosa aulonia Dondale 1969.--U.S.A.: Illinois: Madison County, Poag, SE 1/4 NW 1/4SE SE 1/4 Sec. 13 T4N, R9W, [38[degrees]48'N, 90[degrees]02'W], pitfall, 12-19 July 1993, David Landes, 2 [??] (GES).

Schizocosa avida (Walckenaer 1837).--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Pontotoc County, 3 miles NE of Pontotoc off Highway 9, field near Mubby Creek, R3E T95 Sect 15 [34[degrees]18'N, 888569W], 13 June 1992, G. Stratton, P. Miller, W. Miller, 1 [??](GES); Missisippi: Marshall County, 3 miles S. of Waterford [34[degrees]36'N, 89[degrees]29'W], 9-12 June 1994, G. Stratton, 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 10-12, 51-54).

Schizocosa bilineata (Emerton 1885).--U.S.A.: Michigan: Eaton County, T2N R6W Sect 6 [42[degrees]36'N, 85[degrees]029'W], on porch of farm, 29 June 1989, G. Stratton, 1 [??] (GES); Mississippi, Panola County, 3 miles NE. of Como, west side of Nelson Creek, on Compress Road, T6S R7W Sec 23 & 24 [34[degrees]32'N, 89[degrees]54'W], 15 May 1998, G. Stratton, P. Miller, 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 8, 47, 48).

Schizocosa cespitum Dondale & Redner 1978.--CANADA: Saskatchewan: Matador, 40 miles N. of Swift Current, short grass prairie, P.W. Riegert, 1 [??], 3 [??] paratypes (AMNH). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 20, 69, 70).

Schizocosa chiricahua Dondale & Redner 1978.--U.S.A.: Arizona: Chochise County, Chiricahua Mts, Southwest Research Station [31[degrees]53'N, 109[degrees]12'W], 5400', in swimming pool, 15 July 1967 & June 7 1968, V. Roth, 2 [??] paratypes (AMNH); Arizona: Graham County, near Safford [32[degrees]50'N, 109[degrees]42'W], 14 July 1956, W. Gertsch & V. Roth, 2 [??] paratypes, 1 [??] paratype (AMNH). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 18, 19, 66-68).

Schizocosa communis (Emerton 1885).--CANADA: Ontario: 9 miles NW. of Bloomfield, 44[degrees]04'N, 77[degrees]18'W, 17 July 1965, Jean & Wilton Ivie, 1 [??] (AMNH); U.S.A.: Pennsylvania: Berks County, Lenhartsville [40[degrees]34'N, 75[degrees]53'W], July 1964, Vaurie, 1 [??] (AMNH). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 14, 55-58).

Schizocosa crassipalpata Roewer 1951.--CANADA: Ontario: Rednersville [44[degrees]07'N, 77[degrees]27'W], field pitfall, 3-19 June 1964, C.D. Dondale, 2 [??], 2 [??] (FSCA). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 9, 49, 50).

Schizocosa crassipes (Walckenaer 1837).--U.S.A.: Florida: Alachua County, 0.25 miles E. of River Styx on Highway 346 [29[degrees]31'17"N, 82[degrees]15'47"W], 10 May 1994, G.B. Edwards & P. Cushing, 3 [??], 4 [??] (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 2, 27-30); Stratton (1991, fig. 4).

Schizocosa crassipes (Walckenaer 1837).--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Grenada County, T21N R2E sect. 12, 13N &R3E Sec 7S, 18N [33[degrees]44'N, 90[degrees]00'W], deciduous woods on hillside, 16 May 1993, G. Stratton, P. Miller, W. Miller, B. Grantham, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES).

Schizocosa duplex Chamberlin 1925.--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Lafayette County, 8 miles SE. of Oxford, T10S R3W Sec 35, 34[degrees]36'N, 89[degrees]29'W, in pine litter,18 May 1993, G. Stratton, E. Hebets, 1 [??], 2 [??] (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 6, 42-44).

Schizocosa floridana Bryant 1934.--U.S.A.: Florida: Marion County, Hopkins Prairie, Ocala National Forest [29[degrees]10'N, 81[degrees]47'W], 25 March 1983. G. Stratton, litter, 4 [??], 2 [??] (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 3, 31-34, 35).

Schizocosa humilis (Banks 1892).--U.S.A.: Pennsylvania: Bucks County, east of Jamieson, Horseshoe Bend, Neshaminy Creek, May 1954, W. Ivie (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 7, 45, 46).

