Electronic measurement of soft-tissue balancing reduces lateral releases in total knee arthroplasty.
|Abstract:||Soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has a direct affect on patello-femoral tracking and knee range of motion, which are necessary for a well functioning TKA postoperatively. We report on the use of an electronic pressure sensing instrument for soft tissue balancing of the knee before completion of all intraoperative bone cuts, as a way to improve patellar tracking. In a retrospective study of 99 consecutive TKAs, with intraoperative electronic instrument guided soft tissue balancing performed, a reduction in the incidence of lateral patellar retinacular release was found, as compared with the 100 consecutive TKAs prior to its use (5.5% v 12%, respectively). Electronic measurement of soft tissue balancing during TKA reduced the need for lateral patellar retinacular release.|
Fetto, Joseph F.
Leffers, Kevin J.
D.O., Chris J. Leslie
|Publication:||Name: Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases Publisher: J. Michael Ryan Publishing Co. Audience: Academic Format: Magazine/Journal Subject: Health Copyright: COPYRIGHT 2011 J. Michael Ryan Publishing Co. ISSN: 1936-9719|
|Issue:||Date: Oct, 2011 Source Volume: 69 Source Issue: 4|
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful procedure that
can reduce pain and improve range of motion and function by correcting
angular deformities and restoring the integrity of articulating
surfaces. (1-4) Soft tissue balance and accurate patellar tracking are
an integral part of any successful TKA. Patellofemoral maltracking
remains a common complication after TKA, particularly in valgus
deformity. Over the past 3 decades, different instrumentation systems
have been developed to make the outcome of a TKA more reproducible and
predictable. (5-9) This instrumentation focused on cutting guides and
alignment tools and, more recently, on incorporating the use of computer
navigation and robotics. (10-13) These technologies rely heavily on bony
measurements and cuts to restore alignment to the damaged articulation.
They are not designed to integrate soft-tissue balancing into
consideration. This is an important limitation, because the knee is an
inherently unstable joint that depends on soft-tissue integrity and
balance to achieve stability and optimal function. Instability results
in accelerated wear of the articular cartilage, as demonstrated in the
premature osteoarthrosis seen in anterior cruciate ligament deficient
Precision bone cuts lead to a more accurate prosthesis fit, but they do not guarantee optimal range of motion or joint stability. A well aligned prosthesis must also be accompanied by good ligament balance to produce the best functional results. Otherwise, there are potential complications involving knee instability, which may lead to aseptic loosening, accelerated wear, and premature mechanical failure of the reconstructed joint.
Rotational alignment, particularly of the femoral component about the long axis of the femur, plays a critical role in determining soft-tissue balance of the knee, as well as patellar tracking. Until recently, three conventional referencing methodologies have been used to dictate rotational alignment of the femoral component. They include the transepicondylar axis, Whiteside's line, and 3[degrees] of external rotation off the posterior condyles. Olcott and Scott (18) compared these three intraoperative methods to determine femoral component rotation on 100 TKA procedures. Whiteside's line, the transepicondylar axis, and a line placed in 3[degrees] of external rotation off the posterior condyles were used to plan the femoral bone cuts. The medial and lateral flexion gaps were assessed for asymmetry at 90[degrees] of flexion by laminar spreader placement. (18-19) Olcott and Scott concluded there was variable consistency in the three conventional methods and that any single method used to determine rotation carries at least a 10% chance of creating a flexion space asymmetry. Another disadvantage of conventional rotation determinants is their primary concern with bone cuts and the neglecting of soft-tissue balancing as a secondary concern after bone resection has been completed.
The eLibra Dynamic Knee Balancing System[TM] (Synvasive, El Dorado Hills, California) is a pressure sensor that electronically measures the relative pressures within the medial and lateral compartments before final bony cuts are performed. It guides femoral bone cuts to create the appropriate rotation of the femoral component relative to the longitudinal axis of the femur and, consequently, may reduce the necessity of soft-tissue releases. The eLibra[R] balancing system can be considered as a soft-tissue management tool that is complementary to traditional bone cutting instrumentation. Previous systems such as the Tensor/Balancer device (Stryker Howmedica Osteonics, Allendale, New Jersey) reported comparable but not improved outcomes to existing techniques. (20)
Before the advent of the eLibra Dynamic Knee Balancing System[TM], the conventional methodologies dictated the bone cuts be made before patellofemoral tracking was assessed. In cases of lateral patellar subluxation, most surgeons relied on surgical release of the lateral patellar retinacular tissues in order to restore optimal patellar tracking. Though a very simple procedure, it is not a benign one. It is often associated with the division of the lateral geniculate vessels, risk of hematoma, and an increase in potential for avascular necrosis of the patella. (21) We retrospectively compared 99 consecutive cases with the use of the eLibra[R] pressure sensing device to the 100 TKA consecutive cases prior to its use, to test the hypothesis that it would lead to a reduction in the incidence of lateral retinacular release to TKA.
