Establishment of T-lymphocyte subset reference intervals in a healthy adult population in Chennai, India.
HIV infection (Development and progression)
HIV infection (Drug therapy)
HIV infection (Diagnosis)
HIV infection (Research)
T cells (Measurement)
T cells (Health aspects)
T cells (Research)
Pulimi, Sandeep Sundaram, Muthu
|Publication:||Name: Indian Journal of Medical Research Publisher: Indian Council of Medical Research Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Biological sciences; Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2009 Indian Council of Medical Research ISSN: 0971-5916|
|Issue:||Date: Jan, 2009 Source Volume: 129 Source Issue: 1|
|Topic:||Event Code: 310 Science & research|
|Geographic:||Geographic Scope: India Geographic Name: Chennai, India Geographic Code: 9INDI India|
Estimation of CD4+ T-lymphocytes continues to be an important
aspect for monitoring HIV disease progression and response to
antiretroviral therapy. Most of the diagnostic laboratories often rely
on western text books for CD4+ T-lymphocyte reference values, which
could, often be unreliable for usage in local settings. Therefore, we
attempted to establish the reference values for T-lymphocyte subsets
among healthy adults in a cross-sectional study carried out at the YRG
Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRG CARE) in Chennai, south
India, in 213 (84 female and 129 male) healthy, HIV-1/2 seronegative
adults as volunteers. Whole blood specimens were processed for CD4+,
CD8+ T-lymphocyte estimation and haematological parameters. The
established range of CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts for men and women were
383-1347 cells/[micro]l (mean 865 and median 845 cells/[micro]l) and
448-1593 cells/[micro]l (mean 1021 and median 954 cells/[micro]l),
respectively. Women had significantly higher absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte
counts (P<0.001) and CD4+:CD8+ T-lymphocyte ratio as compared to men.
The established normal range of CD4+ T-lymphocyte % was 21-59 (mean 40.2
and median 40.1). The influence of age was not observed in any of the
parameters except CD4+/CD8+ T-lymphocyte ratio with the >45 yr age
group. Further studies with greater sample size may be required to
define the staging of HIV disease in relation to the normal CD4
T-lymphocyte count in the general population.
Key words CD4+ T-lymphocyte--India--reference range
The depletion of CD4+ T-lymphocyte population in the blood is widely believed to be a better predictor of disease progression in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) (1). Therefore the estimation of CD4+ T-lymphocyte continues to play an important role in the monitoring of HIV disease progression and response to antiretroviral therapy (ART) (1,2). Available evidences suggest that the variations in CD4+ T-lymphocyte could depend on certain important factors namely environment, ethnicity, genetic differences and dietary patterns in addition to age and gender (3-9). Although a few studies have been conducted in India at diverse locations in the past (10-15), most of the laboratories still depend on western textbook references, which are believed to be unreliable for usage in local diagnostic settings. Further, studies have shown that variations exist in relation to reference values of T-lymphocyte subsets, and warrants estimation measures be carried out in quality control established and good clinical laboratory practice (GCLP) certified laboratories. Hence, we established reference ranges for the adult population of Chennai, south India, in a prospective study carried out between March and August 2005, at the YRG Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRG CARE) in Chennai, India.
In the present study, we enrolled 213 laboratory confirmed healthy HIV-1/2 seronegative volunteers to establish the reference interval of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte subsets. The volunteers were invited to participate in the study through distribution of handouts and e-mails circulated to various organizations. The protocols involving human subjects were approved by YRG CARE's Institutional Review Board prior to conducting the research. The study subjects comprised apparently healthy adults (age range 18-56 yr) from the general community. Before enrollment, the protocol was explained in detail and written informed consents were obtained from the volunteers. A study questionnaire was administered that included details viz., martial, extra-marital relations and medical history. Subjects with a history of connective tissue disorders; chronic illnesses like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic renal disease, severe allergies, recent past immunization, steroid therapy in the past three months, antibiotic usage four weeks prior to enrollment, blood or blood product transfusion in the past 6 months, those with either a history of alcohol intake, smoking or strenuous exercise were excluded. In addition, each participant was examined to investigate certain physiological parameters like blood pressure, basal metabolic index (BMI), X-ray and electrocardiogram (ECG) before enrollment. Female subjects that claimed to be pregnant, with a questionable pregnancy status or within 5 days of last menstruation were excluded. Blood (4 ml) collected in K3-EDTA was processed for CD4+, CD8+ T-lymphocyte profile and haematological parameters using the FACSCount (Becton Dickinson, CA, USA) and a 3-part Sysmex K21 haematology analyzer (lymphocytes, neutrophils and mixed cells including basophils, eosinophils and monocytes), (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) respectively in a closed system, as per the manufacturer's instructions, strictly adhering to all the quality control procedures that included daily internal quality control and parallel testing procedures. For parallel testing, the newer lot of the reagents was compared with the previous lots by a bridging test (16). Accordingly, a specimen with CD4/CD8+ T-lymphocyte ratio >1.00 and another with ratio <1.00 were processed with the previous lot and were run with the newer lot of the reagent. Thus, performance of the newer lot was confirmed before introducing the lot into routine testing.