Schizocosa maxima Dondale & Redner 1978.--U.S.A.: California: Solano County, Fair-field [38[degrees]15'N, 122[degrees]02'W], April-August 1955, K.W. Haller, 1 [??]paratype (AMNH); California: Tuolumne County, S. of Highway 108, 5 miles E of Sonora, elev. 2000', drowned in swimming pool, 14 October 1973, W. Icenogle, 1 [??]paratype (AMNH). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 16, 17, 63-65).

Schizocosa mccooki (Montgomery 1904).--U.S.A.: New Mexico: Santa Fe County, Santa Fe [35[degrees]31'N, 105[degrees]56'W], in pinyon scrub, 17 June 1979, D. Lowrie, 3 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 13, 15, 59-62).

Schizocosa mimula (Gertsch 1934).--U.S.A.: Colorado: Otero County, Highway 109, 5 June 1967, 1 [??] (AMNH).

Schizocosa minnesotensis (Gertsch 1934).--U.S.A.: Wyoming: Lincoln County, Kemmerer [41[degrees]48'N, 110[degrees]32'W], 24 August 1983, R. Parmenter, 2 [??], 2 [??] (AMNH).

Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz 1844).--U.S.A.: Ohio: Clermont County, Cincinnati Nature Center [39[degrees]07'N, 84[degrees]15'W], 6 May 1980, G. Stratton, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Stratton (1991, figs. 3, 9).

Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz 1844).--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Washington County, Leroy Percy State Park, N. of Highway 12 near entrance of park, T15N R7W, 90[degrees]50'W, 33[degrees]10'N, 9 April 1993, on knoll by flooded bottomlands, G. Stratton, P. Miller, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES).

Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz 1844).--U.S.A.: Florida: Alachua County, 0.25 miles E. of River Styx on Highway 346 [29[degrees]31'17"N, 82[degrees]15'47"W], 1 March 1993, G.B. Edwards, P. Cushing, 9 [??], 3 [??] (GES).

Schizocosa retrorsa (Banks 1911).--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Lafayette County, 8 miles SE. of Oxford, T10S R3W Sec 35, 34[degrees]36'N, 89[degrees]29'W, pitfall in pine woods, 28 June-5 July 1993, 1 [??],1 [??], G. Stratton (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 21, 75-78).

Schizocosa rovneri Uetz & Dondale 1979.--U.S.A.: Kentucky: Boone County, 5 miles W. of Taylorsport, floodplain of Ohio River, "Sandy Run" [39[degrees]05'N, 84[degrees]41'W], 3 May 1996, K. Delaney, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Stratton (1991, figs. 2, 7).

Schizocosa salsa Barnes 1953.--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Hancock County, mouth of Jordan River [30[degrees]16'N, 89[degrees]37'W], on Juncus marsh island, 25 June 1993, 1 [??] (PRM). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 24, 79, 80).

Schizocosa saltatrix (Hentz 1844).--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Lafayette County, 8 miles SE. of Oxford, T10S R3W Sec 35, 34[degrees]36'N, 89[degrees]29'W, "Lonesome 80," pine deciduous woods, 16 March 1996, G. Stratton & P. Miller, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 4, 39-41).

Schizocosa sp. nr saltatrix.--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Wilkinson County, 5 miles E of Doloroso on Smith Rd, S. of Homochito River, 31[degrees]20'N, 92[degrees]45'W, uplands deciduous forest, 10 April 1993, G. E. Stratton, P.R. Miller, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES).

Schizocosa segregata Gertsch & Wallace 1937.--U.S.A.: Florida: Levy County, 28 April 1934, # 298, H.K. Wallace, 1 [??], 1 [??], paratypes (poor condition); Texas: Edinburg [26[degrees]18'N, 98[degrees]10'W], 1934, S. Mulaik, 1 [??] (poor condition) (AMNH). Published figures: Dondale & Redner (1978, figs. 23, 81, 82).

Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1984.--U.S.A.: Illinois: Mason County, Sand Ridge State Forest [40[degrees]24'N, 89[degrees]52'W], 7 June 1985, G. Stratton, L. Hartz, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Stratton (1991, figs. 1, 5, 6, 13).

Schizocosa uetzi Stratton 1997.--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Lafayette County, 8 miles SE of Oxford, T10S R3W Sec 35, 34[degrees]36'N, 89[degrees]29'W, "Lonesome 80," mixed pine and hardwoods, 4 July 1992, G. Stratton, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Stratton (1997, figs. 1-5).

Schizocosa ocreata x Schizocosa rovneri hybrids.--Cross between S. ocreata [??] from Ohio and S. rovneri [??] from Kentucky, 1980-1982, 1 [??] (GES). Cross between S. rovneri [??] from Kentucky and S. ocreata [??]from Ohio, 1980-1982, 1 [??] (GES).