Methods and Materials
A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent TKA with intraoperative use of the eLibra[R] device, by two senior surgeons between March 3, 2008, and August 20, 2009, was conducted to analyze the incidence of lateral patellar retinacular release. All patients underwent a traditional parapatellar approach. After the initial distal femur and tibial cuts, the eLibra[R] soft-tissue force sensor (El Dorado Hills, California) was positioned in the joint between the femur and tibia, and the pressures of the medial and lateral compartments were balanced. At this point, an instrument-guided accurate completion of the remaining cuts was performed. All patients received a nonconstrained cruciate-retaining TKA implant, manufactured by Encore Medical Corporation (San Jose, California). After implantation of components and reduction of the patella, the tourniquet was deflated, and the knee was tested for full range of motion. When confronted with patellar subluxation, a lateral retinacular release was performed to improve patellar tracking. Data collected included gender, date of birth, date of surgery, preoperative diagnoses, operative side, use of eLibra[R], and surgical lateral retinacular release. A retrospective review of 100 consecutive TKAs performed before March 3, 2008, was conducted to find the incidence of lateral retinacular release prior to the use of the eLibra[R] system. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the rates of lateral release between the different groups. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
Between March 3, 2008, and August 20, 2009, 84 patients underwent 99 TKA (including 15 bilateral) procedures, with intraoperative use of the eLibra[R] balancing system (Fig. 1). There were 33 males and 51 females, with an average age of 70.9 years (44.3 to 93.0) (Table 1). All patients had a preoperative diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA), with three patients noted to have posttraumatic OA and two patients developing OA, secondary to septic arthritis. There were 41 operations performed on the left knee and 58 performed on the right. Of the 99 TKA performed with the use of the eLibra[R], five lateral retinacular releases were done (5.05%). On review of 100 consecutive TKAs performed by the same authors before the use of the eLibra[R] system, the incidence of lateral patellar retinacular release was 12% (Table 2). There was no significant difference between the incidence of moderate and severe (angle > 15[degrees]) varus and valgus knee deformity between the two cohorts, which were compared in the study. After analysis with Fisher's exact test, a statistical significant difference in the rate of lateral release was found between both groups (p < 0.05).
Over the past 3 decades, there have been significant improvements in the precision of bone cuts while the soft-tissue balancing aspect of TKA surgery has been left more to that of an "art form." Conventional methods and instrumentation have been focused on bony alignment, with adjustments to soft tissue performed empirically when deemed necessary. These adjustments are made based on subjective methods of testing, and different surgeons have varying thresholds for intervention in soft-tissue balancing. Furthermore, the surgical approach also has been found to increase the incidence of lateral retinacular release. (22) Bindelglass and Vince (23) reported a decreased need for lateral release with a subvastus approach (27.5%), compared to a parapatellar approach (51.0%). In the current retrospective study, the rate of lateral retinacular release decreased from 12% to 5.5% (p < 0.05), with the intraoperative use of the eLibra[R] pressure sensor.
There is great variability within the literature as to the incidence of lateral retinacular release during TKA. Stern and colleagues (24) reported on 134 knees that had a preoperative alignment of 10[degrees] or more of valgus. They found a lateral retinacular release necessary in 76% of the arthroplasties performed secondary to intraoperative lateral subluxation of the patella. This percentage does not represent an average for experienced TKA surgeons but does indicate the difficulty that valgus-deformed knees present. Benjamin and Chilvers (25) reported on 99 patients that were not treated with lateral retinacular release, despite medial patellar lift-off. They concluded that patients with medial patellar lift-off at the time of arthroplasty do not appear to require lateral release to yield acceptable postoperative patellofemoral alignment. Fithian and coworkers (26) conducted a scientific survey among experienced knee surgeons who had a specific interest in the patellofemoral joint and found that they reported a 2% rate of lateral retinacular release. However, Kusuma and associates (27) reported a 28% lateral retinacular release rate on 1108 TKA. So, clearly, surgeons are performing these releases more often than they report.
As there is much variability in the incidence of lateral retinacular release, there is also confounding results reported on the complications of the procedure. Kusuma and colleagues (27) found no statistically significant difference in range of motion, Knee Society score, or postoperative complications of patella fracture, subluxation, postoperative manipulation, or wound complications. Scuderi and coworkers (28) demonstrated, in a prospective study, the compromise of patellar viability using technetium-99m. They reported a greater incidence of transient patellar hypovascularity associated with lateral release. Ritter and associates (29) reported increased patellar fracture rates and loosening in TKAs in which a lateral release was done.
It is the authors' belief that a lateral retinacular release is not a benign procedure and should be used only when all other options have been exhausted. In this retrospective study, the rate of lateral retinacular release decreased from 12% to 5.5% with the intraoperative use of the eLibra[R] pressure sensor. Using the eLibra[R] technology as a soft tissue management tool gives the surgeon an objective measurement for soft tissue balancing. It bases femoral rotation on soft tissue balance, which leads to better patellofemoral tracking and decreased incidence of lateral retinacular releases.
None of the authors have further financial or proprietary interest in the subject matter or materials discussed, including, but not limited to, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, and paid expert testimony.
(1.) Laskin RS. Modular total knee-replacement arthroplasty. A review of eighty-nine patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Sep;58(6):766-73.