The CD4+ T-lymphocyte % values were calculated by dividing the absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count with the total lymphocyte count and multiplying by hundred. YRG CARE laboratory is certified by the United Kingdom-National External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK-NEQAS) for immunophenotyping and College of American Pathologists (CAP, IL, USA) for haematological parameters, since 2001. Possible diurnal variations in CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts were ruled out by collecting blood only at specified hours in the morning (between 08.00-10.00 h). The blood specimens were also tested for certain infectious conditions; HIV1/2 antibody determination by double ELISA (Abbott HIV-1/2, Murex Biotech, Kent, UK and HIV Uni-form II Ag/Ab, Biomerieux, The Netherlands), rapid plasma reagin (RPR) (Span Diagnostics, Surat, India), Treponema pallidum passive agglutination (TPPA) (Serodia, Fujirebio, Japan), hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) (Hepanostika HBsAg Uniform II, Biomerieux, The Netherlands) and anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) by ELISA (Abbott Murex, South Africa). Persons reactive to any of these conditions were excluded.
The study initially enrolled 227 participants as per the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2000 (NCCLS), guidelines (17). Two subjects were excluded due to abnormalities seen in ECG/X-ray, 7 due to infectious conditions namely, syphilis (n=1), HBV (n=4) and HCV (n=2). Further, five subjects were also excluded due to antibiotic use during the study tenure.
The data generated were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software, version 13.0 (SPSS, IL, USA). Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the distribution of lymphocyte subsets between the genders. To determine parameters that needed an upper and lower boundary (double boundary); the central 95 per cent of the distribution was employed. Reference interval was calculated from the mean 1.96 standard deviation (SD). For non-normally distributed analytes, the reference intervals were calculated non-parametrically from the central 95th percentile.
Of the total 213 participants (age range 18-56 yr) (mean and SD; 29.8 [+ or -] 7.6 yr), 129 (60.6%) were male and 84 (39.4%) were female. Ninety five per cent of the participants were Tamil speaking and the remaining were Telugu and Urdu speaking. The established CD4+ T-lymphocyte % and CD8+ T-lymphocyte % were 21-59 (mean 40.2) and 18-43 (mean 30.8), respectively. The distribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte subset values and CD4/CD8+ T-lymphocyte ratios based on age and gender is presented in the Table. The established reference range of CD4+ T-lymphocyte count for men and women were 383-1347 cells/[micro]l and 448-1593 cells/[micro]l), respectively. The mean CD4+ T-lymphocyte count in men and women were 865 cells/[micro]l (median 845 cells/[micro]l) and 1021 cells/[micro]l (954 cells/[micro]l), respectively. Women had significantly (P<0.001) higher absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte count and CD4: CD8+ T-lymphocyte ratio than males. However, there was no significant difference in CD8+ T-lymphocyte count with regards to gender. The established normal range of CD4+ T-lymphocyte % was 21-59 (mean 40.2 and median 40.1).
Lymphocyte subset values in HIV-seronegative individuals are reported to be affected by race, geographical location, gender, circadian changes, and physical exercise, and a wide variation in counts have also been reported world wide (5-9). Researchers have reported a mean CD4+ T-lymphocyte count of 1036 cells/[micro]l in healthy non-smokers (7), while others have reported a median of 868 cells/[micro]l in San Francisco, USA (18). These studies clearly suggest the possibility of variation within the same ethnic group. Several reports on reference ranges of blood lymphocytes for the western population as well as for countries outside the western hemisphere are also available namely, Malaysia, Singapore, China, Uganda and Ethiopia (6,19-22). Based on reported variations in normal values of lymphocyte subsets, there are questions whether CD4+ T-lymphocyte count thresholds used in western countries are appropriate for India. Though the ranges of lymphocyte sub-populations in Indians have been reported (10-15), the information is based upon relatively small number of blood samples confined to certain geographical areas. It is also of interest to know how our target population differs from other populations studied across the world, and whether such differences need to be taken into account while interpreting data with regard to the immune status of such individuals in the Indian setting.