Allocosa georgicola (Walckenaer 1837).--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Lafayette County, 8 miles SE. of Oxford, T10S R3W Sec 35, 34[degrees]36'N, 89[degrees]29'W,"Lonesome 80," pitfall in mixed pine and hardwoods, 16-24 September 1992, G. Stratton, P. Miller, 1 [??],1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Chamberlin & Ivie (1944, fig. 57). Pedipalps and epigyna of the closely related H. helluo (Walckenaer 1837) are figured in Kaston (1948, figs. 1065, 1066, 1090, 1105) and Dondale & Redner (1990, figs. 43-47).

Gladicosa pulchra (Keyserling 1877).--U.S.A.: Tennessee: Hardeman County, Chickasaw State Park [35[degrees]22'N, 88[degrees]50'W], pine deciduous woods, 1 November 1992, G. Stratton, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Brady (1986, figs. 3, 10-14, 39-42).

Rabidosa rabida (Walckenaer 1837).--U.S.A.: Mississippi: Lafayette County, 8 miles SE. of Oxford, T10S R3W Sec 35, 34[degrees]36'N, 89[degrees]29'W, pine deciduous mixed, 5 August1991, G. Stratton, P. Miller, G. Miller, 1 [??], 1 [??] (GES). Published figures: Brady & McKinley (1994, figs. 1, 6, 11-14) and Kaston (1948, figs. 1077, 1079, 2006).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Thanks are extended to many individuals for their assistance in this study. For the revision that provided the groundwork for much of this study and for many good conversations, I thank C. Dondale and J. Redner. N. Platnick (AMNH), J. Coddington and S. Larcher (NMNH), L. Leibensberger (MCZ), G.B. Edwards (FSCA), R. Brown (MEM) and H. Guarisco were all generous when loaning specimens. P. Miller helped extensively with field collections and identifications. H. Guarisco contributed live specimens for behavioral studies. The SEMs were done by G. Baker. A. Douglas presented an excellent class in phylogenetics and provided feedback at numerous stages of this study. This study was informed by many conversations over the years. I extend my thanks to P. Miller, G. Uetz, E. Hebets, C. Dondale, A. Brady and W. Maddison. Several individuals read earlier drafts of this paper and their suggestions and corrections were much appreciated. For this I extend my thanks to V. Framenau, C. Vink, E. Hebets, A. Douglas and W. Maddison. Finally, thanks are extended to C. Dondale, J. Redner & A. Brady for their many revisions of North American lycosids.

Manuscript received 22 September 2004, revised 1 April 2005.

LITERATURE CITED

Barnes, R.D. 1953. Report on a collection of spiders from the coast of North Carolina. American Musem Novitates 1632:1-21.

Barthel, J. & O. von Helversen. 1990. Pardosa wagleri (Hahn 1822) and Pardosa saturatior Simon 1937, a pair of sibling species (Araneae, Lycosidae). Bulletin for the Society of European Arachnology 1:17-23.

Brady, A.R. 1962. The spider genus Sosippus in North America, Mexico, and Central America (Araneae, Lycosidae). Psyche 69:129-164.

Brady, A.R. 1979. Nearctic species of the wolf spider genus Trochosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Psyche 86:167-212.

Brady, A.R. 1986. Nearctic species of the wolf spider genus Gladicosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Psyche 93:285-319.

Brady, A.R. & K.S. McKinley. 1994. Nearctic species of the wolf spider genus Rabidosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 22:138-160.

Chamberlin, R.V. & W. Ivie. 1944. Spiders of the Georgia region of North America. Bulletin of the University of Utah 35:143-231.

Delcourt, P.A & H.R. Delcourt. 1987. Long-term Forest Dynamics of the Temperate Zone. A case study of late-Quaternary forests in Eastern North America. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Delcourt, P.A., H.R. Delcourt, R.C. Brister & L.E. Lackey. 1980. Quaternary vegetation history of the Mississippi embayment. Quaternary Research 13:111-132.

Dondale, C.D. 1986. The subfamilies of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Actas X Congreso Internacional de Aracnologia Jaca/Espania, 1986. I: 327-332.

Dondale, C.D. & J.H. Redner. 1978. Revision of the Nearctic wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneida: Lycosidae). Canadian Entomologist 110:143-181.

Dondale, C.D. & J.H. Redner. 1984. Revision of the milvina group of the wolf spider genus Pardosa (Araneae: Lycosidae) Psyche 91:67-117.

Dondale, C.D. & J.H. Redner. 1990. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada, Part 17. The wolf spiders, nurseryweb spiders, and lynx spiders of Canada and Alaska. Biosystematics Research Centre, Ottawa.