(2.) Vaczi G, Udvarhelyi I, Sarungi M. Comparison of results of different types of knee arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116(3):177-80.
(3.) Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr, et al. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Oct;331:87-92.
(4.) Sorrells RB. The clinical history and development of the low contact stress total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2002 Feb;25(2 Suppl):S207-12.
(5.) Stulberg BN, Zadzilka JD. Computer-assisted surgery: a wine before its time: in opposition. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Jun;21(4 Suppl 1):29-32.
(6.) Hernigou P, Manicom O, Flouzat-Lachaniete CH, et al. Fifteen year outcome of the ceraver hermes posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: safety of the procedure with experienced and inexperienced surgeons. Open Orthop J. 2009 May 18;3:36-9.
(7.) Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future. J Knee Surg. 2008 Oct;21(4):307-14.
(8.) Tria AJ Jr. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future. Am J Orthop. 2007 Sep;36(9 Suppl):6-7.
(9.) Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Gregg PJ. Survival analysis of cemented press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001 Feb;16(2):161-7.
(10.) Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, et al. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Mar;18(3):381-7.
(11.) Song EK, Seon JK, Park SJ. Flexion-extension gaps balanced using navigation assistance in TKA. Orthopedics. 2009 Oct;32(10 Suppl):26-30.
(12.) Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Tsumura N, et al. Soft tissue balance measurement in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with a navigation system. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Apr;24(3):358 64.
(13.) Picard F, Deakin AH, Clarke JV, et al. Using navigation intraoperative measurements narrows range of outcomes in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Oct;463:50-7.
(14.) Mullaji AB, Marawar SV, Luthra M. Tibial articular cartilage wear in varus osteoarthritic knees: correlation with anterior cruciate ligament integrity and severity of deformity. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jan;23(1):128-35.
(15.) Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, et al. Tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees: a theoretical proposition for the development of osteo arthritis. Sports Med. 2007;37(7):601-13.
(16.) Andriacchi TP, Briant PL, Bevill SL, et al. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jan;442:39-44.
(17.) Lee GC, Cushner FD, Vigoritta V, et al. Evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament integrity and degenerative arthritic patterns in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Ar throplasty. 2005 Jan;20(1):59-65.
(18.) Olcott CW, Scott RD. A comparison of 4 intraoperative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jan;15(1):22-6.
(19.) Olcott CW, Scott RD. Determining proper femoral component rotational alignment during total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg. 2000 Summer;13(3):166-8.
(20.) Winemaker MJ. Perfect balance in total knee arthroplasty: the elusive compromise. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Jan;17(1):2-10.
(21.) Archibeck MJ, Camarata D, Trauger J, et al. Indications for lateral retinacular release in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Sep;(414):157-61.
(22.) Cook JL, Scuderi GR, Tenholder M. Incidence of lateral release in total knee arthroplasty in standard and mini-incision approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:123-6.
(23.) Bindelglass DF, Vince KG. Patellar tilt and subluxation following subvastus and parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Implication for surgical technique. J Arthroplasty. 1996 Aug;11(5):507-11.
(24.) Stern SH, Moeckel BH, Insall JN. Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Dec;(273):5-8.
(25.) Benjamin J, Chilvers M. Correcting lateral patellar tilt at the time of total knee arthroplasty can result in overuse of lateral release. J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):121-6.
(26.) Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Post WR, et al. Lateral retinacular release: a survey of the International Patellofemoral Study Group. Arthroscopy. 2004 May;20(5):463-8.
(27.) Kusuma SK, Puri N, Lotke PA. Lateral retinacular release during primary total knee arthroplasty: effect on outcomes and complications. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Apr;24(3):383-90.
(28.) Scuderi G, Scharf SC, Meltzer LP, et al. The relationship of lateral releases to patella viability in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2(3):209-14.
(29.) Ritter MA, Pierce MJ, Zhou H, et al. Patellar complications (total knee arthroplasty). Effect of lateral release and thickness. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367):149-57.
Joseph F. Fetto, M.D., is Clinical Associate Professor, Division of Adult Reconstructive Surgery; Scott Hadley, M.D., is a Resident; and Ran Schwarzkopf, M.D., M.Sc., is a Chief Resident, all within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. Kevin J. Leffers was a Research Fellow at the Memorial Bone & Joint Foundation, Houston, Texas, and attending Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Chris J. Leslie, D.O., is from Leslie Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Camdenton, Missouri.
Correspondence: Ran Schwarzkopf, M.D., Suite 1402, 301 East 17th Street, New York, New York 10003; email@example.com.
Table 1 Demographics of Electronic Measurement TKA Patients Characteristics Result Totals Gender Male 33 Female 51 84 Age Minimum 44 Maximum 88 Average 70.9 Knee Right 58 Left 41 99 Surgery Unilateral 69 Bilateral 15 84 Table 2 Incidence of Lateral Release Lateral Total Incidence TKA Technique Releases TKAs (%) Electronic soft tissue 5 99 5.5 measurement No soft tissue 12 100 12 measurement
|Gale Copyright:||Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.|