In conclusion, the establishment of normal ranges with the local population is a helpful tool to clinicians for the better clinical management of HIV disease in southern India. Future cohorts with greater sample size may be required to define the staging of HIV disease in relation to the normal CD4+ T-lymphocyte count subsets in the local general population.
Authors thank the clinical and laboratory staff of YRG CARE, Chennai for their assistance and Shri Rajakumar for helping in searching relevant literature.
Received April 4, 2007
(1.) Bofill M, Janossy G, Lee CA, MacDonald-Burns D, Phillips AN, Sabin C, et al. Laboratory control values for CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes. Implications for HIV-1 diagnosis. Clin Exp Immunol 1992; 88 : 243-52.
(2.) UNAIDS. 2006 Report on the global AIDS epidemic. Available at: http://www.unaids.org/en/HIV_data/2006Global Report/default. asp, accessed on February 2, 2007.
(3.) Hussain T, Abbas S, Khan MA, Scrimshaw NS. Lysine fortification of wheat flour improves selected indices of the nutripredominantly cereal-eating families in Pakistan. Food Nutr Bull 2004; 25 : 114-22.
(4.) Fahey Jl, Schnelle JF, Boscardin J, Thomas JK, Gorre ME, Aziz N, et al. Distinct categories of immunologic changes in frail elderly. Mech Ageing Dev 2000; 115 : 1-20.
(5.) Maini MK, Gilson RJ, Chavda N, Gill S, Fakoya A, Ross EJ, et al. Reference ranges and sources of variability of CD4 counts in HIV-seronegative women and men. Genitourin Med 1996; 72 : 27-31.
(6.) Tsegaye A, Messele T, Tilahun T, Hailu E, Sahlu T, Doorly R, et al. Immunohematological reference ranges for adult Ethiopians. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999; 6 : 410-4.
(7.) Tollerud DJ, Clark JW, Brown LM, Neuland CY, Pankiw-Trost LK, Blattner WA, et al. The influence of age, race, and gender on peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets in healthy nonsmokers. J Clin Immunol 1989; 9 : 214-22.
(8.) Lee BW, Yap HK, Chew FT, Quah TC, Prabhakaran K, Chan GS, et al. Age- and sex-related changes in lymphocyte subpopulations of healthy Asian subjects: from birth to adulthood. Cytometry 1996; 26 : 8-15.
(9.) Lebranchu Y, Thibault G, Degenne D, Bardos P. Abnormalities in CD4+ T lymphocyte subsets in patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1991; 61 : 83-92.
(10.) Kannangai R, Prakash K J, Ramalingam S, Abraham OC, Mathews KP, Jesudasan MV. Peripheral CD4/CD8 lymphocyte counts estimated by an immunocapture method in the normal healthy south Indian adults and HIV seropositive individuals. J Clin Virol 2000; 17 : 101-8.
(11.) Saxena RK, Choudhry V, Nath I, Das SN, Paranjape RS, Babu G, et al. Normal ranges of some select lymphocyte subpopulations in peripheral blood of normal healthy Indians. Curr Sci 2004; 86 : 969-75.
(12.) Amatya R, Vajpayee M, Kaushik S, Kanswal S, Pandey RM, Seth E Lymphocyte immunophenotype reference ranges in healthy Indian adults: implications for management of HIV/ AIDS in India. Clin Immunol 2004; 112 : 290-5.
(13.) Ramalingam S, Kannangai R, Zachariah A, Mathai D, Abraham C. CD4 counts of normal and HIV-infected south Indian adults: do we need a new staging system? Natl Med J India 2001; 14 : 335-9.
(14.) Nag VL, Agarwal P, Venkatesh V, Rastogi P, Tandon R, Agarwal SK. A pilot study on observations on CD4 and CD8 counts in healthy HIV seronegative individuals. Indian J Med Res 2002; 116 : 45-9.
(15.) Uppal SS, Verma S, Dhot PS. Normal values of CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte subsets in healthy indian adults and the effects of sex, age, ethnicity and smoking. Cytometry Part B (Clinical Cytometry) 2003; 52B : 32-6.