Eberhard, W.G. 1994. Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spider, and implication for cryptic female choice. Evolution 48:711-733.

Grey, E. & G.E. Stratton. 1998. The courtship behavior of Schizocosa avida (Walckenaer) (Araneae; Lycosidae). American Arachnology 56:7.

Griswold, C.E. 1987. A revision of the jumping spider genus Habronattus F.O.P.-Cambridge (Araneae; Salticidae) with phenetic and cladistic analyses. University of California Publications in Entomology 107:1-345.

Hebets, E.A. 2003. Subadult experience influences adult mate choice in an arthropod: exposed female wolf spider prefer males of a familiar phenotype. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100:13390-13395.

Hebets, E.A. 2005. Attention-altering signal interactions among signals in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa uetzi. Behavioral Ecology. 16:75-82.

Hebets, E.A. & G.W. Uetz. 1999. Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 57: 865-872.

Hebets, E.A. & G.W. Uetz. 2000. Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology 47:280-286.

Hebets, E.A., G.E. Stratton & G.L. Miller. 1996. Habitat and courtship behavior of the wolf spider Schizocosa retrorsa (Banks) (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 24:141-147.

Homann, H. 1971. Die Augen der Araneae. Anatomie, Ontogenie und Bedeutung fur die Systematik (Chelicerata, Arachnida). Zietschrift fu"r Morphologie der Tiere 69:201-272.

Kaston B.J. 1936. The senses involved in the courtship of some vagabond spiders. Entomologica Americana 16:97-167.

Kronestedt, T. 1990. Separation of two species standing as Alopecosa aculeata (Clerck) by morphological, behavioural and ecological characters, with remarks on related species in the pulverulenta group (Araneae, Lycodidae). Zoologica Scripta 19:203-225.

Maddison, W.P. 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42:576-581.

Maddison, W.P. & M. Hedin. 2003. Phylogeny of Habronattus jumping spider (Araneae: Salticidae), with consideration of genital and courtship evolution. Systematic Entomology 28:1-21.

Maddison, W.P. & D.R. Maddison. 1992. Mac-Clade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3. 06. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

McClintock, W.J. & G.W. Uetz. 1996. Female choice and preexisting bias: visual cues during courtship in two Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 52:167-181.

Miller, G.L., G.E. Stratton, P.R. Miller, & E.A. Hebets. 1998. Geographical variation in male courtship behaviour and sexual isolation in wolf spiders of the genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 56:937-951.

Peckham, G.W. & E.G. Peckham. 1889. Observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae. Occasional Papers of the Wisconsin Natural History Society 1:3-60.

Peckham, G.W. & E.G. Peckham. 1890. Additional observations on sexual selection in spiders of the family Attidae, with some remarks on Mr. Wallace's theory of sexual ornamentation. Occasional Papers of the Wisconsin Natural History Society 1:117-151.

Platnick, N.I. 2005. The World Spider Catalog version 5.5. http://research.amnh.org/entomology/ spiders/catalog81-87/index.html

Platnick, N.I., Griswod, C.E. & J. A. Coddington. 1991. On missing entries in cladistic analysis. Cladistics 7:337-343.

Rovner, J.S. 1975. Sound production by nearctic wolf spiders: A substratum-coupled stridulatory mechanism. Science 190:1309-1310.

Rovner, J.S. 1968. An analysis of display in the lycosid spider Lycosa rabida Walckenaer. Animal Behaviour 16:358-368.

Ryan, M.J. & A.S. Rand. 1993. Sexual selection and signal evolution: the ghost of biases past. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society of London Series B 340:187-196.

Scheffer, S.J., G.W. Uetz & G.E. Stratton. 1996. Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signaling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology 38:17-23.

Sierwald, P. 2000. Description of the male Sosippus placidus with notes on the subfamily Sosippinae. Journal of Arachnology 28:133-140.

Stratton, G.E. 1991. A new species of wolf spider, Schizocosa stridulans (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 19:29-39.

Stratton, G.E. 1997a. A new species of Schizocosa from the southeastern USA (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 25:84-92.

Stratton, G.E. 1997b. Investigation of species divergence and reproductive isolation of Schizocosa stridulans (Araneae: Lycosidae) from Illinois. Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 10:313-321.

Stratton, G.E. & D.C. Lowrie. 1984. Courtship behavior and life cycle of the wolf spider Schizocosa mccooki (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 12:223-228.

Stratton, G.E. & G.W. Uetz. 1983. Communication via substratum-coupled stridulation and reproductive isolation in wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Animal Behaviour 31:164-172.

Stratton, G.E. & G.W. Uetz. 1986. The inheritance of courtship behavior and its role as a reproductive isolation mechanism in two species of Schizocosa wolf spiders (Araneae; Lycosidae). Evolution 40:129-141.

Stratton, G.E., P.R. Miller, G.L. Miller and E.A. Hebets. 1996. Copulatory pattern and duration in wolf spiders (Araneae; Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology. 24:186-20.

Swofford, D.L. 2002. [PAUP.sup.*]. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

Uetz, G.W. & G. Denterlein. 1979. Courtship behavior, habitat and reproductive isolation in Schizocosa rovneri Uetz and Dondale (Araneae, Lycosidae). Journal of Arachnology 7:121-128.

Uetz, G.W. & C.D. Dondale. 1979. A new wolf spider in the genus Schizocosa (Araneae, Lycosidae) from Illinois. Journal of Arachnology 7:86-87.

Uetz, G.W. & J. A. Roberts. 2002. Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: Insights from video/audio playback studies. Brain Behavior and Evolution 59:222-230.

Uetz, G.W. & E. I. Smith. 1999. Asymmetry in a visual signaling character and sexual selection in a wolf spider. Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology 45:87-93.

Uetz, G.W., W. J. McClintock, D. Miller, E.I. Smith & K.K. Cook. 1996. Limb regeneration and subsequent asymmetry in a male secondary sexual character influences sexual selection in wolf spiders. Behavior Ecology and Sociobiology. 38: 253-257.

Vink, C.J. 2002. Lycosidae (Arachnida: Araneae). Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln.

Wallace, H.K. 1942a. A revision of the burrowing spiders of the genus Geolycosa (Araneae, Lycosidae). American Midland Naturalist 27:1-62.

Wallace, H.K. 1942b. A study of the lenta group of the genus Lycosa with descriptions of new species (Araneae, Lycosidae). American Museum Novitates 1185:1-21.

Gail E. Stratton: Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677, U.S.A. E-mail: Byges@olemiss.edu
Appendix 1.--Data matrix of character states for the phylogenetic
analysis of Schizocosa wolf spiders and outgroups.

Taxon/Node                                                 Taxon/Node
                             1111111111222222222233333333334444444444
                    1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789

S. aulonia          121211101000000100000100000001111000301000?101110
S. avida            0202111101200101111001000000011010002010000010000
S. bilineata        2201111010011001000001001000011101110100100000211
S. cespitum         1212111100100101000011000010011111003021000111000
S. chiricahua       1202111010000000000001001010001011001030000000000
S. communis         1210010100100101001001011000001110003020000010000
S. crassipalpata    2201110110011001000001011000010101101110100000000
S. crassipes (FL)   1202100000001011011101100000111001110031001010210
S. crassipes (MS)   2200000010001001100001100000111002113010000010210
S. duplex           2200010100001011001101100001001101112030000010000
S. floridana        2212200000001001011001100000111001112021001000010
S. humilis          2200000100000100000001000000010101001020000010010
S. maxima           0211111101100100000001011000010100003020000000010
S. mccooki          0201111101100001011001010000010110002010000000000
S. mimula           1201111000000000000011010110000110002020000000010
S. minnesotensis    0201100100100100000011000000000111001010000010010
S. ocreata (OH)     1200000100000101101101100000100102121021000010210
S. ocreata (FL)     1200000000001011001101100000101001123010000010212
S. ocreata (MS)     1201100100000011001101100000101002123020001010210
ocr (OH) x
  rov hybrid        1200000100000000001101101000101101123011001110110
S. retrorsa         1212100111100000001011010000010110001020001010000
S. rovneri          1201100100000010101101100000100102124011001000000
S. salsa            1101211000000001100011001010001011001031001000111
S. saltatrix        1200000100001001011001100001000001113021000000010
S. sp. nr
  saltatrix         120120000000100101100110000101000?111020000000010
S. segregata        220110011000101101100110000100010000102000?000111
S. stridulans       2202100000001001101101100000100002121031000010110
S. uetzi            1202100000001001111001100000100002120031001000010
G. pulchra          0212100100100000111000000110001101002011010000010
R. rabida           010121100000000?1000000000000111110010?1010111010
A. georgicola       0000000100001110000000000100001110001002010000000


Table 1.--Body size (carapace length, carapace width and ratio of
length/width) of male Schizocosa and outgroups used in this study.
All measures are S. aulonia, and S. maxima are from Dondale & Redner
(1978), measures from S. salsa are from Barnes (1952).