(16.) Ezzelle J, Rodriguez-Chavez IR, Darden JM, Stirewalt M, Kunwar N, Hitchcock R, et al. Guidelines on good clinical laboratory practice: bridging operations between research and clinical research laboratories. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2008; 46 : 18-29.
(17.) National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; Approved Guidelines--2nd ed. NCCLS Document C28-A2, NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898, USA; 2000.
(18.) Royce RA, Winkelstein W Jr. HIV infection, cigarette smoking and CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts: preliminary results from the San Francisco Men's Health Study. AIDS 1990; 4 : 327-33.
(19.) Choong ML, Ton SH, Cheong SK. Influence of race, age and sex on the lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood of healthy Malaysian adults. Ann Clin Biochem 1995; 32 : 532-9.
(20.) Dhaliwal JS, Balasubramaniam T, Quek CK, Gill HK, Nasuruddin BA. Reference ranges for lymphocyte subsets in a defined Malaysian population. Singapore Med J 1995; 36 : 288-91.
(21.) Kam KM, Leung WL, Kwok MY, Hung MY, Lee SS, Mak WE Lymphocyte subpopulation reference ranges for monitoring human immunodeficiency virus-infected Chinese adults. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1996; 3 : 326-30.
(22.) Tugume SB, Piwowar EM, Lutalo T, Mugyenyi PN, Grant RM, Mangeni FW, et al. Hematological reference ranges among healthy Ugandans. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1995; 2 : 233-5.
(23.) Reichert T, DeBruyere M, Deneys V, Totterman T, Lydyard P, Yuksel F, et al. Lymphocyte subset reference ranges in adult Caucasians. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1991; 60 : 190-208.
(24.) Clang WJ, Tan GB, Kuperan E Establishment of adult peripheral blood lymphocyte subset reference range for an Asian population by single-platform flow cytometry: influence of age, sex, and race and comparison with other published studies. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2004; 11 : 168-73.
Reprint requests: Dr K.G. Murugavel, YRG Centre for AIDS Research & Education (YRG CARE), Voluntary Health Services Hospital Campus, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Taramani, Chennai 600 113, India e-mail: email@example.com
K.G. Murugavel, E Balakrishnan, J. Mohanakrishnan, S.S. Solomon, E.M. Shankar, Sandeep Pulimi Muthu Sundaram, Nagalingeswaran Kumarasamy, Estelle Piwowar-Manning ([dagger]), Edward Livant ([dagger]) K.H. Mayer ([double dagger]), S.P. Thyagarajan & Suniti Solomon
YRG Centre for AIDS Research & Education (YRG CARE), Voluntary Health Services Hospital Campus Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Chennai India; ([dagger]) Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, USA & ([double dagger]) Brown University/Miriam Hospital, Providence, USA
Table. Age and gender distribution of absolute CD4+ and CD8+T- lymphocyte counts and CD4/CD8+ T-lymphocyte ratios in healthy adult population in Chennai, south India Age group Gender (yr) Male No. Mean Mean Mean CD4/ tested CD4 CD8 CD8 ratio 18-25 31 782 721 1.21 26-30 60 877 728 1.31 31-35 21 940 821 1.28 36-45 11 842 757 1.13 >45 6 956 595 1.70 Total 129 865 738 1.28 Age group Gender (yr) Female No. Mean Mean Mean CD4/ No. tested CD4 CD8 CD8 ratio tested 18-25 28 1011 694 1.51 59 26-30 26 999 731 1.49 86 31-35 13 1047 800 1.43 34 36-45 9 926 638 1.55 20 >45 8 1191 704 1.97 14 Total 84 1021 * 717 1.54 * 213 Age group Overall (yr) Mean CD4 Mean CD8 Mean CD4/ CD8 ratio 18-25 890 [+ or -] 599 708 [+ or -] 481 1.35 [+ or -] 1.02 26-30 914 [+ or -] 472 729 [+ or -] 533 1.36 [+ or -] 0.93 31-35 981 [+ or -] 585 813 [+ or -] 663 1.33 [+ or -] 0.86 36-45 880 [+ or -] 543 704 [+ or -] 517 1.32 [+ or -] 0.77 >45 1090 [+ or -] 630 657 [+ or -] 504 1.85 [+ or -] 1.70 Total 926 [+ or -] 550 730 [+ or -] 540 1.38 [+ or -] 1.00 Mean CD4 & CD8 values are given in cells/[micro]l * P<0.001 compared to male
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|