                                            Male

Species                      Length        Width          L/W

S. aulonia                    4.0           2.8           1.4
S. avida                      4.8           3.6           1.3
S. bilineata                  2.9           2.1           1.4
S. cespitum                   3.6           2.6           1.4
S. chiricahua                 4.2           3.0           1.4
S. communis                   4.6           3.4           1.4
S. crassipalpata              3.1           2.3           1.3
S. crassipes (FL)             3.2           2.6           1.2
S. crassipes (MS)             3.2           2.4           1.3
S. duplex                     3.2           2.5           1.3
S. floridana                  2.6           2.0           1.3
S. humilis                    3.1           2.3           1.3
S. maxima                     9.0           7.7           1.2
S. mccooki                    3.7           2.8           1.3
S. mimula                     4.0           2.9           1.4
S. minnesotensis              4.6           3.2           1.4
S. ocreata (OH)               3.8           2.8           1.4
S. ocreata (MS)               3.7           2.7           1.4
S. ocreata (FL)               4.0           3.0           1.3
S. retrorsa                   3.7           2.7           1.4
S. rovneri                    3.4           2.6           1.3
S. salsa                      4.1           3.0           1.4
S. saltatrix                  3.7           3.0           1.2
S. S. sp. nr. saltatrix       4.0           3.2           1.3
S. segregata                  3.0           2.2           1.4
S. stridulans                 3.2           2.4           1.3
S. uetzi                      3.6           2.8           1.3
S. ocr x rov hybrids          3.8           3.1           1.2
A. georgicola                 8.0           6.9           1.2
G. pulchra                    6.0           4.5           1.3
R. rabida                     7.8           5.9           1.3

                                           Female

Species                      Length        Width          L/W

S. aulonia                    5.5           4.0           1.4
S. avida                      6.8           5.0           1.4
S. bilineata                  3.5           2.5           1.4
S. cespitum                   4.2           3.0           1.4
S. chiricahua                 3.8           2.5           1.5
S. communis                   4.0           3.0           1.3
S. crassipalpata              3.1           2.2           1.4
S. crassipes (FL)             3.8           2.7           1.4
S. crassipes (MS)             3.4           2.6           1.3
S. duplex                     3.2           2.4           1.3
S. floridana                  3.1           2.5           1.2
S. humilis                    3.6           2.6           1.4
S. maxima                    12.1           9.0           1.3
S. mccooki                    4.2           3.2           1.3
S. mimula                     4.2           2.8           1.5
S. minnesotensis              4.9           3.6           1.4
S. ocreata (OH)               4.1           3.2           1.3
S. ocreata (MS)               4.5           3.4           1.3
S. ocreata (FL)               4.2           3.3           1.3
S. retrorsa                   3.4           2.7           1.3
S. rovneri                    3.7           3.0           1.2
S. salsa                      4.1           2.9           1.4
S. saltatrix                  3.6           3.0           1.2
S. S. sp. nr. saltatrix       3.6           2.8           1.3
S. segregata                  3.2           2.2           1.5
S. stridulans                 3.0           2.3           1.3
S. uetzi                      3.7           3.0           1.2
S. ocr x rov hybrids          4.3           3.5           1.2
A. georgicola                10.0           7.5           1.3
G. pulchra                    6.4           5.0           1.3
R. rabida                     9.8           7.4           1.3

Table 2.--Tibial length and relative tibial length
(tibial L/carapace L) of males of Schizocosa and
outgroups. All measures are in mm.

                                           Male

Species                      Cara         Tibia       Tibial L/
                            length        length        Cara L

S. aulonia                   4.0           2.5           0.61
S. avida                     4.8           3.6           0.75
S. bilineata                 2.9           2.0           0.67
S. cespitum                  3.6           2.0           0.50
S. chiricahua                4.2           2.5           0.60
S. communis                  4.6           2.5           0.68
S. crassipalpata             3.1           1.8           0.57
S. crassipes (FL)            3.2           2.8           0.85
S. crassipes (MS)            3.2           2.5           0.84
S. duplex                    3.4           2             0.66
S. floridana                 2.6           1.5           0.58
S. humilis                   3.1           1.8           0.58
S. maxima                    9.0           6.4           0.71
S. mccooki                   3.7           2.7           0.74
S. mimula                    4.0           2.7           0.68
S. minnesotensis             4.6           2.4           0.51
S. ocreata (OH)              3.8           3             0.78
S. ocreata (MS)              3.7           2.6           0.71
S. ocreata (FL)              4.0           2.6           0.65
S. retrorsa                  3.7           2.6           0.71
S. rovneri                   3.4           2.6           0.76
S. salsa                     4.1           3.8           0.92
S. saltatrix                 3.7           2.5           0.67
S. S. sp. nr. saltatrix      4.0           2.5           0.62
S. segregata                 3.0           1.8           0.59
S. stridulans                3.2           2.4           0.75
S. uetzi                     3.6           3.0           0.83
S. ocr x rov hybrids         3.8           2.6           0.68
A. georgicola                8.0           5.5           0.68
G. pulchra                   6.0           4.8           0.83
R. rabida                    7.8           7.0           0.89

Table 3.--Length, width and length/width of tibia and tarsus of
pedipalp for Schizocosa and outgroups. All measures in mm.

                                       Tibia of palp

Species                    Length        Width          L/W

S. aulonia                  0.2           0.2           1.2
S. avida                    0.7           0.5           1.5
S. bilineata                0.4           0.4           1.0
S. cespitum                 0.5           0.4           1.3
S. chiricahua               0.5           0.4           1.4
S. communis                 0.6           0.4           1.4
S. crassipalpata            0.4           0.3           1.1
S. crassipes (FL)           0.3           0.3           1.0
S. crassipes (MS)           0.6           0.5           1.1
S. duplex                   0.4           0.5           0.9
S. floridana                0.5           0.4           1.3
S. humilis                  0.5           0.5           1.1
S. maxima                   0.4           0.3           1.3
S. mccooki                  0.6           0.4           1.4
S. mimula                   0.3           0.2           1.5
S. minnesotensis            0.7           0.5           1.4
S. ocreata (OH)             0.6           0.6           1.0
S. ocreata (FL)             0.5           0.6           0.8
S. ocreata (MS)             0.6           0.6           1.0
S. retrorsa                 0.6           0.4           1.3
S. rovneri                  0.6           0.6           0.9
S. salsa                    0.7           0.5           1.3
S. saltatrix                0.7           0.6           1.1
S. sp. nr saltatrix         0.7           0.6           1.1
S. segregata                0.4           0.4           1.1
S. stridulans               0.5           0.5           1.0
S. uetzi                    0.6           0.6           1.1
S. ocr. x rov hybrids       0.6           0.6           1.0
A. georgicola               1.6           0.8           1.9
G. pulchra                  1.0           0.6           1.6
R. rabida                   1.7           0.8           2.1

                                     Tarsus of palp

Species                    Length        Width          L/W

S. aulonia                  1.1           0.5           2.0
S. avida                    0.9           0.4           2.4
S. bilineata                0.9           0.5           1.8
S. cespitum                 1.2           0.6           2.1
S. chiricahua               1.2           0.6           2.1
S. communis                 1.3           0.6           2.1
S. crassipalpata            0.9           0.5           1.7
S. crassipes (FL)           0.7           0.4           1.9
S. crassipes (MS)           1.1           0.6           1.9
S. duplex                   1.0           0.5           1.9
S. floridana                0.9           0.5           1.9
S. humilis                  1.0           0.6           1.7
S. maxima                   1.0           0.6           1.6
S. mccooki                  1.2           0.6           2.1
S. mimula                   1.1           0.6           2.1
S. minnesotensis            1.5           0.7           2.2
S. ocreata (OH)             1.4           0.8           1.9
S. ocreata (FL)             1.3           0.8           1.7
S. ocreata (MS)             1.3           0.7           1.8
S. retrorsa                 1.3           0.6           2.1
S. rovneri                  1.3           0.7           1.8
S. salsa                    1.3           0.6           2.3
S. saltatrix                1.1           0.6           1.8
S. sp. nr saltatrix         1.2           0.7           1.8
S. segregata                0.9           0.5           1.9
S. stridulans               1.1           0.6           1.8
S. uetzi                    1.3           0.7           1.9
S. ocr. x rov hybrids       1.1           0.6           1.8
A. georgicola               2.7           1.1           2.4
G. pulchra                  2.1           1.1           1.9
R. rabida                   2.9           1.1           2.6

Table 4.--Epigynal measures including total
length of epigynum, and width of epigynum, the
ratio of epigynal length/width, and depth of the epigynal
hood. All measures in mm. Values for three
species (S. salsa, S. segregata, S. aulonia) were not
available and for these species, ratio of length to
width was calculated from published figures in
Dondale & Redner (1978).

Species                  Length      Width       L/W       Hood

S. aulonia                                       1.4
S. avida                   0.9        0.7        1.3        0.3
S. bilineata               0.5        0.6        0.9        0.1
S. cespitum                0.7        0.7        1.0        0.1
S. chiricahua              0.7        0.6        1.2        0.1
S. communis                0.8        0.7        1.1        0.1
S. crassipalpata           0.5        0.5        0.9        0.1
S. crassipes (FL)          0.7        0.6        1.2        0.1
S. crassipes (MS)          0.7        0.6        1.3        0.1
S. duplex                  0.6        0.6        1.0        0.1
S. Floridana               0.6        0.5        1.2        0.1
S. humilis                 0.8        0.6        1.3        0.1
S. maxima                  0.8        0.7        1.2        0.1
S. mccooki                 0.7        0.7        1.0        0.1
S. mimula                  0.8        0.6        1.3        0.1
S. minnesotensis           0.9        0.6        1.7        0.1
S. ocreata (OH)            0.8        0.7        1.1        0.1
S. ocreata (FL)            0.9        0.7        1.3        0.1
S. ocreata (MS)            0.8        0.6        1.3        0.1
S. retrorsa                0.8        0.6        1.3        0.1
S. rovneri                 0.8        0.7        1.1        0.1
S. salsa                                         1.1
S. saltatrix               0.7        0.7        1.1        0.1
S. sp. nr. saltatrix       0.6        0.7        1.0        0.1
S. segregata                                     1.2
S. stridulans              0.6        0.6        1.1        0.1
S. uetzi                   0.8        0.7        1.2        0.1
S. ocr x rov hybrids       0.7        0.6        1.2        0.1
A. georgicola              1.4        1.0        1.4        0.2
G. pulchra                 0.9        0.8        1.1        0.2
R. rabida                  1.3        1.0        1.3        1.8

Table 5.--Comparison of elements of courtship behavior (both seismic
and visual) in species of Schizocosa, Gladicosa and Allocosa.

Species                This study            Previous studies

S. aulonia
S. avida                                     rapid papal drumming,
                                               leg 1 arch (Grey &
                                               Stratton 1998)
S. bilineata
S. cespitum
S. chiricahua
S. communis                                  Palpal drumming
                                               (Dondale & Redner
                                               1978)
S. crassipalpata       Stridulation
S. crassipes (FL)                            Stridulation, che-
                                               liceral strike, leg
                                               1 extend and wave
                                               (Miller et al. 1998)
S. crassipes (MS)                            Stridulation, cheli-
                                               ceral strike, leg
                                               1 extend and wave
                                               (Miller et al. 1998)
S. duplex              Stridulation          Stridulation (Hebets
                                               & Uetz 2000)
S. floridana           Stridulation, leg
S. humilis               1 tap
S. maxima
S. mccooki                                   Papal drumming
                                               (Stratton & Lowrie
                                               1984)
S. mimula
S. minnesotensis
S. ocreata (OH)                              "Jerky walk" "double
                                             tap" (Stratton &
                                             Uetz 1983, 1986)
S. ocreata (FL)        Cheliceral strike
                         double (bilateral
                         arch with legs 1)
                         Stratton, Miller
                         & Miller unpub-
                         lished data)

S. ocreata (MS)        Cheliceral strike
                         walk and tap legs
                         1 (Stratton,
                         Miller & Miller
                         unpublished data)
S. retrorsa                                  Palpal drumming, leg
                                               1 wave (Hebets et
                                               al. 1996)
S. rovneri                                   Series of body
                                               bounces (Uetz &
                                               Denterlein 1979;
                                               Stratton & Uetz
                                               1983, 1986)
S. salsa
S. saltatrix           Stridulation, leg
                         1 arch
S. sp. nr. saltatrix   Stridulation or
                         body vibration
S. segregata
S. stridulans                                Stridulation, quick
                                               tap of leg 1
                                               (Stratton 1991,
                                               1997a 1997b)
S. uetzi                                     Stridulation, leg 1
                                               arch (Stratton
                                               1997b; Hebets 2003)
S. ocr x rov hybrids   Stridulation, body
                         bounce, double
                         tap, jerky walk
                         (Stratton & Uetz
                         1986)
A. georgicola          Stridulation, leg
                         1 extend and
                         vibrate
G. pulchra             Stridulation
R. rabida                                    Stridulation Papal
                                               scraping, stridu-
                                               lation leg wave
                                               (Rovner 1968)

Species                Not known

S. aulonia             Behavior not known
S. avida
S. bilineata           Behavior not known
S. cespitum            Behavior not known
S. chiricahua          Behavior not known
S. communis
S. crassipalpata
S. crassipes (FL)
S. crassipes (MS)
S. duplex
S. floridana
S. humilis             Behavior not known
S. maxima              Behavior not known
S. mccooki
S. mimula              Behavior not known
S. minnesotensis       Behavior not known
S. ocreata (OH)
S. ocreata (FL)
S. ocreata (MS)
S. retrorsa
S. rovneri
S. salsa               Behavior not known
S. saltatrix
S. sp. nr. saltatrix
S. segregata           Behavior not known
S. stridulans
S. uetzi
S. ocr x rov hybrids
A. georgicola
G. pulchra
R. rabida
Gale Copyright: Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.